Time to presentation with acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: associations with race, sex, and socioeconomic characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Although prompt treatment is a cornerstone of the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), prior studies have shown that one fourth of AMI patients arrive at the hospital >6 hours after symptom onset. It would be valuable to identify individuals at highest risk for late arrival, but predisposing factors have yet to be fully characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project, involving Medicare beneficiaries aged >65 years hospitalized between January 1994 and February 1996 with confirmed AMI, were used to identify patients who presented "late" (>/=6 hours after symptom onset). Patient characteristics were tested for associations with late presentation by use of backward stepwise logistic regression. Among 102 339 subjects, 29.4% arrived late. Significant predictors of late arrival (odds ratio, 95% CI) included diabetes (1.11, 1.07 to 1.14) and a history of angina (1.32, 1.28 to 1.35), whereas prior MI (0.82, 0.79 to 0.85), prior angioplasty (0.80, 0.75 to 0.85), prior bypass surgery (0.93, 0.89 to 0.98), and cardiac arrest (0.52, 0.46 to 0. 58) predicted early presentation. Additionally, initial evaluation at an outpatient clinic (2.63, 2.51 to 2.75) and daytime presentation (1.67, 1.59 to 1.72) predicted late arrival. Finally, female sex, black race, and poverty, which were evaluated with an 8-level race-sex-socioeconomic status interaction term, were also risk factors for delay. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed hospital presentation is a common problem among Medicare beneficiaries with AMI. Factors associated with delay include not only clinical and logistical issues but also race, sex, and socioeconomic characteristics. Education efforts designed to hasten AMI treatment should be directed at individuals with risk factors for late arrival.

Prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the elderly.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI), as well as risk factors, and to compare prognosis after detection of previously UMI to that after recognized myocardial infarction (RMI). BACKGROUND: Past studies revealed that a significant proportion of MIs escape recognition, and that prognosis after such events is poor, but the epidemiology of UMI has not been reassessed in the contemporary era. METHODS: The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) database, composed of individuals > or =65, was queried for participants who, at entry, demonstrated electrocardiographic evidence of a prior Q-wave MI, but who lacked a history of this diagnosis. The features and outcomes of this group were compared to those of individuals with prevalent RMI. RESULTS: Of 5,888 participants, 901 evidenced a past MI, and 201 (22.3%) were previously unrecognized. The independent predictors of UMI were the absence of angina and the absence of congestive heart failure (CHF). Six-year mortality did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: 1) In the elderly, UMI continues to represent a significant proportion of all MIs; 2) associations with angina and CHF may reflect complex neurological issues, but they also may represent diagnosis bias; 3) these individuals can otherwise not be distinguished from those with recognized infarctions; and 4) mortality rates after UMI and RMI are similar. Future studies should address screening for UMI, risk stratification after detection of previously UMI, and the role of standard post-MI therapies.

Sex differences in morphology of coronary artery plaque assessed by intravascular ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Results of autopsy studies have suggested that there are sex differences in morphology of coronary-artery plaques, but these differences have yet to be adequately evaluated in vivo. DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed preintervention intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements on coronary plaques in a consecutive series of 76 men and 30 women with unstable angina pectoris. Both the target lesion and an adjacent reference site were evaluated. Arterial, plaque, and luminal areas were measured by planimetry. Plaques were classified as either calcified or uncalcified, and relative density of plaque was quantitatively assessed by videodensitometry, using a linear gray scale normalized with respect to density of adventitia. RESULTS: Although women were older than men (mean age 55.0 +/- 10.9 versus 60.4 +/- 12.2 years, P = 0.02), their target lesions were less dense (74.6 +/- 23.4 versus 86.2 +/- 22.2% of adventitial density, P = 0.02) and less often found to be calcified (20.0 versus 38.2%, P = 0.05). Similarly, reference sites in female subjects were less dense (77.6 +/- 15.3 versus 97.1 +/- 19.4% of adventitial density, P = 0.01). There was no sex difference in the severity of coronary stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Both qualitative and quantitative sex differences in in-vivo morphology of coronary plaques morphology were detected by IVUS measurement. Plaques in women appear less videodense and are less often calcified than are those in men. Future studies employing sequential IVUS examinations are needed in order to determine whether these morphologic differences relate to a delay in initiation of plaques, slower progression of plaques, or other sex-specific modulators of plaque composition.

