Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in older patients with advanced gastric cancer: the Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group (TCOG) GI-1601 study.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) is a standard treatment option for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We conducted a prospective multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CapeOX as a first-line therapy for AGC in older patients. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients aged ≥ 70 years with AGC were eligible. Initial treatment comprised capecitabine (2000 mg/m2 on days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks. After the initial feasibility assessment, the dose was reduced considering toxicity (capecitabine, 1500 mg/m2 on days 1-14; and oxaliplatin, 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 108 patients were enrolled, of whom 104 were evaluated. Thirty-nine patients received the original-dose treatment, whereas 65 received the reduced-dose treatment. The median OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to treatment failure (TTF) were 12.9 (95% CI 11.6-14.8), 5.7 (95% CI 5.0-7.0), and 4.3 (95% CI 3.9-5.7) months, respectively, for all patients; 13.4 (95% CI 9.5-16.0), 5.8 (95% CI 4.1-7.8), and 5.3 (95% CI 3.5-7.2) months in the original-dose group; and 12.8 (95% CI 11.3-15.3), 5.7 (95% CI 4.4-7.0), and 4.1 (95% CI 3.7-5.7) months in the reduced-dose group. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (17.9%), anemia (12.8%), and thrombocytopenia (12.8%) in the original-dose group and neutropenia (13.8%) and anorexia (12.3%) in the reduced-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate CapeOX's efficacy and safety in older AGC patients.

Advanced colorectal cancer subtypes (aCRCS) help select oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based therapy for colorectal cancer.

Oxaliplatin (OX) and irinotecan (IRI) are used as key drugs for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, no biomarkers have been identified to decide which of the drugs is initially used. In this translational research (TR) of the TRICOLORE trial, the advanced colorectal cancer subtype (aCRCS) was analyzed as a potential biomarker for the selection of OX or IRI. We collected 335 (68.8%) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) primary tumor specimens from 487 patients registered in the TRICOLORE trial and performed direct sequencing and immunohistochemical staining of CRC-related genes, comprehensive gene-expression analysis, and genome-wide methylation analysis. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the IRI group was significantly better compared with the OX group in BRAF wild-type (WT), PTEN-positive, and aCRCS A1 patients. Among the molecular factors, aCRCS were only associated with the PFS of OX and IRI groups. The PFS of the IRI group was significantly better compared with the OX group in aCRCS A1 + B1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-0.82; P = .0023). In contrast, the OX group had better PFS compared with the IRI group in aCRCS B2, although this was not statistically significant (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 0.94-2.96; P = .083). Nearly half of patients with mCRC (46.8%, aCRCS A1 + B1) respond well to IRI, while only about 18.5% (aCRCS B2) of patients with mCRC responded well to OX. In conclusion, the aCRCS might be a predictive factor for the clinical outcomes of OX-based and IRI-based therapies.

Effect of early tumor response on the health-related quality of life among patients on second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in the ABSOLUTE trial.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the association between early tumor response at 8 weeks, previously reported as a positive outcome prognosticator, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients enrolled in the ABSOLUTE trial. METHODS: HRQOL was assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) utility index score in patients with complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD) at 8 weeks, and time-to-deterioration (TtD) of the EQ-5D score, with the preset minimally important difference (MID) of 0.05, was compared between these populations. Among the enrolled patients, 143 and 160 patients were assessable in weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (Sb-PTX) arm and weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) arm, respectively. RESULTS: Changes of the EQ-5D score from baseline to 8 weeks in the nab-PTX arm were 0.0009 and - 0.1229 in CR + PR and PD patients, respectively; the corresponding values for the Sb-PTX arm were - 0.0019 and - 0.1549. For both treatments, changes of the EQ-5D score from baseline at 8 weeks were significantly larger in patients with PD than in those with CR + PR. The median TtD was 3.9 and 2.2 months in patients with CR + PR and PD, respectively, for nab-PTX [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.595, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.358-0.989]. For Sb-PTX, the corresponding values were 4.7 and 2.0 months (HR = 0.494, 95% CI 0.291-0.841). CONCLUSIONS: Early tumor shrinkage was associated with maintained HRQOL in AGC patients on the second-line chemotherapy with taxanes.

