Defining the quality of interdisciplinary care for patients with brain metastases: modified Delphi panel recommendations.

The value of interdisciplinary teams in improving outcomes and quality of care of patients with brain metastases remains uncertain, partly due to the lack of consensus on key indicators to evaluate interprofessional care. We aimed to obtain expert consensus across disciplines on indicators that evaluate the quality and value of brain metastases care. A steering committee of key opinion leaders curated relevant outcomes and process indicators from a literature review and a stakeholder needs assessment, and an international panel of physicians rated the outcomes and process indicators using a modified Delphi method. After three rounds, a consensus was reached on 29 indicators encompassing brain-directed oncological treatment, surgery, whole-brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, supportive or palliative care, and interdisciplinary team care. The Brain Metastases Quality-of-Care measure reflects the value and quality of brain metastases team-based care according to treatment modality and provides a benchmark of care for this under-studied patient population. The adoption, implementation, and sustainability of this set of indicators could help address the need expressed by patients with cancer, caregivers, and clinicians for more coordinated care across inpatient, outpatient, home, community, and tertiary academic settings.

Long-term trends of publications in journal of neuro-oncology: a bibliographic study of a core journal in the field of neuro-oncology.

PURPOSE: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology (JNO), established in 1983, plays a key role in publishing research on brain and spinal cord tumors. This study examines JNO's publication trends, focusing on country and gender representation to highlight its global impact. METHODS: Statistical analyses were conducted using R. Gender of the first authors was predicted using a gender-guesser, and author affiliations were used to determine publication countries. We introduced a novel Country-Related Diversity (CRD) index to assess the JNO's representativeness, comparing a country's JNO publications to its overall neurosurgical output. An index value of 1 indicates proportional representation. RESULTS: The JNO corpus, spanning from 1983 to 2024, comprises 8,154 documents with an average document age of 14.4 years. The average citation count per document is 28.71, with a rate of 2.16 citations per document per year. JNO's scientific output has grown significantly, peaking at 397 articles in 2011, with a long-term annual growth rate of 3.7%. The keyword analysis highlights "glioblastoma" as the most frequent term, reflecting the journal's neuro-oncological focus. Geographically, the U.S. led with 2,535 articles (40.1%), followed by China and Germany. International collaboration rose steadily, with multi-country publications increasing from 4.76% in 1983 to 20.98% in 2024. Analyzing contributions from different countries showed a converging CRD index toward 1 (P < 0.01), with U.S. and non-U.S. countries trending similarly. Upper-middle-income countries displayed fluctuating CRD patterns, whereas lower-middle-income countries lagged behind. Authorship analysis showed an increasing trend in co-authorship (P < 0.01), with the average number of authors per paper reaching 10.4 by 2024. Gender representation revealed a growing number of female first and senior authors, although males still dominate. By 2024, 32.9% of first authors and 21.6% of senior authors were female, signaling a gradual trend toward gender parity (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The CRD index offers a standardized measure of country-specific research representation in the JNO. The convergence towards 1 reflects balanced international representation. JNO publication also reflects a trend toward gender equity, with a notable rise in female first authors, enhancing global research inclusivity.

Biological effective dose as a predictor of local tumor control in stereotactic radiosurgery treated parasellar meningioma patients.

INTRODUCTION: The radio-surgical literature increasingly uses biological effective dose (BED) as a replacement for absorbed dose to analyze outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). There are as yet no studies which specifically investigate the association of BED to local tumor control in para-sellar meningioma. METHODS: we did a retrospective analysis of patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for para-sellar meningioma during the period of 1995-2022. Demographic, clinical, SRS parameters, and outcome data were collected. The target margin BED with and without a model for sub-lethal repair was calculated, as well as a ratio of BED at the target margin to the absorbed dose at the target margin. Factors related to local control were further analyzed. RESULTS: The study was comprised of 91 patients, 20 (22.0%) and 71 (78.0%) of whom were male and female, respectively. The median age was 55.0 (interquartile range Q1, Q3:47.5,65.5years). 34 (37%) patients had a resection of their meningioma prior to SRS. The median interval from SRS to last clinical follow up or progression was 89 months. 13 (14.3%) patients were found to have progression. 3-, 5- and 10-years local tumor control were 98%, 92% and 77%, respectively. In cox univariate analysis, the following factors were significant: Number of prior surgical resections (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.08-3.05, p = 0.024), BED (HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.92-1.00, p = 0.03), and BED/margin (HR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.21-0.92, p = 0.028). A BED threshold above 68 Gy was associated significantly with tumor control (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: BED and BED /margin absorbed dose ratio can be predictors of local control after SRS in parasellar meningioma. Optimizing the BED above 68Gy2.47 may afford better long-term tumor control.

