High rate of extra-haematological toxicity compromises dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: A dose-dense strategy has been considered to improve results of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. This randomised phase II trial investigated the feasibility of this approach with sequential anthracyclines and taxanes-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with high-risk node-positive breast cancer were treated with three cycles of fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2), epirubicin 100 mg m(-2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg m(-2) (FEC 100) followed by three cycles of docetaxel 100 mg m(-2) delivered at 2-weekly intervals supported by primary prophylaxis with filgrastim. All patients were randomised to either uninterrupted treatment (arm A) or to have a 2-week additional period of rest between the FEC and docetaxel (arm B). The primary endpoint was the rate of success of chemotherapy delivery. Using a two-stage Fleming design, 120 patients were required with one interim analysis. RESULTS: In March 2005, enrolment was stopped into arm A after the observation of severe skin toxicities. Following the planned interim analysis, the study was closed because of the high rate of grade 3/4 skin toxicities in both arms (arm A: 32.4% and arm B: 18.9%). CONCLUSION: Sequential dose-dense FEC 100 followed by docetaxel 100 mg m(-2) is not feasible. Feasibility still depends largely on several factors including the choice of drugs, dosage and sequence of administration.

Breast cancer screening in France: results of the EDIFICE survey.

BACKGROUND: The EDIFICE survey aimed to investigate the compliance of the general population to the screening tests available in France for the 4 most common cancers: breast, colorectal, prostate and lung. Implementation of breast cancer screening has been generalized in France since 2003: women aged between 50 and 74 years are systematically invited to perform a mammography every second year. Results pertaining to breast cancer are reported hereafter. METHODS: This nationwide observational survey was carried out in France from 18 January to 2 February 2005 among representative samples of 773 women aged between 40 and 75 years and 600 general practitioners (GPs). Information collected included socio-demographic characteristics, attitude towards cancer screening and actual experience of cancer screening, as well as GPs' practice regarding screening. The precision of the results is +/- 4.3% for a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Among the 507 participating women aged between 50 and 74 years, 92.5% (469/507) had undergone at least one mammography: 54.6% (256/469) underwent this test on their own initiative and 44.6% (209/469) of women performed it in the framework of a systematic screening plan. Most women participating in the systematic screening (89.0% i.e. 186/209) had a mammography within the last dating from less than 2 years versus 73.8% (189/256) of those who performed it outside the screening program (Chi(2) test; p<0.01). Interestingly, 422 women (61.9% i.e. 422/682 women aged between 40-75 years with at least one mammography) had performed a mammography before the recommended age for screening. There was a significant correlation (p = 0.009) between the existence of a first mammography before 50 years of age and subsequent screening on women's own initiative (54.6% of 469 screened women). Main reasons for not performing the screening test every second year (77 women aged between 50-74 years) included: feeling unconcerned and/or unmotivated (p = 0.0001), no cancer anxiety (p = 0.020) and no recommendation by the GP (p = 0.015); Of the 600 participating GPs, 68.6% (412/600) systematically recommended a mammography to their patients. GPs' perceptions of the reasons for women's avoidance of the screening test were unwillingness to be aware of mammography results (44.4% - 266/600) and the belief that mammography was painful (52.5% - 315/600). CONCLUSION: The main result of the EDIFICE survey is the high rate of women's attendance at mammography screening. The EDIFICE survey pointed out that systematic and organized screening played a major role in the regularity of screening tests for breast cancer every second year. GPs and gynaecologist are key actors in heightening public awareness.

[Ductal carcinoma in situ: role of the boost]. / Radiothérapie des carcinomes canalaires in situ: impact du complément d'irradiation du lit tumoral.

Ductal carcinoma in situ is defined as breast cancer confined to the ducts of the breast without evidence of penetration of the basement membrane. Local treatment quality represents one of the most prognostic factors as half of recurrences are invasive diseases. The main goal of adjuvant radiotherapy after conservative surgery is to decrease local recurrences and to permit breast conservation with low treatment-induced sequelae. Several randomized trials have established the impact of 50 Gy to the whole breast in terms of local control. Nevertheless, no randomized trial is still available concerning the role of the boost in this disease. In this review, we present updated results of the literature and we detail the French multicentric randomized trial evaluating the impact of a 16 Gy boost after 50 Gy delivered to the whole breast in 25 fractions and 33 days. This protocol will start inclusions in October 2008.

Phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide combination as first-line chemotherapy in older metastatic breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD; Caelyx)-cyclophosphamide combination in older metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: A multicenter phase II trial was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age 65-75 years, ECOG 0-1 and left ventricular ejection fraction > or =50%. First-line chemotherapy was given to metastatic breast cancer patients resistant to hormonal therapy. The treatment schedule was PLD 40 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks. Efficacy was the primary endpoint, while response duration and tolerance were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (median age 71.3 years) were enrolled. No treatment-related death, no congestive heart failure or decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction and no febrile neutropenia were reported. TOXICITY: grade 3 dyspnea was found in 1 patient, neutropenia in 11 patients (7 grade 3, 4 grade 4), grade 3 mucositis in 4 patients, grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 1 patient and a generalized rash in 1 patient. An objective response (complete and partial response) was achieved in 10 (28.6%) patients and disease control in 24 (69%) with a progression-free survival of 8.8 months and a median overall survival of 20.3 months. CONCLUSION: The PLD-cyclophosphamide combination is moderately active and safe in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients, but cannot be recommended routinely due to myelotoxicity and mucositis hazards.

[Concurrent administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy after breast-conservative surgery enhances late toxicities]. / La chimiothérapie concomitante de la radiothérapie augmente la toxicité tardive après chirurgie conservatrice du cancer du sein.

PURPOSE: In 1996, a multicenter randomized study comparing after breast-conservative surgery, sequential vs concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with radiation therapy (RT) was initiated (ARCOSEIN study). Seven hundred sixteen patients were included in this trial. After a median follow-up of 6.7 (4.3-9) years, we decided to prospectively evaluate the late effects of these two strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 297 patients were asked to follow-up from the five larger including institutions. Seventy-two percent (214 patients) were eligible for late toxicity. After breast-conserving surgery with axillary dissection, patients were treated either with sequential treatment with CT first followed by RT (arm A) or CT administered concurrently with RT (arm B). In all patients, CT regimen combined mitoxantrone (12 mg/m(2)), 5-FU (500 mg/m(2)), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)), 6 cycles (day 1-day 21). In arm B, patients received concurrently the first 3 cycles of CT with RT. In arm A, RT started 3 to 5 weeks after the 6th cycle of CT. Conventional RT was delivered to the whole breast using a 2 Gy-fraction protocol to a total dose of 50 Gy (+/-boost to the primary tumour bed). The assessment of toxicity was blinded to treatment and was graded by the radiation oncologist according to the LENT-SOMA scale. Skin pigmentation was also evaluated using a personal 5-points scoring system (excellent, good, moderate, poor, very poor). RESULTS: Among the 214 evaluated patients, 107 were treated in each arm. The two populations were homogeneous for patients', tumors' and treatment characteristics. Subcutaneous fibrosis (SF), telengectasia (T), skin pigmentation (SP), and breast atrophy (BA) were significantly increased in arm B. Twenty patients experienced grade superior or equal to 2 (SF) in arm B vs five in arm A (P=0.003). Twenty-five and seven patients showed grade superior or equal to 2 (T) in arm B and A, respectively (P=0.001). Forty-four and twenty patients showed grade superior or equal to 2 (BA) in arm B and A, respectively (P=0.0006). Thirty patients experienced grade superior or equal to 3 (SP) in arm B vs fifteen in arm A (P=0.02). No statistical difference was observed between the two arms concerning grade superior or equal to 2 pain, breast oedema, and lymphoedema. No deaths were caused by late toxicity. CONCLUSION: Following breast conserving surgery, the concurrent use of CT with RT is significantly associated with an increase incidence of grade 2 or greater late side effects.

