Potentially functional polymorphism in the promoter region of prodynorphin gene may be associated with protection against cocaine dependence or abuse.

It has been demonstrated that the opioid peptide dynorphin plays a role in modulating responses to several psychoactive substances including cocaine. Our laboratory and others have found that mRNA levels of dynorphin in the caudate and putamen are elevated after acute or chronic cocaine exposure in rats. Recently, a 68-base pair (bp) repeat polymorphism within the core promoter region of the human prodynorphin gene has been reported to occur in alleles containing one, two, three, or four copies. This repeat contains a putative AP-1 transcription factor binding site; reporter gene constructs with three or four, but not one or two, copies of the tandem repeats were shown to be associated with increases in transcriptional activation in in vitro cellular assays. We hypothesize that this polymorphism may be associated with individual differences in vulnerability to cocaine dependence or abuse. From an ongoing study of the genetics of addiction, 174 subjects were studied, including individuals with a primary diagnosis (DSM-IV criteria) of cocaine dependence (N = 61) or abuse (N = 22), and controls with no history of any substance dependence or abuse (N = 91). We designed primers for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify sequences of the promoter region of the prodynorphin gene containing the repeat element. The association of alleles containing three or four repeats with cocaine dependence/abuse was examined. With data stratified by ethnic group, pooled relative risk (RR) with Mantel-Haenszel Chi square was calculated: RR = 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.37-0.95), chi2 (1) = 4.14, P = 0.042. Our results suggest that this allelic variation at the promoter region of the prodynorphin gene (alleles with three or four repeats), which may result in enhanced transcription of the gene, may contribute to relative protection and decrease individual vulnerability to develop cocaine dependence or abuse.

The Kreek-McHugh-Schluger-Kellogg scale: a new, rapid method for quantifying substance abuse and its possible applications.

The new Kreek-McHugh-Schluger-Kellogg scale ('KMSK scale') is designed to quantify self-exposure to opiates, cocaine, alcohol, and/or tobacco. Each section of the KMSK scale assesses the frequency, amount, and duration of use of a particular substance during the individual's period of greatest consumption. The scale also assesses the mode of use, whether the substance use is current or past, and whether each substance is the substance of choice. The administration time is under 5 min. In an initial validation study of this scale, 100 human subjects were administered the KMSK scale concurrently with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I DSM-IV version). The sensitivity and specificity were very good for opiates, cocaine, and alcohol use. In addition, the correlations between KMSK scores and the number of SCID-I criteria items met were excellent for opiates and cocaine and good for alcohol use. Nicotine dependence was not assessed in this study as there is no SCID-I nicotine criteria. These preliminary results show that the KMSK scale may have both construct validity similar to that of other established self-report measures and the potential to be an effective screening instrument for the assessment of a lifetime diagnosis of alcohol, opiate, or cocaine dependence.

The Personality Assessment Inventory Drug Problems Scale: a validity analysis.

An analysis of the relationship among the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey, 1991, 1996) Drug Problems (DRG) scale scores, the Addiction Severity Index (ASI; McLellan et al., 1992) scores, and urine toxicology reports revealed that the PAI Drug Problem scale scores of 100 substance-using and substance-abusing men and women were distributed in a manner that was in agreement with the guidelines suggested by Morey (1991, 1996) in the PAI manual. There were significant correlations among the PAI DRG scale and the ASI scales related to frequency of use, negative consequences of use, and need and desire for treatment. Overall, higher scores did reflect both more serious involvements with drug use and more serious problems as a consequence of their involvement.