RESUMO
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the causal relationships between circulating cell traits and risk of renal disorders. Methods: We applied a comprehensive two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) databases were utilized. Genetically predicted instrumental variables of human blood cell traits were extracted from Blood Cell Consortium (BCX) while data on renal diseases was obtained from Finngen consortium. The primary MR analysis was conducted using the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, with the weighted median (WM) and MR-Egger models used as additional methods. Sensitivity analyses, including MR-PRESSO, radial regression and MR-Egger intercept were conducted to detect outliers and assess horizontal pleiotropy. We further utilized the leave-one-out analysis to assess the robustness of the results. Causal associations were considered significant based on false rate correction (FDR), specifically when the IVW method provided a pFDR < 0.05. Results: Our results demonstrated that both white blood cell (WBC) count (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.10-2.06, pFDR = 0.033, pIVW = 0.011) and lymphocyte count (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.13-1.98, pFDR = 0.027, pIVW = 0.005) were causally associated with a higher risk of IgA nephropathy. Furthermore, WBC count was identified as a significant genetic risk factor for renal malignant neoplasms (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.06-1.43, pFDR = 0.041, pIVW = 0.007). Additionally, an increased level of genetically predicted eosinophils was found to be causally associated with a higher risk of diabetic nephropathy (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.08-1.36, pFDR = 0.007, pIVW = 0.001). No evidence of pleiotropy was determined. Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence of causal associations of circulating WBC count, lymphocyte count and IgA nephropathy, WBC count and renal malignant neoplasms, and eosinophil count and diabetic nephropathy. These results have the potential to contribute to the development of novel diagnostic options and therapeutic strategies for renal disorders.
RESUMO
Purpose: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of single-dose intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant for treating non-infectious uveitic macular edema (UME). Methods: Studies including clinical outcomes of the DEX implant in UME were comprehensively searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for potential studies from inception to July 2022. The primary outcomes were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) during the follow-up period. Stata 12.0 was used to perform the statistical analyses. Results: Six retrospective studies and one prospective investigation involving 201 eyes were ultimately included. Significantly improved BCVA was observed from baseline to 1 month (WMD = -0.15, 95%CI = -0.24, -0.06), 3 months (WMD = -0.22, 95%CI = -0.29, -0.15), and 6 months (WMD = -0.24, 95%CI = -0.35, -0.13), after single-dose DEX implant. When considering CMT, macular thickness of 1 month (WMD = -179.77, 95%CI = -223.45, -136.09), 3 months (WMD = -179.13, 95%CI = -232.63, -125.63), and 6 months (WMD = -140.25, 95%CI = -227.61, -52.88) decreased in comparison with baseline, with statistical significance. Conclusion: Based on the current results, this meta-analysis confirmed favorable visual prognosis and anatomical improvement in patients with UME, after receiving the single-dose DEX implant. The most common adverse event is increased intraocular pressure, which could be controlled with topical medications.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022325969.