Third-line hormonal treatment with exemestane in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer progressing on aminoglutethimide: a phase II multicentre multinational study. Exemestane Study Group.

In a European multicentre phase II study, 80 postmenopausal patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer progressing on aminoglutethimide (AG) at daily doses of > or = 500 mg were enrolled. Seventy-eight received exemestane (200 mg daily orally), including 33 pts resistant to prior AG, 39 pts who had progressed after an initial response to AG, and 6 pts whose response to AG was either unavailable or not evaluable. Three pts were pretreated with AG only, 69 with tamoxifen and AG, and 6 with tamoxifen, AG and other hormone therapies; 55% had also previously received chemotherapy. The predominant site of disease was visceral in 34 cases, bone in 27 and soft tissue in 17. Based on Peer Review assessment, the overall objective response rate (CRs plus PRs) was 26% (12% in pts resistant to AG and 33% in AG-responsive pts). Disease stabilisation > or = 24 weeks was achieved in an additional 13% of patients (15% of those resistant to AG and 13% of those AG-responsive), resulting in an overall success rate of 39% (28-50, 95% confidence interval). The median duration of objective response, overall success and median TTP were 59, 48 and 21 weeks, respectively. Toxicities were usually mild to moderate in severity, with hot flushes (21%), nausea (19%), dizziness (12%), weakness (12%), increased sweating (12%), androgenic symptoms (10%) and peripheral oedema (9%) as the most common side-effects. Only 2 pts (3%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. These results are very promising considering that exemestane was administered as third- or fourth-line hormonal treatment in most cases and confirm previous observations about the lack of cross-resistance when steroidal aromatase inhibitors are sequenced with the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor AG.

Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Treating patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) represents a significant challenge to oncologists. The tumour-activated oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine, is the only treatment approved for these patients. Our study evaluated the efficacy, safety and impact on quality of life (QOL) of capecitabine in this setting. Patients (n=126) with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer received capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14, followed by a 7-day rest period. Median time to progression was 4.9 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 4.0-6.4). Thirty-five patients (28%) achieved an objective response (95% CI: 20-36%), including five (4%) complete responses. Median overall survival was 15.2 months (95% CI: 13.5-19.6 months). Capecitabine demonstrated a favourable safety profile, with a low incidence of treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events. The most common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome and gastrointestinal effects. QOL assessment showed that capecitabine treatment was associated with an increase in mean Global Health Score. Capecitabine is active, well tolerated and improves the QOL of patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Based on the consistently high activity demonstrated in clinical trials, capecitabine has become the reference treatment in this setting.

Cancer genetics clinics: target population and consultees' expectations.

The aim of this study was to determine in healthy consultees attending cancer genetics clinics their risk status, their pathways leading to the clinics, their expectations and perception of cancer risk. In 1994, the consultees at six French centres completed a questionnaire before their first oncogenetic consultation. The oncogeneticists subsequently filled in a standardised form giving their risk assessment. Among the 206 healthy consultees, 91.3% were women, 92.2% had at least one cancer-affected first-degree relative and 73% had a "cancer family risk" as assessed by the oncogeneticist. Sixty-nine per cent of the consultees were referred to the clinics by a physician, 10.4% by their family and 18.8% on their own initiative: 83.5% of the sample perceived their family risk of cancer as being high and this belief was confirmed in 74.3% of the cases studied by the oncogeneticist. The families of self-referred consultees were less often at risk than those of consultees referred by a physician or by their family (P = 0.012). The majority (78%) expected to be informed about cancer prevention and screening, and this expectation depended on the consultee's level of education (P = 0.001). This study shows that medical pathways are more effective than the media as a means of reaching the members of the general population who are genuinely at risk, and shows that fuller information about prevention needs to be provided at cancer genetic consultations.

Caring About Women and Cancer (CAWAC): a European survey of the perspectives and experiences of women with female cancers.