Phase 2 study of irinotecan plus cetuximab rechallenge as third-line treatment in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: JACCRO CC-08.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil as third-line treatment have limited efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: This Phase 2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus cetuximab rechallenge as third-line treatment in KRAS wild-type mCRC patients who achieved clinical benefit with first-line cetuximab-containing therapy. The primary endpoint was 3-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. A sample size was calculated; 30 patients with a 3-month PFS rate of 45% deemed promising and 15% unacceptable. Patients with greater and less than the cut-off value of cetuximab-free intervals (CFIs) were classified into the long and short CFI groups, respectively, in subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Among 34 eligible patients who received treatment at least once, 3-month PFS rate was 44.1% (95% confidence interval, 27.4-60.8%). The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 2.4 and 8.2 months, respectively. The response and disease control rates were 2.9 and 55.9%, respectively. PFS and OS were significantly longer in the long- than in the short CFI group. CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan plus cetuximab rechallenge as third-line treatment for KRAS wild-type mCRC was safe and had promising activity, especially in those with a long CFI, warranting further investigation in a Phase 3 randomised trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000010638.

Meta-analysis of two randomized phase III trials (TCOG GI-0801 and ECRIN TRICS) of biweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin versus irinotecan alone as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Biweekly irinotecan (CPT-11) plus cisplatin (CDDP) combination (BIRIP) and CPT-11 alone are both expectable options for treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in a second-line setting. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of these two regimens in patients enrolled two randomized phase III trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient-level data from two randomized phase III trials were collected for this study. In both trials, patients with AGC refractory to S-1-based chemotherapy were randomly allocated to BIRIP (CPT-11, 60 mg/m2; CDDP, 30 mg/m2, q2w) or to CPT-11 (150 mg/m2, q2w). RESULTS: Cumulative data from 290 eligible patients were evaluated. The OS was 12.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.5-14.1] in the BIRIP group and 11.3 months (95% CI 10.0-13.2) in the CPT-11 group (hazard ratio 0.87; 95% CI 0.68-1.12, P = 0.272), while PFS was significantly longer in the BIRIP group (4.3 months [95% CI 3.5-5.1]) than in the CPT-11 group (3.3 months [2.9-4.1]; HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61-0.98, P = 0.035). The response rate was 20.5% in the BIRIP group and 16.0% in the CPT-11 group (P = 0.361). However, the disease control rate was significantly better in the BIRIP group (72.1%) than in the CPT-11 group (59.2%) (P = 0.032). The two groups did not differ significantly in the incidences of grade 3 or worse adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Both BIRIP and CPT-11 may be good therapeutic options for patients with AGC as second-line treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN 000025367.

[Multimodal therapy improved carcinoid syndrome secondary to liver metastases of an atypical lung carcinoid tumor:a case report].

A 69-year-old male presented for an annual medical examination, and his chest X-ray showed an abnormal shadow. He presented to our hospital, and was diagnosed with typical carcinoid tumor of the lung by bronchoscopy. We recommended surgery, however the patient did not agree to the operation. One year later, two masses were detected in the liver. Ultrasound guided biopsy revealed that they were metastases from the atypical carcinoid tumor of the lung. We recommended chemotherapy, but he refused. Six months later, he was admitted to our hospital for symptoms of flushing, fever, watery diarrhea, and palpitations. We diagnosed this combination of symptoms as carcinoid syndrome, and started the administration of a long acting release (LAR) octreotide. The patient's symptoms improved, but did not resolve completely. We then performed a hepatic artery embolization for the liver metastases, and the symptoms resolved. However, viable lesions of the liver metastases slowly grew and caused a carcinoid crisis. By increasing the dosage of octreotide up to a continuous intravenous infusion of 1500µg/day, as well as LAR 30mg/4weeks, the patient recovered from the crisis. Hepatic artery embolization was performed shortly afterward. Because it was difficult to control the carcinoid syndrome by hepatic artery embolization alone, he underwent a resection of the liver metastases. After the hepatic resection, he has had no recurrence of carcinoid syndrome while still being treated with octreotide LAR.

