Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science position statement for arterial blood gas sampling.

The assessment of gas exchange under varying ambient and metabolic conditions is an important and fundamental investigation of respiratory function. The gold standard is an arterial blood gas (ABG) sample; however, the procedure is not universally performed by medical scientists, is not standardised, and is typically taught by a subjective Halsted 'see one, do one' approach. The Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science recognised the need to create an ABG position statement that includes the required pre-requisite education, an evidence-based procedure and the minimum reporting and competency assessment requirements. This position statement aims to minimise patient discomfort, to improve puncture success rate and reduce the potential for sample handling and analysis error. Importantly, this position statement translates to all relevant health professionals, including medical officers, scientists, nursing staff and allied health.

Longitudinal monitoring of asthma in the clinic using respiratory oscillometry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Asthma guidelines emphasize the importance of assessing lung function and symptoms. The forced oscillation technique (FOT) and its longitudinal relationship with spirometry and symptoms are unresolved. We examined concordance between longitudinal spirometry, FOT and symptom control, and determined FOT limits of agreement in stable asthma. METHODS: Over a 3-year period, adults with asthma attending a tertiary clinic completed the asthma control test (ACT), fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), FOT and spirometry. Analysis included between-visit concordance for significant change using Cohen's kappa (κ) and stable asthma FOT limits of agreement. RESULTS: Data (n = 186) from 855 visits (mean ± SD 4.6 ± 3.0 visits), 114 ± 95 days apart, were analysed. Between-visit concordance was moderate between reactance at 5 Hz (X5) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) (κ = 0.34, p = 0.001), and weak between ACT and FEV1 (κ = 0.18, p = 0.001). Change in FeNO did not correlate with lung function or ACT (κ < 0.05, p > 0.1). Stable asthma between visits (n = 75; 132 visits) had reduced lung function variability, but comparable concordance to the entire cohort. Limits of agreement for FEV1 (0.42 L), resistance at 5 Hz (2.06 cm H2 O s L-1 ) and X5 (2.75 cm H2 O s L-1 ) in stable asthma were at least twofold greater than published values in health. CONCLUSION: In adults with asthma, there is moderate concordance between longitudinal change in FOT and spirometry. Both tests relate poorly to changes in asthma control, highlighting the need for multi-modal assessment in asthma rather than symptoms alone. The derivation of longitudinal FOT limits of agreement will assist in its clinical interpretation.

Effects of adopting the Global Lung Function Initiative 2017 reference equations on the interpretation of carbon monoxide transfer factor.

The recently published Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) carbon monoxide transfer factor (T LCO) reference equations provide an opportunity to adopt a current, all-age, widely applicable reference set. The aim of this study was to document the effect of changing to GLI from commonly utilised reference equations on the interpretation of T LCO results.33 863 T LCO results (48% female, 88% Caucasian, n=930 aged <18 years) from clinical pulmonary function laboratories within three Australian teaching hospitals were analysed. The lower limit of normal (LLN) and proportion of patients with a T LCO below this value were calculated using GLI and other commonly used reference equations.The average T LCO LLN for GLI was similar or lower than the other equations, with the largest difference seen for Crapo equations (median: -1.25, IQR: -1.64, -0.86 mmol·min-1·kPa-1). These differences resulted in altered rates of reduced T LCO for GLI particularly for adults (+1.9% versus Miller to -27.6% versus Crapo), more so than for children (-0.8% versus Kim to -14.2% versus Cotes). For adults, the highest raw agreement for GLI was with Miller equations (94.7%), while for children it was with Kim equations (98.1%). Results were reclassified from abnormal to normal more frequently for younger adults, and for adult females, particularly when moving from Roca to GLI equations (30% of females versus 16% of males).The adoption of GLI T LCO reference equations in adults will result in altered interpretation depending on the equations previously used and to a greater extent in adult females. The effect on interpretation in children is less significant.

The impact of severe lung disease on evidential breath analysis collection.

