Relationship Between Immune Response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccines and Development of Breakthrough Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: The CONTRAST Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is associated with poorer antibody response (AbR) compared with non-SOT recipients. However, its impact on the risk of breakthrough infection (BI) has yet to be assessed. METHODS: Single-center prospective longitudinal cohort study enrolling adult SOT recipients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during a 1-year period (February 2021 - January 2022), end of follow-up April 2022. Patients were tested for AbR at multiple time points. The primary end-point was BI (laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection ≥14 days after the second dose). Immunization (positive AbR) was considered an intermediate state between vaccination and BI. Probabilities of being in vaccination, immunization, and BI states were obtained for each type of graft and vaccination sequence using multistate survival analysis. Then, multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze the risk of BI related to AbR levels. RESULTS: 614 SOT (275 kidney, 163 liver, 137 heart, 39 lung) recipients were included. Most patients (84.7%) received 3 vaccine doses. The first 2 consisted of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 in 73.5% and 26.5% of cases, respectively. For the third dose, mRNA-1273 was administered in 59.8% of patients. Overall, 75.4% of patients reached immunization and 18.4% developed BI. Heart transplant recipients showed the lowest probability of immunization (0.418) and the highest of BI (0.323); all mRNA-1273 vaccine sequences showed the highest probability of immunization (0.732) and the lowest of BI (0.098). Risk of BI was higher for non-high-level AbR, younger age, and shorter time from transplant. CONCLUSIONS: SOT patients with non-high-level AbR and shorter time from transplantation and heart recipients are at highest risk of BI.

Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program in the Vascular Surgery ward of a university tertiary care hospital in Pavia, Northern Italy.

PURPOSE: The commitment of multidisciplinary teams in antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is often inadequately considered, especially in surgical wards. We wanted to evaluate clinical, microbiological, and pharmacological outcomes before and after the implementation of an ASP in the Vascular Surgery ward of Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, a tertiary care hospital in Pavia, Italy. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental quality-improvement study. The antimicrobial stewardship activity was conducted twice a week for 12 months and consisted of both prospective audit and feedback of all the ongoing antimicrobial prescriptions by the infectious diseases' consultants and educational meetings for the healthcare workers of the Vascular Surgery ward. For comparison between the study periods, Student t test (Mann-Whitney test for skewed distributions) was used for quantitative variables (ANOVA or Kruskall-Wallis for > 2 groups respectively), and Pearson's chi-squared test (Fisher exact test where appropriate) for categorical variables. 2-tailed tests were used. P-value significance cut-off was 0.05. RESULTS: During the 12-month intervention period, among a total number of 698 patients, 186 prescriptions were revised, mostly leading to de-escalating an ongoing antimicrobial therapy (39, 20.97%). A statistically significant reduction in isolates of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p-value 0.003) and the absence of Clostridioides difficile infections were reported. No statistically significant changes were observed in terms of length of stay and all-cause in-hospital mortality. A significant decrease in the administration of carbapenems (p-value 0.01), daptomycin (p-value < 0.01) and linezolid (p-value 0.43) was registered. A significant reduction in antimicrobial costs was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a 12-month ASP brought significant clinical and economic results, highlighting the benefits of a multidisciplinary teamwork.

Role of risk scoring systems in predicting life expectancy after carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare and to test the performance of all available risk scoring systems (RSSs) designed to predict long-term survival rate in asymptomatic candidate patients for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for significant carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: Data on asymptomatic patients who underwent CEA in three high-volume centers were prospectively recorded. Through literature research using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, six RSSs were identified for the intent of the study. Primary endpoints were 3- and 5-year survival rates after CEA. All items used as variables to compose multiple RSSs were applied to every patient in the study population. The 3- and 5-year mortality prediction rates for each score were assessed by sensitivity, specificity, and predictive negative and positive value calculation, as well as univariable Cox proportional hazard models with the Harrell C index. RESULTS: During the study period, 825 CEAs in 825 asymptomatic patients were analyzed. All items used in RSSs were available in the dataset, with some concerns regarding their definition and application among RSSs. The 3- and 5-year survival rates of the study cohort were 94.5% and 90.3%, respectively. Among the six RSSs analyzed, no RSS demonstrated optimal results in terms of mortality rate prediction accuracy, although some scores had good diagnostic and risk of death precision. CONCLUSIONS: RSSs, when used alone, fail to optimally detect postoperative life expectancy in asymptomatic CEA patient candidates. Further prospective controlled studies are needed to compose and validate RSSs with better calibration to predict outcomes.

