Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arab J Gastroenterol ; 25(2): 102-108, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38418285

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and most CRCs develop from polyps with malignant potential. We aimed to study the difference in polyp detection rate between EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopies (EAC) and standard colonoscopy (SC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted at Cairo University Hospitals on patients referred for screening or diagnostic colonoscopy from July 2018 to August 2020. All included patients underwent back-to-back standard colonoscopy (SC) and ENDOCUFF VISION-assisted colonoscopies (EAC). RESULTS: 214 patients were included in this study. In comparison between EAC and SC, EAC increased the polyp detection rate (69 (32.24 %) vs. 57(26.64 %) (p < 0.05), EAC increased the detection of diminutive polyps ≤ 5 mm (104 vs. 81) (p < 0.05), and small polyps 6-9 mm (12 vs. 10) while there was no difference in large polyps ≥ 10 mm. EAC increased the adenoma detection rate (ADR) (37 (17.2 %) vs. 32(14.9 %) (p < 0.05). The findings detected by EAC shortened the interval of surveillance determined by SC findings. EndoCuff caused six mucosal erosions (2.8 %) in patients. CONCLUSION: EAC increases the number of detected colonic polyps, primarily small polyps on the left and right sides of the colon.


Assuntos
Adenoma , Pólipos do Colo , Colonoscopia , Estudos Cross-Over , Humanos , Colonoscopia/métodos , Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenoma/patologia , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Adulto , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA