Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (hemopatch®) in open partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: To describe the results of a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch, Hemopatch® on blood loss, surgical time and renal function in partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Out of a single surgeon cohort of n = 565 patients undergoing conventional open PN (CPN) between 01/2015 and 12/2017 at the University of Munich a consecutive subgroup (n = 42) was operated on using a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen-based sealant Hemopatch® (Baxter International Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA) (HPN). RESULTS: Median age was 65.2 years (range 12.7-95.2) with median follow-up of 9.43 months (0.03-49.15). Baseline renal function (CKD-EPI) was 78.56 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 20.38-143.09) with a non-significant decline to 74.78 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 3.75-167.74) at follow-up. In CPN 46% had low complexity, 33% moderate complexity and 20% high complexity lesions with 33% low, 40% moderate and 27% high complexity masses in HPN. Median tumor size was 4.3 cm (range 1-38 cm) in CPN with 4.8 cm (range 3.8-18.3 cm) with HPN, p = 0.293. Median blood loss and duration of surgery was significantly lower in the HPN group vs. CPN (146 ml ± 195 vs. 114 ml ± 159 ml; p = 0.021; 43 min ± 27 for HPN vs. 53 min ± 49; p = 0.035) with no difference in clamping time (12.6 min ± 8.6 for HPN vs. 12.0 min ± 9.5; p = 0.701). CONCLUSIONS: Hemopatch® supported renoraphy shows promising results compared to standard renoraphy in PN. No side effects were seen. Further studies should evaluate the prevention of arterio-venous or urinary fistulas. In complex partial nephrectomies Hemopatch® supported renoraphy should be considered.

[Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) after radical cystectomy-current data]. / Aktuelle Studienlage der Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) nach radikaler Zystektomie.

BACKGROUND: Radical cystectomy is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Based on the solid evidence in colorectal surgery, fast-track/ERAS® (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocols have been developed to improve the perioperative management of patients undergoing radical cystectomy. OBJECTIVES: To review the literature and guidelines and evaluate the evidence regarding the different components of ERAS® protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systemic literature search and evaluation of relevant guidelines. RESULTS: The majority of ERAS® recommendations for radical cystectomy are based on extrapolations of abdominal surgery studies. Four randomized, controlled trials and one ERAS® guideline were published for radical cystectomy. ERAS® seems to shorten length of stay without increasing the complication rate. Key elements are no bowel preparation, no nasogastric tube, optimized fluid substitution, multimodal pain management, early mobilization, and oral diet. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of ERAS® requires multidisciplinary collaboration. Individualization of an ERAS® program, identification of the most important components and adaption to the specific needs of radical cystectomy patients are future goals.

Postoperative change in Gleason score of prostate cancer in fusion targeted biopsy: a matched pair analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if MRI/ultrasound fusion based targeted biopsy (FBx) leads to a reduced rate of change in Gleason score (GS) compared to prostatectomy specimen. METHODS: The histopathological findings of the biopsy of the prostate and the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen of 210 patients who were referred to our hospital between 2012 and 2017 were compared retrospectively in this study. One hundred and five patients who underwent FBx combined with ultrasound-guided 12-core biopsy of the prostate (SBx) were matched with 105 patients who underwent SBx only. This study evaluated the rate of up- or downgrading in the RP specimen in both groups and compared the results via matched pair analysis. RESULTS: Concordance in Gleason grade group (GGG) was found in 52/105 patients (49.5%) in SBx and in 49/105 patients (46.7%) with FBx (p = 0.679). The rate of downgrading was statistically significant (p = 0.014) and was higher in the FBx group (14/105 patients, 13.3%) than in the SBx group (4/105 patients, 3.8%). A higher rate of upgrading was seen in SBx (49/105 patients; 46.7%) compared to FBx (42/105 patients; 40%), with no statistical significance (p = 0.331). The change in GGG from biopsy to final pathology in patients with GGG 1 and 2 at biopsy level was not statistically significant (p = 0.168). CONCLUSION: FBx does not decrease the rate of upgrading between biopsy and final pathology in RP specimens. Our results indicate that FBx tends to overestimate the final GGG compared to SBx.

Efficacy of retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi >2 cm.

