The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials.

The kidney sessions of the 2017 Banff Conference focused on 2 areas: clinical implications of inflammation in areas of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (i-IFTA) and its relationship to T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and the continued evolution of molecular diagnostics, particularly in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). In confirmation of previous studies, it was independently demonstrated by 2 groups that i-IFTA is associated with reduced graft survival. Furthermore, these groups presented that i-IFTA, particularly when involving >25% of sclerotic cortex in association with tubulitis, is often a sequela of acute TCMR in association with underimmunosuppression. The classification was thus revised to include moderate i-IFTA plus moderate or severe tubulitis as diagnostic of chronic active TCMR. Other studies demonstrated that certain molecular classifiers improve diagnosis of ABMR beyond what is possible with histology, C4d, and detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and that both C4d and validated molecular assays can serve as potential alternatives and/or complements to DSAs in the diagnosis of ABMR. The Banff ABMR criteria are thus updated to include these alternatives. Finally, the present report paves the way for the Banff scheme to be part of an integrative approach for defining surrogate endpoints in next-generation clinical trials.

Real Time Central Assessment of Kidney Transplant Indication Biopsies by Microarrays: The INTERCOMEX Study.

The authors conducted a prospective trial to assess the feasibility of real time central molecular assessment of kidney transplant biopsy samples from 10 North American or European centers. Biopsy samples taken 1 day to 34 years posttransplantation were stabilized in RNAlater, sent via courier overnight at ambient temperature to the central laboratory, and processed (29 h workflow) using microarrays to assess T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection (TCMR and ABMR, respectively). Of 538 biopsy samples submitted, 519 (96%) were sufficient for microarray analysis (average length, 3 mm). Automated reports were generated without knowledge of histology and HLA antibody, with diagnoses assigned based on Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) classifier algorithms and signed out by one observer. Agreement between MMDx and histology (balanced accuracy) was 77% for TCMR, 77% for ABMR, and 76% for no rejection. A classification tree derived to provide automated sign-outs predicted the observer sign-outs with >90% accuracy. In 451 biopsy samples where feedback was obtained, clinicians indicated that MMDx more frequently agreed with clinical judgment (87%) than did histology (80%) (p = 0.0042). In 81% of feedback forms, clinicians reported that MMDx increased confidence in management compared with conventional assessment alone. The authors conclude that real time central molecular assessment is feasible and offers a useful new dimension in biopsy interpretation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT#01299168.

The Banff 2015 Kidney Meeting Report: Current Challenges in Rejection Classification and Prospects for Adopting Molecular Pathology.

The XIII Banff meeting, held in conjunction the Canadian Society of Transplantation in Vancouver, Canada, reviewed the clinical impact of updates of C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) from the 2013 meeting, reports from active Banff Working Groups, the relationships of donor-specific antibody tests (anti-HLA and non-HLA) with transplant histopathology, and questions of molecular transplant diagnostics. The use of transcriptome gene sets, their resultant diagnostic classifiers, or common key genes to supplement the diagnosis and classification of rejection requires further consensus agreement and validation in biopsies. Newly introduced concepts include the i-IFTA score, comprising inflammation within areas of fibrosis and atrophy and acceptance of transplant arteriolopathy within the descriptions of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) or chronic ABMR. The pattern of mixed TCMR and ABMR was increasingly recognized. This report also includes improved definitions of TCMR and ABMR in pancreas transplants with specification of vascular lesions and prospects for defining a vascularized composite allograft rejection classification. The goal of the Banff process is ongoing integration of advances in histologic, serologic, and molecular diagnostic techniques to produce a consensus-based reporting system that offers precise composite scores, accurate routine diagnostics, and applicability to next-generation clinical trials.

Biomarkers of Tolerance in Kidney Transplantation: Are We Predicting Tolerance or Response to Immunosuppressive Treatment?

We and others have previously described signatures of tolerance in kidney transplantation showing the differential expression of B cell-related genes and the relative expansions of B cell subsets. However, in all of these studies, the index group-namely, the tolerant recipients-were not receiving immunosuppression (IS) treatment, unlike the rest of the comparator groups. We aimed to assess the confounding effect of these regimens and develop a novel IS-independent signature of tolerance. Analyzing gene expression in three independent kidney transplant patient cohorts (232 recipients and 14 tolerant patients), we have established that the expression of the previously reported signature was biased by IS regimens, which also influenced transitional B cells. We have defined and validated a new gene expression signature that is independent of drug effects and also differentiates tolerant patients from healthy controls (cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.81). In a prospective cohort, we have demonstrated that the new signature remained stable before and after steroid withdrawal. In addition, we report on a validated and highly accurate gene expression signature that can be reliably used to identify patients suitable for IS reduction (approximately 12% of stable patients), irrespective of the IS drugs they are receiving. Only a similar approach will make the conduct of pilot clinical trials for IS minimization safe and hence allow critical improvements in kidney posttransplant management.