This paper reports on the findings of the largest ever European survey of female patients' perceptions of their cancer treatment. It has provided clarification of what women consider important in relation to their management and has identified several areas where more research is needed. It has shown that women's knowledge about cancer before diagnosis is poor and the number undergoing regular screening could be improved. Women are not being adequately prepared and educated about what to expect from treatment and steps should be taken as a matter of urgency to redress this shortcoming. It was revealed that whilst families were the primary source of support to female cancer patients, women also derive considerable support from healthcare professionals, particularly senior doctors; more attention should be paid by specialists and nurses to developing psychological skills to cope with this. In this context, further research is needed into how support groups may best meet patient needs.

Results of a phase III prospective, randomised trial, comparing mitoxantrone and vinorelbine (MV) in combination with standard FAC/FEC in front-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer.

This comparative phase III trial of mitoxantrone+vinorelbine (MV) versus 5-fluorouracil+cyclophosphamide+either doxorubicin or epirubicin (FAC/FEC) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer was conducted to determine whether MV would produce equivalent efficacy, while resulting in an improved tolerance in relation to alopecia and nausea/vomiting. This multicentre study recruited and randomised 281 patients with metastatic breast cancer; 280 were evaluable for response survival and toxicity (138 received FAC/FEC, 142 received MV). Patient characteristics were matched in each arm and stratification for prior exposure to adjuvant therapy was made prospectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was equivalent in the two arms (33.3% for FAC/FEC versus 34.5% for MV), but MV was more effective in patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (13% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3-23) for FAC/FEC versus 33% (95% CI 20-47) for MV P=0.025) with a better progression-free survival (PFS) (5 months (range 1-18 months) versus 8 months (range 1-27 months); P=0.0007 for FAC/FEC versus MV, respectively) while FAC/FEC was more effective in previously untreated patients (ORR 43% (95% CI 33-53) versus 35% (95% CI 25-45), P=0.26; PFS 9 months (range 0-29 months) versus 6 months (range 0-26 months) P=0.014). Toxicity was monitored through the initial six cycles of therapy; febrile neutropenia and delayed haematological recovery was more frequent for MV (P=0.001), while nausea/vomiting of grades 3-4 was greater for FAC/FEC (P=0.031), as was alopecia (P=0.0001), cardiotoxicity was the same for the two regimens. MV represents a chemotherapy combination with equivalent efficacy to standard FAC/FEC and improved results for patients who have previously received adjuvant chemotherapy. Toxicity must be balanced to allow for increased haematological suppression and risk of febrile neutropenia with MV compared with a higher risk of subjectively unpleasant side-effects such as nausea/vomiting and alopecia with FAC/FEC.

Phase II randomized study of paclitaxel versus mitomycin in advanced breast cancer.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has been shown to be an effective agent in the treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma. This multicenter randomized study compared paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 given as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks with mitomycin 12 mg/m2 given as an intravenous infusion every 6 weeks. Eighty-one patients have been randomized, and preliminary results of a planned analysis of the first 36 evaluable patients per arm are reported. Pretreatment characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. All patients previously have received chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and half had both adjuvant therapy and chemotherapy for metastatic disease. All but one patient previously had received anthracyclines. Of the first 81 randomized patients, 72 were evaluable for response and toxicity (four never treated, five concomitant hormonotherapy). Partial responses were seen in 17% of patients in the paclitaxel arm and 6% in the mitomycin arm (P = .14). Crossover to paclitaxel therapy following progression on mitomycin achieved an objective response rate of 24% (five of 21 patients). Responses to paclitaxel therapy lasted for a median duration of 9.1 months (range, 6.2 to 12+ months). Median time to progression was significantly longer in the paclitaxel arm (3.5 months v 1.6 months; P = .026). The quality-of-life-adjusted analysis confirmed the advantage of paclitaxel therapy, even when the delay of disease progression was adjusted for important adverse events. Adverse events, most importantly neutropenia and neuropathy, were more frequently observed in the paclitaxel arm. However, patients remained on paclitaxel therapy for many more courses than did those treated in the mitomycin arm. In conclusion, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 given as a 3-hour intravenous infusion has been demonstrated to be an active agent in the treatment of chemotherapy-refractory advanced breast cancer, even after therapy with mitomycin has failed.

