Impact of Intravenous Acetaminophen on Perioperative Opioid Utilization and Outcomes in Open Colectomies: A Claims Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The value of intravenous acetaminophen in postoperative pain management remains debated. The authors tested the hypothesis that intravenous acetaminophen use, in isolation and in comparison to oral, would be associated with decreased opioid utilization (clinically significant reduction defined as 25%) and opioid-related adverse effects in open colectomy patients. METHODS: Using national claims data from open colectomy patients (Premier Healthcare Database, Premier Healthcare Solutions, Inc., USA; 2011 to 2016; n = 181,640; 602 hospitals), we separately categorized oral and intravenous acetaminophen use: 1 (1,000 mg) or more than 1 dose on the day of surgery, postoperative day 1, or later. Multilevel models measured associations between intravenous or oral acetaminophen and (1) opioid utilization and (2) opioid-related adverse effects. Percent change and multiplicity-adjusted 99.5% CI are reported. RESULTS: Overall, 25.1% of patients received intravenous acetaminophen, of whom 48.0% (n = 21,878) received 1 dose on the day of surgery. In adjusted analyses, particularly more than 1 dose of intravenous acetaminophen (versus nonuse) on postoperative day 1 was associated with a -12.4% (99.5% CI, -15.2 to -9.4%) change in opioid utilization. In comparison, a stronger reduction was seen in those receiving more than 1 oral acetaminophen dose: -22.6% (99.5% CI, -26.2 to -18.9%). Unadjusted group medians were 550 and 490 oral morphine equivalents, respectively. Intravenous versus oral differences were less pronounced among those receiving more than 1 acetaminophen dose on the day of surgery: -8.0% (99.5% CI, -11.0 to -4.9%) median 499 oral morphine equivalents versus -8.7% (99.5% CI, -14.4 to -2.7%) median 445 oral morphine equivalents, respectively; all statistically significant, but none clinically significant. Comparable outcome patterns existed for opioid-related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The demonstrated marginal effects do not support routine use of intravenous acetaminophen given alternative nonopioid analgesic options.

Single-dose intravenous gammaglobulin can stabilize neutrophil Mac-1 activation in sickle cell pain crisis.

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) decreases neutrophil adhesion to endothelium and red blood cell-neutrophil interactions in sickle cell mice undergoing vaso-occlusion. In this Phase I clinical trial of sickle cell anemia (SCA) patients admitted with pain crisis, we evaluated the status of adhesion molecules on neutrophils in control and IVIG-treated subjects pre- and post-infusion up to 800 mg/kg, the same dose used in murine studies. Mac-1 function significantly decreased from baseline in the low-dose IVIG (200-400 mg/kg) cohorts. IVIG-related adverse events may have occurred in the high-dose (600-800 mg/kg) cohorts. There were no significant increases in neutrophil and leukocyte counts, suggesting that IVIG may more selectively inhibit Mac-1 function as opposed to neutrophil adhesion. This study provides the first in-human validation of pre-clinical murine studies that IVIG can decrease Mac-1 function.

The Quantitative Analgesic Questionnaire: A Tool to Capture Patient-Reported Chronic Pain Medication Use.

CONTEXT: The extent to which patients take chronic pain medications as prescribed is not well studied, and there are no generally agreed-upon measures. The Quantitative Analgesic Questionnaire (QAQ) is a new instrument designed to comprehensively document patient-reported medication use, generate scores to quantify it (by individual drug, class, and/or overall), and compare it (qualitatively and/or quantitatively) to the regimen as prescribed. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the development and preliminary validation of the QAQ. METHODS: The QAQ was studied in a convenience sample of 149 HIV-infected participants. RESULTS: We found that the QAQ scores computed for participants' chronic pain medication regimens were valid based on their correlation with 1) patient-reported pain intensity (r = 0.38; P < 0.001) and 2) experienced pain management physicians' independent quantification of the regimens (r = 0.89; P < 0.001). The QAQ also demonstrated high interrater reliability (r = 0.957; P < 0.001). Detailed examination of the QAQ data in a subset of 34 participants demonstrated that the QAQ revealed suboptimal adherence in 44% of participants and contained information that would not have been gleaned from review of the medical record alone in 94%, including use of over-the-counter medications and quantification of "as needed" dosing. The QAQ also was found to be useful in quantifying change in the medication regimen over time, capturing a change in 50% of the participants from baseline to eight week follow-up. CONCLUSION: The QAQ is a simple tool that can facilitate understanding of patient-reported chronic pain medication regimens, including calculation of percent adherence and generation of quantitative scores suitable for estimating and tracking change in medication use over time.