Modifications in Aortic Stiffness After Endovascular or Open Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Increased aortic stiffness (AoS) has been recognised as a risk factor in the development of cardiovascular disease. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of aortic repair on AoS. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched systematically for relevant studies evaluating the consequences of endovascular and open aortic repair on AoS. REVIEW METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement was followed to perform the research process. Papers containing data on AoS before and after both thoracic (TEVAR) and abdominal (EVAR) endovascular repair, as well as open surgical repair (OSR), were included for detailed evaluation. A fixed effects model was used to perform analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was calculated for each included study. RESULTS: The first article cluster comprised 367 papers. After removal of duplicates and the adoption of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 14 articles remained, 13 of which were selected for meta-analysis. Ten studies analysed EVAR and three analysed TEVAR. Five of the selected papers were case control studies, with OSR adopted in four of these as the EVAR comparator. Several graft types were used in the endovascular group. AoS increased after TEVAR and EVAR, in terms of pulse wave velocity (PWV), even though several spatial levels and measurement modalities were adopted. No differences were described after OSR, although no pooled data could be analysed. CONCLUSION: EVAR and TEVAR both demonstrated a significant increase in AoS measurement (PWV). Although the heterogeneity and the low number of available studies limit the strength of the results, this review highlights the potential deleterious endograft role in the cardiovascular system although further studies are needed to achieve robust evidence. Further studies are needed to improve the mutual interaction between aorta and endograft, minimising their impact on the native aortic wall properties.

Clinical Assessment of Continuous Hemodialysis with the Medium Cutoff EMiC®2 Membrane in Patients with Septic Shock.

INTRODUCTION: At the time of renal replacement therapy, approximately 20% of critically ill patients have septic shock. In this study, medium cutoff (MCO) continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) was compared to high-flux membrane continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in terms of hemodynamic improvement, efficiency, middle molecule removal, and inflammatory system activation. METHODS: This is a monocenter crossover randomized study. Between December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2019, 20 patients with septic shock and stage 3 acute kidney injury (AKI) admitted to 2 Italian ICUs were enrolled. All patients underwent CVVHD with Ultraflux® EMiC®2 and CVVHDF with AV1000S® without washout. Each treatment lasted 24 h. RESULTS: Compared to AV1000S®-CVVHDF, EMIC®2-CVVHD normalized cardiac index (ß = -0.64; p = 0.02) and heart rate (ß = 5.72; p = 0.01). Interleukin-8 and myeloperoxidase removal were greater with AV1000S®-CVVHDF than with EMiC®2-CVVHD (ß = 0.35; p < 0.001; ß = 0.43; p = 0.03, respectively). Leukocytosis improved over 24 h in EMiC®2-CVVHD-treated patients (ß = 4.13; p = 0.03), whereas procalcitonin levels decreased regardless of the modality (ß = 0.89; p = 0.01) over a 48-h treatment period. Reduction rates, instantaneous plasmatic clearance of urea, creatinine, and ß2-microglobulin were similar across modalities. ß2-Microglobulin removal efficacy was greater in the EMiC®2 group (ß = 0-2.88; p = 0.002), while albumin levels did not differ. Albumin was undetectable in the effluent in both treatments. DISCUSSION: In patients with septic shock and severe AKI, the efficacy of uremic toxin removal was comparable between MCO-CVVHD and CVVHDF. Further, MCO-CVVHD was associated with improved hemodynamics. Fraction of filtration and transmembrane pressure reduction and the maintenance of equal efficacy might be the key features of CVVHD with MCO membranes in critically ill patients.

Performance of existing clinical scores and laboratory tests for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in critically ill, nonneutropenic, adult patients: A systematic review with qualitative evidence synthesis.