The NeuroPoint alliance SRS & tumor QOD registries.

OBJECTIVE: Along with the increasing interest in real-world evidence in neuro-oncology, the deficiencies of prior population-based and quality registries became evident. The neuro-oncological quality registries of the NeuroPoint Alliance (NPA) focus on neuro-oncological surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and aim to fill the gaps of neuro-oncological practice in quality surveillance and real-world research. METHODS: Herein, we discuss the historical background, design process, and features of the NPA SRS and Tumor QOD registries. The registries'current status and future directions are outlined. RESULTS: The NPA SRS and Tumor QOD registries were designed based on the principles of prospective multi-institutional data collection, central auditing for data quality, and focus on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Currently, the registries include over 4,500 and 2,500 patients each, with caseloads comprising predominantly of brain metastases and primary extra-axial tumors, respectively. The registries serve both as a quality surveillance and improvement tool - providing participating sites with adjusted quality reports - and as platforms for real-world research of observational and, potentially, interventional nature. Future directions of the NPA neuro-oncological registries include the functional communications of the two registries and the incorporation of imaging analyses in the workflow of quality assessment and research efforts. CONCLUSIONS: The NPA SRS and Tumor QOD registries are quality registries of unique granularity in terms of surgical variables and postoperative outcomes. They constitute increasingly valuable data sources for real-time quality surveillance of participating sites and real-world research.

Comparative analysis of the spatial distribution of brain metastases across several primary cancers using machine learning and deep learning models.

OBJECTIVE: Brain metastases (BM) are associated with poor prognosis and increased mortality rates, making them a significant clinical challenge. Studying BMs can aid in improving early detection and monitoring. Systematic comparisons of anatomical distributions of BM from different primary cancers, however, remain largely unavailable. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that anatomical BM distributions differ based on primary cancer type, we analyze the spatial coordinates of BMs for five different primary cancer types along principal component (PC) axes. The dataset includes 3949 intracranial metastases, labeled by primary cancer types and with six features. We employ PC coordinates to highlight the distinctions between various cancer types. We utilized different Machine Learning (ML) algorithms (RF, SVM, TabNet DL) models to establish the relationship between primary cancer diagnosis, spatial coordinates of BMs, age, and target volume. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that PC1 aligns most with the Y axis, followed by the Z axis, and has minimal correlation with the X axis. Based on PC1 versus PC2 plots, we identified notable differences in anatomical spreading patterns between Breast and Lung cancer, as well as Breast and Renal cancer. In contrast, Renal and Lung cancer, as well as Lung and Melanoma, showed similar patterns. Our ML and DL results demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing BM distribution for different primary cancers, with the SVM algorithm achieving 97% accuracy using a polynomial kernel and TabNet achieving 96%. The RF algorithm ranked PC1 as the most important discriminating feature. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our results support accurate multiclass ML classification regarding brain metastases distribution.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from human epidermal receptor 2 positive breast Cancer: an international, multi-center study.

PURPOSE: To report patient outcomes and local tumor control rates in a cohort of patients with biopsy-proven HER-2 positive breast cancer treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM). METHODS: This international, retrospective, multicenter study, included 195 female patients with 1706 SRS-treated BM. Radiologic and clinical outcomes after SRS were determined and prognostic factors identified. RESULTS: At SRS, median patient age was 55 years [interquartile range (IQR) 47.6-62.0], and 156 (80%) patients had KPS ≥ 80. The median tumor volume was 0.1 cm3 (IQR 0.1-0.5) and the median prescription dose was 16 Gy (IQR 16-18). Local tumor control (LTC) rate was 98%, 94%, 93%, 90%, and 88% at six-, 12-, 24-, 36- and 60-months post-SRS, respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor volume (p = < 0.001) and concurrent pertuzumab (p = 0.02) improved LTC. Overall survival (OS) rates at six-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48-, and 60-months were 90%, 69%, 46%, 27%, 22%, and 18%, respectively. Concurrent pertuzumab improved OS (p = 0.032). In this patient subgroup, GPA scores ≥ 2.5 (p = 0.038 and p = 0.003) and rare primary tumor histologies (p = 0.01) were associated with increased and decreased OS, respectively. Asymptomatic adverse radiation events (ARE) occurred in 27 (14.0%) and symptomatic ARE in five (2.6%) patients. Invasive lobular carcinoma primary (p = 0.042) and concurrent pertuzumab (p < 0.001) conferred an increased risk for overall but not for symptomatic ARE. CONCLUSION: SRS affords effective LTC for selected patients with BM from HER-2 positive breast cancer. Concurrent pertuzumab improved LTC and OS but at the same time increased the risk for overall, but not symptomatic, ARE.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial cavernous malformations of the deep-seated locations: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for deep-seated (brainstem, basal ganglia, thalamus, cerebellar peduncle) intracranial cavernous malformations (ICMs). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. The main outcomes were comparing pre- and post-SRS hemorrhage rates, using the pooled risk ratios (RR) as the measure of effect. Additionally, the study assessed lesion volume changes and radiation-injury incidence. RESULTS: Data of 850 patients across 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled RR of all deep-seated ICMs show a decrease in hemorrhage rate after SRS compared to pre-SRS over the total follow-up period (RR =0.13), initial 2 years (RR =0.22), and after 2 years (RR =0.07). For 9 studies that reported hemorrhage rate of the brainstem only, the pooled RR shows a decrease of hemorrhage rate after SRS compared to pre-SRS over the total follow-up period (RR =0.13), initial 2 years (RR =0.19), and after 2 years (RR =0.07). Volumetric regression was achieved in 44.25% and stability in 56.1%. The pooled incidence of symptomatic and permanent radiation injury was 9% (95% CI, 7-11) and 3% (95% CI, 0-1.9%), respectively. CONCLUSION: SRS appears effective in reducing hemorrhage rates for deep-seated ICMs. The risk of symptomatic radiation injury is low. Given the high risk of surgical morbidity, SRS is a reasonable treatment option for patients with deep-seated ICMs with at least one prior hemorrhage.

Repeat single-session stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery is the preferred option for treating brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) when the risks associated with surgery outweigh the potential benefits. However, some patients require repeat radiosurgery due to residual AVM after the first procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of repeated procedure of radiosurgery for AVM. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline. The search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, using a pre-designed search string. Studies investigating the efficacy of repeat radiosurgery for residual AVM following initial single session radiosurgery were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI tool. Meta-analysis and met-regression were performed to pool and inspect data. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis, with a mean follow-up of 45.57 months, reveals repeat radiosurgery as a viable option for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), achieving a 60.82% obliteration rate with a mean time to obliteration of 33.18 months. Meta-regression identifies AVM volume and Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade as factors influencing obliteration, with smaller volume and lower SM grades associated with higher rates. Complications include 10.33% radiation-induced changes, 5.26% post-radiosurgery hemorrhage, 2.56% neurologic deficits, and 0.67% cyst formation. Heterogeneity in complications is primarily attributed to male proportion and SM grade, while factors influencing post-radiosurgery hemorrhage remain unclear. The type of radiosurgery, whether Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) or LINAC, does not significantly impact outcomes. CONCLUSION: Repeat radiosurgery is a feasible, effective, and safe treatment for AVMs following failure of initial radiosurgery. When utilized in appropriate patient subgroups, it provides an acceptable risk-to-benefit profile. Feature studies are required to clarify its clear indications.

Upfront stereotactic radiosurgery versus adjuvant radiosurgery for parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Parafalcine and parasagittal (PFPS) are common locations for meningiomas. Surgical resection for these tumors, the first-line treatment, poses challenges due to their proximity to critical structures. This systematic review investigates the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as a treatment for PFPS meningiomas, aiming to elucidate its safety and efficacy. The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria involved studies on SRS for PFPS meningiomas, reporting procedure outcomes and complications. Tumors were presumed or confirmed to be WHO grade 1. Data was systematically extracted. Meta-analysis was performed where applicable. The review included data from eight studies, 821 patients with 878 lesions. Tumor control was achieved in greater than 80% of cases. Adverse radiation effects were reported in 7.3% of them. Recurrence and further surgical approach were observed in 17.1% and 9.2% of cases, respectively. Symptom improvement was noted in 33.2% of patients. Edema occurred in approximately 25.1% of patients. A subgroup of 283 patients had upfront SRS, achieving tumor control in approximately 97% of such cases. SRS is a safe and effective treatment for PFPS meningiomas, both as an adjuvant therapy and as an upfront treatment for often smaller tumors. Post-SRS edema can typically be managed medically and usually does not require further surgical intervention. Further studies should provide more specific data on PFPS meningiomas. The use of single and hypofractionated SRS for larger volume PFPS meningiomas should be more explored to better define the risks and benefits.

Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) delivers a high dose of radiation to a specific brain area while limiting radiation to nearby healthy tissue. While most SRS has traditionally been performed with a stereotactic frame-based approach, this study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases. Our study followed the recommended guidelines summarized in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The electronic databases of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS) were searched from inception to 10 October 2023. The pooled rate of outcomes was calculated using random effect model and Restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) method. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA V.17. A total of 499 studies were recruited from the electronic databases. After removing duplicates (n = 117), 382 studies were used for title/abstract, and 329 were removed from the study selection process. A total of 53 articles were used for full-text assessment, and 35 studies were included for data extraction. Our analysis revealed a significant increase across all pooled survival rates and local control rates by initiating the radiosurgery for patients, estimating the pooled 6-month OSR of 75% (95% CI: 68-81%), 1-year overall survival rate (OSR) of 60% (95% CI: 51-69%), 18-month OSR of 48% (95% CI: 10-85%), 2-year OSR of 39% (95% CI: 19-58%), 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFSR) of 68% (95% CI: 39-98%), 2-year PFSR of 75% (95% CI: 58-91%), 6-month local control rate (LCR) of 93% (95% CI: 90-96%), and 12-month LCR of 86% (95% CI: 82-90%). Our meta-analysis findings confirm the efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in treating brain metastases. Using data from several trials, we were able to demonstrate stereotactic radiosurgery's effectiveness as a therapy option for brain metastasis patients, demonstrating local control and reasonable overall survival.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of skull base chordomas: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Chordoma is a primary bone tumor with limited literature on its management because of its rarity. Resection, while considered the first-line treatment, does not always provide adequate tumor control. In this systematic review, the authors aimed to provide comprehensive insights by managing these tumors with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Search terms included chordoma and radiosurgery and their equivalent terms. Data on baseline characteristics, SRS details, and outcomes were extracted. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist was used to assess risk of bias. A meta-analysis was performed on relevant variables. RESULTS: A total of 33 eligible studies encompassing 714 patients with skull base chordomas were included. Most studies had a low risk of bias. Patients, predominantly male (57.37%) with a mean age of 46.54 years, exhibited a conventional chordoma subtype (74.77%) and primary lesions (77.91%), mainly in the clivus (98.04%). The mean lesion volume was 13.49 cm3, and 96.68% of patients had undergone prior surgical attempts. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (88.76%) was the predominant SRS method. Radiologically, 27.19% of patients experienced tumor regression, while 55.02% showed no signs of disease progression at the latest follow-up. Progression occurred after a mean of 48.02 months. Symptom improvement was noted in 27.98% of patients. Radiosurgery was associated with a relatively low overall adverse event rate (11.94%), mainly cranial nerve deficits (8.72%). Meta-regression revealed that age and primary lesion type influenced symptom improvement, while factors like extent of resection, radiotherapy, and SRS type affected adverse event rates. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides evidence on the safety and effectiveness of radiosurgery in the management of skull base chordomas. Local tumor control was achieved in the majority of patients treated with SRS. Various baseline characteristics and SRS features have been analyzed to identify modifying factors for each outcome to provide a framework for informed decision-making when managing these patients.

