Is Hand Surgery in the Procedure Room Setting Associated With Increased Surgical Site Infection? A Cohort Study of 2,717 Patients in the Veterans Affairs Population.

PURPOSE: Procedure rooms (PRs) are increasingly used for hand surgeries, but few studies have directly compared surgical site infection (SSI) rates between the PR and operating room. We tested the hypothesis that procedure setting is not associated with an increased SSI incidence in the VA population. METHODS: We identified carpal tunnel, trigger finger, and first dorsal compartment releases performed at our VA institution from 1999 to 2021 of which 717 were performed in the main operating room and 2,000 were performed in the PR. The incidence of SSI, defined as signs of wound infection within 60 days of the index procedure, which was treated with oral antibiotics, intravenous antibiotics, and/or operating room irrigation and debridement, was compared. We constructed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the association between procedure setting and SSI incidence, adjusting for age, sex, procedure type, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Surgical site infection incidence was 55/2,000 (2.8%) in the PR cohort and 20/717 (2.8%) in the operating room cohort. In the PR cohort, five (0.3%) cases required hospitalization for intravenous antibiotics of which two (0.1%) cases required operating room irrigation and debridement. In the operating room cohort, two (0.3%) cases required hospitalization for intravenous antibiotics of which one (0.1%) case required operating room irrigation and debridement. All other SSIs were treated with oral antibiotics alone. The procedure setting was not independently associated with SSI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.49, 1.48]). The only risk factor for SSI was trigger finger release (odds ratio, 2.13 [95% confidence interval, 1.32, 3.48] compared with carpal tunnel release), which was independent of setting. CONCLUSIONS: Minor hand surgeries can be performed safely in the PR without an increased rate of SSI. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Distal Metaphyseal Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy Fixation: A Biomechanical Analysis.

PURPOSE: Ulnar shortening osteotomy can be used to treat ulnar impaction syndrome and other causes of ulnar wrist pain. Distal metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (DMUSO) is one technique that has been proposed to reduce the complications seen with a diaphyseal USO or a wafer resection. However, to our knowledge, the optimal fixation construct for DMUSO has not been studied. We sought to characterize the biomechanical stiffness and rotational stability of different DMUSO constructs. METHODS: A DMUSO was performed on 40 human cadaveric ulnas using 4 different fixation constructs (10 specimens per group): one 3.0 mm antegrade screw; two 2.2 mm antegrade screws; one 3.0 mm retrograde screw; and two 2.2 mm retrograde screws. Biaxial testing using axial load and cyclical axial torque was performed until failure, defined as 10° of rotation or 2 mm displacement. Specimens were assessed for stiffness at failure. Bone density was assessed using the second metacarpal cortical percentage. RESULTS: Bone density was similar between all 4 testing groups. Of the 4 groups, the 2 antegrade screw group exhibited the highest rotational stiffness of 232 ± 102 Nm/deg. In paired analysis, this was significantly greater than 1 retrograde screw constructs. In multivariable analysis, 2-screw constructs were significantly stiffer than 1 screw and antegrade constructs were significantly stiffer than retrograde. Maximum failure torque did not differ with orientation, but 2 screws failed at significantly higher torques. CONCLUSION: Using 2 screws for DMUSO fixation constructs may provide higher stiffness and maximum failure torque, and antegrade screw constructs may provide more stiffness than retrograde constructs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Antegrade screw fixation using 2 screws may provide the strongest construct for DMUSO. Antegrade fixation may be preferred because it avoids violating the distal radioulnar joint capsule and articular surface of the ulna.

Failure of humeral shaft fixation: construct characteristics.