BACKGROUND: It is a legal requirement to supply a breath analysis sample when requested by Police at roadside checkpoints. The current device requires a 1L sample at 8L·min(-1). Court disputes commonly attribute respiratory disease for failure to produce a sample. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether respiratory disease aetiology and/or severity precludes an adequate breath sample using a modern evidential breath analyser. METHODS: Subjects performed breath analysis following standard Police procedure. Three efforts within 15min were allowed and any reasons for failure recorded. RESULTS: 24 subjects with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and 26 subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were studied and met minimum respiratory function criteria as per device specifications. 18 ILD subjects (75%) and 24 COPD subjects (92%) were able to provide a sample. All subjects with a vital capacity below 1.5L were unable to provide a sample. DISCUSSION: In the balance of probabilities most patients with lung disease are able to supply an evidential breath sample. The exception is a very severe disease, particularly in volume limited patients.

An example of ventilatory limitation during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in a patient with COPD.

A 64-year-old obese gentleman attended for further evaluation of ongoing dyspnoea in the context of a previous diagnosis of moderate COPD treated with dual long-acting bronchodilators. A cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was performed, which demonstrated reduced peak work and oxygen consumption with evidence of dynamic hyperinflation, abnormal gas exchange and ventilatory limitation despite cardiac reserve. The CPET clarified the physiological process underpinning the patient's dyspnoea and limiting the patient's activities. This, in turn, helped the clinician tailor the patient's management plan.

Mechanisms of gas transfer impairment utilizing nitric oxide following severe COVID-19 pneumonitis.

Reduced carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO ) is common after recovery from severe COVID-19 pneumonitis. The extent to which this relates to alveolar membrane dysfunction as opposed to vascular injury is uncertain. Simultaneous measurement of nitric oxide diffusing capacity (DLNO ) and DLCO can partition gas diffusion into its two components: alveolar-capillary membrane conductance (DmCO ) and capillary blood volume (VC ). We sought to evaluate DmCO and VC in the early and later recovery periods after severe COVID-19. Patients attended for post-COVID-19 clinical review and lung function testing including DLNO /DLCO . Repeat testing occurred when indicated and comparisons made using t-tests. Forty-nine (eight female) subjects (mean ± SD age: 58 ± 13, BMI: 34 ± 8) who had severe COVID-19 pneumonitis, WHO severity classification of 6 ± 1, and prolonged (21 ± 22 days) hospital stay, were assessed 2 months (61 ± 35 days) post discharge. DLCO adj (z-score -1.70 ± 1.49, 25/49 < lower limit of normal [LLN]) and total lung capacity (z-score -1.71 ± 1.30) were both reduced. DmCO and VC and were reduced to a similar extent (z-score -1.19 ± 1.05 and -1.41 ± 1.20, p = 0.4). Seventeen (one female) patients returned for repeat testing 4 months (122 ± 61 days) post discharge. In this subgroup with more impaired lung function, DLCO adj improved but remained below LLN (z-score -3.15 ± 0.83 vs. -2.39 ± 0.86, p = 0.01), 5/17 improved to >LNN. DmCO improved (z-score -2.05 ± 0.89 vs. -1.41 ± 0.78, p = 0.01) but VC was unchanged (z-score -2.51 ± 0.55 vs. -2.29 ± 0.59, p = 0.16). Alveolar membrane conductance is abnormal in the earlier recovery phase following severe COVID-19 but significantly improves. In contrast, reduced VC persists. These data raise the possibility that persisting effects of acute vascular injury may contribute to gas diffusion impairment long after severe COVID-19 pneumonitis.