Stereotactic radiosurgery with versus without embolization for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been established as a safe and alternative treatment for dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs). While embolization alone is the most commonly used modality for the treatment of dAVFs, the adjunctive use of embolization with SRS, with the growing use of SRS, has gained increasing interest in the past few years. However, the relative efficacy and safety of SRS combined with embolization versus SRS alone for dAVFs remains uncertain. Hence, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SRS with adjunctive embolization for intracranial dAVFs. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, up to August 2023. All studies evaluating the utilization of adjunctive embolization and SRS for dAVFs were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was conducted on the suitable outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 715 patients were included. The mean age of the participants in the study was 64.30 years in the adjunctive embolization group and 60.51 years in the SRS-alone group. In the adjunctive embolization group 41.3% of patients were female, compared with 47.1% in the SRS-only group. The dAVF obliteration rates were 64.7% and 65.7% in the adjunctive embolization and SRS-alone groups, respectively. These obliteration rates were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.96), as were the symptom improvement rates (p = 0.35). Adverse events were rare, and were more commonly associated with the adjunctive embolization procedure, although further causal analysis was not possible. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that adjunctive embolization plus SRS provides similar obliteration and symptom improvement rates compared with SRS alone, with both having very limited SRS-related adverse events. Considering the added burden and adverse events of additional endovascular treatment, the authors recommend embolization be reserved for more complex dAVFs or when embolization can potentially be curative alone or provide more rapid symptomatic relief or protection during the radiosurgical latency period.

Dural arteriovenous fistulas are not observed to convert to a higher grade after partial embolization.

OBJECTIVE: Borden-Shucart type I dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) lack cortical venous drainage and occasionally necessitate intervention depending on patient symptoms. Conversion is the rare transformation of a low-grade dAVF to a higher grade. Factors associated with increased risk of dAVF conversion to a higher grade are poorly understood. The authors hypothesized that partial treatment of type I dAVFs is an independent risk factor for conversion. METHODS: The multicenter Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database was used to perform a retrospective analysis of all patients with type I dAVFs. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-eight (33.2%) of 1077 patients had type I dAVFs. Of those 358 patients, 206 received endovascular treatment and 131 were not treated. Two (2.2%) of 91 patients receiving partial endovascular treatment for a low-grade dAVF experienced conversion to a higher grade, 2 (1.5%) of 131 who were not treated experienced conversion, and none (0%) of 115 patients who received complete endovascular treatment experienced dAVF conversion. The majority of converted dAVFs localized to the transverse-sigmoid sinus and all received embolization as part of their treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Partial treatment of type I dAVFs does not appear to be significantly associated with conversion to a higher grade.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

OBJECTIVE: Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) present different characteristics from sporadic AVMs, and they have lower initial bleeding rates. Conservative management is usually preferred for the treatment of these lesions. In this case study, we present the largest series of HHT patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery to date. METHODS: We identified eight patients with HHT and 14 AVMs. We retrospectively collected clinical, radiographic, and treatment characteristics of the patients and each AVM. RESULTS: Most patients in our sample presented with small AVMs. The median volume of these AVMs was 0.22 cm3 (IQR 0.08-0.59). Three out of eight patients presented with initial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The majority of lesions had low (12/14) Spetzler-Martin grades (I-II). Median maximum and margin doses used for treatment were 36.2 (IQR 35.25-44.4) and 20 (IQR 18-22.5) Gy, respectively. The overall obliteration rate after SRS was 11/14, and the median time to obliteration across all 11 obliterated AVMs was 35.83 months (IQR, 17-39.99). Neurological status was favorable with all patients having a mRS of 0 or 1 at the last follow-up. Symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RIC) after SRS were low (7.1%), and there were no permanent RIC. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HHT who present with multiple brain AVMs are generally well served by SRS. Obliteration can be achieved in the majority of HHT patients and with a low complication rate. In the current study, initial hemorrhage rates prior to SRS were noticeable which supports the decision to treat these AVMs. Future studies are needed to better address the role of SRS for HHT patients harboring ruptured and unruptured AVMs.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for intraventricular meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intraventricular meningioma (IVM) is a rare subtype of intracranial meningioma, accounting for 9.8 to 14% of all intraventricular tumors. Currently, there is no clear consensus on which patients with IVM should receive conservative treatment, surgery, or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This research aims to analyze the outcomes, including survival and recurrence rates of patients who undergo SRS for IVM as a primary or adjuvant treatment. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase till June 5th 2023. Screening and data extraction were performed by two independent authors. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the tumor control proportion of IVM cases treated with SRS. Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was performed for the progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in the follow-up time. All analyses were performed using the R programming language. RESULTS: Out of the overall 132 records, 14 were included in our study, of which only 7 had enough data for the meta-analysis. The tumor control proportion was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.69-0.98) in patients who underwent SRS for primary IVM. The overall tumor control in both primary and adjuvant cases was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.34-0.99). the heterogeneity was not significant in both meta-analyses (P = 0.73 and P = 0.92, respectively). Post-SRS perifocal edema occurred in 16 out of 71 cases (0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.56), with no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.32). IPD meta-analysis showed a PFS of 94.70% in a 2-year follow-up. Log-rank test showed better PFS in primary SRS compared to adjuvant SRS (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, patients with IVM can achieve high rates of tumor control with a low risk of complications when treated with SRS, regardless of whether they have received prior treatment. Although SRS could be a promising first-line treatment option for asymptomatic IVM, its efficacy in symptomatic patients and its comparison with resection require further investigation.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent/residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: a single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are a significant subtype of pituitary tumors, accounting for 30% of all pituitary tumors and 10-20% of intracranial tumors. The primary treatment for NFPAs is resection, but complete resection is often challenging due to the tumor's proximity to critical structures, leading to frequent recurrences. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a viable treatment option for recurrent or residual NFPAs, but its long-term efficacy and safety profile require further investigation. METHODS: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and included studies published up to February 2024. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating SRS for recurrent/residual NFPAs. Inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting outcomes and complications of SRS, while exclusion criteria omitted case reports, case series, and non-English studies. Data extracted included demographic details, dosimetry parameters, and follow-up durations. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, and statistical analyses were performed using single-arm meta-analyses. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies involving 3,781 patients were included. The mean follow-up duration was 60 months. Tumor control was achieved in approximately 92.3% of patients. The risk of developing hypopituitarism post-SRS was 13.62%, while the risk for panhypopituitarism was 2.55%. New visual field deficits occurred in 3.94% of patients. Cranial nerve deficits were rare, with event rates below 1% for CN III, CN V, and CN VI. CONCLUSION: SRS is effective in managing recurrent or residual NFPAs, achieving high tumor control rates. However, the risk of hypopituitarism remains a significant concern, necessitating regular endocrinological monitoring. While generally safe, the potential for new visual field deficits and other cranial nerve deficits must be considered. SRS remains a valuable treatment option, but clinicians should be aware of its potential complications.