Postmenopausal patients with node-positive resectable breast cancer. Tamoxifen vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) plus tamoxifen vs control--preliminary results of a 4-arm randomised trial. The French Adjuvant Study Group.

In 1986 the true benefit of adjuvant medical treatment in postmenopausal patients with pathological node-positive breast adenocarcinoma was still controversial. The French Adjuvant Study Group (FASG) initiated a randomised trial to elucidate the respective roles of adjuvant chemo-and/or hormonotherapy in this group of patients. Of the 776 patients who have been included between 1986 and 1990, 741 were fully eligible for evaluation. Inclusion criteria were postmenopausal patients aged between 50 and 70 years with adenocarcinoma of the breast, positive pathological nodes and no distant metastasis. Patients were randomised to 1 of 4 treatment arms: Group A (n = 192) received tamoxifen 30 mg/day orally for 3 years; Group B (n = 183) received FEC 50 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) for 6 cycles; Group C (n = 182) received tamoxifen 30 mg/day orally for 3 years plus FEC 50 for 6 cycles; Group D (n = 184) received no medical adjuvant treatment. Surgery was either modified radical mastectomy (n = 363) or tumorectomy (n = 378), and postoperative irradiation was given to all patients. All major prognostic factors were well balanced between the 4 patient groups. Toxicity was evaluated in 348 patients in Groups B and C who received a total of 1983 chemotherapy cycles. Median epirubicin dose intensity (mg/m2/week) was 15.8 in Group B and 15.7 in Group C. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was observed in 4.7% of cycles for Group B and 3.7% for Group C. Grade 3 to 4 nausea/vomiting were seen in 18% of treatment cycles in Group B and 15% in Group C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Cancer of the breast: primary prevention of breast cancer by tamoxifen, eligibility criteria, alternatives to English proposals]. / Cancer du sein: prévention primaire du cancer du sein par le tamoxifène, tentative de définition de la population cible, alternatives aux propositions anglaises.

During the spring of 1993, UKCCCR prevention trial group proposed to the french medical community to participate into the international breast cancer prevention trial by tamoxifen set up in Great Britain. In January 1994 this proposal was eventually judged unacceptable in France because of lack of reflexion on primary cancer prevention, medico-legal risks, tamoxifen use risks and the eligibility criteria. A randomized trial could be designed and carried out in France to evaluate the place of tamoxifen in breast cancer prevention in the following settings: post menopausal patient with atypical epithelial hyperplasia or lobular in situ carcinoma.

[Parcours de femmes. Opinion survey carried out among women treated for gynecologic and breast cancers and their medical care teams]. / Parcours de femmes. Enquête d'opinion réalisée auprès des femmes traitées pour cancers gynécologiques et mammaires et auprès des équipes soignantes qui les ont prises en charge.

The opinion survey "Parcours de femmes" initiated in partnership with Bristol-Myers Squibb was conducted by la Ligue nationale contre le cancer between November 1993 and May 1995 and by Sofres Institute. The aim of the study was to increase knowledge of experience of feminine cancers, both by patients and by different treatment teams. Two thousand eight hundred and seventy-four women treated for one of these diseases answered anonymously on a form with sixty-eight questions. Eighty-one individual interviews gave the opinion of the general practitioners and specialists concerned, as well as nursing and hospital staff, pharmacists, health leaders in the private or public fields. The results of this opinion survey highlight and confirm needs, deficiencies, and aspirations of everyone involved. The data show the importance of information, explanations and dialogue at every stage of the disease. The data specify the lines of support to be developed: calming distress, stimulating hope and the will to recover. They also indicate a need for psychological support outside the family and the medical environment as well as for treatment teams. The necessity to improve the hospital environment as well as access to maternal aid during and after treatment to make reinsertion easier are also demonstrated. Apart from associations and help services (such as home care), institutionals do not all have the same sensitivity expect to this pathology. Many people consider it has nothing specific in comparison to other pathologies or to other women in difficulties. They reject the idea of implementing specific measures and valorize research and prevention actions.