Maintenance of vital capacity during repetitive breath-hold in a spearfishing competition.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cough and a reduction in vital capacity have recently been reported following breath-hold dives to depths of 25-75 m. We sought to investigate whether repetitive dives to depths of less than 30 m would elicit similar effects. METHODS: Participants in a single-day spearfishing competition were recruited. Subjects performed spirometry before and after the 5-h event. Demographics, medical and diving history, respiratory symptoms and competition diving statistics were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects (two females), age 33 years (11) (mean (SD)), were studied. During the competition each subject completed 76 (33) dives, to 10 (3) m depth, with each dive lasting 0.9 (0.3) min. Maximum depth was 17 (4) m. No respiratory symptoms were reported. There was no difference in spirometry before and after competition except for FEF(25-75%), which increased by 0.16(0.34) L (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary oedema or lung injury is not common after repetitive breath-hold diving to depths to 25 m, or is too mild to be reflected in symptoms or spirometry.

Quality assessment pathway for respiratory oscillometry.

A flow-chart-driven procedure is presented to facilitate respiratory oscillometry operator competency and measurement quality. A novel feature is a quality grading system, in line with other standards of lung function. https://bit.ly/3G4r0X1.

Oscillometry and Asthma Control in Patients With and Without Fixed Airflow Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is defined by the presence of reversible airflow limitation, yet persistently abnormal spirometry may develop despite appropriate asthma treatment. Fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) describes abnormal postbronchodilator spirometry that is associated with greater symptom burden and disease severity. Respiratory oscillometry measures the mechanics of the entire airway tree, including peripheral airway changes that have been shown to influence asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between abnormal oscillometry following bronchodilator and symptom control in adults with asthma. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients with asthma attending an airways clinic completed oscillometry (resistance and reactance), spirometry, and the Asthma Control Test. Postbronchodilator lung function below the lower limit of normal was considered abnormal. Spirometric FAO was defined as FEV1/forced vital capacity below the lower limit of normal. Spearman's rank coefficient and multiple linear regression were performed to assess associations of lung function parameters with Asthma Control Test. The discriminative ability of abnormal lung function to identify poor asthma control was determined using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Ninety patients with asthma were included; 48% had spirometric FAO. Only reactance parameters, not spirometry, significantly related to (rs ≥ 0.315; P < .05) and identified asthma control (r2 = 0.236; P < .001). Lung function was more strongly associated with asthma control in patients with FAO compared with those without. Abnormal oscillometry identified an additional 24% of patients with poor asthma control as compared with spirometric FAO. CONCLUSIONS: Reactance related to asthma control, independently of spirometric FAO. Abnormal postbronchodilator reactance identified more patients with poor asthma control compared with spirometry. These findings confirm that oscillometry is a relevant lung function test in the clinical assessment of asthma.

Glossopharyngeal insufflation causes lung injury in trained breath-hold divers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Glossopharyngeal insufflation (GI) is a technique practised by competitive breath-hold divers to enhance their performance. Using the oropharyngeal musculature, air is pumped into the lungs to increase the lung volume above physiological TLC. Experienced breath-hold divers can increase their lung volumes by up to 3 L. Although the potential for lung injury is evident, there is limited information available. The aim of this study was to examine whether there is any evidence of lung injury following GI, independent of diving. METHODS: Six male, competitive breath-hold divers were studied. CT of the thorax was performed during breath-holding at supramaximal lung volumes following GI (CT(GI)), and subsequently at baseline TLC (CT(TLC)). CT scans were performed a minimum of 3 days apart. Images were analysed for evidence of pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax by investigators who were blinded to the procedure. RESULTS: None of the subjects showed symptoms or signs of pneumomediastinum. However, in five of six subjects a pneumomediastinum was detected during the CT(GI). In three subjects a pneumomediastinum was detected on the CT(GI), but had resolved by the time of the CT(TLC). In two subjects a pneumomediastinum was seen on both the CT(GI) and the CT(TLC), and these were larger on the day that a maximal GI manoeuvre had been performed. The single subject, in whom a pneumomediastinum was not detected, was demonstrated separately to not be proficient at GI. CONCLUSIONS: Barotrauma was observed in breath-hold divers who increased their lung volumes by GI. The long-term effects of this barotrauma are uncertain and longitudinal studies are required to assess cumulative lung damage.

Patients with lung disease - Fit to fly?