Banff fibrosis study: multicenter visual assessment and computerized analysis of interstitial fibrosis in kidney biopsies.

Increasing interstitial fibrosis (IF) in native and kidney transplant biopsies is associated with functional decline and serves as a clinical trial end point. A Banff 2009 Conference survey revealed a range in IF assessment practices. Observers from multiple centers were asked to assess 30 renal biopsies with a range of IF and quantitate IF using two approaches on trichrome, Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and computer-assisted quantification of collagen III immunohistochemistry (C-IHC) slides, as well as assessing percent of cortical tubular atrophy% (TA%) and Banff total cortical inflammation score (ti-score). C-IHC using whole slide scans was performed. C-IHC assessment showed a higher correlation with organ function (r = -0.48) than did visual assessments (r = -0.32--0.42); computerized and visual C-IHC assessment also correlated (r = 0.64-0.66). Visual assessment of trichrome and C-IHC showed better correlations with organ function and C-IHC, than PAS, TA% and ti-score. However, visual assessment of IF, independent of approach, was variable among observers, and differences in correlations with organ function were not statistically significant among C-IHC image analysis and visual assessment methods. C-IHC image analysis correlated among three centers (r > 0.90, p < 0.0001, between all centers). Given the difficulty of visual IF assessment standardization, C-IHC image could potentially accomplish standardized IF assessment in multicenter settings.

Microarray diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant biopsies: an international prospective study (INTERCOM).

In a reference set of 403 kidney transplant biopsies, we recently developed a microarray-based test that diagnoses antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) by assigning an ABMR score. To validate the ABMR score and assess its potential impact on practice, we performed the present prospective INTERCOM study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01299168) in 300 new biopsies (264 patients) from six centers: Baltimore, Barcelona, Edmonton, Hannover, Manchester and Minneapolis. We assigned ABMR scores using the classifier created in the reference set and compared it to conventional assessment as documented in the pathology reports. INTERCOM documented uncertainty in conventional assessment: In 41% of biopsies where ABMR features were noted, the recorded diagnoses did not mention ABMR. The ABMR score correlated with ABMR histologic lesions and donor-specific antibodies, but not with T cell-mediated rejection lesions. The agreement between ABMR scores and conventional assessment was identical to that in the reference set (accuracy 85%). The ABMR score was more strongly associated with failure than conventional assessment, and when the ABMR score and conventional assessment disagreed, only the ABMR score was associated with early progression to failure. INTERCOM confirms the need to reduce uncertainty in the diagnosis of ABMR, and demonstrates the potential of the ABMR score to impact practice.

Potential impact of microarray diagnosis of T cell-mediated rejection in kidney transplants: The INTERCOM study.

We previously developed a microarray-based test for T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in a reference set of 403 biopsies. To determine the potential impact of this test in clinical practice, we undertook INTERCOM, a prospective international study of 300 indication biopsies from 264 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01299168). Biopsies from six centers-Baltimore, Barcelona, Edmonton, Hannover, Manchester and Minneapolis-were analyzed by microarrays, assigning TCMR scores by an algorithm developed in the reference set and comparing TCMR scores to local histology assessment. The TCMR score correlated with histologic TCMR lesions-tubulitis and interstitial infiltration. The accuracy for primary histologic diagnoses (0.87) was similar to the reference set (0.89). The TCMR scores reclassified 77/300 biopsies (26%): 16 histologic TCMR were molecularly non-TCMR; 15 histologic non-TCMR were molecularly TCMR, including 6 with polyoma virus nephropathy; and all 46 "borderline" biopsies were reclassified as TCMR (8) or non-TCMR (38). Like the reference set, discrepancies were primarily in situations where histology has known limitations, for example, in biopsies with scarring and inflammation/tubulitis potentially from other diseases. Neither the TCMR score nor histologic TCMR was associated with graft loss. Thus the molecular TCMR score has potential to add new insight, particularly in situations where histology is ambiguous or potentially misleading.