[Combination radiotherapy and chemotherapy in cancer of the pancreas. Review of the literature and prospects]. / Les associations radio-chimiothérapiques dans le cancer du pancréas. Revue de la littérature et perspectives.

Overall prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is still very poor with median survival around 10 months after radical surgery in operable patients, or after full-dose radiation therapy in non-surgical candidates. In metastatic disease, multidrug chemotherapy regimens give a response rate of around 30% with median survival of 10 months. Random trials conducted by the GITSG in inoperable cases have shown improved results for chemoradiation with 5-FU for radiotherapy alone and a doubling of median survival with a 1-year survival of 40% vs 10%. Incorporation of Adriamycin in these combined modality protocols does not improve the results in terms of survival. Chemoradiation also shows improved results compared with chemotherapy alone. In patients amenable to radical surgery, adjuvant post-operative treatment with chemoradiation gave superior results over surgery alone with a doubling of median survival and a significant improvement of a two-year survival rate (42% versus 15%). Intra-operative radiation therapy leads to better local control but without a significant improvement in survival. With a better understanding of radio-chemotherapy interactions and mechanisms of radiosensitization through continuous infusion of fluorouracil and/or cisplatinum, these encouraging results should be confirmed within the next few years.

[Is breast cancer prevention by tamoxifen possible?]. / La prévention des cancers du sein par le tamoxifène est-elle possible?

Breast cancer is a frequent disease especially in the Western world with an incidence that increases by 1% each year. Distressingly, even nowadays, 40% of patients with breast cancer will die of their disease. Postoperative adjuvant therapy and detection of non-palpable cancers by mass screening of women have improved patient survival but have not impinged upon the steady increase in incidence. Treatment before radiological detection could improve the chances of survival and even prevent the full-blown expression of the disease. The probability that a woman will develop breast cancer during her life-time is high but not evenly distributed. Knowledge of predisposing factors can help to identify those women subject to greater risk than the general population. The most important known risk factors are age, family history, factors related to ob-gyn antecedents, lifestyle, benign hyperplastic breast disease with or without atypia. These various risks, are often associated and cumulative. A woman who has already had breast cancer has a 3 to 5 times greater probability of developing cancer of the contralateral breast than the average woman. The second breast is therefore at risk in the same way as are the women with predisposing factors. Many clinical studies have demonstrated the benefits of postoperative adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) in improving the disease-free interval and survival of patients. An analysis of the site of relapse has interestingly brought to light a marked decrease in the percentage of cancers of the contralateral breast. In order to establish whether TAM could prevent or delay the onset of high-risk women without detectable signs of illness into groups receiving either TAM or placebo. Is this ethically acceptable? The answer to this question rests heavily on an objective evaluation of the unwanted and beneficial side-effects of TAM in order to weigh up all pros and cons before initiating a trial.

[Frequency of lymphedema of the upper limb after treatment of breast cancer. Risk factors. Apropos of 683 cases]. / Fréquence des lymphoedèmes du membre supérieur après traitement du cancer du sein. Facteurs de risque. A propos de 683 observations.

Lymphoedema of the upper limb after breast cancer treated with axillary clearance is a well known sequels. But its real rate is not precise. The retrospective study of 683 patients approaches this reality. When clinic criteria are selected with centimetric measures, its general rate is 41%; 65% out of them have a difference smaller than 3 cm. We noticed three different kinds of lymphoedemas which occur on the arm, the forearm or the complete upper limb. Their volumes are different, the more voluminous ones occur when the upper limb is touched completely (P = 0.0001). The different factors which increase the risk of lymphoedema are described. The role of the infection is noticed (x 1.7). The rate is independent of the surgery, of the importance of axillary clearance and of the shoulder joint function. The lymphoedema size is more important when it occurs secondary to mastectomy then conservative treatment (P = 0.0078). Parietal fibrosis increases lymphoedema risk to 54% (P = 0.005) and lymphoedemas are more voluminous (P = 0.009).

