A nationwide study of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in patients with breast cancer receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy: comparison of complications according to radiotherapy fractionation and reconstruction procedures.

BACKGROUND: We examined the patterns of breast reconstruction postmastectomy in breast cancer patients undergoing postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) and compared complications based on radiotherapy fractionation and reconstruction procedures. METHODS: Using National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) data (2015-2020), we analysed 4669 breast cancer patients with PMRT and reconstruction. Using propensity matching, cohorts for hypofractionated fractionation (HF) and conventional fractionation (CF) were created, adjusting for relevant factors and identifying grade ≥3 complications. RESULT: Of 4,669 patients, 30.6% underwent HF and 69.4% CF. The use of HF has increased from 19.4% in 2015 to 41.0% in 2020. Immediate autologous (32.9%) and delayed two-stage implant reconstruction (33.9%) were common. Complication rates for immediate (N = 1286) and delayed two-stage (N = 784) reconstruction were similar between HF and CF groups (5.1% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.803, and 10.5% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.856, respectively) with median follow-ups of 2.5 and 2.6 years. HF showed no increased risk of complications across reconstruction methods. CONCLUSION: A nationwide cohort study revealed no significant difference in complication rates between the HF and CF groups, indicating HF for reconstructed breasts is comparable to CF. However, consultation regarding the fractionation for reconstructed breast cancer patients may still be necessary.

A Survey of Practice Patterns for Clinical Nodal Staging Prior to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The importance of clinical staging in breast cancer has increased owing to the wide use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). This study aimed to investigate the current practice patterns regarding clinical nodal staging in breast cancer in real-world settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey was administered to board-certified oncologists in Korea, including breast surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists, from January to April 2022. The survey included 19 general questions and 4 case-based questions. RESULTS: In total, 122 oncologists (45 radiation, 44 surgical, and 33 medical oncologists) completed the survey. Among them, 108 (88%) responded that clinical staging before NST was primarily performed by breast surgeons. All the respondents referred to imaging studies during nodal staging. Overall, 64 (52.5%) responders determined the stage strictly based on the radiology reports, whereas 58 (47.5%) made their own decision while noting radiology reports. Of those who made their own decisions, 88% referred to the number or size of the suspicious node. Of the 75 respondents involved in prescribing regimens for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 58 (77.3%) responded that the reimbursement regulations in the selection of NST regimens affected nodal staging in clinical practice. In the case-based questions, high variability was observed among the clinicians in the same cases. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse assessments by specialists owing to the lack of a clear, harmonized staging system for the clinical nodal staging of breast cancer can lead to diverse practice patterns. Thus, practical, harmonized, and objective methods for clinical nodal staging and for the outcomes of post-NST response are warranted for appropriate treatment decisions and accurate outcome evaluation.

Comparison of initial and sequential salvage brain-directed treatment in patients with 1-4 vs. 5-10 brain metastases from breast cancer (KROG 16-12).

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the initial and salvage brain-directed treatment and overall survival (OS) between patients with 1-4 brain metastases (BMs) and those with 5-10 from breast cancer (BC). We also organized a decision tree to select the initial whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for these patients. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2014, 471 patients were diagnosed with 1-10 BMs. They were divided into two groups based on the number of BM: 1-4 BMs (n = 337) and 5-10 BMs (n = 134). Median follow-up duration was 14.0 months. RESULTS: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) was the most common treatment modality (n = 120, 36%) in the 1-4 BMs group. In contrast, 80% (n = 107) of patients with 5-10 BMs were treated with WBRT. The median OS of the entire cohort, 1-4 BMs, and 5-10 BMs was 18.0, 20.9, and 13.9 months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the number of BM and WBRT were not associated with OS, whereas triple-negative BC and extracranial metastasis decreased OS. Physicians determined the initial WBRT based on four variables in the following order: number and location of BM, primary tumor control, and performance status. Salvage brain-directed treatment (n = 184), mainly SRS/FSRT (n = 109, 59%), prolonged OS by a median of 14.3 months. CONCLUSION: The initial brain-directed treatment differed notably according to the number of BM, which was chosen based on four clinical factors. In patients with ≤ 10 BMs, the number of BM and WBRT did not affect OS. The major salvage brain-directed treatment modality was SRS/FSRT and increased OS.