Sex differences in the safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin and S-1 plus cisplatin for patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Previous studies have shown sex-related differences in the incidence of adverse events following treatment with fluoropyrimidines, however the mechanism of this difference is unknown. We examined sex-related differences in the safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and S-1 plus cisplatin (CS) in 663 metastatic gastric cancer patients taking part in a phase III study. The incidences of leukopenia (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; P = .015), neutropenia (OR 2.2; P = .002), nausea (OR 2.0; P = .009), and vomiting (OR 2.8; P < .001) were increased in women versus men treated with SOX, while vomiting (OR 2.9; P < .001) and stomatitis (OR 1.8; P = .043) were increased in women versus men treated with CS. In contrast, male patients treated with CS experienced thrombocytopenia more often (OR 0.51; P = .009). The mean relative dose intensity of S-1 in SOX was 75.4% in women and 81.4% in men (P = .032). No difference in efficacy was observed between women and men undergoing either regimen. Sex-related differences in adverse reactions during SOX and CS treatment were confirmed in this phase III study. Further translational research studies are warranted to pursue the cause of this difference.

Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of a randomized phase III study of first-line S-1 plus oxaliplatin vs. S-1 plus cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: We investigated early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) using data from the G-SOX study comparing S-1 plus oxaliplatin with S-1 plus cisplatin as the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). METHODS: ETS was determined as % decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions at the first evaluation of week 6 compared to baseline. DpR was the maximum % shrinkage during the study treatment. The impact of ETS (cutoff value 20%) and DpR (continuous value) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis including prognostic factors obtained in the G-SOX study; ECOG performance status, baseline sum of tumor diameters, disease status (recurrent/unresectable), and histology (diffuse/intestinal). RESULTS: Among 685 patients enrolled in the G-SOX study, 632 patients who had the first tumor evaluation were analyzed. Patients with ETS ≥ 20% had longer PFS (median 4.5 vs. 2.8 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (median 14.8 vs. 10.5 months, p < 0.0001) than those with ETS < 20%. Adjusted hazard ratios of ETS < 20 vs. ≥ 20% were 0.606 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.506-0.725) for PFS and 0.589 (95% CI 0.492-0.704) for OS. DpR was also significantly associated with PFS and OS (both p < 0.0001). These results were similar between the SOX and CS groups. CONCLUSIONS: In AGC patients receiving the first-line therapy, ETS and DpR might be predictors for PFS and OS.

Phase II study of S-1 plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Regimen of 1 week on, 1 week off.

A phase II study of S-1 plus leucovorin (LV) given in a 4-week schedule (2 weeks' administration followed by 2 weeks' rest) for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed that the combination was effective, but grade 3 toxicities (diarrhea, stomatitis and anorexia) occurred at a relatively high rate. In this phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 2-week schedule of S-1 plus LV. Patients with mCRC received oral S-1 (40-60 mg) and LV (25 mg) twice daily for 1 week, followed by 1 week's rest. Treatment was repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate. The pharmacokinetics of S-1 and LV in Chinese patients were evaluated on day 1 of the first cycle. Seventy-three patients were enrolled in Japan and China. Of 71 eligible patients, the response rate was 53.5%, and the disease control rate was 83.1%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6.5 and 24.3 months, respectively. The incidences of grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea 8.3%, stomatitis 8.3%, anorexia 2.8% and neutropenia 9.7%. There were no treatment-related deaths. The pharmacokinetics profiles of S-1 plus LV in Chinese patients were similar to those in Japanese patients. This 2-week schedule of S-1 plus LV showed good efficacy and better tolerability than the 4-week schedule. This therapy will be the base regimen for mCRC to be added by other cytotoxic or molecular-targeted drugs. The optimized treatment schedule for S-1 plus LV was 1 week on and 1 week off.

