Hybrid fixation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty shows equivalent short-term implant survivorship and clinical scores compared to standard fixation techniques.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data regarding hybrid-fixated unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and no study directly compared all three available fixation techniques (cementless, cemented, and hybrid). The hypothesis was that hybrid fixation might have a lower incidence of radiolucent lines (RLL) than cemented UKA, with equivalent outcomes to uncemented UKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 UKA with a minimal follow-up of 1 year were retrospectively included, of which 40 were cemented, 41 cementless, and 23 hybrid prostheses. The functional outcomes scores included the Oxford Knee (OKS), Subjective Knee (SKS), and Forgotten Joint scores (FJS). RLLs, subsidence, and component positioning were assessed on radiographs. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 28 months, the survival rate was 95% for cemented UKA and 100% for the cementless and hybrid UKA (n.s.), respectively. Postoperative FJS (93 vs. 82 points, p = 0.007) and SKS (4.7 vs. 4.1 points, p = 0.001) were better in cementless than cemented UKA, with hybrid-fixated UKA in between the two (90 and 4.4 points, n.s.). Improvement of OKS preoperatively to postoperatively did not differ between the groups (n.s.). RLLs were more frequent in cemented (23%) compared to cementless (5%, p = 0.021) and hybrid UKA (9%, n.s.). With an incidence of 12%, subsidence occurred more commonly in cementless UKA compared to cemented (5%) and hybrid (0%) (n.s.) UKA. CONCLUSION: Hybrid fixation achieves equivalent results to standard UKA fixation techniques regarding implant survival and functional and radiological outcomes. Therefore, the hybrid fixation technique seems to be a valuable alternative as it combines the advantages of cemented tibial components with those of uncemented femoral components. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Influence of patient selection, component positioning and surgeon's caseload on the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Implant malpositioning, low surgical caseload, and improper patient selection have been identified as essential factors, which could negatively affect the longevity of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the impact of the surgeon's caseload on patient selection, component positioning, as well as component survivorship and functional outcomes following a PSI-UKA. METHODS: A total of 125 patient-specific instrumented (PSI) UKA were included. One hundred and two cases were treated by a high-volume surgeon (usage 40%) and 23 cases by a low-volume surgeon (< 10 cases/year, usage 34%). Preoperative UIS, as well as the postoperative clinical and radiologic outcome, were assessed retrospectively. RESULTS: Irrespective of the surgeon's UKA caseload, PSI allowed good accuracy in component positioning (p > 0.05). The high-volume surgeon had a more strict indication for UKA with 89% showing a UIS > 25 (considered a good indication) compared to 70% for the low-volume surgeon (p = 0.016). The low-volume surgeon achieved worse results regarding functional outcome (p < 0.05) and a tendency toward an increased risk for UKA failure (p = 0.11) compared to the high-volume surgeon. CONCLUSION: Due to potential selection errors, mostly connected to a low UKA-caseload, low-volume UKA surgeons might achieve worse outcomes. Very strict indications for UKA might be recommended in low-volume surgeons to achieve excellent clinical outcomes following a UKA.