PURPOSE: Fixation failure following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of humeral shaft fractures can be a challenging complication. We aimed to identify the modes of failure and characteristics of failed fixation constructs. METHODS: We queried our institutional database for patients > 18 years old with fixation failure after ORIF with single plate and screw constructs of humeral shaft fractures from 2006 to 2017. Demographics, fracture characteristics, fixation construct design and mode of failure were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-three failures were identified. Mean age was 55.9 years (SD 19.2 years) with 15 (65%) women. Twelve patients (52%) had midshaft fractures; the remainder had distal-third shaft (8 pts, 35%) or proximal-third shaft (3 pts, 13%) fractures. Midshaft fractures were most commonly fixed through an anterolateral approach with plates and all non-locking screws (83%), while distal-third shaft fractures were fixed with a combination of locking and non-locking screws from a posterior approach. Distal-third shaft fractures failed by plate breakage (63%) or screw pullout (38%) and all midshaft failures occurred by screw pullout proximal (92%) or distal (8%) to the fracture. Resultant varus deformity occurred in 20 (87%) fractures. CONCLUSION: Screw pullout in midshaft fractures suggests that fixation to bone was insufficient or biomechanically disadvantageous. Varus moments contribute significantly to the failure of humeral shaft fracture ORIF. Plate breakage in distal fractures suggests high concentrations of stress over a narrow working length of constructs with inadequate plate strength. Recognizing how these constructs fail can aid proper implant selection and application for humeral shaft fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Treatment level IV.

Radiocarpal Fusion: Indications, Technique, and Modifications.

Degenerative disorders of the wrist may affect isolated joints and inhibit normal functions of the wrist secondary to pain and stiffness. These processes that affect only the radiocarpal joint may be secondary to posttraumatic osteoarthritis, primary osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Radiocarpal wrist arthrodesis may help preserve some of the native wrist kinematics while alleviating pain and improving the range of motion. However, the surgeon must ensure that the patient's pathologic process primarily affects the radiocarpal articulations while relatively sparing the midcarpal articulations. Depending on the location of the pathology, isolated radiolunate or radioscapholunate arthrodesis have been described to preserve some motion in the midcarpal joint. To maximize motion in the midcarpal joint after radiocarpal arthrodesis, techniques for distal scaphoid and triquetrum excision have been described. We report patient outcomes for various techniques and describe our preferred technique for radioscapholunate arthrodesis using distal scaphoid excision.

Gorham Disease Limited to the Left Upper Extremity Without Hand Involvement.

In this case report, we present a young female patient with a history of Gorham disease, who sustained pathologic fractures of the left radius and ulna after a low-impact fall. Massive osteolysis of the left forearm and wrist was noted on plain radiographs. The patient had had 8 previous left upper-extremity fractures without evidence of disease in any other area of the body.

Measurement of the coracohumeral distance on magnetic resonance imaging in a large patient cohort.

BACKGROUND: Coracoid impingement syndrome is an increasingly recognized etiology of anterior shoulder pain. Numerus studies have documented the coracohumeral distance (CHD) as a primary or secondary measurement in symptomatic individuals, but there lacks an evaluation of CHD in a large cohort of asymptomatic individuals. The purpose of this study was to quantify a normative distribution of the CHD in a large cohort of healthy, asymptomatic subjects with no history of impingement or shoulder instability. METHODS: Incoming first-year students in the United States Military Academy were offered enrollment in this study as part of a prospective cohort to assess the normal anatomic relationships of the shoulder girdle. Magnetic resonance images were obtained, and a board-certified, fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist performed measurements of the smallest distance from the coracoid to the humeral head on axial images. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance images of 714 subjects were available for analysis, including 630 males and 84 females, with a total of 1120 individual shoulders with images of adequate quality. The mean CHD for all shoulders imaged was 13.7 mm. The mean CHD in male shoulders was 13.8 mm, and in female subjects the average was 12.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest of its kind to evaluate the CHD in asymptomatic, healthy shoulders to date and demonstrates a mean CHD of 13.7 mm for all subjects. This information can help to standardize "normal" ranges and act as a comparison for future work, when taken in the context of age and imaging in neutral rotation.