BACKGROUND: Commercial air travel is cheap and accessible. Many patients living ever better lives despite chronic lung disease wish to, and do, fly. Statistics tell us that misadventure is rare and that flight must be safe for the majority of people. OBJECTIVE: To assist the general practitioner in assessing and advising patients with lung disease on issues relating to the risks associated with air travel. DISCUSSION: An aircraft cabin is a low pressure, hypoxic environment that challenges those with lung disease for up to 15 hours at a time. Patients with very poor performance status or severe lung disease should not fly or must fly with oxygen. Selected patients with moderately severe COPD or other chronic lung disease will benefit from specialist review and cabin hypoxia simulation. The risk of venous thromboembolism can be reduced if the patient is risk stratified and simple interventions applied. Perhaps the most important principle is that patients must be clinically stable at the time they fly.

Acute cardiopulmonary responses during expert trumpet performance.

Lung function and vascular effects of expert trumpet performance has not been elucidated. Airway mechanics, gas exchange and cardiovascular function were investigated in expert trumpeters during a challenging performance. Respiratory impedance was measured in expert trumpeters and violinist controls prior to and following performance. Electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, transcutaneous CO2 and pulse transit time were monitored continuously. Performance did not alter lung function or gas exchange, except for a reduction in transcutaneous CO2 in 14 expert trumpeters compared to 4 expert violinists. Heart rate variability and pulse transit time were significantly altered in the trumpeters only, associated with the performance ventilatory requirements with a weight to low frequency band reflecting elevated baroreflex feedback. Trumpet performance at an expert level does not have an acute effect on airway mechanics and gas exchange was maintained. Repetitive increased intrathoracic pressure during performance resulted in marked heart rate and vagal tone variability. This study reveals the high demands placed on autonomic modulation of the cardiac response to expert trumpet performance.

Bronchodilator Response Assessed by the Forced Oscillation Technique Identifies Poor Asthma Control With Greater Sensitivity Than Spirometry.

BACKGROUND: Persistent bronchodilator response (BDR) following diagnosis of asthma is an underrecognized treatable trait, associated with worse lung function and asthma control. The forced oscillation technique (FOT) measures respiratory system impedance, and BDR cutoffs have been proposed for healthy adults; however, the relevance in asthma is unknown. We compared BDR cutoffs, using FOT and spirometry, in asthma and the relationship with asthma control. METHODS: Data from patients with asthma who withheld bronchodilator medication for at least 8 h before a tertiary airway clinic visit were reviewed. All subjects performed FOT and spirometry before and after salbutamol administration, and completed the Asthma Control Test. FOT parameters examined included respiratory system resistance (R5) and reactance (X5) at 5 Hz, and area under the reactance curve (AX). BDR was defined by standard recommendations for spirometry and based on the 95th percentile of BDR in healthy adults for FOT. RESULTS: Fifty-two subjects (18 men; mean age, 53 ± 18 years) were included. BDR was identified more frequently by FOT than spirometry (54% vs 27% of subjects). BDR assessed by X5 and AX, but not R5, was associated with spirometric BDR (χ2, P < .01) and correlated with asthma control (X5: rs = -0.36, P < .01; AX: rs = 0.34, P = .01). BDR measured by reactance parameters identified more subjects with poor asthma control than did spirometry (AX, 69% vs spirometry, 41%). CONCLUSIONS: BDR assessed by FOT can identify poor asthma control. Reactance parameters were more sensitive in identifying poor asthma control than spirometry, supporting the use of FOT to complement spirometry in the clinical management of asthma.

