Results of video-assisted thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery for thymectomy with myasthenia gravis has not been examined. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive patients underwent total thymectomy by video-assisted techniques between 1992 and 1995. There were 13 male and 20 female patients with a mean age of 38.42 +/- 16.88 years (range 9 to 84 years). The procedures were performed by either a right (n = 11) or left (n = 22) thoracoscopic approach and all anterior mediastinal tissue was removed. RESULTS: There was no perioperative mortality or long-term morbidity. One patient required conversion of the video-assisted technique to a lateral thoracotomy. All patients except one were extubated immediately. The mean hospital stay was 4.12 +/- 6.07 days (range 1 to 37 days) with a median of 3 days. Mean follow-up is 23.39 +/- 11.72 months (range 4 to 47 months). Clinical improvement was seen in 87.9% (29/33): one of two patients (50%) in stage I, 17 of 19 (89.4%) in stage IIA, eight of nine (88.8%) in stage IIB, and three of three (100%) in stage III. Metaanalysis of these results compared with results in nine published series in which other techniques were used showed no difference in clinical improvement after thymectomy between series. CONCLUSION: We conclude that video-assisted thymectomy is as effective as the traditional open surgical approaches for performance of thymectomy in the management of patients with myasthenia gravis. In addition, the improved cosmesis of the video-assisted approach ideally will lead to earlier thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery: has technology found its place?

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of minimally invasive surgical techniques in thoracic surgery in 1990, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has become the approach for many thoracic operations. The role of VATS has slowly evolved but has not been clearly defined. To better understand the role of VATS, we undertook a survey of practicing thoracic surgeons. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to members of the General Thoracic Surgery Club asking the role of VATS in their practice and their opinions regarding appropriate applications, advantages, and limitations of the approach. RESULTS: Two hundred of the 229 members (87.3%) responded to the questionnaire. In this largely academic (66.3%) group of thoracic surgeons, 72% of whom had more than 10 years experience in general thoracic surgery, VATS was the preferred approach (> 50% response) for the management of pleural disease, lung biopsy, recurrent pneumothorax, and sympathectomy. A majority of respondents thought that VATS was an acceptable approach for the diagnosis of the indeterminate pulmonary nodule and of anterior and posterior mediastinal masses, and for the management of early empyema, clotted hemothoraces, secondary pneumothorax, limited lung cancer treatment, and benign esophageal disease. Video-assisted thoracic surgery was thought to be unacceptable or investigational by a majority for thymectomy, lobectomy, and lung volume reduction operations. Video-assisted thoracic surgery still represents only a small portion of the thoracic procedures performed, but there is a gradual increase in its rate of use, although 38.1% expressed concern regarding overuse. The main limitation was thought to be in the management of oncologic disease. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that VATS is a valuable addition to the practice of thoracic surgery, but significant limitations exist. Although there appear to be many specific indications defined, there is still a significant evolutionary component.