The objectives of this study are to assess the efficacy and safety of retrograde ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi greater than 2 cm in diameter. A total of 24 patients with a stone burden >2 cm were treated with retrograde ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. Primary study endpoints were number of treatments until the patient was stone free and perioperative complications with a follow-up of at least 3 months after intervention. In 24 patients (11 women and 13 men, 20-78 years of age), a total of 40 intrarenal calculi were treated with retrograde endoscopic procedures. At the time of the initial procedure, calculi had an average total linear diameter of 29.75 ± 1.57 mm and an average stone volume of 739.52 ± 82.12 mm(3). The mean number of procedures per patient was 1.7 ± 0.8 (range 1-3 procedures). The overall stone-free rate was 92%. After 1, 2 and 3 procedures 54, 79 and 92% of patients were stone free, respectively. There were no major complications. Minor postoperative complications included pyelonephritis in three cases (7.5%), of whom all responded immediately to parenteral antibiotics. In one patient the development of steinstrasse in the distal ureter required ureteroscopic fragment disruption and basketing. Ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy represents an efficient treatment option and allows the treatment of large intrarenal calculi of all compositions and throughout the whole collecting system even for patients with a stone burden of more than 2 cm size.

Minimizing complications during retropubic radical prostatectomy - Is ureteral stenting necessary?

OBJECTIVES AND AIMS: To avoid damage to the ureters during bladder neck preparation in radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, it may be helpful to insert ureteral stents temporarily or to intravenously administer indigo carmine dye for enhanced visualisation of ureteric orifices. We evaluated our bladder neck preserving technique at radical prostatectomy with regard to ureteric injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 369 consecutive radical prostatectomies operated in our clinic in a bladder neck preserving technique. The following parameters were assessed in this retrospective study: number of prophylactic ureteric stent insertions, application of indigo carmine dye, observed injuries of the ureters by the surgeon, postoperative increase of serum creatinine and postoperative status of kidney ultrasound. RESULTS: In 7/369 prostatectomies (1.90%) a ureteric stent insertion was performed, indigo carmine was not applied to any patient at all, yet no intraoperative injury of a ureter was observed by a surgeon. No revision was necessary due to a ureteral injury within the observation period of one year after surgery. In 17 patients with preoperative normal creatinine value a pathological value was observed on the first postoperative day (mean 1.4 mg/dl). In these patients no consecutive postrenal acute renal failure was observed, no hydronephrosis was monitored by ultrasound and no further intervention was necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder neck preserving operation technique does not implicate the need of prophylactic ureteric stent insertions and has no higher incidence of ureteric injuries.

Comparison of guideline recommendations with daily practice in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES AND AIMS: To compare guideline recommendations with daily practice patterns in a German patient cohort with renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 81 patients with T1 oder T2 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were included in this prospective single-center study. All patients were operated in a single institution either by open radical nephrectomy (ORN) or nephron sparing surgery (NSS). Patients and doctors were evaluated using a written questionnaire with a follow-up of 12 months. Follow-up intervals, follow-up modalities (e. g. imaging modalities, laboratory controls of blood and urine) and the call on psycho-oncological support were evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of patients (72%) were followed up by their urologists. Follow-up examinations included abdominal ultrasound, urine and blood diagnostics, conventional chest x-rays, computed tomography (CT) of abdomen, chest or head or abdominal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). There were no significant differences between patients operated by ORN or NSS. In total, 12.5% of patients were asking for psycho-oncological support. CONCLUSIONS: In general, patients were followed up according to existing guideline recommendations. Only a small proportion of patients asked for psycho-oncological treatment.

Prospective evaluation of 4-D contrast-enhanced-ultrasound (CEUS) imaging in bladder tumors.

PURPOSE: The evaluation of the potential clinical benefit of four-dimensional ultrasound (4D-US) in the assessment of bladder cancer (BC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 20 patients with indication for cystoscopy for suspicion of bladder cancer were prospectively included in this study. All patients underwent two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US), contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and real-time four-dimensional ultrasound (4D-US). All acquisitions were compared to each other in regard to image quality. This assessment was done using a 6 point scale (1 = best). All patients underwent subsequently cystoscopy with resection of the tumor (TURB), due a histopathological analysis was possible. RESULTS: All examinations were performed successfully and no patient had to be excluded from the study. Patients acceptance of 4D-US was consistently good. No adverse events occurred. Image quality of real time 4D-US (score: 1.27±0.46) was significantly superior (p < 0.001) to both, conventional 2D-US (score: 2.33±0.62) and also to 2D-CEUS (score: 2.00±0.53). In terms of tumor detection no superiority was evident for 4D-US compared to 2D-US or in utilization of CEUS (sensitivity = 0.89; specificity = 1.00; positive predictive value = 1.00; negative predictive value = 0.50; AUC = 0.944; (95% CI: 07.43-0.998)). CONCLUSION: The assessment of bladder cancer using real time 4D-US is feasible and improves the image quality and therefore also the precise anatomical consistency of intravesical tumor masses.

