Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 60(6): e76-e79, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32593633

RESUMO

The 2020 coronavirus disease pandemic in the United States has created a dramatic need for the rapid implementation of telehealth services in areas of the country where telehealth is limited in scope. This implementation would not be possible without changes in how the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services provide reimbursement for these services. Reimbursement options remain open to pharmacists, but depend on local regulation or the ability to alter practice at the site. Though pharmacists provide high-quality direct patient care, they are excluded from seeking compensation for providing this care, even as the nation expands the telehealth model. This overview shows that despite changes in telehealth service compensation for health care providers, pharmacists remain unable to seek appropriate compensation for their direct patient care services.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Regulamentação Governamental , Farmacêuticos/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislação & jurisprudência , Telemedicina/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Humanos , Farmacêuticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Papel Profissional , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Endocr Pract ; 25(7): 689-697, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30865543

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of multidisciplinary process improvement interventions on glycemic control in the inpatient setting of an urban community hospital, utilizing the daily simple average as the primary glucometric measure. Methods: From 2010-2014, five process of care interventions were implemented in the noncritical care inpatient units of the study hospital. Interventions included education of medical staff, implementation of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia protocols, computerized insulin order entry, and coordination of meal tray delivery with finger stick and insulin administration. Unpaired t tests compared pre- and postintervention process measures. Simple average daily glucose measure was the primary glucometric outcome. Secondary outcome measures included frequency of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Glucose outcomes were compared with an in-network hospital that did not implement the respective interventions. Results: A total of 180,431 glucose measurements were reported from 4,705 and 4,238 patients from the intervention and comparison hospitals, respectively. The time between bolus-insulin administration and breakfast tray delivery was significantly reduced by 81.7 minutes (P<.00005). The use of sliding scale insulin was sustainably reduced. Average daily glucose was reduced at both hospitals, and overall rates of hypoglycemia were low. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach at an urban community hospital with limited resources was effective in improving and sustaining processes of care for improved glycemic control in the noncritical care, inpatient setting. Abbreviations: IQR = interquartile range; JMC = Jacobi Medical Center; NCBH = North Central Bronx Hospital.


Assuntos
Hiperglicemia , Hipoglicemia , Glicemia , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes , Insulina
3.
Diabetes Spectr ; 32(4): 349-354, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31798293

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare statin prescribing practices according to the American Diabetes Association's Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2017 between diabetes patients managed by pharmacists versus those managed by internal medicine providers. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was completed using the electronic health record of a multispecialty private practice. A total of 176 patients were included in the study, with 88 each in the pharmacy and internal medicine groups. Patients were ≥40 years of age with diabetes and managed by an internal medicine provider or a pharmacist between January and December 2017. Descriptive statistics, χ2, and unpaired t tests were used to describe between-group differences. RESULTS: More pharmacy than internal medicine patients were prescribed appropriate statin therapy (47.7 vs. 34.1%, P = 0.092), particularly those needing high-intensity statins (44.3 vs. 27.4%, P = 0.03). Females, patients 40-75 years of age, and patients with no history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the pharmacy group were more likely to receive appropriate treatment (37.5 vs. 15.0%, P = 0.022; 46.8 vs. 29.7%, P = 0.039; and 45.3 vs. 23.5%, P = 0.015, respectively). Overall, more males than females were prescribed appropriate statin therapy (53.1 vs. 26.3%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although there were no overall significant differences in statin prescribing between the pharmacy and internal medicine groups, patients needing high-intensity statins, those who were female, and those who were younger were more likely to receive appropriate therapy when managed by a pharmacist. Appropriate statin prescribing remains low among diabetes patients, and optimization of this therapy should be prioritized.

4.
Consult Pharm ; 31(11): 633-645, 2016 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28107120

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, screening and diagnosis, and optimal treatment of diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) and its implications in older adults. DATA SOURCES, STUDY SELECTION, DATA EXTRACTION, DATA SYNTHESIS: A search of PubMed using the Mesh terms "diabetes," "type 1," "insulin-dependent," "T1DM," and "diabetic autonomic neuropathy" was performed to find relevant primary literature. Additional search terms "epidemiology," "geriatric," and "risk" were employed. All English-language articles from 2005 to 2015 appearing in these searches were reviewed for relevance. Related articles suggested in the PubMed search and clinical guidelines from the American Diabetes Association and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists were reviewed. These uncovered further resources for risk stratification, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of DAN. DAN is highly prevalent in the diabetes population and increases the risk of morbidity and mortality in older adults, yet, often goes undiagnosed and untreated. Treatment of DAN is complex in the older adult because of poor tolerability of many pharmacologic treatment options; therefore, great care must be taken when selecting therapy as to avoid unwanted adverse effects. CONCLUSION: With increasing life-expectancy of patients with diabetes mellitus, awareness of DAN and its implications to older adults is needed in primary care. Consistent screening and appropriate treatment of DAN in older adults with diabetes mellitus is essential in helping to maintain functional status and avoid adverse events.


Assuntos
Sistema Nervoso Autônomo/efeitos dos fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Neuropatias Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Fatores Etários , Sistema Nervoso Autônomo/fisiopatologia , Comorbidade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/fisiopatologia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatias Diabéticas/epidemiologia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Heliyon ; 9(2): e13122, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36793967

RESUMO

Background: Studies show that pharmacists are unsure in their ability to screen patients for substance abuse. This study evaluates the efficacy of incorporating interprofessional education (IPE) into a substance misuse training program on pharmacy students' learning outcomes in providing screening and counseling for substance misuse. Methods: Pharmacy students from 2019 to 2020 completed 3 substance misuse training modules. Students from the class of 2020 completed an additional IPE event. Both cohorts completed pre- and post-surveys that evaluated knowledge of content and comfort level with patient screening and counseling regarding substance misuse. Paired student t-tests and difference-in-difference analyses were used to evaluate the impact of the IPE event. Findings: Both cohorts (n = 127) showed statistically significant improvement in learning outcomes in providing substance misuse screening and counseling. IPE yielded extremely positive feedback from all students, but its addition to the overall training did not improve learning outcomes. This may be attributed to the differences in baseline knowledge of each class cohort. Conclusion: Substance misuse training successfully improved pharmacy student knowledge and comfort level with providing patient screening and counseling services. Though the IPE event did not improve learning outcomes, qualitative student feedback was overwhelmingly positive and supports the continued incorporation of IPE.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA