The Maryland aggregate pathology index: a deceased donor kidney biopsy scoring system for predicting graft failure.

Despite the common use of diagnostic pretransplant deceased donor kidney biopsy, there is no consensus on the prognostic significance of the pathologic findings. In order to assist clinicians with interpretation we analyzed 371 pretransplant biopsies and correlated the findings with graft failure. Glomerular pathology was assessed with percent glomerulosclerosis (GS), glomerular size and periglomerular fibrosis (PGF); vascular pathology with arterial wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR) and arteriolar hyalinosis and interstitial pathology with measurement of cumulative fibrosis and presence of scar. Using two-thirds of the study population as a model-development cohort, we found that biopsy features independently associated with an increased risk of graft failure were GS > or =15%, interlobular arterial WLR > or =0.5 and the presence of PGF, arteriolar hyalinosis or scar. The Maryland Aggregate Pathology Index (MAPI), was developed from these parameters and validated on the remaining one-third of the population. Five-year actuarial graft survival was 90% for kidneys with MAPI scores between 0 and 7, 63% for scores from 8 to 11 and 53% for scores from 12 to 15 (p < 0.001). We conclude MAPI may help transplant physicians estimate graft survival from the preimplantation biopsy findings, in clinical situations similar to this study population (cold ischemia over 24 h, GS < 25%).

A neural network model for predicting pancreas transplant graft outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of a neural network versus a logistic regression model for predicting early (0-3 months) pancreas transplant graft survival or loss. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional, secondary analysis of demographic and clinical data from 117 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK), 35 pancreas-after-kidney (PAK), and 8 pancreas-transplant-alone (PTA) patients (n = 160). The majority of patients were men (57%) and were white (90.1%), with a mean age of 39 +/- 8.09 years. Of the patients, 23 (14.4%) experienced early graft loss, which included any loss owing to technical or immunological causes, and death with a functional graft. Data were analyzed with a logistic regression model for multivariate analysis and a backpropagation neural network (BPNN) model. RESULTS: A total of 12 predictor variables were chosen from literature and transplant surgeon recommendations. A logistic model with all predictor variables included correctly classified 93.53% of cases. Model sensitivity was 35.71%; specificity was 100% (pseudo-R2 0.24). Of the predictors, history of alcohol abuse (odds ratio [OR] 32.39; 95% CI 1.67-626.89), having a PAK or PTA (OR 13.6; 95% CI 2.20-84.01), and use of a nonlocal organ procurement center (OPO) (OR 4.51; 95% CI 0.78-25.96) were most closely associated with early graft loss. The BPNN model with the same 12 predictor variables correctly predicted 92.50% of cases (R2 0.71). Model sensitivity was 68%; specificity was 96%. Of the predictors, the three variables most closely associated with graft outcome in this model were recipient/donor weight difference >50 lb, having a PAK or PTA, and use of a nonlocal OPO. CONCLUSIONS: First, the BPNN model correctly predicted 92.5% of graft outcomes versus the logistic model (93.53%). Second, the BPNN model rendered more accurate predictions (>0.70 = loss; <0.30 = survival) versus the logistic model (>0.50 = loss; <0.50 = survival). Third, the BPNN model was more sensitive (68%) than the logistic model (35.71%) to graft failures and demonstrated an almost threefold increase in explained variance (R2 = 0.71 vs. 0.24). These results suggest that the BPNN model is a more powerful tool for predicting early pancreas graft loss than traditional multivariate statistical models.

Simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation--a comparison of enteric and bladder drainage of exocrine pancreatic secretions.

Simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation (SPK) has evolved to become a therapeutic option for patients with renal failure resulting from type 1 diabetes mellitus. However, the appropriate route for drainage of the exocrine secretions of the pancreas allograft remains unclear. While bladder drainage (BD) is the current state of the art, it is associated with a high frequency of urologic complications, including urinary tract infections, hematuria, metabolic acidosis, dehydration, and reflux pancreatitis. Although enteric drainage (ED) is the more physiologic route, it has been associated in the past with decreased graft survival and increased infectious complications. In addition, BD offered a technique for detection of rejection through measurement of urinary amylase. However, with the advent of improved immunosuppression and antibiotic therapy, percutaneous pancreas biopsy, improved radiologic imaging, and greater understanding of pancreas transplantation, we hypothesized that ED could be performed without increased morbidity or cost. A group of 23 consecutive SPK was performed with ED during the period from July 1995 to November 1995. Another 23 age- and sex-matched recipients of SPK with BD performed from November 1994 to June 1995 served as a historical control group. Because of the differing lengths of follow-up, data were analyzed with respect to the first six months posttransplant. ED and BD were associated with equivalent actuarial one-year patient and graft survival rates: 100% and 88% for ED, and 96% and 91% for BD, respectively. Hospital charges, length of stay, readmissions, rejection, sepsis-related procedures were also equivalent in ED and BD. However, ED was associated with significantly fewer urinary tract infections and urologic complications. In addition, no grafts were lost as the result of sepsis. In the setting of SPK, ED represents a viable alternative to BD for primary drainage of pancreas exocrine secretions. Further studies with extended lengths of follow-up are necessary to confirm our observations.

Safe pancreas transplantation in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the risk of clinically significant posttransplant cardiac events (PCEs) in a cohort of diabetic patients referred for pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Between April 1991 and December 1995, 316 insulin-dependent diabetics were evaluated for pancreas transplantation. Patients were assessed for risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD), and underwent screening for significant CAD by a standardized algorithm that included selective coronary angiography. For the 3-year period following transplantation, PCEs were identified, and related to pretransplant cardiac risk factors. RESULTS: Only four patients (1.3%) were turned down for cardiac contraindications. Coronary angiography was done in 74 patients (27% of the active transplant candidates) during the evaluation period because of the patient's history or a positive stress test. Significant coronary artery stenoses were found in 54% of the patients catheterized. Twenty-five of these 40 patients (63%) underwent revascularization with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and/or coronary artery bypass grafting. A total of 359 organs were subsequently transplanted into 194 of these patients. No deaths occurred within 30 days of any of the transplants; four percent of transplant recipients died of cardiac causes within the follow-up period (median 23 months). Those with no pretransplant evidence of CAD had significantly lower rates of PCE (2% and 8% at 1 and 3 years, respectively) than those with pretransplant evidence of CAD (11% and 29% at 1 and 3 years, P<0.01; relative risk, 4.3). CONCLUSIONS: Routine cardiac screening of pancreas recipients with selective angiography and revascularization allows patients with significant CAD to safely undergo pancreas transplantation. Patients should rarely be excluded from pancreas transplantation for cardiac causes.

Isolated pancreas rejection in combined kidney pancreas tranplantation.

The clinical success of pancreas transplantation is limited by the difficulty in diagnosing rejection. In simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplantation, the diagnosis of pancreatic rejection is particularly difficult in the absence of clinical evidence of kidney rejection. Moreover, patients receiving only pancreas grafts will not have a concomitantly grafted kidney to serve as a "sentinel" for rejection. Percutaneous pancreas graft biopsy has been reported in a few small series but has not been adopted for broad clinical use. We describe the evaluation of 69 consecutive episodes of suspected isolated pancreas allograft rejection by percutaneous pancreas allograft biopsy. These rejection episodes occurred in 41 patients with bladder-drained pancreas transplants (25 SPK, 14 pancrease after kidney transplants [PAK], amd two pancreas transplant alone [PTA]). The indications for percutaneous pancreas biopsy were a twofold or greater increase in serum amylase or lipase, or a sustained 40% to 50% drop in urine amylase in the setting of no evidence of renal allograft dysfunction in SPK transplants. Biopsies were performed with color-flow Doppler ultrasound localization using an 18-gauge automated biopsy needle. Pancreatic tissue adequate for histologic evaluation was obtained in 61 of 69 cases (88%). There were two cases of intraabdominal bleeding, one of which required surgical intervention; the other resolved spontaneously. Histologic assessment of the biopsies demonstrated varying degrees of acute cellular rejection in 48 of 61 specimens (79%). Twelve specimens (20%) were free of histologic evidence of rejection, and one specimen (2%) showed acute pancreatitis. At the time of suspected rejection mean serum amylase and lipase values were increased 3.6 and 8.3-fold, respectively, and urine amylase was decreased by a mean of 45%. We conclude that the commonly used markers for pancreas allograft rejection are only about 80% specific for acute rejection. Percutaneous pancreas allograft biopsy is safe and allows the avoidance of unnecessary antirejection therapy with its attendant side effects and cost.

Prevention of autoimmune islet allograft destruction by engraftment of donor T cells.

The results of clinical islet transplantation have remained poor when compared with the consistent success of pancreas transplantation. Autoimmunity has usually been discounted as a cause of islet transplant failure. Previously, we demonstrated that pancreas transplants from the diabetes resistant BB rat (BB-DR) function indefinitely in autoimmune diabetic hosts, but islets from the same donor are vulnerable to recurrent autoimmunity. Addition of 100 million pancreatic lymph node cells (PLNC) to BB-DR islets restores resistance to autoimmunity and leads to repletion of a T cell subset (RT6.1) in the recipients. Autoimmune (BB-Ac) and streptozocin (BB-Sz) diabetic BB rats were recipients of Wistar Furth (WF) intraportal islet or islets plus PLNC transplants with cyclosporine 5 mg/kg/day recipient treatment. One cohort of Brown Norway (BN) islet transplants to BB-Ac with CsA was performed. At the termination of the experiment, recipient peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) were characterized by flow cytometry (FACS) for class I, CD4, CD8, RT6.1, and RT6.2, a T cell maturation marker found in WF but not BB rats. All (14/14) WF and 75% (6/8) BN islet transplants to BB-Ac recipients failed after a mean of 42 and 36 days, respectively, despite CsA immunosuppression. WF islets were successful in 6/8 (75%) transplants to BB-Sz recipients (P<0.001 vs. BB-Ac recipients), confirming that autoimmunity is the major cause of islet failure in BB-Ac rats. Addition of PLNC to WF islets increased the survival in BB-Ac to 82% (9/11) (P<0.0001 vs. WF islets alone). Recipients of islet+PLNC express 19.7% RT6.2 compared with 4.6% and 4.0% for WF islets alone in BB-Ac (P<0.01) and BB-Sz (P<0.01), respectively. Autoimmunity is an important factor leading to islet transplant failure in autoimmune diabetic BB rats. Addition of donor PLNC prevent islet allograft failure and leads to recipient chimerism for a donor T cell subset (RT6.2) associated with resistance to autoimmunity.

Histologic grading of acute allograft rejection in pancreas needle biopsy: correlation to serum enzymes, glycemia, and response to immunosuppressive treatment.

BACKGROUND: Allograft rejection continues to be the most common cause of graft failure in technically successful pancreas transplants. Early diagnosis and treatment of rejection is essential for long-term graft survival. Pancreas graft biopsies are now used routinely for the diagnosis of acute allograft rejection. The correlation between clinical evidence of graft dysfunction (increased serum enzymes and glucose), severity of acute rejection on biopsy (rejection grade), and response to treatment has not been previously studied. METHODS: A total of 151 pancreas transplant needle biopsy specimens from 57 patients were evaluated. Statistical correlation was done between the histologic rejection grade (O-V) and the peak level of enzymes in serum, glycemia, type of antirejection treatment instituted, and response to treatment. Differentiation between grades was also evaluated statistically. RESULTS: Response to antirejection treatment was 25%, 40%, 88%, 78%, 50%, and 17% for grades O-V, respectively. The response for grades II and III was better than for grades 0-I and IV-V (P=0.0003 and 0.0008, respectively). The response to corticosteroids alone was 36%, 86%, 68%, and 0% for grades I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The response to antilymphocyte regimen was 50%, 89%, 85%, 71%, and 17% for grades I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. Overall correlation between the mean levels of enzymes and rejection grade was seen; the increase of lipase was statistically significant (r=0.24, P=0.012). Amylase and lipase correlated very well with each other (r=0.84, P=0.0001). No correlation was found in the mean values of blood glucose with the serum enzyme increase and with severity of rejection. Hyperglycemia was present in 12 patients; this abnormality in patients with grades II-IV responded promptly to treatment, whereas in patients with grade V, hyperglycemia persisted despite antirejection treatment. Other causes of increased enzymes were found in patients with biopsy specimens showing no rejection (grades 0 and I, 43% and 31%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Increased serum enzymes, particularly lipase, correlate with the grade of acute rejection, but their lack of specificity precludes their use as sole markers of acute rejection. Glucose levels are not a sensitive marker for acute rejection. Rejection grades II and III are the most responsive to treatment, and a significant proportion of these cases respond to treatment with corticosteroids only. The higher rejection grades (IV and V) require treatment with antilymphocytic regimens, and their overall response to treatment is moderate to poor, respectively.

Outcome after splenic vein thrombosis in the pancreas allograft.

The outcome and management of isolated splenic vein thrombosis in the pancreas transplant is unknown. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 76 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations (SPK) and 56 solitary pancreas transplantations (SPT) performed at the University of Maryland from January 1995 to December 1996. A total of 24 patients were identified (9 SPK and 15 SPT recipients). All were systemically anticoagulated for a period of 6-8 weeks after diagnosis. In the SPK thrombosis group, anticoagulation resulted in 1-year graft survival that was equivalent to that of SPK controls (86.1% vs. 95.3%). In contrast, in SPT, thrombosis and subsequent anticoagulation were associated with decreased graft survival compared with SPT controls (26.8% vs. 78.3%; P<0.01). Although the outcome of splenic vein thrombosis in the absence of anticoagulation is unknown, these data suggest that (1) in SPK, anticoagulation for splenic vein thrombosis maintains graft survival, and (2) in SPT, anticoagulation does not alter the ultimate progression of splenic vein thrombosis to complete graft thrombosis.

Late pancreas allograft rejection. Preliminary experience with factors predisposing to rejection.

A case series of 31 cadaveric pancreas transplant recipients who were insulin-independent at least for one year was analyzed for the factors predisposing to late acute rejection (> 12 months posttransplant). Sixty-two pancreas transplants were performed in 61 patients, of whom 53 had functioning allografts 3 months posttransplant; 31 of these had a follow-up > 12 months. Twenty had no evidence of late rejection, whereas 11 had evidence of acute rejection after 12 months. All patients received quadruple induction immunosuppression. No demographic or clinical factors-including donor age, organ cold time, HLA mismatch, age, sex, or race-could distinguish the late acute rejection group. The presence of acute rejection in the first year posttransplant was similar in the late rejectors (21 episodes in 9 of 11 patients) compared with patients without late rejection (31 episodes in 16 of 20 patients). Antilymphocyte induction therapy type had no influence, but the amount of immunosuppression with prednisone and cyclosporine (CsA) at 3 months posttransplant was significantly lower in those patients who experienced late rejection. After the first year posttransplant, CsA 12-hr trough levels were significantly lower in late rejection months (121 +/- 7 ng/ml) compared with each patient's own stable months (183 +/- 5 ng/ml, P < 0.0001). Neither prednisone nor azathioprine dosages differed between teh two groups after the first year posttransplant. Our preliminary results suggest that early under immunosuppression with prednisone and CsA in the first year and 12-hr trough CsA levels less than approximately 180 ng/ml after the first year posttransplant predispose to late pancreatic rejection.

Use of renal allografts from donors positive for hepatitis B core antibody confers minimal risk for subsequent development of clinical hepatitis B virus disease.