BACKGROUND: The Fungal Infections Definitions in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients (FUNDICU) project aims to provide standard sets of definitions for invasive fungal diseases in critically ill, adult patients. OBJECTIVES: To summarise the available evidence on the diagnostic performance of clinical scores and laboratory tests for invasive candidiasis (IC) in nonneutropenic, adult critically ill patients. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to evaluate studies assessing the diagnostic performance for IC of clinical scores and/or laboratory tests vs. a reference standard or a reference definition in critically ill, nonneutropenic, adult patients in ICU. RESULTS: Clinical scores, despite the heterogeneity of study populations and IC prevalences, constantly showed a high negative predictive value (NPV) and a low positive predictive value (PPV) for the diagnosis of IC in the target population. Fungal antigen-based biomarkers (with most studies assessing serum beta-D-glucan) retained a high NPV similar to that of clinical scores, with a higher PPV, although the latter showed important heterogeneity across studies, possibly reflecting the targeted or untargeted use of these tests in patients with a consistent clinical picture and risk factors for IC. CONCLUSIONS: Both clinical scores and laboratory tests showed high NPV for the diagnosis of IC in nonneutropenic critically ill patients. The PPV of laboratory tests varies significantly according to the baseline patients' risk of IC. This qualitative synthesis will provide the FUNDICU panel with baseline evidence to be considered during the development of definitions of IC in critically ill, nonneutropenic adult patients in ICU.

Interobserver variability in the evaluation of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation: impact of radiological training and analysis of discordant cases.

PURPOSE: Radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after lung transplantation are nonspecific and can lead to misinterpretation. The primary aim of our study was to assess the interobserver agreement in the evaluation of chest X-rays (CXRs) for PGD diagnosis and to establish whether a specific training could have an impact on concordance rates. Secondary aim was to analyze causes of interobserver discordances. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 164 patients who received bilateral lung transplantation at our institution, between February 2013 and December 2019. Three radiologists independently reviewed postoperative CXRs and classified them as suggestive or not for PGD. Two of the Raters performed a specific training before the beginning of the study. A senior thoracic radiologist subsequently analyzed all discordant cases among the Raters with the best agreement. Statistical analysis to calculate interobserver variability was percent agreement, Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 473 CXRs were evaluated. A very high concordance among the two trained Raters, 1 and 2, was found (K = 0.90, ICC = 0.90), while a poorer agreement was found in the other two pairings (Raters 1 and 3: K = 0.34, ICC = 0.40; Raters 2 and 3: K = 0.35, ICC = 0.40). The main cause of disagreement (52.4% of discordant cases) between Raters 1 and 2 was the overestimation of peribronchial thickening in the absence of unequivocal bilateral lung opacities or the incorrect assessment of unilateral alterations. CONCLUSION: To properly identify PGD, it is recommended for radiologists to receive an adequate specific training.

Analysis of surgical outcomes and learning curve of surgical parameters for robotic hysterectomy: a comparison between multiport versus single-site.

Introduction: The primary goal is to analyze the learning curve of surgical parameters (docking, operation and console time) between multiport and single-site robotic hysterectomy techniques, performed by expert laparoscopic surgeons.Material and methods: The trial is a retrospective analysis of 229 patients enrolled between 2010 and 2018 who underwent robotic hysterectomies with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomies (HBSO) for gynecological diseases.Results: Surgical parameters, learning curve and surgical outcomes were analyzed in order to evaluate the transition from multiport to single-site programs, performed by non-expert surgeons using the multiport technique. All surgical times (total, docking and console time) were shorter in the multiport robotic hysterectomy group, while the intraoperative complication rate was lower in the robotic single-site hysterectomy group (p = 0.007). The learning curve of operative, console and docking time significantly decreased more in the robotic-single site hysterectomy group, than in the multiport robotic hysterectomy group over time (p value < 0.001).Conclusions: The direct transition from the laparoscopy program to the single-site approach is feasible and effective in HBSO performed by expert laparoscopic surgeons. The learning curve of robotic single-site hysterectomy shows that the proficiency in this technique requires more cases than the multiport robotic hysterectomy cases and needs more time to fit the surgical step to the single-site platform.

Regorafenib Efficacy After Sorafenib in Patients With Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Study.

Safety of regorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) has been recently demonstrated. We aimed to assess the survival benefit of regorafenib compared with best supportive care (BSC) in LT patients after sorafenib discontinuation. This observational multicenter retrospective study included LT patients with HCC recurrence who discontinued first-line sorafenib. Group 1 comprised regorafenib-treated patients, whereas the control group was selected among patients treated with BSC due to unavailability of second-line options at the time of sorafenib discontinuation and who were sorafenib-tolerant progressors (group 2). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of group 1 compared with group 2. Secondary endpoints were safety and OS of sequential treatment with sorafenib + regorafenib/BSC. Among 132 LT patients who discontinued sorafenib included in the study, 81 were sorafenib tolerant: 36 received regorafenib (group 1) and 45 (group 2) received BSC. Overall, 24 (67%) patients died in group 1 and 40 (89%) in group 2: the median OS was significantly longer in group 1 than in group 2 (13.1 versus 5.5 months; P < 0.01). Regorafenib treatment was an independent predictor of reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.89; P = 0.02). Median treatment duration with regorafenib was 7.0 (95% CI, 5.5-8.5) months; regorafenib dose was reduced in 22 (61%) patients for adverse events and discontinued for tumor progression in 93% (n = 28). The median OS calculated from sorafenib start was 28.8 months (95% CI, 17.6-40.1) in group 1 versus 15.3 months (95% CI, 8.8-21.7) in group 2 (P < 0.01). Regorafenib is an effective second-line treatment after sorafenib in patients with HCC recurrence after LT.

Chromosome 3 cluster rs11385942 variant links complement activation with severe COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Genetic variation at a multigene cluster at chromosome 3p21.31 and the ABO blood group have been associated with the risk of developing severe COVID-19, but the mechanism remains unclear. Complement activation has been associated with COVID-19 severity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine whether chromosome 3p21.31 and the ABO variants are linked to the activation of the complement cascade in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We considered 72 unrelated European hospitalized patients with genetic data and evaluation of circulating C5a and soluble terminal complement complex C5b-9 (SC5b-9). Twenty-six (36.1%) patients carried the rs11385942 G>GA variant and 44 (66.1%) non-O blood group associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19. RESULTS: C5a and SC5-b9 plasma levels were higher in rs11385949 GA carriers than in non-carriers (P = 0.041 and P = 0.012, respectively), while C5a levels were higher in non-O group than in O group patients (P = 0.019). The association between rs11385949 and SC5b-9 remained significant after adjustment for ABO and disease severity (P = 0.004) and further correction for C5a (P = 0.018). There was a direct relationship between upper airways viral load and SC5b-9 in carriers of the rs11385949 risk allele (P = 0.032), which was not observed in non-carriers. CONCLUSIONS: The rs11385949 G>GA variant, tagging the chromosome 3 gene cluster variation and predisposing to severe COVID-19, is associated with enhanced complement activation, both with C5a and terminal complement complex, while non-O blood group with C5a levels. These findings provide a link between genetic susceptibility to more severe COVID-19 and complement activation.

Preoperative bleeding risk assessment with ISTH-BAT and laboratory tests in patients undergoing elective surgery: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inherited haemorrhagic disorders may bleed during surgery. No questionnaire on bleeding diathesis has been yet validated for the preoperative period and current guidelines provide conflicting recommendations. AIM: We aimed to assess if preoperative assessment with ISTH-BAT (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Bleeding Assesment Tool) and laboratory screening tests is useful to identify mild previously undiagnosed bleeding disorders (BDs) and to predict bleeding complications in selected patients undergoing elective surgery. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery received ISTH-BAT evaluation and laboratory screening for platelet count, Prothrombin Time (PT) and activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT). Subjects with an abnormal ISTH-BAT and/or laboratory results underwent further testing, and they were compared with a 1:1 random gender-, age- and type of surgery- matched control group. RESULTS: Overall, 1502 consecutive surgical patients (1186 adults, 316 children) were enrolled. Of these, 83 (5.5%, 95% confidence interval 4.4-6.8) patients (37 adults and 46 children) had an abnormal ISTH-BAT, and/or prolonged PT and/or prolonged aPTT and/or low platelet count; of them, one subject had low von Willebrand factor level, three Factor XII deficiency and four anticardiolipin and/or antiB2GPI antibodies. No major bleeding was reported in these 83 patients and their controls. CONCLUSION: ISTH-BAT and laboratory screening tests do not accurately detect mild BDs in selected patients undergoing elective surgery.

Impact of COVID-19 on the quality of life of patients with neuromuscular disorders in the Lombardy area, Italy.