Predicting the response to air travel in passengers with non-obstructive lung disease: are the current guidelines appropriate?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Air travel guidelines recommend using baseline arterial oxygen levels and the hypoxic challenge test (HCT) to predict in-flight hypoxaemia and the requirement for in-flight oxygen in patients with lung disease. The purpose of the present study was to (i) quantify the hypoxaemic response to air travel and (ii) identify baseline correlate(s) to predict this response in passengers with non-obstructed lung disease. METHODS: Fourteen passengers (seven women) with chronic non-obstructed lung disease volunteered for this study. The study involved three phases: (i) respiratory function testing; (ii) in-flight measures (SpO(2), cabin pressure and dyspnoea); and (iii) a HCT. The in-flight hypoxaemic response was compared with the baseline arterial oxygen level, respiratory function and the HCT. RESULTS: All subjects flew without oxygen and no adverse events were recorded in-flight. Mean cabin pressure was 593 +/- 16 mm Hg. Pre-flight SpO(2) was 95 +/- 3% and significantly decreased to 85 +/- 9% in-flight, with further significant falls in subjects who walked during the flight (nadir SpO(2) 78 +/- 11%). The pre-flight SpO(2) showed the strongest correlation with in-flight SpO(2) (r = 0.91, P < 0.001). The HCT SpO(2) was moderately correlated to the in-flight SpO(2) (r = 0.58, P < 0.05). Spirometry, D(L,CO) and TLC measurements did not correlate with in-flight SpO(2). CONCLUSION: Significant in-flight desaturation can be expected in passengers with non-obstructive lung disease. Respiratory function did not predict in-flight desaturation. We found a good relationship between pre-flight SpO(2) and in-flight SpO(2) which supports the role of pre-flight oximetry for predicting in-flight hypoxaemia in passengers with non-obstructed lung disease.

Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction Identified Using the Forced Oscillation Technique.

Objective: Lung mechanics using the forced oscillation technique (FOT) is suggested to be equivalent and more sensitive in determining exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) than spirometry. Dynamic alterations in minute ventilation (VE) may affect this measurement. We investigated changes in FOT parameters post exercise challenge (EC) in people with asthma as compared to spirometry. The rate of recovery and any effect of raised VE following exercise on FOT parameters were also assessed. Method: Airway resistance (R5) and reactance (X5) at 5 Hz and VE were measured prior to forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) before and up to 20 min after a standard EC in people with asthma and healthy controls. Airway hyperresponsiveness to the hyperosmolar mannitol test was measured in the asthmatic subjects within 1 week of the EC. Baseline and sequential measures were assessed using repeated measures ANOVA and Pearson's correlation. Group demographics and recovery data were compared using an unpaired t test. Results: Subjects with current asthma (n = 19, mean ± SD age 28 ± 6 years) and controls (n = 10, 31 ± 5 years) were studied. Baseline FEV1, R5, X5, and VE were similar between groups (p > 0.09). Airway hyperresponsiveness was present in 12/19 asthmatic subjects. The EC max % change of R5 and X5 correlated with FEV1 (r > 0.90) and were only different to controls in those with asthma that responded by FEV1 criteria (p < 0.01). EC recovery of R5 was similar to FEV1; however, X5 was greater (p = 0.03). Elevated VE post EC did not affect the % change in FOT parameters across all subjects (p > 0.3). R5 and X5 were highly sensitive in determining a positive EC response (80-86%), but X5 was more specific (93 vs. 80%). Conclusion: FOT parameters tracked with forced maneuvers and were not influenced by increased ventilation following an exercise challenge designed to elicit EIB. FOT identified EIB similarly to spirometry in patients with asthma.

Mepolizumab improves small airway function in severe eosinophilic asthma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Treatment with mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) significantly reduces exacerbations with modest improvements in symptom control and spirometry. The time course of any changes in small airway function is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in ventilation inhomogeneity, a marker of small airway function, after commencing mepolizumab. METHODS: Prospective cohort of 20 adults (12 male) with SEA commencing monthly mepolizumab. Measurements at baseline, Week 4 and Week 26 included the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5), spirometry, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and multiple breath nitrogen washout to measure global (Lung Clearance Index, [LCI]) and regional ventilation inhomogeneity in acinar (Sacin) and conducting (Scond) airways. Other asthma therapy remained unchanged between baseline and Week 4. Treatment related changes were assessed using RM-ANOVA and paired t-tests. Relationships between changes in lung function and symptoms were assessed by Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: At Week 4, ACQ-5, spirometry, LCI and Sacin improved significantly (p < 0.04) and all were sustained at Week 26. The change in ACQ-5 correlated with the change in Sacin (r = 0.48, p = 0.03) and FRC (r = 0.46, p = 0.04), but not spirometry. CONCLUSION: Improved symptom control improved rapidly after commencing mepolizumab in patients with SEA. The early improvement in small airway function was associated with asthma control and may be a significant contributor to the therapeutic response.