[The value of breast lymphoscintigraphy in the definition of axillary staging in cancer of the breast]. / Intérêt de la lymphoscintigraphie mammaire dans la définition du staging axillaire des cancers du sein.

Axillary lymphoscintigraphy (ALS) has been investigated in 51 patients with operable breast carcinoma between July 1982 and February 1984. Pre-operative intra-tumoral injection of 2.5 cm Ci of technetium 99 m antimony sulfide colloid has been performed before axillary dissection. We compared the scans produced by ALS with the results of pre-operative clinical examination of the axilla (UICC criterias) and to the histological status of the nodes surgically removed. We focused on the statistical methodology because, for us, most of the studies use inadequate tests. Axillary lymphoscintigraphy did not predict axillary metastase in breast cancer with precision. Its score was under clinical exam. Today, we are not allowed to abandon axillary dissection for pre-operative ALS. That simple and non traumatic examination appeared to be of no value in order to determine the axillary metastatic nodal status in breast cancer.

[Current role of chemotherapy in the treatment of invasive cancers of the bladder]. / Place actuelle de la chimiothérapie dans le traitement des cancers infiltrants de vessie.

Treatment of bladder carcinoma with cystectomy and or radiotherapy provide 5-year survival rates of 28-50%. Phase II chemotherapy trials have proven its efficacy with a partial and complete response rate of 20% and 10% respectively for drugs such as cisplatin or methotrexate. Recent phase III studies have demonstrated the superiority of associations such as CMV, CISCA or M-VAC with complete response rates of 28-39%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may increase local control and offer the possibility of conservative treatment after complete tumor regression (one third of cases). The positive effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival has not yet been demonstrated and randomized trials are now in progress. The concomitant association of cisplatin or fluorouracil with radiation therapy provides high complete response rates (65-88%) in all published studies. A longer follow-up period is necessary to confirm these results in terms of local control gain and survival benefit, but this strategy seems to constitute a major advancement for patients unable to undergo radical cystectomy. Further studies are needed before extending this conservative approach to less advanced invasive bladder carcinoma. Adjuvant chemotherapy may decrease metastasis rate, but survival benefit has not yet been definitively established by randomized studies.

[Radiotherapy and concomitant cisplatin in stage III non-small cell bronchial cancer: results of a pilot study]. / Radiothérapie et cisplatine concomitant dans les cancers bronchiques inopérables non à petites cellules stade III: résultats d'une étude pilote.

From July 1989 to July 1991, 73 previously untreated patients with histologically proven stage III inoperable non-small cell lung cancer have been treated with standard fractionation radiation therapy and concomitant cisplatin by continuous infusion. Thoracic irradiation was delivered at a dose of 40 grays in 20 fractions over 4 weeks to the entire mediastinum, ans was followed after a two-week rest by a boost of 30 grays in 15 fractions over 3 weeks with oblique fields sparing the spinal cord. Continuous infusion cisplatin was given during the second week or each radiation therapy sequence at a dose of 20 mg/sqm/24 hours during five days (120 hours) with usual hyperhydratation and antiemetic measures. Toxicity was essentially hematologic and gastro-intestinal but there was only 4.1% grade 3 or grade 4 complications. Radical surgery became feasible after the first cycle of treatment in 10 patients (13.7%). Complete response rate as determined by CT-scan and fiberoptic bronchoscopy was 61.6%. At a median follow-up of 26 months, actuarial overall survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 46.6%, 27.7% and 24.5%, respectively. There were no local recurrence or distant relapses after 3 years, which will hopefully result in long-term survival in one quarter of these patients. These results compare favorably with other studies combining radiation therapy and concomitant cisplatin with different dosage and schedule. Local control appears substantially improved by this combined modality treatment over radiation therapy alone. However, the incidence of distant metastasis remains significant, especially during the first year of follow-up. Further improvement of early and long-term survival could possibly result from the incorporation in this protocol of a second drug active against subclinical dissemination.