INTRODUCTION: /AIMS: Patients with neuromuscular disorders (NMDs), including many elderly, immunosuppressed, and disabled individuals, may have been particularly affected during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Lombardy, a COVID-19 high-incidence area between February and May 2020. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life (QoL) and perceived disease burden of this group of patients. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional phone-based survey study between June 1 and June 14, 2020, on a sample of 240 NMD patients followed at our clinic in Milan, Italy. We asked about perceived NMD burden and QoL before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We collected responses on access to outpatient care and ancillary services. We investigated the presence of symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection and confirmed cases. RESULTS: We collected 205 responses: 53 patients (25.9%) reported a subjective worsening of the underlying NMD. QoL measures showed a significant worsening between pre and pandemic time frames (odds ratio, 2.14 95%; confidence interval, 1.82-2.51). Outpatient visits were postponed in more than half of cases (57.1%), with 104 patients (50.7%) experiencing a cancellation of scheduled diagnostic tests. 79 patients (38.5%) reported at least one symptom attributable to COVID-19 infection. Among the 10 patients tested with nasopharyngeal swabs, 6 tested positive and 3 died from respiratory failure, including 2 patients on corticosteroid/ immunosuppressive therapy. DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 pandemic affected QoL and limited access to outpatient care and ancillary services of NMD patients in Lombardy between February and May 2020.

Migrations do not modify Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance rates: a 20-year retrospective study.

Tuberculosis (TB) caused by resistant strains is becoming a public health concern also in high-income countries. In Pavia province, Northern Italy, the prevalence of foreign-born has increased in recent years. Nevertheless, it is unclear if this has modified epidemiology and resistance patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We retrospectively collected data on all the Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated by culture in the microbiology reference laboratory of the province of Pavia from 01/01/1998 to 31/12/2017. Overall, 919 patients were identified, 320 were foreign-born (34.8%). The proportion of cases due to foreign-born patients increased during the study period as did resistance to isoniazid (INH) (p = 0.01), while resistance to rifampicin (RIF) did not (p = 0.8). INH and RIF resistance were comparable among Italian and foreign-born patients (7.9% vs 9.7% for INH and 4% vs 5% for RIF, respectively). Twenty-height (3.05%) patients harboured MDR strains. Prevalence of MDR strains was not different between Italians and foreign-born patients (2.8% vs 3.4%, p = 0.6). During the study period the proportion of TB cases due to foreign-born patients and INH resistance increased. This increase was equal among Italian and foreign-born patients. Migrants in our area are not a driver of resistance to anti-mycobacterial drugs.

Contemporary Early and Long-Term Results of Open Repair for Ruptured and Symptomatic Unruptured Infrarenal AAA. Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have shown a reduced short-term mortality and increased long-term survival of EVAR over OR in the treatment of ruptured Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (IAAA). Until now, none of the RCT has gained the result to demonstrate this superiority. Moreover, contemporary reports about results of OR of rIAAA are poor. METHODS: The study is observational and retrospective according to STROBE statement. The patients, unselected and strictly consecutive, were operated in urgency/emergency between 2007 and 2012. All had a preoperative CT angiography. Patients' characteristics, presentation, intraoperative and postoperative details were analyzed to identify factors that can affect the outcome. Considering the small number of events and the exploratory nature of the analyses, only univariate models were fit. RESULTS: One hundred five patients were treated in urgency/emergency setting because of symptomatic. The patients have been divided into two subgroups, based on lesion findings: 75 patients had ruptured IAAA (group A) and 30 patients had unruptured symptomatic IAAA, with CT findings of impending rupture (group B). Intraoperative, perioperative, and in-hospital mortality was respectively 0.9%, 8.6%, and 15.2%, with no difference between the groups. Unique predictors of 30-day mortality were transfusions, major and minor complications. Cumulative follow-up time was 455 person-years. Overall survival was not different between the groups. Predictors of late mortality were: age, creatinine at presentation, adjunctive procedures, length of in-hospital stay, any intraoperative complications, any perioperative complications, any major complication, and postoperative AKI. CONCLUSIONS: An experienced vascular team can achieve very good results in OR of ruptured IAAA, entirely comparable to EVAR. We are still far from a scientifically robust demonstration of the superiority of EVAR over OR in the treatment of ruptured IAAA.

Somatostatin as Inflow Modulator in Liver-transplant Recipients With Severe Portal Hypertension: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of somatostatin as liver inflow modulator in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) undergoing liver transplantation (LT) (ClinicalTrials.gov number,01290172). BACKGROUND: In LT, portal hyperperfusion can severely impair graft function and survival, mainly in cases of partial LT. METHODS: Thirty-three patients undergoing LT for ESLD and CSPH were randomized double-blindly to receive somatostatin or placebo (2:1). The study drug was administered intraoperatively as 5-mL bolus (somatostatin: 500 µg), followed by a 2.5 mL/h infusion (somatostatin: 250 µg/h) for 5 days. Hepatic and systemic hemodynamics were measured, along with liver function tests and clinical outcomes. The ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) was analyzed through histological and protein expression analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (18 receiving somatostatin, 11 placebo) were included in the final analysis. Ten patients responded to somatostatin bolus, with a significant decrease in hepatic venous portal gradient (HVPG) and portal flow of -28.3% and -29.1%, respectively. At graft reperfusion, HVPG was lower in patients receiving somatostatin (-81.7% vs -58.8%; P = 0.0084), whereas no difference was observed in the portal flow (P = 0.4185). Somatostatin infusion counteracted the decrease in arterial flow (-10% vs -45%; P = 0.0431). There was no difference between the groups in the severity of IRI, incidence of adverse events, long-term complications, graft, and patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Somatostatin infusion during LT in patients with CSPH is safe, reduces the HVPG, and preserves the arterial inflow to the graft. This study establishes the efficacy of somatostatin as a liver inflow modulator.

Automated mononuclear cell collection: a feasibility study employing a new software for extracorporeal photopheresis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Very recently, Fresenius Kabi, improved the software (autoMNC lymphocytes, SW 04.03.08) for mononuclear cells (MNCs) collection with the aim to ameliorate the quality of harvest, employing the automated autoMNC lymphocytes software SW 04.03.09. Herein, we report the results of an observational study evaluating the feasibility of MNCs collection in patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) at our centre, using the new COM.TEC software 04.03.08c for MNC collection, afterwards integrated in the software 04.03.09, available on the market since November 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty adult patients (21 males and 9 females) with GvHD, Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction or renal rejection, were consecutively enrolled to undergo 1 ECP procedure by the offline technique, according to our internal protocol, processing 1·5 blood volumes. Feasibility of collection was defined as: Hct in collection bag ≤5%, MNCs purity (percentage of MNCs/bag) ≥80%, MNCs collection efficiency (CE2) ≥60%, patient's platelet depletion ≤50%. RESULTS: Thirty ECP procedures were evaluated. Feasibility (defined by the four parameters previously described) of MNCs collection was observed in 1 out of the 30 harvests analysed. Median Hct in the product was 3·45% (IQR: 2·6-5·0), and median MNCs purity was 97·2% (IQR 89·1-98·6). Median CE2 for MNCs was 21·4% (IQR: 11·9-41·2), and median patient's platelet depletion was 36·2% (IQR 21·9-51·4). CONCLUSION: The autoMNC lymphocytes software SW 04.03.08c for MNCs collection in ECP setting demonstrated to collect a good quality product in terms of purity and RBC contamination even if the collection efficiency and platelet contamination must be improved.

Developing definitions for invasive fungal diseases in critically ill adult patients in intensive care units. Protocol of the FUNgal infections Definitions in ICU patients (FUNDICU) project.

BACKGROUND: The reliability of diagnostic criteria for invasive fungal diseases (IFD) developed for severely immunocompromised patients is questionable in critically ill adult patients in intensive care units (ICU). OBJECTIVES: To develop a standard set of definitions for IFD in critically ill adult patients in ICU. METHODS: Based on a systematic literature review, a list of potential definitions to be applied to ICU patients will be developed by the ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Critically Ill Patients (ESGCIP) and the ESCMID Fungal Infection Study Group (EFISG) chairpersons. The proposed definitions will be evaluated by a panel of 30 experts using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness methods. The panel will rank each of the proposed definitions on a 1-9 scale trough a dedicated questionnaire, in two rounds: one remote and one face-to-face. Based on their median rank and the level of agreement across panel members, selected definitions will be organised in a main consensus document and in an executive summary. The executive summary will be made available online for public comments. CONCLUSIONS: The present consensus project will seek to provide standard definitions for IFD in critically ill adult patients in ICU, with the ultimate aims of improving their clinical outcome and facilitating the comparison and generalizability of research findings.