Impact of progression type on overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer based on randomized phase III study of S-1 plus oxaliplatin versus S-1 plus cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: The association between progression type and survival has been reported in breast cancer, but remains unclear in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Here, this association was assessed using data obtained from an earlier randomized phase III study demonstrating the non-inferiority of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) to S-1 plus cisplatin (CS) on progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) in the first-line treatment of AGC. METHODS: A Cox regression model including two time-dependent covariates, progression with new lesions and with no new lesions, was used to determine their effect on OS in each treatment group. When both types of progression were detected simultaneously, this was categorized as progression with new lesions. RESULTS: Progression with and with no new lesions was identified in 91 and 167 patients, respectively, in the SOX group (333 patients) and 95 and 147 patients, respectively, in the CS group (330 patients). The association between progression type and OS was similar in both treatment groups; both progression types were strong poor prognostic factors, particularly progression with new lesions [hazard ratio (HR), 7.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.89-10.80 in SOX and HR, 5.78; 95% CI, 4.13-8.08 in CS] compared to no new lesions (HR, 4.66; 95% CI, 3.21-6.77 in SOX and HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.95-3.75 in CS). CONCLUSIONS: Progression accompanied by new lesions had a strong negative impact on OS in patients treated with S-1 and platinum for AGC.

A Phase II Study of Third-Line Combination Chemotherapy with Bevacizumab Plus S-1 for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer with Mutated KRAS (SAVIOR Study).

OBJECTIVE: No salvage treatment had been established for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with mutated KRAS before the emergence of the new drugs regorafenib and TAS-102. We performed a phase II study of third-line chemotherapy with combined bevacizumab and S-1 for mCRC. METHODS: Subjects were mCRC patients with mutated KRAS who showed disease aggravation even after two regimens with oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Bevacizumab was given intravenously every 2 weeks, and S-1 was administered orally on days 1-28 of a 42-day cycle. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). RESULTS: In total, 31 subjects were enrolled between August 2009 and June 2011. Three subjects in whom antitumor effects could not be evaluated were excluded. The median follow-up period was 8.6 months. The DCR was 67.9%, the response rate 0%, median progression-free survival 3.7 months, and overall survival 8.6 months. In 30 subjects evaluated for safety, there was no treatment-related death. The most common adverse events were anorexia (grade ≥3, 20%), diarrhea (grade 3, 10%), and decreased hemoglobin (grade ≥3, 17%). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that third-line chemotherapy with combined bevacizumab and S-1 is safe and may delay the progression of mCRC resistant to oxaliplatin and irinotecan with mutated KRAS.

Increased Plasma Concentrations of Unbound SN-38, the Active Metabolite of Irinotecan, in Cancer Patients with Severe Renal Failure.