[The renin-angiotensin system and the brain]. / El rol del sistema renina angiotensina a nivel cerebral.

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS) system and its effects on blood pressure and the regulation of water and electrolyte balance have been studied focusing on the cardiovascular and renal system. The activation of RAAS in other organs has local and systemic repercussions by modeling the macro- and microvasculture of peripheral organs. The brain RAAS influence on systemic blood pressure through the sympathetic nervous system. The angiotensin converting enzyme/angiotensin II/angiotensin 1 receptor axis (ACE/AngII/AT1), classical pathway, and angiotensin converting enzyme type 2/angiotensin (1-7)/Mas receptor (ACE2/Ang (1-7)/MasR), non-classical pathway, are involved in the modulation of the sympathetic response. The imbalance of these two axes with subsequently Ang II accumulation promote neurogenic hypertension and other vascular pathologies. The aminopeptidase/angiotensin IV/angiotensin 4 receptor (AMN/Ang IV/AT4) axis, which is exclusive of the brain, acts on cerebral microvasculature and participates in cognition, memory, and learning. The aim of this review is to decipher the major central RAAS mechanisms involved in blood pressure regulation. In addition, paracrine functions of brain RAAS and its role in neuroprotection and cognition are also described in this review.

Banff '09 meeting report: antibody mediated graft deterioration and implementation of Banff working groups.

The 10th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in Banff, Canada from August 9 to 14, 2009. A total of 263 transplant clinicians, pathologists, surgeons, immunologists and researchers discussed several aspects of solid organ transplants with a special focus on antibody mediated graft injury. The willingness of the Banff process to adapt continuously in response to new research and improve potential weaknesses, led to the implementation of six working groups on the following areas: isolated v-lesion, fibrosis scoring, glomerular lesions, molecular pathology, polyomavirus nephropathy and quality assurance. Banff working groups will conduct multicenter trials to evaluate the clinical relevance, practical feasibility and reproducibility of potential changes to the Banff classification. There were also sessions on quality improvement in biopsy reading and utilization of virtual microscopy for maintaining competence in transplant biopsy interpretation. In addition, compelling molecular research data led to the discussion of incorporation of omics-technologies and discovery of new tissue markers with the goal of combining histopathology and molecular parameters within the Banff working classification in the near future.

Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in renal allograft protocol biopsies as a surrogate of graft survival.

Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) evaluated in protocol renal allograft biopsies are associated with decreased graft survival, especially when associated with transplant vasculopathy, subclinical rejection, or transplant glomerulopathy. IF/TA evaluated in protocol biopsies has been used as a secondary efficacy variable in clinical trials, some of which have shown that the prevalence of IF/TA depends on the type of immunosuppressive treatment. These observations suggest that IF/TA may be considered a surrogate of graft survival. However, there is an important difference between a predictive and a surrogate variable. A predictive variable is associated only with the main outcome variable, whereas in case of a surrogate variable, an additional condition must be accomplished; that is, modifications of the predictive variable as a result of treatment imply changes in the main outcome variable. In a trial of cyclosporine withdrawal from a cyclosporine-sirolimus-prednisone regimen, cyclosporine discontinuation was associated with less severe chronic lesions in protocol biopsies at 3 years and also with improved graft survival at 4 years. This observation suggest that IF/TA may be a surrogate of survival. This conclusion must be confirmed in other trials before accepting IF/TA as a real surrogate of graft outcome.

Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions.

The 9th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in La Coruna, Spain on June 23-29, 2007. A total of 235 pathologists, clinicians and scientists met to address unsolved issues in transplantation and adapt the Banff schema for renal allograft rejection in response to emerging data and technologies. The outcome of the consensus discussions on renal pathology is provided in this article. Major updates from the 2007 Banff Conference were: inclusion of peritubular capillaritis grading, C4d scoring, interpretation of C4d deposition without morphological evidence of active rejection, application of the Banff criteria to zero-time and protocol biopsies and introduction of a new scoring for total interstitial inflammation (ti-score). In addition, emerging research data led to the establishment of collaborative working groups addressing issues like isolated 'v' lesion and incorporation of omics-technologies, paving the way for future combination of graft biopsy and molecular parameters within the Banff process.

Management of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacilli infections in solid organ transplant recipients: SET/GESITRA-SEIMC/REIPI recommendations.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are especially at risk of developing infections by multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), as they are frequently exposed to antibiotics and the healthcare setting, and are regulary subject to invasive procedures. Nevertheless, no recommendations concerning prevention and treatment are available. A panel of experts revised the available evidence; this document summarizes their recommendations: (1) it is important to characterize the isolate's phenotypic and genotypic resistance profile; (2) overall, donor colonization should not constitute a contraindication to transplantation, although active infected kidney and lung grafts should be avoided; (3) recipient colonization is associated with an increased risk of infection, but is not a contraindication to transplantation; (4) different surgical prophylaxis regimens are not recommended for patients colonized with carbapenem-resistant GNB; (5) timely detection of carriers, contact isolation precautions, hand hygiene compliance and antibiotic control policies are important preventive measures; (6) there is not sufficient data to recommend intestinal decolonization; (7) colonized lung transplant recipients could benefit from prophylactic inhaled antibiotics, specially for Pseudomonas aeruginosa; (8) colonized SOT recipients should receive an empirical treatment which includes active antibiotics, and directed therapy should be adjusted according to susceptibility study results and the severity of the infection.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase expression in kidney transplantation: from alfa (alpha) to Omega (Omega).

INTRODUCTION: Overactivation of the enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) can be induced by ischemia-reperfusion and involved in the renal injury subsequent to kidney transplant. The poly(ADP-ribosy)lation mechanism alters free radical-induced DNA damage, which is repair by PARP-1 polymer. However, PARP-1 overexpression induces cellular necrosis. Our aim was to study the immunohistochemical PARP-1 expression in kidney transplant biopsies associated with various events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the nuclear expression of PARP-1 in kidney tubule cells by immunohistochemistry using the monoclonal antibody PAR01 in donor biopsies without acute tubular necrosis (ATN) (n = 60; controls), allografts that suffer ATN (n = 90) or an episode of acute humoral rejection (n = 12) or acute tubulointerstitial rejection (n = 25), or chronic allograft nephropathy (n = 25). Furthermore, we also studied protocol biopsies with subclinical rejection (n = 60). Renal lesions in transplant biopsies were graded blindly using 1997 Banff criteria without any clinical information. RESULTS: Biopsies without morphological features of ATN, namely acute tubulointerstitial rejection, borderline or subclinical rejection, showed lesser PARP-1 expression compared with biopsies with ATN or with ischemic mechanism of acute humoral rejection or chronic allograft nephropathys. We observed an inverse relation between PARP-1 expression and renal function (P < .001). Overall, renal biopsies showing ATN revealed greater expression of PARP-1 (r = 0.785, Pearson test). A significant relationship with PARP-1 expression was demonstrated with renal function (effective diuresis, serum creatinine levels) and pretransplant cold ischemia time (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Kidney transplant events including ischemia were associated with the highest PARP-1 expression and worse allograft renal function.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in renal transplant recipients under treatment with cyclosporine and Myfortic.

INTRODUCTION: Efficacious prophylaxis of acute rejection episodes (ARE) requires adequate exposure to each component of the immunosuppressive treatment from the first days after renal transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation between cyclosporine (CsA) and mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure based upon pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) and 6-month biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) episodes and chronic allograft nephropathy on 6 month protocol biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined twenty-two first or second de novo renal transplant recipients treated with steroids, Sandimmune Neoral (CsA) and Myfortic (720 mg twice a day). PK (C0, C2, and AUC(0-12h)) for both drugs were determined on days 7, 90, and 180. Calcineurin activity, interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma synthesis as well as %CEM were tested at days 7 and 180. CsA dosages were adjusted by C2 monitoring. Collected data included: BPAR during the first 6 months and Banff histological parameters on the 6-month protocol biopsies. RESULTS: Eighteen of 22 patients completed 1 year follow-up under treatment. The 6-month BPAR was 18% (4/22). Six-month protocol biopsies in 50% of 14 recipients showed chronic allograft nephropathy 1. At day 7, CsA C2 and AUC median values were 138 ng/mL and 6377 ng x h/mL, while C0 MPA was 1.0 microg/mL and AUC = 23.9 microg x h/mL. CsA C2 medians at 3 and 6 months were 1468 and 1720 ng/mL. MPA-AUC reached therapeutic targets at 3 months (32.3 microg x h/mL) and was 48.3 microg x h/mL at 6 months. Patients with BPAR showed lower CsA AUC (P = .06) and a significantly lower baseline inhibition of calcineurin activity (P < .005) than patients with no BPAR. An increase in mesangial matrix in 6-month protocol biopsies correlated with higher CsA C2 (P = .01). All biomarkers evaluated were significantly inhibited compared with the standard population. CONCLUSIONS: When Myfortic is administered together with CsA, it is advisable to begin with higher doses (720 mg x 3 days) to reach adequate PK targets and improve BPAR rates. To prevent chronic allograft nephropathy, lower CsA C2 should be targeted from 3 months.

Donor structural and functional parameters are independent predictors of renal function at 3 months.

INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological studies have shown that demographic, clinical, and histological donor characteristics influence renal function after transplantation, but whether these variables are independent predictors has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative contribution of different donor variables on glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) at 3 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed single renal transplants performed at our center from January 2000 to July 2004. Donor variables included age, gender, weight and height, cause of death, duration of brain death, serum creatinine at admission and preprocurement, history of arterial hypertension or diabetes mellitus, and smoking habit. Donor chronic damage score was calculated in preimplantation biopsies as was the addition of interstitial fibrosis, fibrous intimal thickening, and glomerulosclerosis (<10% = 0, >10% = 1). Donor and recipient GFRs were calculated according to the Cockroft-Gault formula. RESULTS: We analyzed 202 transplants obtained from 113 deceased donors. A renal biopsy was available in 111 transplants. Recipient GFR at 3 months correlated negatively with donor age (R = -0.32, P < .01) and donor chronic damage score (R = 0.32, P < .01). GFR was lower among recipients of female versus male donors (50 +/- 15 vs 60 +/- 20 mL/min; P < .01). Donor cerebrovascular accident death (53 +/- 19 vs 63 +/- 19 mL/min; P < .01) and hypertension (48 +/- 16 vs 59 +/- 20 mL/min; P < .01) were also associated with lower GFR at 3 months. There was a positive correlation between GFR at admission, GFR preprocurement, and GFR at 3 months (R = 0.32 and R = 0.18 respectively; P < .01). Stepwise regression analysis included chronic damage score, GFR at admission, and donor gender but not donor age as independent predictors of GFR at 3 months (R = 0.50; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Donor structural and functional parameters are independent predictors of renal function at 3 months.

Renal function in patients with cadaveric kidney transplants treated with tacrolimus or cyclosporine.

INTRODUCTION: Renal function predicts graft survival in kidney transplant patients. This study compared the 2-year evolution of renal function in patients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone. METHODS: We studied 1558 cadaveric renal transplant recipients from 14 Spanish hospitals between January 2000 and December 2002. Of these, 1168 were treated with tacrolimus and 390 with cyclosporine. The primary efficacy endpoint was long-term renal function. Renal function was measured by serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by creatinine clearance calculated from the Cockcroft-Gault formula. This report summarizes the 2-year results. RESULTS: At 24 months the tacrolimus group showed significantly better serum creatinine (1.5 +/- 0.7 vs 1.8 +/- 0.8 mg/dL, P < .001) and GFR (60.5 +/- 20.9 mL/min vs 47.9 +/- 10.0, P < .001) than the cyclosporine group. Additionally, recipients with ideal graft donors (23.5 +/- 2.8 vs 24.0 +/- 2.9 years) had a better serum creatinine at 2 years (1.23 +/- 0.2 vs 1.5 +/- 0.4 mg/dL, P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that tacrolimus was an independent factor associated with better renal function: odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval (1.2 to 2.2), P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a renal transplant treated with tacrolimus in combination with MMF and prednisone displayed better renal function at 2 years than those who received cyclosporine.

Lorraine Racusen and Kim Solez Awarded the Gold Medal of the Catalan Transplant Society.

In March 2017, a joint meeting between The Catalan Society of Transplantation and the Banff Foundation was held at the University of Barcelona. This was an opportunity for the Catalan Society of Transplantation to recognize the crucial contributions to transplant pathology made by Lorraine Racusen and Kim Solez, who created and actively contributed to the development of the International Banff Classification System. The ceremony of the Gold Medal took place on March 31 at the University of Barcelona; it consisted of a presentation of the contributions of Lorraine Racusen and Kim Solez to the development of transplant pathology. In this article, the presentation of these awardees with the Gold Medal of the Catalan Society of Transplantation is summarized.

[Adherence to treatment after kidney transplantation as quality indicator of the information received: Longitudinal study of 2 years follow-up]. / Adherencia al tratamiento tras trasplante renal como indicador de calidad de la información recibida: estudio longitudinal con un seguimiento de 2 años.