Has a Prescription-limiting Law in Rhode Island Helped to Reduce Opioid Use After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: In the United States, since 2016, at least 28 of 50 state legislatures have passed laws regarding mandatory prescribing limits for opioid medications. One of the earliest state laws (which was passed in Rhode Island in 2016) restricted the maximum morphine milligram equivalents provided in the first postoperative prescription for patients defined as opioid-naïve to 30 morphine milligram equivalents per day, 150 total morphine milligram equivalents, or 20 total doses. While such regulations are increasingly common in the United States, their effects on opioid use after total joint arthroplasty are unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are legislative limitations to opioid prescriptions in Rhode Island associated with decreased opioid use in the immediate (first outpatient prescription postoperatively), 30-day, and 90-day periods after THA and TKA? (2) Is this law associated with similar changes in postoperative opioid use among patients who are opioid-naïve and those who are opioid-tolerant preoperatively? METHODS: Patients undergoing primary THA or TKA between January 1, 2016 and June 28, 2016 (before the law was passed on June 28, 2016) were retrospectively compared with patients undergoing surgery between June 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 (after the law's implementation on April 17, 2017). The lapse between the pre-law and post-law periods was designed to avoid confounding from potential voluntary practice changes by physicians after the law was passed but before its mandatory implementation. Demographic and surgical details were extracted from a large multi-specialty orthopaedic group's surgical billing database using Current Procedural Terminology codes 27130 and 27447. Any patients undergoing revision procedures, same-day bilateral arthroplasties, or a second primary THA or TKA in the 3-month followup period were excluded. Secondary data were confirmed by reviewing individual electronic medical records in the associated hospital system which included three major hospital sites. We evaluated 1125 patients. In accordance with the state's department of health guidelines, patients were defined as opioid-tolerant if they had filled any prescription for an opioid medication in the 30-day preoperative period. Data on age, gender, and the proportion of patients who were defined as opioid tolerant preoperatively were collected and found to be no different between the pre-law and post-law groups. The state's prescription drug monitoring program database was used to collect data on prescriptions for all controlled substances filled between 30 days preoperatively and 90 days postoperatively. The primary outcomes were the mean morphine milligram equivalents of the initial outpatient postoperative opioid prescription after discharge and the mean cumulative morphine milligram equivalents at the 30- and 90-day postoperative intervals. Secondary analyses included subgroup analyses by procedure and by preoperative opioid tolerance. RESULTS: After the law was implemented, the first opioid prescriptions were smaller for patients who were opioid-naïve (mean 156 ± 106 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 451 ± 296 before, mean difference 294 morphine milligram equivalents; p < 0.001) and those who were opioid-tolerant (263 ± 265 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 534 ± 427 before, mean difference 271 morphine milligram equivalents; p < 0.001); however, for cumulative prescriptions in the first 30 days postoperatively, this was only true among patients who were previously opioid-naïve (501 ± 416 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 796 ± 597 before, mean difference 295 morphine milligram equivalents; p < 0.001). Those who were opioid-tolerant did not have a decrease in the cumulative number of 30-day morphine milligram equivalents (1288 ± 1632 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 1398 ± 1274 before, mean difference 110 morphine milligram equivalents; p = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: The prescription-limiting law was associated with a decline in cumulative opioid prescriptions at 30 days postoperatively filled by patients who were opioid-naïve before total joint arthroplasty. This may substantially impact public health, and these policies should be considered an important tool for healthcare providers, communities, and policymakers who wish to combat the current opioid epidemic. However, given the lack of a discernible effect on cumulative opioids filled from 30 to 90 days postoperatively, further investigations are needed to evaluate more effective policies to prevent prolonged opioid use after total joint arthroplasty, particularly in patients who are opioid-tolerant preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Opioid-Limiting Regulation: Effect on Patients Undergoing Knee and Shoulder Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect prescription-limiting legislation passed in Rhode Island has had on opioids prescribed following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery at various time points, up to 90 days postoperatively. METHODS: All patients undergoing the 3 most common arthroscopic procedures at our institution (anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, partial meniscectomy, and rotator cuff repair) were included. Patients were selected from 2 6-month study periods (prepassage and postimplementation of the law). The state's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program database was queried for controlled substances filled in the perioperative period (from 30 days preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively). Multiple logistic regressions were used to identify predictors of chronic (>30 days) opioid use. RESULTS: The morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed in the initial postoperative script decreased from 319.04 (∼43 5-mg oxycodone tablets) in the prepassage to 152.45 MMEs (∼20 5-mg oxycodone tablets) in the postimplementation group (P < .001). The total MMEs filled in the first 30 days decreased from 520.93 to 299.94 MMEs (∼70 to ∼40 5-mg oxycodone tablets) (P < .001). MMEs filled between 30 and 90 days fell by 22.5% for all patients in this study; however, this change was not statistically significant (P = .263). Preoperative opioid use (odds ratio, 10.85; P < .001) and preoperative benzodiazepine use (odds ratio, 2.13; P = .005) predicted chronic opioid use postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: State opioid-limiting legislation reduced cumulative MMEs following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery in the first 30 days. Further research assessing the impact of this legislation on postoperative pain control, patient satisfaction, and functional outcomes following surgery is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Suture Suspension Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.

