Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Addict Med ; 2024 Mar 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38452185

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Few studies describe contemporary alcohol withdrawal management in hospitalized settings or review current practices considering the guidelines by the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with alcohol withdrawal on medical or surgical wards in 19 Veteran Health Administration (VHA) hospitals between October 1, 2018, and September 30, 2019. Demographic and comorbidity data were obtained from the Veteran Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse. Inpatient management and hospital outcomes were obtained by chart review. Factors associated with treatment duration and complicated withdrawal were examined. RESULTS: Of the 594 patients included in this study, 51% were managed with symptom-triggered therapy alone, 26% with fixed dose plus symptom-triggered therapy, 10% with front loading regimens plus symptom-triggered therapy, and 3% with fixed dose alone. The most common medication given was lorazepam (87%) followed by chlordiazepoxide (33%), diazepam (14%), and phenobarbital (6%). Symptom-triggered therapy alone (relative risk [RR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.80) and front loading with symptom-triggered therapy (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92) were associated with reduced treatment duration. Lorazepam (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-1.41) and phenobarbital (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.06-1.54) were associated with increased treatment duration. Lorazepam (adjusted odds ratio, 4.30; 95% CI, 1.05-17.63) and phenobarbital (adjusted odds ratio, 6.51; 95% CI, 2.08-20.40) were also associated with complicated withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our results support guidelines by the ASAM to manage patients with long-acting benzodiazepines using symptom-triggered therapy. Health care systems that are using shorter acting benzodiazepines and fixed-dose regimens should consider updating alcohol withdrawal management pathways to follow ASAM recommendations.

2.
J Hosp Med ; 2024 Jul 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39031461

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Alcohol withdrawal is a common reason for admission to acute care hospitals. Prescription of medications for alcohol-use disorder (AUD) and close outpatient follow-up are commonly recommended, but few studies report their effects on postdischarge outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of medications for AUD and follow-up appointments on readmission and abstinence. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated veterans admitted for alcohol withdrawal to medical services at 19 Veteran Health Administration hospitals between October 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019. Factors associated with all-cause 30-day readmission and 6-month abstinence were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 594 patients included in this study, 296 (50.7%) were prescribed medications for AUD at discharge and 459 (78.5%) were discharged with follow-up appointments, including 251 (42.8%) with a substance-use clinic appointment, 191 (32.9%) with a substance-use program appointment, and 73 (12.5%) discharged to a residential program. All-cause 30-day readmission occurred for 150 patients (25.5%) and 103 (17.8%) remained abstinent at 6 months. Medications for AUD and outpatient discharge appointments were not associated with readmission or abstinence. Discharge to residential treatment program was associated with reduced 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.39, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.18-0.82) and improved abstinence (AOR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.33-4.73). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission and return to heavy drinking are common for patients discharged for alcohol withdrawal. Medications for AUD were not associated with improved outcomes. The only intervention at the time of discharge that improved outcomes was discharge to residential treatment program, which was associated with decreased readmission and improved abstinence.

3.
J Addict Med ; 17(1): 42-46, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35914119

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the proportion of total hospital discharges that involved a primary or secondary substance-related diagnosis code (SubDx) on inpatient medicine, psychiatry, and surgery services as part of a needs assessment for inpatient addiction consultation at our large, academic-affiliated Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital. METHODS: We first calculated the percentage of total and service-specific discharges with a primary or secondary substance-related International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision , code on all inpatient services (medicine, psychiatry, and surgery) in Fiscal Year 2017, 2018, and 2019, using facility-level data. Second, we calculated the proportion of total discharges that involved alcohol- and opioid-related diagnoses. RESULTS: Over the 3 years studied, 29% of total discharges had a SubDx (4469 of 15,575). The proportion of total discharges that involved a SubDx was 23% (1246 of 5449) in 2017, 31% (1664 of 5332) in 2018, and 33% in 2019 (1559 of 4794), a statistically significant increase ( P < 0.001). As a percentage of service-specific discharges, 65% of discharges from psychiatry (1446 of 2217) had a SubDx, compared with 25% from medicine (2469 of 9713), and 15% from surgery (554 of 3645). Medicine services had the most discharges with SubDx, with a year-over-year increase in the number of discharges with SubDx. The percentage of total discharges that involved alcohol- and opioid-related diagnoses was 14% and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Substance-related diagnoses are prevalent at our hospital and are increasing over time. The largest number of discharges with SubDx was found on medicine services. Alcohol-related diagnoses were nearly 4 times more prevalent than opioid-related diagnoses. We found focused need around alcohol use and alcohol withdrawal.


Assuntos
Alcoolismo , Comportamento Aditivo , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias , Veteranos , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Analgésicos Opioides , Alcoolismo/epidemiologia , Alcoolismo/terapia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
4.
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes ; 28(4): 377-382, 2021 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34010225

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The pathogenesis of bone fragility in diabetes has not been fully characterized. The antifracture efficacy of available therapies remains unproven in patients with diabetes. We aim to collate current evidence of the treatment of diabetic bone fragility, and to provide a rationale for considering optimal therapeutic option in patients with diabetes. RECENT FINDINGS: The antifracture efficacy of antiresorptive and anabolic therapies is well established in patients without diabetes. Studies in patients with osteoporosis have shown that anabolic therapies lead to faster and larger benefits to bone mineral density and offer greater protection against fracture than antiresorptive therapies. Available data suggest that antiresorptive and anabolic therapies have similar effect on bone density and fracture risk reduction in patients with and without diabetes. However, the evidence in diabetes is limited to observational studies and post hoc analyses of osteoporosis studies. SUMMARY: There are no specific guidelines for the treatment of bone fragility in patients with diabetes. We offer a rationale for use of anabolic therapies in diabetes which is a low bone formation state, in contrast to postmenopausal osteoporosis that is characterized by increased bone turnover. Prospective studies evaluating the effect of available therapies on bone quality and fracture outcomes in patients with diabetes are needed.


Assuntos
Anabolizantes , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Complicações do Diabetes , Osteoporose , Anabolizantes/uso terapêutico , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Complicações do Diabetes/complicações , Humanos , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/etiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle
5.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 42(6-7): 450-4, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20297925

RESUMO

Central nervous system tuberculomas are rare and severe complications of tuberculosis. We performed a retrospective study of the clinical, biological, radiological, pathological, and therapeutic features of 23 patients. Almost all patients were from countries with a high prevalence of tuberculosis (22/23). Their mean age was 37.3 y; 43.5% had laboratory-proven meningitis and 17.4% had biopsy-proven tuberculomas. For most of the patients, the duration of treatment lasted 13-18 months. The disease was controlled without relapse in 16 patients and 3 patients died. Diagnosis relies on magnetic resonance imaging and bacteriological specimens from all the involved sites. This study indicates that central nervous system tuberculomas occur in young patients from high risk countries. The anti-tuberculous drug regimen in this series was 2 months of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol, followed by at least 10 months of isoniazid and rifampin. Results did not contradict the use of a 12-month regimen as currently recommended.


Assuntos
Tuberculose do Sistema Nervoso Central/diagnóstico , Adulto , Encéfalo/patologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Tuberculose do Sistema Nervoso Central/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose do Sistema Nervoso Central/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA