Effect of dexmedetomidine on pulmonary artery pressure after congenital cardiac surgery: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the effects of dexmedetomidine on the pulmonary artery pressure in patients after congenital cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective observational pilot study. SETTING: Pediatric cardiac intensive care unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-two patients who received dexmedetomidine after cardiothoracic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: An echocardiogram was performed at three time points: 1) baseline (T0); 2) 6 mins after dexmedetomidine loading (T1); and 3) 1 hr after initiation of dexmedetomidine infusion (T2). Transthoracic echocardiography was used to estimate pulmonary artery pressure based on tricuspid regurgitant velocity (4 x Velocity2) plus central venous pressure. Twenty-two patients aged 0.9 yrs old (interquartile range, 7.9) were enrolled at a median of 1 hr (1.5) after surgery. Dexmedetomidine loading, 0.62 microg/kg (0.5), was given in all patients followed by 0.5 microg/kg/hr (0.6) at T1 and 0.65 microg/kg/hr (0.5) at T2. None of the patients had any increase in pulmonary artery pressure. Overall, the pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 30 mm Hg (13) at T0 to 24 mm Hg (10) at T1 and 26 mm Hg (8) at T2 (p < .001). The pulmonary artery pressure/systemic systolic blood pressure ratio decreased from 33% (12) at T0 to 23% (15) at T1 and 25% (13) at T2 (p = .002). There was no difference in the left ventricular function, Fio2, oxygen %, Po2, CO2, and vasoactive agents. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of dexmedetomidine after congenital cardiac surgery was not associated with any increase in pulmonary artery pressure.

Do neonates, infants and young children need a higher dose of enoxaparin in the cardiac intensive care unit?

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events are a serious complication occurring in critically ill children admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit. Although enoxaparin is one of the current anticoagulants of choice, dosages in children are extrapolated from adult guidelines. Recent data suggest that this population may need a higher dose than what is currently recommended to achieve target anti-factor Xa levels. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether children less than 2 years old admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit require a higher enoxaparin dose than that currently recommended to achieve target anti-factor Xa levels. METHODS: Retrospective chart review including patients who received enoxaparin for the treatment or prophylaxis of venous thrombosis between January, 2005 and October, 2007. Patients were classified as younger and older as well as prophylactic and therapeutic on the basis of age and enoxaparin dose, respectively. Younger patients were those 2 month old or less and older patients were those older than 2 months of age. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were identified; 13 (42%) were 2 months or younger and 25 (81%) were postoperative patients. Ten (32%) received prophylactic and 21 (68%) received therapeutic enoxaparin doses. To achieve optimal anti-factor Xa levels, enoxaparin dose was increased in all groups and reached statistical significance in all patients except those older than 2 months who received prophylactic enoxaparin. An average of 2.8 dosage adjustments was needed. No bleeding complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Young children, infants, and neonates admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit required a significantly higher enoxaparin dose than that currently recommended to achieve target anti-factor Xa levels.

Dexmedetomidine: a novel drug for the treatment of atrial and junctional tachyarrhythmias during the perioperative period for congenital cardiac surgery: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial and junctional tachyarrhythmias occur frequently during the perioperative period for congenital cardiac surgery and can be a cause of increased morbidity and mortality. These rhythm disturbances that may be well tolerated in a normal heart can cause significant hemodynamic instability in patients with congenital heart defects, particularly during the postcardiopulmonary bypass period. Management of these arrhythmias presents more of a challenge, since currently available antiarrhythmic drugs can be ineffective and poorly tolerated. In this study, we examined the possible effect of dexmedetomidine, a primarily sedative drug, on atrial and junctional tachyarrhythmias. Though some animal data have shown that it can prevent certain types of ventricular tachycardia, its therapeutic role during these types of arrhythmias has not been studied. METHODS: This was a retrospective, nonrandomized, noncontrolled study. Fourteen patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit and who received dexmedetomidine for both, sedation/analgesia and for junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET), atrial ectopic tachycardia (AET), reentry type supraventricular tachycardia (Re-SVT), atrial flutter (AF) or junctional accelerated rhythm (JAR) were included. Dexmedetomidine was used as a primary drug or as a rescue if other antiarrhythmics had been used. Our primary end-points were (a) conversion to normal sinus rhythm (NSR) within 3 min for Re-SVT, and 2 h for all other arrhythmias or (b) heart rate (HR) reduction to improve hemodynamics; JET < or =170 bpm, AET > or =20%, AF < or =150 bpm and for JAR prevention of progression to JET. RESULTS: The mean age and weight were 2 +/- 3 mo and 4 +/- 1.5 kg, respectively. Most of the arrhythmias (79%) occurred during the postoperative period. Dexmedetomidine was used as a primary treatment in nine and as a rescue in five patients. Ten patients (71%) received an initial loading dose of 1.1 +/- 0.5 microg/kg. A continuous infusion, 0.9 +/- 0.3 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) was administered in 12 patients. Thirteen patients' lungs were mechanically ventilated. Adverse effects were seen in four patients (28%). Three had hypotension that responded to fluid administration and one had a possible brief complete atrioventricular (AV) block. Nine of the 14 patients were transiently paced with atrial (seven) or AV sequential (two) pacing to improve AV synchrony. The primary outcome with rhythm and/or HR control was achieved in 13 patients (93%). JET rate decreased from 197 +/- 22 to 165 +/- 17 bpm within 67 +/- 75 min of dexmedetomidine administration. Five of these patients converted to NSR in 39 +/- 31 h and one remained in JAR. All four patients with Re-SVT had resolution of their tachyarrhythmia. Three converted to NSR and one to JAR. One patient with AET (220-270 bpm) responded well with decreasing HR to 120 bpm within 35 min and to NSR in 85 min. One patient with AF failed to respond. In two patients with JAR, neither progressed to JET and HR decreased from 158 +/- 11 to 129 +/- 1 bpm. CONCLUSION: This preliminary, observational report suggests that dexmedetomidine may have a potential therapeutic role in the acute phase of perioperative atrial and junctional tachyarrhythmias for either HR control or conversion to NSR.

Critical congenital heart disease--utility of routine screening for chromosomal and other extracardiac malformations.

Objective. Infants with critical congenital heart disease (CHD) can have genetic and other extracardiac malformations, which add to the short- and long-term risk of morbidity and perhaps mortality. We sought to examine our center's practice of screening for extracardiac anomalies and to determine the yield of these tests among specific cardiac diagnostic categories. Design. Retrospective review of infants admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit with a new diagnosis of CHD. Subjects were categorized into six groups: septal defects (SD), conotruncal defects (CTD), single-ventricle physiology (SV), left-sided obstructive lesions (LSO), right-sided obstructive lesions (RSO), and "other" (anomalous pulmonary venous return, Ebstein's anomaly). Screening modalities included genetic testing (karyotype and fluorescent in situ hybridization for 22q11.2 deletion), renal ultrasound (RUS), and head ultrasound (HUS). Results. One hundred forty-one patients were identified. The incidence of cardiac anomalies was: CTD (36%), SD (18%), SV (18%), LSO (14%), RSO (3%), and "other" (8%). Overall 14% had an abnormal karyotype, 5% had a deletion for 22q11.2, 28% had an abnormal RUS and 22% had abnormal HUS. Patients in SD and SV had the highest incidence of abnormal karyotype (36% and 17%); 22q11.2 deletion was present only in CTD and LSO groups (9% and 7%, respectively); abnormal RUS and HUS were seen relatively uniformly in all categories. Premature infants had significantly higher incidence of renal 43% vs. 24%, and intracranial abnormalities 46% vs. 16%. Conclusion. Infants with critical CHD and particularly premature infants have high incidence of genetic and other extracardiac anomalies. Universal screening for these abnormalities with ultrasonographic and genetic testing maybe warranted because early detection could impact short and long-term outcomes.

Perioperative use of dexmedetomidine is associated with decreased incidence of ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after congenital cardiac operations.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative tachyarrhythmias remain a common complication after congenital cardiac operations. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), an α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist, can have a therapeutic role in supraventricular tachyarrhythmias for cardioversion to sinus rhythm or heart rate control. Whether routine perioperative use of DEX decreases the incidence of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias was studied. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 32 pediatric patients undergoing cardiothoracic operations received DEX and were compared with 20 control patients who did not receive DEX. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine was started after anesthesia induction and continued intraoperatively and postoperatively for 38±4 hours (mean dose, 0.76±0.04 µg/kg/h). Ten control patients and 2 DEX patients sustained 16 episodes of tachyarrhythmias (p=0.001), including a 25% vs 0% (p=0.01) incidence of ventricular tachycardia and 25% vs 6% (p=0.05) of supraventricular arrhythmias in the control and DEX group, respectively. Transient complete heart block occurred in 2 control patients and in 1 DEX patient. Control patients had a higher heart rate (141±5 vs 127±3 beats/min, p=0.03), more sinus tachycardia episodes (40% vs 6%; p=0.008), required more antihypertensive drugs with nitroprusside (20±7 vs 4±1 µg/kg; p=0.004) and nicardipine (13±5 vs 2±1 µg/kg; p=0.02), and required more fentanyl (39±8 vs 19±3 µg/kg; p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative use of dexmedetomidine is associated with a significantly decreased incidence of ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, without significant adverse effects.

Diagnosis of abnormal diaphragm motion after cardiothoracic surgery: ultrasound performed by a cardiac intensivist vs. fluoroscopy.

OBJECTIVES: Abnormal diaphragmatic motion secondary to phrenic nerve injury is not uncommon after pediatric cardiothoracic surgery. Fluoroscopy is the most frequent method of diagnosis but it carries risks associated with transportation of critically ill children and exposure to ionizing radiation. Ultrasonography, a reliable diagnostic method in adults, eliminates both concerns. Since most cardiac intensivists are trained in echocardiography, we tested the hypothesis that chest ultrasound performed by a cardiac intensivist is faster than fluoroscopy, and is highly accurate in predicting fluoroscopy results, therefore serving as an equally useful diagnostic test. DESIGN: Prospective study in consecutive pediatric patients with suspected abnormal diaphragmatic motion after cardiothoracic surgery. All patients underwent fluoroscopy and ultrasound study of the diaphragm. Ultrasound was performed by a pediatric cardiac intensivist and a trainee. Kappa statistic was calculated to assess concordance between both ultrasound readings. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated to assess accuracy of each ultrasound test in predicting fluoroscopy results. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with median age 3 months (12 days-11 years) and median weight of 3.8 kg (2.5-29 kg) were included. The ultrasound diagnosis of the cardiac intensivist was perfectly accurate (100% sensitivity, specificity, and PPV and NPV) in predicting fluoroscopy results. The ultrasound performed by the trainee achieved 85.7% sensitivity, 94.4% NPV, and 100% specificity relative to fluoroscopy. The interoperator reliability of chest ultrasound was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.69-1). Delay between clinical suspicion and the diagnostic tests was 15 minutes (5 minutes-2.5 hours) for ultrasound and 17 hours (60 minutes-82 hours) for fluoroscopy (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Chest ultrasound performed by cardiac intensivists allows for an early and accurate diagnosis of abnormal diaphragmatic motion, as evidenced by their ability to predict fluoroscopy findings in pediatric cardiothoracic patients. Training in ultrasound-guided assessment of diaphragmatic motion should be reinforced during pediatric cardiac intensive care fellowship.

Electrocardiographic effects of dexmedetomidine in patients with congenital heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of electrocardiographic (ECG) effects of dexmedetomidine. DESIGN: Prospective observational study including children 0-17 years of age with congenital heart disease (CHD) and children following cardiothoracic surgery. Patients who did not receive dexmedetomidine were used as a control group. All patients had two ECGs: one baseline, pre-dexmedetomidine (T1) and one during dexmedetomidine infusion (T2). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Fifty-one patients, median age of 0.5 years (IQR = 3.4), and 25 patients, age 0.25 (IQR = 2.9), were included in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively. Forty received a dexmedetomidine-loading dose of 1 microg/kg (IQR = 0.5). At T2, the dexmedetomidine infusion was 1 microg/kg/h (IQR = 0.5). In the dexmedetomidine group, heart rate (HR) decreased from 140 +/- 22 to 115 +/- 23 (P < 0.001); PR, PRc and PR index changed from 115 +/- 28 to 122 +/- 29 ms (P = 0.01), 174 +/- 38 to 167 +/- 35 ms (P = 0.07) and 15,882 +/- 3,565 to 13,792 +/- 3,311 (P < 0.001), respectively. QRS decreased from 84 +/- 21 to 80 +/- 21 ms (P = 0.02), and QTc had no change (433 +/- 47 to 435 +/- 36 ms). When compared to the control group, none of the ECG intervals had any difference other than a trend towards lower HR (P = 0.08). Neonates and infants had a bigger drop in the HR compared to older children (P < 0.001), while other parameters were similar. At T2 none of the dexmedetomidine group patients had atrioventricular block or other arrhythmia. Four patients in the control group had accelerated junctional rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: Use of dexmedetomidine in patients with CHD and patients following cardiothoracic surgery is not associated with any significant ECG interval abnormalities other than a trend towards lower HR.