Conservative management of rectal perforation after nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (nsEERPE) in a patient with a past history of polypectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Rectal polypectomy causes thinning (or even perforation) of the rectal wall in addition to thermic injury at the polypectomy site. CASE REPORT: We present a rare case of spontaneous rectal perforation after uncomplicated nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in a patient with a previous history of rectal polypectomy at the perforation site. The patient could be treated conservatively. There was complete healing of the fistula without any effect on functional results. This Conservative therapy for such rectal perforations is indicated if the patient's general condition remains stable without any signs of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Polypectomy is an important risk factor for rectal perforation during nsEERPE. Adequate time interval should be given to allow healing and avoid adding further thermal wall damage which may obscure healing leading to complications like fistula. Conservative therapy for small missed rectal perforations constitutes an attractive, feasible and non invasive treatment entity. Following this principle we have not faced this complication in following similar cases.

[Follow-up surveillance of muscle-invasive urinary bladder cancer after curative treatment]. / Nachsorge des muskelinvasiven Harnblasenkarzinoms nach kurativer Therapie.

Follow-up care of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is subdivided into oncological and functional surveillance. More than 80% of local relapses and distant metastases occur within the first 2 years. Recurrences in the remnant urothelium also occur several years after radical cystectomy. Urinary cytology and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and thorax including a urography phase are the standard diagnostics for tumor follow-up. There is no clear evidence for a survival benefit for the detection of asymptomatic vs. symptomatic recurrences. After partial cystectomy or trimodal treatment, there is no established follow-up schedule; however, the relatively high incidence of intravesical recurrences should be considered as there are curative treatment approaches including salvage cystectomy. Functional surveillance, which should be carried out lifelong, encompasses prevention and diagnostics of metabolic complications, urethral/ureteral strictures, problems with the urinary stoma, urinary incontinence, sexual dysfunction and urinary tract infections.

[Aftercare of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer]. / Nachsorge des nicht muskelinvasiven Harnblasenkarzinoms.

Tumor follow-up in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a weighing up between the morbidity associated with invasive diagnostics and the risk of tumor recurrence and especially progression. The risk stratification into low, intermediate, and high-risk tumors enables a risk-adapted follow-up. For individual estimation of the risk of progression and recurrence, risk calculators should be used. Follow-up is still based on cystoscopy, which is recommended lifelong for high and intermediate-risk tumors and for up to 5 tumor-free years for low-risk tumors. Urine cytology has a high sensitivity and specificity for high-risk tumors and is recommended in the follow-up care. There is currently no recommendation for any commercially available urinary marker due to inadequate evidence. For the clarification of synchronous and metachronous tumors of the upper urinary tract computed tomography (CT) urography or alternatively magnetic resonance (MR) urography is recommended.

Comparison of PIRADS 3 lesions with histopathological findings after MRI-fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate in a real world-setting.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate whether PIRADS 3 lesions in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) represent a significant risk of prostate cancer (PCa) in a real-world setting of different referring radiologic institutes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2015 and October 2017, a total of 408 patients were referred to our clinic for MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate (FusPbx) due to suspected prostate cancer. In all patients, preoperatively an mpMRI of the prostate was performed by altogether 62 different radiologic institutes. Prostate lesions were classified according to the PIRADS system. A PIRADS 3 lesion was diagnosed in 41 patients. FusPbx was performed transrectally using a Philips EPIQ 7 (Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) scanner with plane wise fusion of ultrasound and MRI image data. In addition to FusPbx in each patient a randomized 12-core transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (USPbx) was performed. RESULTS: Mean PSA Level was 9.5 ng/ml (range: 1- 26 ng/ml), mean patients age was 66.1 years (48.6- 80.4). In 11/41 patients (26.8%) prostate cancer was diagnosed by FusPbx of the PIRADS 3 lesion. In the target lesion PCa was classified as Gleason Score 3+3 in 5 patients, as 3+4 in 3, 4+3 in 1, 4+4 in 1 and 4+5 in 1 patient. In patients with negative FusPbx USPbx revealed PCa in another 7 patients (17.1%). In 5 of these GS 3+3 PCa was found, in another 2 patients GS 3+4 PCa. CONCLUSIONS: PIRADS 3 lesion indicates an equivocal likelihood of significant prostate cancer. In our series the overall PCa detection rate was 26.8% and 14.6% for clinically significant cancer in PIRADS 3 lesions. This evokes the question, if PIRADS 3 lesions could be surveilled only. The findings should be confirmed in a larger series.