PURPOSE: Most studies have demonstrated little difference in the outcome of the various techniques proposed for the surgical treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis. However, the difficulty and time required to perform each technique vary widely. In addition, the introduction of recent implants has increased the cost of the overall procedure. We hypothesize that using a simple, yet stable, suture suspension technique without tendon interposition or ligament reconstruction yields similar results to conventional approaches with less operative time. METHODS: Three hundred twenty consecutive patients underwent thumb CMC arthroplasty by trapezial excision and metacarpal suspension using #2 high-strength orthopedic suture locked weave alone passed from the distal most abductor pollicis longus and flexor carpi radialis insertions without K-wire fixation or tendon transfer. Average duration of preoperative symptoms was 17.8 months. Patient radiographs were graded for arthritis severity and a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (scale 0-10) obtained. Postoperative clinical and radiological follow-up averaged 5.4 years (minimum, 24 months). RESULTS: The average age at surgery was 57.3 years and there were 221 women (243 procedures) and 65 men (77 procedures). Average total operative time was 23.4 minutes. The dominant hand was involved in 52% of patients. All had prior treatment including orthoses and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with 312 having had at least 1 steroid injection. Five patients had stage 1, 134 had stage 2, 164 had stage 3, and 17 had stage 4 disease on radiographs. Average trapezial space height on final follow-up radiographs was 0.8 cm. Two patients had complete trapezial space collapse and required a revision procedure. The average VAS score was 0.6 with pain eliminated in 269 thumbs, minimal in 49, and unchanged/worse in 2. All patients that were employed at the time of surgery returned to work at an average of 2.3 months (range, 3-16 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Suture suspension thumb CMC arthroplasty provides comparable clinical results and several advantages over many current techniques that are described in the literature. The advantages include shortened operative time, inherent stability of the thumb metacarpal height, and no necessity for K-wire fixation, tendon transfers, or implants. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Medical Malpractice Litigation Following Arthroscopic Surgery.

PURPOSE: Our study aims to analyze a variety of factors involving malpractice lawsuits following arthroscopy, focusing on reasons for lawsuit and establishing predictors for the outcome of the lawsuit. METHODS: Two legal databases, VerdictSearch and Westlaw, were queried for arthroscopic cases in adult patients. For all included cases, clinical and demographic data were recorded. The effects of plaintiff demographics, joint involved, lawsuit allegation, case ruling, and size of indemnity payments were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 240 included cases, 62 (26%) resulted in plaintiff verdict, 160 (67%) resulted in defense verdict, and 18 (8%) were settled without trial. Plaintiff demographics (age and sex) had no effect on the case ruling. There was no statistical difference between indemnity awards for plaintiff verdicts ($1,013,494) and settled cases ($848,331; P = .13). Patient death was noted in 20 cases (8.3%); a significantly higher proportion of these cases were settled versus went to trial (P = .0022), including 19 patients (95%) who had knee arthroscopy and 16 deaths (80%) resulting from a pulmonary embolus. Plaintiff verdict or settlement were seen significantly more frequently for vascular complications and wrong-sided surgery. Alternatively, defense verdicts followed lawsuits alleging surgeon technical error. Wrong-sided surgery, retained instruments, deep venous thrombosis, and postoperative infections were seen at a significantly higher proportion after knee arthroscopy than after arthroscopy of other joints. Similarly, neurological injury was significantly associated with elbow and hip arthroscopy, while allegations of technical error by the surgeon and block-related complications were associated with shoulder arthroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Plaintiff verdict or settlement were seen for vascular complications and wrong-sided surgery, while defense verdicts followed lawsuits alleging surgeon technical error and block-related complications. We also identified types of allegations that were associated with arthroscopy of different joints. All but one case of patient death (20 cases) were noted to involve knee arthroscopy, and an overwhelming majority resulted due to a pulmonary embolism. This information helps the arthroscopic surgeon better counsel patients and employ strategies to mitigate preventable complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Quantitative Assessment of Scalene Muscle Block for the Diagnosis of Suspected Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To measure changes in upper limb work and power capacity before and after anterior scalene muscle block (ASMB) to suggest thoracic outlet syndrome caused by costoclavicular space compression. METHODS: We evaluated 34 patients disabled by symptoms suggesting thoracic outlet syndrome. An ASMB was performed via a supraclavicular injection. The sternocleidomastoid muscle was injected as a control. We captured data obtained from work simulator measurements before and after ASMB. Each patient performed a push-pull test with the forearm at waist level (test 1), an overhead bar push-pull test with the arm elevated (test 2), and the extremity abduction stress test with repetitive hand gripping during static arm elevation (test 3). We measured the work product, time to fatigue, and power generation. Sensory testing was performed after ASMB to rule out improved performance associated with possible sensory nerve block. RESULTS: In contrast to sternocleidomastoid injection controls, symptomatic and functional improvement was noted in all patients (n = 34) after ASMB. Work product measurement improved 93%, 108%, and 104% for tests 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Time to fatigue and power output also increased after the block. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary symptomatic improvement after ASMB may be anticipated in patients with TOS. This study documents a significant concurrent increase in upper limb motor function after the block. Increased work and power measurements after ASMB may draw diagnostic inference regarding a dynamic change in the scalene muscle and the costoclavicular space associated with symptomatic thoracic outlet syndrome. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic III.

Surgical techniques for spinopelvic reconstruction following total sacrectomy: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To identify all available reconstruction methods for a total sacrectomy. Secondarily, we aimed to evaluate outcomes based on different interventions. METHODS: We searched PubMed to identify sacral resections for tumors requiring internal fixation for stabilization. Demographic information, fixation techniques and postoperative outcomes were abstracted. RESULTS: Twenty-three publications (43 patients) met inclusion criteria from an initial search of 856 (κ 0.93). Mean age was 37 years and follow-up was 33 months. Fixation methods included a combination of spinopelvic fixation (SPF), posterior pelvic ring fixation (PPRF), and/or anterior spinal column fixation (ASCF). For the purposes of analysis, patients were segregated based on whether they received ASCF. Postoperative complications including wound/instrument infections, GI or vascular complications were reported at a higher rate in the non-ASCF group (1.63 complications/patient vs. 0.7 complications/patient). Instrument failure was seen in 5 (16.1 %) out of the 31 patients with reported outcomes. Specifically, 1 out of 8 patients (12.5 %) with ASCF compared with 4 out of 23 patients (17.4 %) without ASCF had hardware failure. At final follow-up, 35 of 39 patients were ambulating. CONCLUSION: While surgical treatment of primary sacral tumors remains a challenge, there have been advances in reconstruction techniques following total sacrectomy. SPF has shifted from intrapelvic rod and hook constructs to pedicle and iliac screw-rod systems for improved rigidity. PPRF and ASCF have adapted for deficiencies in the posterior ring and anterior column. A trend toward a lower rate of hardware failure emerged in the group utilizing anterior spinal column support. Despite a more involved reconstruction with ASCF, surgical complications such as infection rates and blood loss were lower compared to the group without ASCF. While we cannot definitively say one system is superior to the other, based on the data gleaned from this systematic review, it is our opinion that incorporation of ASCF in reconstructing the spinopelvic junction may lead to improved outcomes. However, most importantly, we recommend that the treating surgeon operate on patients requiring a total sacrectomy based on his or her level of comfort, as these cases can be extremely challenging even among experts.

Bone Graft Substitutes-What Are My Options?