Efficacy and safety of a third stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: an international, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating facial pain disorder, often necessitating surgical interventions when medication proves insufficient. Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is an established therapeutic option. Limited studies explored the feasibility of a third SRS procedure. Our study investigates the safety and efficacy of a third SRS procedure for recurrent TN. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis across multiple centers using databases collected prospectively. Pain status was evaluated utilizing the BNI Pain Intensity Scales. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to estimate the time to recurrence, with group comparisons conducted using log-rank tests. Associations were explored using Chi-square and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Ten institutions contributed with a total of 35 patients. A third SRS revealed sustained effectiveness with a pain control rate of 82.7%. The median time to recurrence was 35.5 months. New sensory dysfunction following the third procedure occurred in 22% of patients who had preserved sensory function after the second procedure. When considering those who developed sensory dysfunction after the second procedure, 40% of the entire cohort was affected. There were no significant differences in pain recurrence intervals among the three procedures. A meta-analysis, combining data from previous studies, showed that 89.6% of patients achieved some degree of pain control after a third SRS, with 27.4% experiencing new sensory dysfunction and a median time to recurrence of 31.6 months. CONCLUSION: Our study, the largest on the topic, affirms the sustained effectiveness of a third SRS for TN, providing comparable pain relief to initial procedures. Notably, an extended pain-free interval after the third SRS session was observed. Facial sensory dysfunction emerged as the primary side effect. Larger studies are warranted to explore correlations with demographics and treatment parameters for a comprehensive understanding of repeat SRS in managing recurrent TN.

Outcome Evaluation of Repeat Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations.