Follow-up after focal therapy of the prostate with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in combination with MRI image fusion.

INTRODUCTION: Focal therapy (FT) of the prostate for low risk prostate cancer (PCa) is an alternative to traditional definite treatment options like external beam radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy. However, follow up after FT is still challenging and is subject to current studies. Significance of imaging after FT such as multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is currently not well established. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of alternative imaging during the follow up of low risk PCa treated with focal HIFU therapy using CEUS and image fusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective single arm study in patients with uni- or bilateral, low or intermediate risk prostate cancer treated with HIFU at our institution between October 2016 and January 2018. CEUS in combination with image fusion using an axial T2-weighted MRI sequence was performed during follow up 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the therapy. RESULTS: 4 consecutive patients with Gleason score (GS) 6 and 4 patients with GS 7a prostate cancer were included in the study. Hemiablation was performed in 7 patients with unilateral tumor. One patient underwent whole gland treatment due to histological proven bilateral PCa. Mean patient age at time of therapy was 70.3 (54-83) years and mean Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level prior treatment was 7.8 ng/ml (2.1-14.4), after 3 months mean PSA level was 3.9 ng/ml (0.1-7.2), after 6 months 3.5 ng/ml (0.2-6.0), after 9 months 3.1 ng/ml (0.2-6.8) and 3.3 ng/ml (0.2-6.1) after 12 months. CEUS showed no signs of microvascularisation after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months in the ablated zone. 3 months posttreatment the necrotic tissue was still visible in the B-mode scan, although with no signs of vascularization performing CEUS. After 6 months the ablated side of the prostate was almost completely atrophic. And after 9 months the necrotic tissue was completely resolved. Between 9 and 12 months no changes in microvascularisation and perfusion could be shown. CONCLUSIONS: MpMRI/CEUS image fusion is a cost-effective and feasible technique to monitor the perfusion of the ablation zone after focal therapy of the prostate.

[Current controversies in the treatment of localized prostate cancer]. / Aktuelle Kontroversen in der Therapie des lokal begrenzten Prostatakarzinoms.

In the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era, most prostate cancers (PCa) are diagnosed in a localized stage and a plethora of therapeutic options are warranted in different clinical settings and disease stages of localized PCa. In the current narrative review, we give an overview of the current controversies in the therapeutic landscape of localized PCa and focus on organ-sparing approaches, percutaneous radiotherapy, brachytherapy as well as retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy by summarizing studies that have been published within the last two years.

Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI)-Ultrasound fusion guided biopsy (Fbx) has emerged as the new standard of risk stratification for prostate cancer (PCa) with superior detection rates of clinically significant PCa than randomized biopsy. In the present study, we evaluated patients with suspicion of clinically significant PCa on mpMRI, but histopathologically proven Gleason 6 PCa in Fbx. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2015 and 2019, 849 patients underwent Fbx and concurrent systematic 12-core biopsy at our department. 234 patients were diagnosed with Gleason 6 PCa in either mpMRI-targeted and/or concurrent systematic biopsy. Patients were analyzed regarding PSA, mpMRI findings according to PI-RADS classification, histopathological results of Fbx and systematic 12-core biopsy. 99/234 patients were also analyzed in regards of histopathology of the whole-mount specimen of subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP). RESULTS: In 131/234 patients (56%), Gleason 6 PCa was detected in the mpMRI target. In 103/234 patients (44%), Gleason 6 PCa was detected in the concurrent systematic 12-core biopsy with negative mpMRI-targeted biopsy. Men with evidence of Gleason 6 in the mpMRI target had significantly higher amounts of overall positive biopsies (median 4 vs. 2, p < 0.001) and higher maximum tumor infiltration per biopsy core (30% vs. 20%, p < 0.001) compared to men with negative mpMRI-targeted biopsy. Detection of Gleason 6 in mpMRI Target lesions correlated significantly with the PI-RADS score (p < 0.001). Patients with positive mpMRI-target had significantly higher tumor infiltration in whole-mount specimen after prostatectomy (20% vs. 15%, p = 0.0026) compared to men without detection of Gleason 6 in mpMRI-targeted biopsy but in additional systematic biopsy. CONCLUSION: Detection of Gleason 6 PCa in mpMRI-targeted biopsy indicates higher tumor burden compared to detection of Gleason 6 PCa in concurrent systematic biopsy and negative mpMRI-targeted biopsy.