Data-driven interdisciplinary interventions to improve inpatient pain management.

Pain during hospitalization and dissatisfaction with pain management are common. This project consisted of 4 phases: identifying a pain numeric rating scale (NRS) metric associated with patient satisfaction, identifying independent predictors of maximum NRS, implementing interventions, and evaluating trends in NRS and satisfaction. Maximum NRS was inversely associated with favorable pain satisfaction for both efficacy (n = 4062, χ(2) = 66.2, P < .001) and staff efforts (n = 4067, χ(2) = 30.3, P < .001). Independent predictors of moderate-to-severe maximum NRS were younger age, female sex, longer hospital stay, admitting department, psychoactive medications, and 10 diagnostic codes. After interventions, moderate-to-severe maximum NRS declined by 3.6% per quarter in 2010 compared with 2009. Satisfaction data demonstrated improvements in nursing units meeting goals (5.3% per quarter, r (2) = 0.67) and favorable satisfaction answers (0.36% per quarter, r (2) = 0.31). Moderate-to-severe maximum NRS was an independent predictor of lower likelihood of hospital discharge (likelihood ratio = 0.62; 95% confidence interval = 0.61-0.64). Targeted interventions were associated with improved inpatient pain management.

Epidural clonidine added to a bupivacaine infusion increases analgesic duration in labor without adverse maternal or fetal effects.

PURPOSE: Many obstetric patients receiving epidural analgesia are encouraged to ambulate. This current study was designed to determine the potential for maximizing the time to first epidural supplement when adding clonidine to a 0.625 mg.ml(-1) bupivacaine continuous epidural infusion following epidural fentanyl bolus in early labor for patients allowed to ambulate. Maternal and fetal effects secondary to clonidine were also evaluated. METHODS: Sixty-eight laboring primigravid women received a 3-ml epidural test dose of lidocaine with epinephrine, followed by a fentanyl 100-microg bolus (in a 10 ml-volume). The patients then received a 0.625 mg.ml(-1) bupivacaine continuous epidural infusion, either with or without clonidine (5 microg.ml(-1)), at a rate of 10 ml.h(-1). Pain scores and side effects were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: The overall quality of analgesia was similar in both groups. The mean duration prior to request for additional analgesia was significantly longer in the clonidine group (269 +/- 160 min), compared to the control group (164 +/- 64 min). No patient in either group experienced any detectable motor block; one patient (clonidine group) complained of mild thigh numbness and was not allowed to ambulate. While mean blood pressure was approximately 6 mmHg lower in the clonidine group at 1, 1.5, and 3.5 h, this was not clinically significant. No adverse effects on maternal heart rate or fetal heart rate were noted. CONCLUSION: In early laboring patients, addition of clonidine prolongs the analgesia duration of a 0.625 mg.ml(-1) bupivacaine continuous epidural infusion following 100 microg epidural fentanyl (after a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose) without a clinically significant increase in side effects.

Diluent volume for epidural fentanyl and its effect on analgesia in early labor.

UNLABELLED: Epidural fentanyl after a lidocaine and epinephrine test dose provides adequate analgesia and allows for ambulation during early labor. We designed the current study to determine the influence of the diluent volume of the epidural fentanyl bolus (e.g., whether it has an effect on the onset and duration of analgesia). Sixty laboring primigravid women received a 3-mL epidural test dose of lidocaine with epinephrine and then received a fentanyl 100- micro g bolus in either a 2-mL, 10-mL, or 20-mL volume. Pain scores and side effects were recorded for each patient. The onset of analgesia was similar in all three groups. The mean duration before re-dose was not significantly different in the 2-mL group (108 +/- 40 min), the 10-mL group (126 +/- 57 min), or the 20-mL group (126 +/- 41 min). No patient in any group experienced any detectable motor block; one patient (2-mL group) complained of mild knee weakness and was not allowed to ambulate. In early laboring patients, the volume in which 100 micro g of epidural fentanyl (after a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose) is administered does not affect the onset or duration of analgesia, nor does it affect the ability to ambulate. IMPLICATIONS: In early laboring patients, the volume in which 100 micro g of epidural fentanyl (after a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose) is administered does not affect the onset or duration of ambulatory analgesia.