BACKGROUND: The risk associated with transplantation of renal allografts from hepatitis B virus core antibody-positive (HBcAb(+)), hepatitis B virus surface antigen-negative (HBsAg(-)) donors is not well defined. METHODS: Over 4 years, we performed 45 kidney transplants from IgG HBcAb(+), IgM HBcAb(-), HBsAg(-) donors into recipients with a history of prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or reported vaccination. We examined HBV-related outcomes in these 45 patients, in comparison with 45 recipients of allografts from HBcAb(-) donors (matched for transplant type, date, and pretransplant HBV antibodies). We sought evidence for HBV transmission by testing posttransplant sera for the presence of HBcAb, hepatitis B virus surface antibody, and HBsAg. Additionally, we analyzed alanine aminotransferase profiles and allograft survival rates for all patients. RESULTS: No patient receiving an allograft from an HBcAb(+) donor developed clinical HBV infection. No patient receiving an allograft from an HBcAb(+) donor had HBsAg detected through retrospective testing of stored sera or through prospective routine clinical evaluation and care. However, among the HBcAb(+) kidney recipients, 27% developed new HBcAb and/or hepatitis B virus surface antibody after transplant; in contrast, only 4% of control patients developed new antibody responses (relative risk=4.94; confidence interval 1.07-22.83). Among the recipients of HBcAb(+) organs, 18% developed elevated transaminases after transplant, in comparison with 36% of the controls. No association was found between "seroconverter" status and elevated alanine aminotransferase profiles in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of renal allografts from HBcAb(+), HBsAg(-) donors was not associated with clinically detectable HBV disease or antigenemia. However, recipients had a significantly increased risk of HBV seroconversion, consistent with exposure to HBV antigen. These results suggest that HBcAb(+) kidneys can be safely used if transplanted into appropriate recipients, but highlight the need for effective HBV vaccination and vaccine-response monitoring in potential recipients.

Evaluation of pancreas transplant needle biopsy: reproducibility and revision of histologic grading system.

BACKGROUND: Tissue samples for the diagnosis of pancreatic allograft rejection are now obtained routinely through the application of the percutaneous needle biopsy technique. The availability of biopsy material (89% adequate for diagnosis in our setting) presents a challenge for pathologists who are asked to provide a fast and accurate diagnosis of rejection and its severity, while at the same time being able to differentiate rejection from other causes of graft dysfunction. METHODS: To differentiate rejection from other pathologic processes, 26 histologic features were assessed in 92 biopsies performed for confirmation of clinical diagnosis of rejection and the results were compared with 31 protocol biopsies, 12 allograft pancreatectomies with non-rejection pathology, and 30 native pancreas resections with various disease processes. RESULTS: Based on these comparisons, a constellation of findings relating to the vascular, septal, and acinar inflammation was identified for the diagnosis of rejection. Application of these features led us to revise our scheme for grading rejection (ranging from 0-normal to V-severe rejection) to include the categories of "inflammation of undetermined significance" and "minimal rejection." The scheme was used by five pathologist to grade 20 biopsies independently of any clinical data and the interobserver level of agreement was highly significant (kappa=0.83, P<0.0001). This grading scheme was applied blindly to all (183) biopsies from 77 patients with 6-52 months of follow-up. The correlation of the highest degree of rejection on each patient and ultimate graft loss (0% for grades 0-I, 11.5% for grade II, 17.3% for grade III, 37.5% for grade IV, and 100% for grade V) was highly statistically significant (P<0.002). The fraction of grafts lost due to pure immunologic causes increased proportionally to the grade of rejection (0, 50, 66, and 100% for grades II, III, IV, and V, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides strong support for the proposed pancreas rejection grading scheme and confirms its potential for practical use.

Double renal allografts successfully increase utilization of kidneys from older donors within a single organ procurement organization.

BACKGROUND: In 1994, a policy of double renal allografting (DUAL) was used at two centers within our local organ procurement organization to increase utilization of kidneys from older donors that would otherwise be discarded. Both kidneys from an older donor (age > 60 years) were selectively transplanted into a single adult recipient. METHODS: The relative impact of a DUAL policy on the utilization of older donor kidneys is examined for the period of April 1994 to April 1996. Actual utilization is compared with the hypothetical case in which a DUAL policy is not present. RESULTS: In the actual setting, a total of 75 kidneys from older donors (> 60 years) were accepted for transplantation. Thirty-six kidneys were transplanted as singlets, and 16 additional kidneys were transplanted as DUAL renal allografts. Thus, a 44% increase in transplantable kidneys, and a 22% increase in patients transplanted with kidneys from older donors, was realized. In the actual setting, 23 older kidneys were discarded; without the DUAL policy, 39 kidneys would have been deemed untransplantable. When compared with the actual (n = 52) and hypothetical number of kidneys transplanted without a policy of DUAL transplantation (n = 36), the DUAL policy significantly increased the utilization of older donor kidneys (P = 0.01). The actuarial 1-year graft survival rate of the dual kidneys was 100%, with a mean follow-up of 11.1 +/- 2.9 months. Mean 6-month and 1-year serum creatinine level were 1.76 +/- 0.4 and 1.63 +/- 0.6 mg/dl, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A DUAL policy significantly increased the number of older donor kidneys transplanted in a single organ procurement organization and reduced the rate of discard of older donor kidneys over a 2-year period. Long-term follow-up is necessary to substantiate satisfactory graft function in DUAL from older donors.

The shrinking renal replacement therapy "break-even" point.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the current cost of live donor (LD) transplantation at our institution, and compares it with that of dialysis. METHODS: The study population consisted of 184 consecutive adult recipients of laparoscopically procured LD kidney transplants. Cost-containment measures instituted during this series included elimination of routine postoperative antilymphocyte induction and an accelerated discharge clinical pathway with planned discharge of the recipient on postoperative day (POD) 2. Costs of the transplants to Medicare were estimated from hospital charges, readmission rates, and immunosuppressant usage. These were compared with published costs of dialysis to Medicare in terms of a fiscal transplant-dialysis break-even point. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier patient and graft survival rates at 1 year were 97 and 93%, respectively. Among patients followed for at least 90 days and treated with no induction and either cyclosporine-mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil, acute rejection rates were low (27.6 and 13.9%, respectively). In the last 124 patients, 32.3% were discharged by POD 3 and 71.8% by POD 6, with corresponding mean transplant hospital charges (excluding organ acquisition) of $11,873 and $17,350, respectively. The 30-day readmission rate for patients discharged on the accelerated pathway by POD 3 was only 16%. The least expensive subgroup in the present study (30% of patients) was that of patients discharged by POD 6 and not readmitted during the first year; the break-even point with dialysis costs was calculated as 1.7 years after the transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of LD transplants can be safely reduced by elimination of routine postoperative anti-lymphocyte immune induction and by an early discharge clinical pathway. Uncomplicated LD kidney transplants, meaning those with a short length of stay in the hospital after transplantation and no need for readmission within the first year, accrue savings over dialysis within 2 years.

A high panel-reactive antibody rescue protocol for cross-match-positive live donor kidney transplants.

BACKGROUND: Alloimmunization can present a virtually insurmountable barrier to kidney transplantation. Past protocols to desensitize patients using plasmapheresis and cyclophosphamide have not been broadly applied because of the fear of complications, including high rates of immunologic failure. METHODS: Fifteen patients with a positive donor-recipient cross-match were desensitized with plasmapheresis to permit live donor (LD) transplantation under newer maintenance immunosuppressants. Pretransplant the patients received plasmapheresis three times weekly for a planned maximum of six treatments, plus intravenous hyperimmune globulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Patients who were successfully desensitized and received transplants were given 10 days of OKT3 postoperatively. RESULTS: Eleven of the 15 patients became anti-human globulin cross-match-negative after one to five plasmapheresis treatments and underwent LD transplantation. Relatively low initial titers of donor-specific antibody were predictive of successful attainment of a negative cross-match. Few side effects and rejection episodes were observed. All transplant patients remain dialysis-free after 3-26 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: A positive cross-match is not necessarily a contraindication to LD transplantation, especially for patients with low donor-specific alloantibody titers.

The use of bilateral adult renal allografts - a method to optimize function from donor kidneys with suboptimal nephron mass.

Alternatives to traditional organ donor usage has allowed expansion of the organ donor pool to help compensate for the increasing disparity between recipients and donors. The use of bilateral adult renal transplants is a novel idea to salvage older donor kidneys with suboptimal nephron mass that would otherwise be destined for discard. Ten renal transplants were performed utilizing both kidneys from adult cadaver donors with diminished nephron mass determined by calculated glomerular filtration rate or biopsy evidence of significant glomerulosclerosis (>10%). Nine of ten (90%) recipients have satisfactory renal function at a mean follow-up of 7 months. The single case of graft failure was due to documented medical non-compliance. Mean serum creatinine at 6 months was 1.5 mg/dl. Mean measured creatinine clearance was 43.2+/-3.4. These preliminary findings suggest that the use of bilateral renal transplants provide satisfactory early function and allows salvage of older donor kidneys with suboptimal nephron mass.

Mycophenolate mofetil reduces the risk of acute rejection less in African-American than in Caucasian kidney recipients.

BACKGROUND: Multicenter clinical trials have shown that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduces the risk of acute rejection, but it is unknown whether African-Americans constitute a subgroup of recipients less likely to benefit from MMF. METHODS: This study compared the acute rejection rates within 6 months of kidney transplantation in MMF-treated transplant patients with those on azathioprine (AZA) at a single center. The study population consisted of 353 consecutive recipients of cadaver or living donor kidney transplants. African-Americans constituted 43% of the patients on AZA and 49% of the patients on MMF. Variables used in a Cox regression analysis included MMF immunosuppression, recipient race, type of transplant, delayed graft function, postoperative immune induction, average cyclosporine trough level, and HLA mismatch. RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients on MMF experienced a biopsy-proven rejection episode than those treated with AZA (24% vs. 42%, respectively; relative risk [RR]=0.57, P=0.001). This decrease in risk was greater in Caucasian transplant recipients (MMF vs. AZA: 16% vs. 46%, RR=0.35, P < 0.001) than in African-American patients (32% vs. 36%, RR=0.88, P=0.6). Within each race stratum, the mean cyclosporine trough levels averaged over 2-week intervals were nearly identical for AZA- compared with MMF-treated patients. In the regression model, the effect of MMF on the incidence of rejection was again less in African-American than in Caucasian patients. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney recipients treated with MMF have a significantly lower risk of acute rejection within 6 months of transplantation than those given AZA. This reduction in risk is significantly less in African-American recipients than Caucasians.

Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN) is a recently developed procedure, the performance of which needs to be studied. Given the reported advantages in the donors, this study looks at graft outcome and ureteral complications in recipients of kidneys procured by open donor nephrectomy (ODN) versus LDN. METHODS: The LDN recipients consisted of 193 patients since 3/27/96. A total of 168 ODN recipients from 1991 to 1998 served as controls. Immunosuppression protocols were similar for both groups. RESULTS: Two-year graft survival for LDN and ODN was 98% and 96%, respectively. Two-year patient survival for LDN and ODN was 98% and 97%, respectively. The incidence of delayed graft function and mean serum creatinine at 3 and 12 months was similar in both groups. However, the number of ureteral complications that required operative repair was significantly higher for LDN recipients compared to ODN recipients, 7.7% (n=15) vs. 0.6% (n=1) respectively (P=0.03). Ureteral stenting was required in an additional 3.1% (n=6) of LDN and 2.4% (n=4) of ODN (P=NS). There was, however, a learning curve with time. For the first 130 LDN patients, a total of 20 ureteral complications were recorded, whereas only one occurred in the more recent 63 patients (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The higher ureteral complication rate in LDN recipients has improved over time as technical causes have been identified. We have noted significant improvement in ureteral viability by using the endogastrointestinal anastomosis instrument on the ureter and peri-ureteral tissue. LDN is therefore an excellent alternative to ODN. Identification of hazards unique to this technique is critical before its broader application.

A novel approach to the treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Progressive deterioration of renal function in kidney transplant recipients is the leading cause of graft failure. Both nonimmunologic and immunologic mechanisms contribute to this deterioration. METHODS: Twenty-eight cyclosporine (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients (21 cadaveric, 5 living, 2 simultaneous kidney-pancreas) with progressive deterioration of renal function were prospectively enrolled in a clinical trial and had their immunosuppressive regimen changed 24.3+/-7.7 months after transplant. All patients had their CsA dose reduced by 50%, azathioprine was discontinued, and mycophenolate mofetil was added to the medical regimen. The mean creatinine of the patients at the initiation of the change in immunosuppression was 3.5+/-1.2 mg/dl (range 1.9 to 6.2 mg/dl). RESULTS: Before the change in immunosuppression, the mean loss in renal function as indicated by the least-squares slope of the reciprocal of creatinine versus time was -0.006+/-0.002 (mg/dl)-1 per month. The change in immunosuppression significantly decreased the rate of loss in renal function for most patients when compared with their pretreatment values with a mean slope of 0.007+/-0.003 (mg/dl)-1 per month (P=0.003). Renal function improved in 21 of 28 patients. Only one patient had continued deterioration of renal function. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for CsA dose, mean arterial blood pressure, and baseline creatinine, the change in immunosuppression was significantly associated with improved renal function (P=0.02). There were no acute rejections after the immunosuppression change. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that adding mycophenolate mofetil and reducing CsA in patients with chronic deterioration of graft function is well tolerated and results in a short-term improvement in renal function.

H+ back diffusion interferes with intrinsic reactive regulation of esophageal mucosal blood flow.

The esophageal mucosa maintains a barrier that is relatively impermeable to glucose, H+, and other small molecules. Injury of the mucosa causes disruption of this barrier, manifest initially by increased permeability to small molecules. In the stomach the mucosa is protected from gross ulceration in the presence of bile-induced H+ back diffusion (JH+) by increases in mucosal blood flow (Qm). Qm to the esophagus during injury has never been studied. We explored the possibility that esophageal Qm would increase as a compensatory reaction to early barrier disruption. Rabbits (2 to 4 kg) were anesthetized and the in situ esophagus was luminally perfused for two 1-hour periods with subulcerogenic concentrations of bile salts, pepsin, or trypsin in the presence (pH 2) or absence (pH 7) of acid. Qm was measured with 15 mu radioactive microspheres in nine experimental groups with a total of 62 rabbits. Changes in Qm were compared with changes in permeability of the esophageal barrier to glucose, Na+, and H+. When the mucosal barrier was broken by bile salts or trypsin at a neutral pH, no acid back diffusion occurred and barrier disruption was accompanied by dramatic increases in esophageal mucosal blood flow. In contrast, barrier disruption by bile salts, pepsin, or acid during pH 2 perfusions failed to elicit increases in Qm when significant JH+ (50 microEq/hr) occurred. These results demonstrate a loss in reactive regulation of esophageal Qm in the presence of significant JH+ that may contribute to the injury seen in acid reflux esophagitis.

Composite kidney-islet transplantation prevents recurrent autoimmune beta-cell destruction.

BACKGROUND: Clinically successful islet transplantation has been rare despite adequate isolation techniques. Reenactment of the original autoimmune beta-cell destruction may contribute to the poor results. Distinguishing autoimmune effects from rejection can be accomplished with isogeneic transplants exchanged between diabetes-prone (BB-DP) and diabetes-resistant (BB-DR) rats. These experiments determine the relative sensitivity of islet, whole pancreas, and composite kidney-islet transplants to recurrent autoimmunity. METHODS: Acutely diabetic (BB-Ac) BB rats served as recipients of vascularized pancreas, intraportal (IPo) or renal capsular (KC) islet transplants, or vascularized composite kidney-islet grafts from BB-DR or BB-DP donors. Graft function was assessed by daily blood glucose level, and the outcome was confirmed on histologic examination. Cyclosporine 5 mg/kg/day intramuscularly was administered to assess its effect on recurrent beta-cell injury. RESULTS: BB-DP pancreases developed recurrent autoimmunity in 55% of cases; cyclosporine afforded complete protection if maintained. Diabetes resistance was transplanted with 23 of 23 BB-DR pancreas grafts; however, islet isolation led to a loss of diabetes resistance for islet grafts to the KC and IPo. Cyclosporine protected KC but not IPo islets. Composite BB-DR kidney-islet transplants functioned indefinitely in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Transplanted islets initially survive by passive diffusion but are ultimately revascularized by capillary ingrowth. The finding that composite kidney-islet transplants function indefinitely suggests that the revascularizing endothelium may play a role in resistance or susceptibility to autoimmune beta-cell destruction.