[Organ-sparing surgery for penile cancer]. / Organerhaltende Chirurgie des Peniskarzinoms.

In patients with penile cancer health-related quality of life is closely related to organ-sparing surgery. To achieve an ideally suited treatment modality for this rare but aggressive tumor entity different operating techniques like micrographic surgery, laser treatment, and glansectomy were developed. These should offer optimal oncological treatment while preserving sexual function. This article gives an overview of indications and limits of organ-sparing treatment in penile cancer.

[Human papillomavirus and penile cancer : Thinking about measures for prevention]. / Humane Papillomaviren und Peniskarzinom : Überlegungen zu Präventionsmaßnahmen.

Two major pathways of penile carcinogenesis are known: human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced penile cancer and HPV-negative cancers associated with chronic dermatoses. Therefore, modern measures for prevention of penile cancer may for example include prophylactic HPV vaccination. The resulting B­cell-mediated immunity to HPV capsid proteins is effective protection against future HPV infections. Contrarily when treating existing HPV infections or HPV-associated cancers an antigen-specific T­cell immunity is necessary. To date, screening and treatment of precancerous lesions to prevent penile cancer are not established in the German health care program and the highly expected therapeutic HPV vaccines are still on the horizon. In this article, we focus on possible strategies to prevent HPV-related penile cancer on different levels of carcinogenesis.

[Anogenital warts and HPV-associated precancers : Looking into the recently passed German S2k guideline]. / Anogenitale Warzen und HPV-assoziierte Präkanzerosen : Einblicke in die kürzlich konsentierte S2k-Leitlinie.

Anogenital warts are the most frequently sexually transmitted disease caused by viral infections worldwide. People's lifetime risk to suffer from this disease or HPV-associated precancers counts to more than 10%. The therapy and the recurrence rates of both disorders continue to be challenging in Germany because the coverage rate of the preventive HPV vaccination is still insufficient. This underlines the importance of a recently passed interdisciplinary German guideline on anogenital HPV lesions. This article summarizes the main aspects of the new guideline. Specialists should be consulted by children, pregnant women, individuals suffering from immunodeficiency and people frequently having relapses of HPV-associated diseases or having lesions being accessible only endoscopically.

MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate: Quality of image fusion in a clinical setting.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies in men. The diagnostic standard to confirm prostate cancer is the transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. However, this procedure is associated with the underdetection of clinically significant prostate cancer and therefore needs to be improved. In the last years MRI fusion based targeted biopsy gained importance as consequence. In this study, we evaluated the quality of MRI ultrasound image fusion and evaluated factors influencing the image fusion quality. This was done by comparing fusion quality with the histopathological findings in the defined MRI target on the one hand and the PIRADS score on the other hand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single arm study including patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) and a multiparametric MRI showing a suspicious lesion underwent a MRI fusion targeted biopsy at our institution. MRI fusion targeted biopsy and an additional 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy was performed using the Philips Percunav device (Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA). The fusion accuracy was rated by two experienced clinicians (1 radiologist, 18 years of experience, 1 urologist, 5 years of experience) using a five-point rank scale (1 = best) and comparing the result with the histological findings in the target and the PIRADS score. RESULTS: The detection rate of clinically significant cancer (Gleason 7a or greater) by MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy was 58.6% (17/29) compared to 50% (19/38) in the standard transrectal ultrasound-guided approach. PCa was found in 36.4% (4/11 patients) of patients with a PIRADS 3 lesion, in 57.7% (15/26 patients) of patients with a PIRADS 4 lesion. In 76.9% (10/13 patients) of patients with a PIRADS 5 lesion PCa was diagnosed. No statistical significance was found comparing the quality of registration either with the PIRADS (p = 0.7873) nor with the Gleason score (p = 0.4376). The study is limited by the small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: MRI fusion based targeted biopsy improves the identification of clinical significant cancer. The Gleason score of detected PCa is not influenced by the quality of fusion.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with MRI image fusion for monitoring focal therapy of prostate cancer with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)1.