Near-maximum rib dose is the most relevant risk factor for ipsilateral spontaneous rib fracture: a dosimetric analysis of breast cancer patients after radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Spontaneous rib fracture (SRF) is a common late complication in treated breast cancer patients. This study evaluated the incidence and risk factors of ipsilateral SRF after radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer patients. In addition, we identified dosimetric parameters that were significantly associated with ipsilateral SRF. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2204 patients with breast cancer who underwent RT between 2014 and 2016, and were followed up with bone scans. We evaluated clinical risk factors for ipsilateral SRF. Dose-volume histogram analysis was also performed for patients (n = 538) whose dosimetric data were available. All ipsilateral ribs were manually delineated, and dosimetric parameters of the ribs were converted into the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). RESULTS: Most of the patients with SRF (87.3%) were asymptomatic, and the remaining symptomatic patients complained of mild tenderness or chest wall discomfort; these symptoms all resolved within 6 months without any treatment. Ipsilateral SRF occurred in 14.5% of patients 3 years after RT. The median time to develop ipsilateral SRF was 15 months. In dosimetric analysis, near-maximum rib dose (D2cc) best predicted ipsilateral SRF. The cut-off value of D2cc was EQD2 52 Gy, as determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. In multivariate analysis including dosimetric variables, D2cc EQD2 ≥ 52 Gy was the only significant risk factor for ipsilateral SRF. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that near-maximum rib dose was the best dosimetric parameter to predict ipsilateral SRF in RT-treated breast cancer patients. In addition, our results suggest that patients who received RT with exceeding rib dose cut-off value and had ipsilateral SRF on bone scan be recommended routine follow-up without additional imaging tests.

Validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of lymphedema following contemporary treatment for breast cancer: a large multi-institutional study (KROG 20-05).

PURPOSE: We previously constructed a nomogram for predicting the risk of arm lymphedema following contemporary breast cancer treatment. This nomogram should be validated in patients with different background characteristics before use. Therefore, we aimed to externally validate the nomogram in a large multi-institutional cohort. METHODS: Overall, 8835 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery during 2007-2017 were identified. Data of variables in the nomogram and arm lymphedema were collected. The nomogram was validated externally using C-index and integrated area under the curve (iAUC) with 1000 bootstrap samples and by calibration plots. RESULTS: Overall, 1377 patients (15.6%) developed lymphedema. The median time from surgery to lymphedema development was 11.4 months. Lymphedema rates at 2, 3, and 5 years were 11.2%, 13.1%, and 15.6%, respectively. Patients with lymphedema had significantly higher body mass index (median, 24.1 kg/m2 vs. 23.4 kg/m2) and a greater number of removed nodes (median, 17 vs. 6) and more frequently underwent taxane-based chemotherapy (85.7% vs. 41.9%), total mastectomy (73.1% vs. 52.1%), conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (71.9% vs. 54.2%), and regional nodal irradiation (70.7% vs 22.4%) than those who did not develop lymphedema (all P < 0.001). The C-index of the nomogram was 0.7887, and iAUC was 0.7628, indicating good predictive accuracy. Calibration plots confirmed that the predicted lymphedema risks were well correlated with the actual lymphedema rates. CONCLUSION: This nomogram, which was developed using factors related to multimodal breast cancer treatment and was validated in a large multi-institutional cohort, can well predict the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Protocol for the postoperative radiotherapy in N1 breast cancer patients (PORT-N1) trial, a prospective multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of patients receiving breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) could be useful for pN1 breast cancer patients who have undergone breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. However, the value of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for BCS patients, and the indications for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for pN1 breast cancer mastectomy patients, have recently been challenged due to the absence of relevant trials in the era of modern systemic therapy. "PORT de-escalation" should be assessed in patients with pN1 breast cancer. METHODS: The PORT-N1 trial is a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial for patients with pN1 breast cancer that compares the outcomes of control [whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and RNI/PMRT] and experimental (WBI alone/no PMRT) groups. PORT-N1 aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of the experimental group by comparing 7-year disease-free survival rates with the control group. Female breast cancer patients with pT1-3 N1 status after BCS or mastectomy are eligible. Participants will be randomly assigned to the two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified by surgery type (BCS vs. mastectomy) and histologic subtype (triple-negative vs. non-triple-negative). In patients who receive mastectomy, dissection of ≥5 nodes is required when there is one positive node, and axillary lymph node dissection when there are two or three positive nodes. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy are not eligible. RNI includes a "high-tangent" or wider irradiation field. This study will aim to recruit 1106 patients. DISCUSSION: The PORT-N1 trial aims to verify that PORT de-escalation after BCS or mastectomy is safe for pN1 breast cancer patients in terms of oncologic outcomes and capable of reducing toxicity rates. This trial will provide information crucial for designing PORT de-escalation strategies for patients with pN1 breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05440149) on June 30, 2022.