PURPOSE: Delayed plasma concentration profiles of the active irinotecan metabolite SN-38 were observed in cancer patients with severe renal failure (SRF), even though SN-38 is eliminated mainly via the liver. Here, we examined the plasma concentrations of unbound SN-38 in such patients. METHODS: Plasma unbound concentrations were examined by ultrafiltration. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of irinotecan and SN-38 were established to quantitatively assess the principal mechanism for delayed SN-38 elimination. RESULTS: The area under the plasma unbound concentration-time curve (AUC(u)) of SN-38 in SRF patients was 4.38-fold higher than that in normal kidney patients. The unbound fraction of SN-38 was also 2.6-fold higher in such patients, partly because SN-38 protein binding was displaced by the uremic toxin 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionate (CMPF). This result was supported by correlation of the unbound fraction of SN-38 with the plasma CMPF concentration, which negatively correlated with renal function. PBPK modeling indicated substantially reduced influx of SN-38 into hepatocytes and approximately one-third irinotecan dose for SRF patients to produce an unbound concentration profile of SN-38 similar to normal kidney patients. CONCLUSION: The AUC(u) of SN-38 in SRF cancer patients is much greater than that of normal kidney patients primarily because of the reduced hepatic uptake of SN-38.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 and oxaliplatin combination therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: A randomized phase III study of Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer, the G-SOX trial, revealed that S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) combination therapy was noninferior to S-1 and cisplatin (CS) combination therapy. However, it is unclear whether the efficacy and safety in elderly patients were different between the two regimens. METHODS: A total of 685 patients registered in the G-SOX trial were classified as elderly (70 years or older) or not elderly (younger than 70 years), and 663 patients (SOX therapy, elderly 113 of 333 patients, 34 %; CS therapy, elderly 99 of 330 patients, 30 %) and 673 patients (SOX therapy, elderly 114 of 338 patients, 34 %; CS therapy, elderly 101 of 335 patients, 30 %) were analyzed for efficacy and safety, respectively. Treatment delivery of SOX was also compared between elderly and nonelderly groups. RESULTS: No differences in efficacy were identified between the elderly and nonelderly groups for either regimen. In the elderly groups, SOX therapy showed better trends in progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.805, 95 % confidence interval 0.588-1.102) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.857, 95 % confidence interval 0.629-1.167) compared with CS therapy, although there were no significant differences. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were less frequent in the elderly group receiving SOX than in the elderly group receiving CS except for the low incidence of sensory neuropathy (5.3 % vs 0 %), neutropenia (25.4 % vs 42.6 %), anemia (21.1 % vs 42.6 %), febrile neutropenia (1.8 % vs 10.9 %), increased creatinine level (0.9 % vs 3.0 %), and hyponatremia (7.9 % vs 18.8 %). CONCLUSIONS: SOX is an effective and feasible therapy in both nonelderly and elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. In elderly patients, SOX demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety compared with CS.

Comparison of the effect of two types of whole mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) powders on intestinal fermentation in rats.

The effects of two types of mushroom (Agaricus bisporus; white, WM; brown, BM) powders on intestinal fermentation in rats were investigated in terms of the physical characteristics of animals and by bacterial and HPLC analyses of cecal contents. Short-chain fatty acid levels were found to be significantly higher in the WM group than in the BM and the control (CN) groups; coliform bacteria levels in the BM group were significantly lower than those in the CN group, with the WM group inducing an apparent but insignificant decrease in coliforms. Anaerobe levels in the WM group were significantly higher than those in the CN group and, compared with the CN group, the BM and WM groups exhibited significantly increased feces weight and cecum weight, respectively. These results indicate that the mushroom powders, and in particular the WM powder, have beneficial effects on the intestinal environment in rats.

Meta-analysis supporting noninferiority of oxaliplatin plus S-1 to cisplatin plus S-1 in first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (G-SOX study): indirect comparison with S-1 alone.

BACKGROUND: The Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Oxaliplatin plus S-1 with Cisplatin plus S-1 in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer (G-SOX) showed the noninferiority of S-1 (an oral fluoropyrimidine-derivative dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor) plus oxaliplatin combination therapy (SOX) to S-1 plus cisplatin therapy (CS) in overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) from proportional hazard model 0.958, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.803-1.142; noninferiority margin 1.15]. To further clarify the clinical position of SOX in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), a meta-analysis including information from other reported studies was conducted. METHODS: In addition to G-SOX, Japanese phase III clinical trials including S-1 monotherapy were included in the analyses. Individual patient data for SOX (318 patients) and CS (324 patients) from G-SOX, as well as those for S-1 (160 patients) from the Randomized Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 Alone as First-line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer (GC0301/TOP-002), were available. Published clinical information for S-1 from other studies (total 705 patients) was also collected. A Weibull distribution was assumed for overall survival time, and parameters for SOX, CS, and S-1 were estimated parametrically. Posterior HR distributions were obtained with a Bayesian approach. RESULTS: The HR of SOX to S-1 was 0.817 (95 % credible interval 0.704-0.939), and the probability of the HR <1.00 was 99.8 %. The HR of CS to S-1 was 0.871 (95 % credible interval; 0.754-0.998), and the probability of the HR <1.00 was 97.6 %. The HR of SOX to CS in G-SOX was 0.942 (95 % credible interval; 0.789-1.117), and the probability of HR <1.15 was 98.9 %. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicates that SOX was superior to S-1 and noninferior to CS in AGC.

[A Case of HER2-Positive Esophagogastric Junction Cancer with Perforation Curatively Resected after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy plus Trastuzumab].

A 60-year-old man was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction with lymph node metastasis along the left gastric artery. The clinical stage was determined to be T4b, N1, M0, Stage IIIB, and a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)regimen of capecitabine/CDDP plus trastuzumab was selected for treatment. Before 3 courses of chemotherapy, the patient developed perforated gastric cancer. With conservative therapy, we were able to obtain closure of the perforation without affecting the curability of the cancer. We changed the chemotherapy regimen to S-1/CDDP plus trastuzumab, and the patient underwent curative resection.

Phase I study of TAS-102 and irinotecan combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: TAS-102 is a nucleoside antitumor agent consisting of trifluridine (FTD) and tipiracil hydrochloride (TPI). We investigated the recommended dose (RD) of TAS-102 plus irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin. METHODS: This study was used a escalated dose of TAS-102 (40-70 mg/m(2)/day, for 5 days a week with 2 days rest for 2 weeks, followed by a 14-day rest) with a fixed dose of irinotecan (150 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day schedule). The primary endpoints were determination of RD and assessment of safety. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled; 7 at the Level 1 (50 mg/m(2)/day) and 3 at the Level 2 (60 mg/m(2)/day). One patient at Level 1 was excluded from the analysis of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and efficacy. Five DLTs occurred in 3 patients; 1 patient at Level 1 (Grade 3 febrile neutropenia and Grade 4 neutropenia), and 2 patients at Level 2 (Grade 3 febrile neutropenia in two patients and Grade 4 neutropenia in one). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (100 %), leukopenia (70 %), febrile neutropenia (30 %) and lymphopenia, anaemia (20 % each). 2 patients (22 %) achieved partial response with the duration of response were 112 and 799 days. CONCLUSION: The RD was determined to be 50 mg/m(2)/day of TAS-102 combined with 150 mg/m(2) of irinotecan although further investigation to explore optimal regimen is warranted.

Phase 1 combination study of eribulin mesylate with trastuzumab for advanced or recurrent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer.

Eribulin mesylate (Halaven®) is a novel inhibitor of microtubule dynamics that has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who previously received at least two chemotherapeutic regimens including an anthracycline and a taxane. Although trastuzumab is indicated for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer, a phase 1 study to evaluate tolerability/safety of eribulin mesylate with trastuzumab has not been conducted. Therefore, a study of eribulin mesylate in combination with trastuzumab was conducted to evaluate dose limiting toxicity (DLT), tolerability/safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy and to estimate the recommended dose in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent HER2+ breast cancer. Eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m(2)) was administered on days 1 and 8 of every 3 week cycle. Trastuzumab was administered with a 4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg weekly doses or with an 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg tri-weekly doses. A total of 12 patients (six for each regimen) received eribulin mesylate and trastuzumab. No DLT was observed and the recommended dose of eribulin mesylate in combination with trastuzumab was estimated as 1.4 mg/m(2). Common adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia, anaemia and alopecia. This combination therapy was well tolerated and the neutropenia observed was manageable. No PK drug-drug interaction between eribulin and trastuzumab was observed. Since a transient ejection fraction decreased was observed in two patients, cardiac function should be routinely assessed in patients receiving the combination therapy of eribulin mesylate with trastuzumab (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01432886).