Race and sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease.

Although numerous studies have documented race and sex differences in the treatment of coronary artery disease, the available analyses have not been comprehensively evaluated. In this review, we summarize prior estimates of race and sex disparities in the utilization of standard tests and therapies, and we evaluate studies of factors that may contribute to gaps in care. The studies presented consistently demonstrate that blacks and women with coronary artery disease, compared with whites and men, are substantially less likely to receive standard interventions. Studies also indicate that racial differences relate in part to socioeconomic factors, process-of-care variables, and patient preferences, whereas sex differences relate in part to clinical factors. In both cases, however, our understanding is limited by deficiencies in currently available datasets. Moreover, factors that have been shown to contribute to race and sex disparities in medical care fail to explain them fully. In both cases, physician decision-making appears to contribute as well, suggesting that subconscious biases may contribute to treatment disparities. We conclude by proposing initiatives to remedy race and sex disparities in medical care. Efforts should focus on increasing physician awareness of this problem. Studies should gather data that are currently unavailable for analysis, including detailed clinical variables and patient-level socioeconomic information. Finally, novel quality assurance programs, designed to evaluate and improve the care of blacks and women with coronary artery disease, should be promptly undertaken.

Unrecognized myocardial infarction.

This review addresses myocardial infarctions that escape clinical recognition. It focuses on the prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of these unrecognized infarctions, and incorporates data from relevant epidemiologic studies, basic science investigations, and review articles. These data indicate that at least one fourth of all myocardial infarctions are clinically unrecognized. The demographic characteristics and coronary risk factor profiles of persons with previously unrecognized myocardial infarctions appear to be similar to those of persons whose infarctions are clinically detected. Impaired symptom perception may contribute to lack of recognition, but both patients' and physicians' perceptions about the risk for myocardial infarction may also play an important role. Finally, mortality rates after unrecognized and recognized myocardial infarction are similar. Given the public health implications of unrecognized myocardial infarction, future studies should address screening strategies, risk stratification after detection of previously unrecognized myocardial infarction, and the role of standard postinfarction therapies in affected patients.

Sex differences in coronary artery size assessed by intravascular ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Women have worse outcomes after myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization. The explanations are likely multifactorial but may include smaller coronary artery size. Smaller luminal diameter has been confirmed angiographically; however, because of possible confounding effects of coronary remodeling, angiographically silent atherosclerosis, and body size, it is unclear if there is a true sex influence on arterial size. METHODS: We performed intravascular ultrasound on left main (LM) and proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery segments that were free of significant atherosclerosis in 50 men and 25 women. Arterial and luminal areas were measured by planimetry and corrected for body surface area. We evaluated associations between sex and coronary dimensions with univariate and then multiple linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Mean uncorrected LM and LAD arterial areas were smaller in women than in men (21.53 vs 26.95 mm(2), P <.001, and 14. 68 vs 19.94 mm(2), P =.002, respectively), as were mean LM and LAD luminal areas (15.94 vs 18.79 mm(2), P =.020, and 10.13 vs 12.71 mm(2), P =.036, respectively). In multivariate models accounting for body surface area and controlling for other factors, sex independently predicted corrected LM and LAD arterial area. In analyses that additionally controlled for plaque area, sex independently predicted corrected LAD luminal area. CONCLUSIONS: LM and LAD arteries are smaller in women, independent of body size. This suggests an intrinsic sex effect on coronary dimensions. Future studies should investigate underlying mechanisms because they may lead to novel therapeutic strategies and improved outcomes for women with coronary artery disease.