INTRODUCTION: Reduced acceptance of radical prostatectomy in patients with low risk or intermediate risk prostate cancer has significantly changed treatment strategies in prostate cancer (PCa) during the last years. Focal therapy of the prostate with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an organ-preserving treatment for prostate cancer with less impairment of health-related quality of life. Follow-up after HIFU therapy by imaging modalities remains a major problem as eg. MRI performs poorly. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows to monitor the vascular architecture of organs non-invasively. However, only limited data are available using CEUS to define successful and complete HIFU treatment of the prostate. In this study, we aimed to evaluate short-term image findings using CEUS and image fusion before and after HIFU treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective single arm study in patients with uni- or bilateral, low or intermediate risk prostate cancer or recurrent cancer after radiotherapy treated with HIFU at our institution between October 2016 and November 2017. HIFU hemiablation or whole gland treatment was performed using the Focal One® device. PCa was diagnosed either by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) followed by MRI fusion based targeted biopsy combined with 12 core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy or 12 core random biopsy only. Monitoring of the target region before, immediately and 24 hours after the ablation was done by CEUS in combination with image fusion using an axial T2-weighted MRI sequence. RESULTS: 6 consecutive patients with Gleason score (GS) 6, 5 patients with GS 7a prostate cancer and one patient with biochemical recurrence after radiotherapy were included in the study. Three patients underwent whole gland treatment due to histological proven bilateral PCa or recurrent PCa after radiotherapy. Hemiablation was performed in 9 patients with unilateral tumor and no PIRADS 4 or 5 lesion in the contralateral lobe. Median patient age was 69.8 years and median PSA (prostate-specific antigen) level was 8.4 ng/ml. CEUS showed markedly reduced microbubbles in the ablated area, the prostate capsule still showed signs of perfusion. The study is limited by the short follow up and small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS examination showed a reduction of microcirculation in the treated area immediately after the treatment and 24 hours later. The combination of CEUS and image fusion seems to be helpful for detecting the PCa target lesion and monitor the success of HIFU ablation treatment. Evidence for image findings after HIFU-therapy are rare. Further studies on this topic are needed.

[Diode laser. Ex vivo studies on vaporization and coagulation characteristics]. / Der Diodenlaser. Ex-vivo-Untersuchungen zu den Vaporisations- und Koagulationseigenschaften.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Laser therapy of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) remains a challenge for most urologic surgeons. The main goal of laser surgery is to achieve a marked volume reduction and to decrease bladder outlet obstruction and lower urinary tract symptoms with minimal morbidity. Laser therapy encompasses a variety of techniques using different laser wavelengths, application systems, and surgical techniques to achieve contrasting tissue effects. In an in vitro animal model we compared the vaporization and coagulation effects of the potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser, holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser, and diode laser (980 nm). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an in vitro model using isolated perfused porcine kidneys we investigated the vaporization, the coagulation effect, and the bleeding rate of the KTP, Ho:YAG, and diode lasers on five porcine kidneys each. The application of each laser type was standardized. The area of laser application was 1 cm x 1 cm. The KTP group received an application with 80 W, the Ho:YAG group an application with 10-30 W, and the diode group an application with 30, 60, and 100 W. Hemostasis was measured semiquantitatively. Ablation and coagulation were investigated macro- and microscopically. RESULTS: Concerning the ablation capacity, the diode laser is most effective (more than fivefold) compared to the KTP and Ho:YAG lasers but demonstrated a rather large coagulation zone of up to tenfold in comparison to the KTP and Ho:YAG lasers. Semiquantitatively, in terms of bleeding rate, all lasers were equivalent in this ex vivo model. CONCLUSIONS: Our very early and limited experience indicates that KTP (80 W) and Ho:YAG (30 W) laser application are equivalent in terms of tissue ablation capacity and coagulation in an experimental setting. The diode laser at 980 nm is superior in terms of ablation capacity but has a large coagulation zone. Concerning the bleeding rate all tested lasers are equivalent in this ex vivo model.