Comparison of the LIAISON®XL and ARCHITECT IgG, IgM, and IgG avidity assays for the diagnosis of Toxoplasma, cytomegalovirus, and rubella virus infections.

This study compared the performance of the LIAISON®XL system of immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM immunoassays for the diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and rubella virus infections with that of the ARCHITECT system. Patient serum samples, previously screened and clinically diagnosed with T. gondii, CMV or rubella, were used to compare LIAISON®XL and ARCHITECT IgG and IgM immunoassays. LIAISON®XL Toxo and CMV IgG avidity assays were also compared with equivalent ARCHITECT assays and reference methods. Overall agreement between the LIAISON®XL and ARCHITECT assays was 99% and 92% for the Toxo IgG and IgM assays, respectively, 98% and 96% for the CMV IgG and IgM assays, respectively, and 93% and 98% for the rubella virus IgG and IgM assays, respectively. LIAISON®XL IgG Toxo and CMV avidity assays showed high concordance with the VIDAS® Toxo IgG avidity assay and an in-house CMV avidity assay (reference methods), and faster IgG avidity maturation in a larger number of samples collected months after the primary infection compared with equivalent ARCHITECT assays. LIAISON®XL assays for detection of anti-T. gondii, CMV and rubella virus IgG and IgM are at least equal to the competitor assays on the ARCHITECT platform.

Prevalence of dry eye in video display terminal users: a cross-sectional Caucasian study in Italy.

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of dry eye among video-terminal (VDT) users and to assess risk factors for dry eye in this population. STUDY DESIGN: A single-centre, cross-sectional study was carried out on subjects employed as VDT workers and on a control group. METHODS: Demographic data, years spent working at a VDT, number of effective hours at VDT/day, number and hours of breaks/day were considered. All subjects underwent a complete ophthalmic examination and completed the Italian version of the computer vision symptom scale 17-item (CVSS17) questionnaire. Both groups were classified as definite, suspect and non-dry eye syndrome (DES). RESULTS: One-hundred and ninety four subjects completed the study; 70 (36.1%) of which represented the control group, and 124 (63.9%) represented the VDT group. Among VDT workers, 29 (23.4%) presented definite DES and 55 (44.4%) suspect DES, while among controls, only 2 (2.9%) presented definite DES and 37 (52.8%) suspect DES. In the univariate analysis, the DES group was older (p < 0.001), spent more time a day at VDT (p < 0.001), used VDT from more time (p < 0.001), instilled artificial tears (p = 0.031), and presented worst quality of life (p < 0.001). At the multivariate analysis, only age and time at VDT retained association with DES (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p = 0.01 and OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.07-2.02; p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The global increase of VDT workers is accompanied by a higher frequency of ocular complaints. Older subjects and people spending more than 4 h a day at VDT are at major risk to develop DES and should take precautions to prevent the onset of the disease.

Treatment of knee osteoarthritis: platelet-derived growth factors vs. hyaluronic acid. A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Aim of this trial was to compare efficacy of activated platelet-rich plasma against hyaluronic acid as intra-articular injections to people with osteoarthritis of the knee. DESIGN: Phase-2 randomized controlled trial, with blind patients and outcome assessors. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation service; years 2011-2013. SUBJECTS: Patients with knee osteoarthritis grades 2-3 at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included after consent and randomized. Target sample size was 25 patients per group. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received three activated platelet-rich plasma (intervention group) or hyaluronic acid (controls) intra-articular injections at 4-week intervals. MAIN MEASURES: Main outcome measure was proportion of patients with >1 grade improvement at six months from last injection, as assessed by a radiologist blind to study group. Patients were evaluated over time clinically and with functional scales (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm, Tegner, American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Lequesne, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain). RESULTS: Overall, 30 patients were randomized to intervention and 28 to control group. For primary outcome, 28 patients (29 knees) in the intervention and 22 (25 knees) in the control group were available. Patients with at least 1 grade improvement at repeat MRI were 14 (48.3%) in the intervention and 2 (8%) in the control group ( P < 0.003). Improvement in symptoms and functional scales was consistently higher in the intervention group. No side-effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Activated platelet-rich plasma reduces articular damage as evident at MRI, as soon as six months after treatment; it reduces pain and improves patient's function and overall quality of life.