We examine the range of available bone graft substitutes often used in nonunion and malunion surgery of the upper extremity. Synthetic materials such as calcium sulfate, beta-calcium phosphate ceramics, hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, and 3D printed materials are discussed. We delve into the advantages, disadvantages, and clinical applications for each, considering factors such as biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, mechanical strength, and resorption rates. This review provides upper extremity surgeons with insights into the available array of bone graft substitutes. We hope that the reviews helps in the decision-making process to achieve optimal outcomes when treating nonunion and malunion of the upper extremity.

Antegrade Fixation of Distal Metaphyseal Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy.

The ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is a common procedure used to treat ulnar impaction syndrome secondary to static or dynamic ulnar-positive variance. There are many described techniques for the USO. The distal metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (DMUSO) with retrograde cannulated screw fixation was described to reduce complications seen with other techniques. Biomechanical analysis of fixation constructs demonstrates 2-screw constructs are significantly stiffer than 1 screw and antegrade constructs have similar or greater stiffness when compared with retrograde constructs. Here, we describe a technique of antegrade cannulated screw fixation for DMUSO that obviates the need for the disruption of the distal radioulnar joint for intra-articular exposure of the ulnar head. Similar to the traditional retrograde DMUSO technique, this construct may also decrease the risk of delayed union, symptomatic implants associated with diaphyseal osteotomies, and disruption of triangular fibrocartilaginous complex in wafer procedures.

Pulse oximetry measurements in the evaluation of patients with possible thoracic outlet syndrome.

PURPOSE: We present our experience in using pulse oximetry as an aid in the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Our attention was given to those symptomatic patients without objective confirmatory data on imaging or electrodiagnostic evaluation. METHODS: Using a pulse oximeter, we measured the oxygen saturation and the pulse rate during a provocative extremity abduction stress test exercise maneuver in 18 patients with symptoms and signs consistent with a diagnosis of nonspecific neurogenic TOS. The oxygen saturation and pulse rates in 18 asymptomatic subjects were used as a control. RESULTS: Resting oxygen saturation above 97% was present in both groups initially. After the provocative exercise maneuver, there was a significant reduction in the oxygen saturation levels, which dropped to 86% in the symptomatic TOS group compared with 94% in the control group. There was a significant increase in pulse rate in those subjects suspected of having TOS compared with a minimal increase in pulse rate in control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse oximetry produced objective confirmatory measurements, which support a hypothesis that hypoperfusion in the upper limb during provocative activities or exercise may cause disabling symptoms associated with nonspecific neurogenic TOS. This method may be a useful, noninvasive, rapid, and inexpensive clinical tool in the diagnosis of TOS, a condition frequently lacking in objective, confirmatory diagnostic data.

Is Opioid-Limiting Legislation Effective for Hand Surgery Patients?

BACKGROUND: The Rhode Island State Legislature passed the Uniform Controlled Substances Act in 2016 to limit opioid prescriptions. We aimed to objectively evaluate its effect on opioid prescribing for hand surgery patients and also identify risk factors for prolonged opioid use. METHODS: A 6-month period (January-June 2016) prior to passage of the law was compared with a period following its implementation (July-December 2017). Thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty and distal radius fracture fixation were classified as "major surgery" and carpal tunnel and trigger finger release as "minor surgery." Prescription Drug Monitoring Database was used to review controlled substances filled during the study periods. RESULTS: A total of 1380 patients met our inclusion criteria, with 644 prelaw and 736 postlaw patients. Patients undergoing "major surgery" saw a significant decrease in the number of pills issued in the first postoperative prescription (41.1 vs 21.0) and a corresponding decrease in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) (318.6 vs 159.2 MMEs) after implementation. A 30% decrease in MMEs was also seen in those undergoing "major surgery" in the first 30 days postoperatively (544.7 vs 381.7 MMEs). Risk factors for prolonged opioid use included male sex and preoperative opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: In Rhode Island, opioid-limiting legislation resulted in a significant decrease in the number of pills and MMEs of the initial prescription and a 30% decrease in total MMEs in the 30-day postoperative period after "major hand surgery." Additional research is needed to explore the association between legislation and clinical outcomes.