INTRODUCTION: Transplantation is an optimal form of treatment for end-stage renal disease, but requires lifelong adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of this study was to longitudinally assess the adherence to treatment after kidney transplant, as well as to compare the amount of information about the treatment received at one month and 18 months post-transplantation, and its influence on adherence to treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Self-Reported Measure of Medication Adherence was administered at month (T1), 6 months (T2), 12 months (T3), 18 months (T4), and 24 months (T5) post-transplantation. Survey about aspects of knowledge and attitudes about medication, was administered at one month and 18 months post-transplant. Measures of central tendency and non-parametric tests were used to compare the data. RESULTS: The study included a total of 73 patients with a median age of 57 years. The percentage of patients non-adherent to medication was 9.6% (T1), 22.5% (T2), 29.2% (T3), 29.8% (T4), and 28.1% (T5). One month after transplantation "not consulting with the doctor on forgetting to take medication (P=.034) significantly influenced the non-adherence to treatment. At 18 months post- transplantation, none of the issues raised on medication knowledge had an influence on non-adherence to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Longer times since transplantation increased the non-adherence to treatment. Some issues regarding the information of treatment influenced the non-adherence in the immediate transplant period, but not in the follow-up.

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus in renal allograft recipients: A prospective multicenter study at 2 years.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors for the development of diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation (PTDM). A total of 1783 nondiabetic renal allograft recipients transplanted from January 2000 to December 2002 were included. Diabetes was diagnosed following American Diabetes Association criteria. While 1276 patients were treated with tacrolimus (Tac), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids, 507 patients received cyclosporine-ME (CsA), MMF, and steroids. PTDM incidence at 6, 12, and 24 months was 14.2%, 12.8%, and 13.3%, respectively. Cumulative incidence during the follow-up was 21.6%. Only 121 of the diabetic patients (47.6%) at 6 months remained diabetic at 24 months. Furthermore, 60 patients of 116 patients on insulin at 6 months (51.7%) remained on treatment at 24 months. The cumulative incidence of PTDM was similar in the two immunosuppressive treatments (19.7% on CsA-MMF vs 22.3% on Tac-MMF; P = NS). However, at 24 months, 14 of 50 diabetic patients on CsA-MMF (28%) and 74 of 161 patients on Tac-MMF (45.9%) were on insulin treatment (P < .05). By Cox regression analysis, age older than 60 years (RR 1.61; 95%CI 1.28-2.04; P < .001), body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2 at transplantation (RR 1.66; 95%CI 1.27-2.16; P < .001), and immunosuppression with Tac (RR 1.30; 95%CI 1.02-1-66; P = .033) were associated with PTDM. In conclusions, the incidence of PTDM at 24 months in immunosuppressive protocols including MMF is about 22%, and it is associated with older age, increased BMI, and immnunosuppression with Tac.

Identidad de género y salud mental / Gender identity and mental health

Resumen Este artículo tiene como objetivo revisar las implicaciones de la identidad de género en la construcción psíquica y la salud mental, sin pretender ser una revisión exhaustiva, dada la complejidad del tema. Se realiza un recorrido por las definiciones conceptuales de la identidad de género, pasando por algunos modelos explicativos de la misma, como una forma de comprender esta experiencia. Además, se abordará la realidad transgénero como factor de estrés psicosocial y, desde una perspectiva clínica, sus repercusiones psíquicas, enfatizando la diferenciación de las identidades trans con la entidad diagnóstica llamada disforia de género. Finalmente, se caracterizará la disforia de género, con énfasis en el malestar subjetivo secundario a la discordancia de género, sus relaciones con otros diagnósticos psiquiátricos, sus repercusiones psicosociales y las barreras de atención médica que este grupo de personas experimenta.

This article aims to review the implications of gender identity in psychic construction and mental health, without intending to be an exhaustive review, given the complexity of this issue. A tour of the conceptual definitions of gender identity is made, going through some explanatory models of it, as a way to understand this experience. Also, transgender reality as a psychosocial stress factor will be addressed and, from a clinical perspective, its psychic repercussions, emphasizing the differentiation of trans identities with the diagnostic entity called gender dysphoria. Finally, gender dysphoria will be characterized, focusing on the subjective disconfort secondary to gender discordance, its relationships with other psychiatric diagnoses, its psychosocial repercussions and the health care barriers that this group of people experiences.