Health Literacy and Self-Reported Hearing Aid Use in the Health and Retirement Study.

OBJECTIVES: Understanding the determinants of hearing aid use is important to improve the provision of hearing healthcare. Prior research has indicated that materials in the clinic and online, as well as audiologists' language during appointments, require a higher literacy level than most patients possess. We hypothesized that low health literacy is a barrier to entry in hearing healthcare, and therefore that health literacy would be positively correlated with the probability of hearing aid use. DESIGN: We performed retrospective analyses of the Health and Retirement Study, a longitudinal survey of American adults of retirement age. Objective health literacy was measured in different but overlapping subsamples using subsets of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (n = 1240, n = 1586, and n = 2412). Subjective health literacy was assessed using a single-question screener in a larger sample (n = 8362). Separate discrete time models including common covariates of hearing aid use were constructed for each subsample. RESULTS: Objective health literacy measures did not correlate significantly with hearing aid use when age, gender, race/ethnicity, self-assessed hearing ability, and net income were included in the models. Subjective health literacy did correlate significantly with hearing aid use in the complete model, with lower subjective health literacy correlated with lower odds of reporting hearing aid use. CONCLUSIONS: Taken at face value, the results provide mixed evidence for a link between health literacy and hearing aid use. The results from the analysis of the largest sample, using the subjective health literacy measure, were consistent with the hypothesis that low health literacy is a barrier to hearing aid use. However, this was not supported by the analysis of the objective health literacy measures in these samples. Further research using full health literacy measurement tools and capturing other relevant variables would offer clarification on this conflict. The literacy level of clinical materials and conversation is a modifiable potential factor in hearing aid uptake, so further clinical and research consideration is warranted.

A Comparative Study of Ocular Surface Disease in Childhood Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate ocular surface disease (OSD) in patients with childhood glaucoma (CG). METHODS: A multicenter, comparative, cross-sectional study of 41 eyes of 27 patients with CG and 42 eyes of 42 healthy age- and sex-matched controls was conducted between 2021 and 2022. Developmentally delayed children and those having a coexisting systemic illness that might affect the ocular surface were not enrolled. Data collected included glaucoma type, glaucoma medications and surgeries, anterior segment examination, symptom frequency and severity, and tear break-up time (TBUT). Dry eye disease (DED) symptoms were evaluated using an Arabic-language SPEED questionnaire. RESULTS: The average number of glaucoma medications and surgeries among the 27 patients with CG was 1.17 and 1.4, respectively. TBUT was shorter in patients with CG compared with controls and even shorter when glaucoma medication usage was accounted for. Punctate epithelial erosions were more prevalent in patients with CG and of a higher grade. The severity of all DED parameters, and the prevalence of all DED parameters except for eye fatigue, were greater in patients with CG on the day of questionnaire intake. In addition, each additional glaucoma drop was associated with worse TBUT and ocular surface dryness. All analyses mentioned above were statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this first study to comprehensively evaluate OSD in patients with CG, a significantly greater incidence of OSD signs and symptoms was found in patients with CG compared with a healthy population. Additional study by CG subtype is needed.

Efficacy of oral anticoagulants in chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and undergoing hemodialysis (HD) who also have atrial fibrillation (AF). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database for relevant studies reporting the usefulness of OAC therapy for CKD, ESRD, and HD patients with AF was conducted from its inception until 1st May 2023. The studies that reported OR, RR, or HR for adult AF patients to investigate the efficacy of OAC in CKD, ESRD, and HD were included. Statistical analysis was completed using a generic inverse variance and random-effects model to calculate the combined HR and their corresponding 95% CIs for all outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The meta-analysis included 33 studies with 178,956 patients. The analysis revealed that the DOACs, when compared to VKA, significantly lowered the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.93]; P=0.002; I2=62%), bleeding (HR: 0.77, [95% CI: 0.67, 0.89]; P=0.0003; I2=83%), and intracranial hemorrhage (HR: 0.56, [95% CI 0.47, 0.66]; P<0.00001; I2=0%). Similarly, the risks of cardiovascular death (HR: 0.88, [95% CI 0.78, 1.00]; P=0.05; I2=0%), all-cause mortality (HR: 0.88, [95% CI 0.70, 1.10]; P=0.25; I2=96%), and myocardial infarction (HR: 0.80, [95% CI 0.54, 1.17]; P= 0.25; I2= 0%) were lowered by DOAC, but the result was insignificant. No significant difference was seen in the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding between DOAC and VKA as well (HR: 0.95, [95% CI 0.75, 1.20]; P=0.65; I2=83%). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis confirms that DOACs are effective for managing AF in patients with kidney disease, with potential clinical implications for AF and CKD management. Further research should explore DOACs' reno-protective effects.