Physician-Patient Relationship, Assisted Suicide and the Italian Constitutional Court.

In 2017, Italy passed a law that provides for a systematic discipline on informed consent, advance directives, and advance care planning. It ranges from decisions contextual to clinical necessity through the tool of consent/refusal to decisions anticipating future events through the tools of shared care planning and advance directives. Nothing is said in the law regarding the issue of physician assisted suicide. Following the DJ Fabo case, the Italian Constitutional Court declared the constitutional illegitimacy of article 580 of the criminal code in the part in which it does not exclude the punishment of those who facilitate the suicide when the decision has been freely and autonomously made by a person kept alive by life-support treatments and suffering from an irreversible pathology, the source of physical or psychological suffering that he/she considers intolerable, but fully capable of making free and conscious decisions. Such conditions and methods of execution must be verified by a public structure of the national health service, after consulting the territorially competent ethics committee. This statement admits, within strict and regulated bounds, physician assisted suicide, so widening the range of end-of-life decisions for Italian patients. Future application and critical topics will be called into question by the Italian legislator.

Is it time for international guidelines on physical restraint in psychiatric patients?

The freedom-restraining measures used during Involuntary Health Treatment (IHT) are highly criticized in the medical community. Physical restraint techniques are currently largely used worldwide in Psychiatry. The use of restraints against the patient's will can be considered a serious intrusion of basic human rights and even an act of violence against the patient. In all cases, the restraint should not lead to injuries or damage to the patient's health and should be implemented with a respect of the human rights and dignity. Generally, the use of restraint should be considered as a last resource, when all the other methods have failed. Since it represents the principal freedom-limitation measure, it should be constantly monitored by physicians who apply these methods. The case of a 58 years-old white male, affected by chronic schizoaffective disorder and cannabinoid dependence, was under involuntary medical treatment as a consequence of antisocial behavior. During the IHT he suffered firstly a pharmacological restraint and then a physical restraint in order to suppress a slight state of agitation. The patient was completely blocked to the bed for more than 80 hours and died after three days of hospitalization. The aim of this study is to evaluate the suitability of restrictive methods for psychiatric patients in order to establish specific rules to prevent abuse of restraint techniques and even to help physicians to treat psychiatric patients.