BACKGROUND: Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for persistent cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) has generally favorable patient outcomes. However, reporting studies are limited by small patient numbers and single-institution biases. The purpose of this study was to provide the combined experience of multiple centers, in an effort to fully define the role of repeat SRS for patients with arteriovenous malformation. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients treated with repeat, single-fraction SRS between 1987 and 2022. Follow-up began at repeat SRS. The primary outcome was a favorable patient outcome, defined as a composite of nidus obliteration in the absence of hemorrhage or radiation-induced neurological deterioration. Secondary outcomes were obliteration, hemorrhage risk, and symptomatic radiation-induced changes. Competing risk analysis was performed to compute yearly rates and identify predictors for each outcome. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 505 patients (254 [50.3%] males; median [interquartile range] age, 34 [15] years) from 14 centers. The median clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up was 52 (interquartile range, 61) and 47 (interquartile range, 52) months, respectively. At last follow-up, favorable outcome was achieved by 268 (53.1%) patients (5-year probability, 50% [95% CI, 45%-55%]) and obliteration by 300 (59.4%) patients (5-year probability, 56% [95% CI, 51%-61%]). Twenty-eight patients (5.6%) experienced post-SRS hemorrhage with an annual incidence rate of 1.38 per 100 patient-years. Symptomatic radiation-induced changes were evident in 28 (5.6%) patients, with most occurring in the first 3 years. Larger nidus volumes (between 2 and 4 cm3, subdistribution hazard, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.44-0.86]; P=0.005; >4 cm3, subdistribution hazard, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.32-0.7]; P<0.001) and brainstem/basal ganglia involvement (subdistribution hazard, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.45-0.81]; P<0.001) were associated with reduced probability of favorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat SRS confers reasonable obliteration rates with a low complication risk. With most complications occurring in the first 3 years, extending the latency period to 5 years generally increases the rate of favorable patient outcomes and reduces the necessity of a third intervention.

Social media insights for neurosurgical oncologists: a survey of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons Joint Section on Tumors.

PURPOSE: There is a paucity in the literature regarding the characteristics and attitudes of social media (SM) utilization in a professional manner by neurosurgical oncologists. METHODS: A 34-question electronic survey was created using Google Forms and disseminated via email to members of the AANS/CNS Joint Section on Tumors. Demographic data were compared amongst those who utilize social media versus those who do not. Factors associated with positive effects of professional SM use and with having more followers on SM were analyzed. RESULTS: The survey received 94 responses, of which 64.9% reported that they currently use SM in a professional manner. Age < 50 years was found to be associated with SM use (p = 0.038). Facebook (54.1%), Twitter (60.7%), Instagram (41%), and LinkedIn (60.7%) were the most used SM platforms. Having a higher number of followers was associated with practicing in academics (p = 0.005), using Twitter (p = 0.013), posting about their own research publications (p = 0.018), posting interesting cases (p = 0.022), and posting about upcoming events (p = 0.001). Having a higher number of followers on SM was also associated with positive effects, specifically new patient referrals (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Neurosurgical oncologists can benefit by using social media professionally for increased patient engagement and networking within the medical community. Practicing in academics, making use of Twitter, and posting about interesting cases, upcoming academic events, and one's own research publications can help gain followers. In addition, having a large following on social media could lead to positive effects such as new patient referrals.

Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable brain tumors.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a method of delivering conformal radiation, which allows minimal radiation damage to surrounding healthy tissues. Adjuvant radiation therapy has been shown to improve local control in a variety of intracranial neoplasms, such as brain metastases, gliomas, and benign tumors (i.e., meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, etc.). For brain metastases, adjuvant SRS specifically has demonstrated positive oncologic outcomes as well as preserving cognitive function when compared to conventional whole brain radiation therapy. However, as compared with neoadjuvant SRS, larger post-operative volumes and greater target volume uncertainty may come with an increased risk of local failure and treatment-related complications, such as radiation necrosis. In addition to its role in brain metastases, neoadjuvant SRS for high grade gliomas may enable dose escalation and increase immunogenic effects and serve a purpose in benign tumors for which one cannot achieve a gross total resection (GTR). Finally, although neoadjuvant SRS has historically been delivered with photon therapy, there are high LET radiation modalities such as carbon-ion therapy which may allow radiation damage to tissue and should be further studied if done in the neoadjuvant setting. In this review we discuss the evolving role of neoadjuvant radiosurgery in the treatment for brain metastases, gliomas, and benign etiologies. We also offer perspective on the evolving role of high LET radiation such as carbon-ion therapy. METHODS: PubMed was systemically reviewed using the search terms "neoadjuvant radiosurgery", "brain metastasis", and "glioma". ' Clinicaltrials.gov ' was also reviewed to include ongoing phase III trials. RESULTS: This comprehensive review describes the evolving role for neoadjuvant SRS in the treatment for brain metastases, gliomas, and benign etiologies. We also discuss the potential role for high LET radiation in this setting such as carbon-ion radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Early clinical data is very promising for neoadjuvant SRS in the setting of brain metastases. There are three ongoing phase III trials that will be more definitive in evaluating the potential benefits. While there is less data available for neoadjuvant SRS for gliomas, there remains a potential role, particularly to enable dose escalation and increase immunogenic effects.