Air travel hypoxemia vs. the hypoxia inhalation test in passengers with COPD.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available comparing air travel with the hypoxia inhalation test (HIT) in passengers with COPD. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive capability of the HIT to in-flight hypoxemia in passengers with COPD. METHODS: Thirteen passengers (seven female passengers) with COPD (mean [+/- SD], FEV(1)/FVC ratio, 44 +/- 17%) volunteered for this study. Respiratory function tests were performed preflight. Pulse oximetry, cabin pressure, and dyspnea were recorded in flight. The HIT and a 6-min walk test were performed postflight. The in-flight oxygenation response was compared to the HIT results and respiratory function parameters. RESULTS: All subjects flew without the use of oxygen, and no adverse events were recorded in-flight (mean cabin altitude, 2,165 m; altitude range, 1,892 to 2,365 m). Air travel caused significant desaturation (mean preflight oxygen saturation, 95 +/- 1%; mean in-flight oxygen saturation, 86 +/- 4%), which was worsened by activity (nadir pulse oximetric saturation [Spo(2)], 78 +/- 6%). The HIT caused mean desaturation that was comparable to that of air travel (84 +/- 4%). The mean in-flight partial pressure of inspired oxygen (Pio(2)) was higher than the HIT Pio(2) (113 +/- 3 mm Hg vs 107 +/- 1 mm Hg, respectively; p < 0.001). The HIT Spo(2) showed the strongest correlation with in-flight Spo(2) (r = 0.84; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Significant in-flight desaturation can be expected in passengers with COPD. The HIT results compared favorably with the air travel data, with differences explainable by Pio(2) and physical activity. The HIT is the best widely available laboratory test to predict in-flight hypoxemia.

Exercise-induced Bronchoconstriction with Firefighting Contained Breathing Apparatus.

PURPOSE: Protective self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) used for firefighting delivers decompressed (cold) dehumidified air that may enhance the severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in those susceptible. We investigated the effect of SCBA during exercise on airway caliber in people with asthma and healthy controls. METHODS: Two exercise challenges (EC) designed to elicit EIB were performed on separate days within 1 wk. The initial challenge was breathing room air (ECRA) with workload titrated to elicit >60% estimated maximum voluntary ventilation. The exercise intensity was repeated for the second challenge using SCBA (ECSCBA). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was measured before and up to 20 min after exercise. Bronchial hyperresponsivenss (BHR) to the hyperosmolar mannitol test was measured in the subjects with asthma. RESULTS: Twenty subjects with current asthma (mean [SD]: age 27 [6] yr) and 10 healthy controls (31 [5] yr, P = 0.1) were studied. The percent fall in FEV1 after ECSCBA was greater in the mannitol-positive asthma subjects (14.4% [15.1%]) compared with mannitol-negative asthmatic subjects (1.6% [1.7%]; P = 0.02) and controls (2.3% [2.3%]; P = 0.04). The FEV1 response was not different between ECRA and ECSCBA (0.49% [5.57%]; P = 0.6). No BHR to mannitol (n = 7) was highly sensitive for identifying a negative response to ECSCBA (negative predictive value 100%). CONCLUSIONS: The SCBA does not increase the propensity or severity for EIB in subjects with BHR. Those subjects with asthma but no BHR to inhaled mannitol did not exhibit EIB. The BHR to a hyperosmolar stimulus maybe considered a useful screening tool for potential recruits with a history of asthma.