No axillary surgical treatment for lymph node-negative patients after ultra-sonography [NAUTILUS]: protocol of a prospective randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), the axillary recurrence rate is very low although SLNB has a false-negative rate of 5-10%. In the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, non-sentinel positive-lymph nodes were found in more than 20% of the axillary dissection group; the SLNB only group did not have a higher axillary recurrence rate. These findings raised questions about the direct therapeutic effect of the SLNB. SLNB has post-surgical complications including lymphedema. Considering advances in imaging modalities and adjuvant therapies, the role of SLNB in early breast cancer needs to be re-evaluated. METHODS: The NAUTILUS trial is a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial involving clinical stage T1-2 and N0 breast cancer patients receiving breast-conserving surgery. Axillary ultrasound is mandatory before surgery with predefined imaging criteria for inclusion. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy or needle aspiration of a suspicious node is allowed. Patients will be randomized (1:1) into the no-SLNB (test) and SLNB (control) groups. A total of 1734 patients are needed, considering a 5% non-inferiority margin, 5% significance level, 80% statistical power, and 10% dropout rate. All patients in the two groups will receive ipsilateral whole-breast radiation according to a predefined protocol. The primary endpoint of this trial is the 5-year invasive disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints are overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, axillary recurrence rate, and quality of life of the patients. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide important evidence on the oncological safety of the omission of SLNB for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery and receiving whole-breast radiation, especially when the axillary lymph node is not suspicious during preoperative axillary ultrasound. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04303715 . Registered on March 11, 2020.

New brain metastases after whole-brain radiotherapy of initial brain metastases in breast cancer patients: the significance of molecular subtypes (KROG 16-12).

PURPOSE: To identify the risk factors leading to new brain metastases (BM) following brain-directed treatment for initial BM resulting from breast cancer (BC). METHODS: In this multi-institutional study, 538 BC patients with available follow-up imaging after brain-directed treatment for initial BM were analyzed. Tumor molecular subtypes were classified as follows: hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-, n = 136), HER2-positive (HER2+, n = 253), or triple-negative BC (TNBC, n = 149). RESULTS: In 37.4% of patients, new BM emerged at a median of 10.5 months after brain-directed treatment for initial BM. The 1-year actuarial rate of new BM for HR+/HER2-, HER2+, and TNBC were 51.9%, 44.0%, and 69.6%, respectively (p = 0.008). Initial whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) reduced new BM rates (22.5% reduction at 1 year, p < 0.001) according to molecular subtype (HR+/HER2-, 42% reduction at 1 year, p < 0.001; HER2+, 18.5%, p = 0.004; TNBC, 16.9%, p = 0.071). Multivariate analysis revealed an increased risk of new BM for the following factors: shorter intervals between primary BC diagnoses and BM (p = 0.031); TNBC (relative to HR+/HER2-) (p = 0.016); presence of extracranial metastases (p = 0.019); number of BM (>4) (p < 0.001); and BM in both tentorial regions (p = 0.045). Anti-HER2 therapy in HER2+ patients (p = 0.013) and initial use of WBRT (p < 0.001) significantly lowered new BM development. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor molecular subtypes were associated with both rates of new BM development and the effectiveness of initial WBRT. Anti-HER2 therapy in HER2+ patients significantly lowered new BM occurrence.

Efficacy of health coaching and a web-based program on physical activity, weight, and distress management among cancer survivors: A multi-centered randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of health coaching and a web-based program on survivor physical activity (PA), weight, and distress management among stomach, colon, lung and breast cancer patients. METHODS: This randomised, controlled, 1-year trial conducted in five hospitals recruited cancer survivors within 2 months of completing primary cancer treatment who had not met ≥1 of these behavioural goals: (i) conducting moderate PA for at least 150 minutes/week or strenuous exercise for over 75 minutes per week or, in the case of lung cancer patients, low or moderate intensity exercise for over 12.5 MET per week, (ii) maintaining normal weight, and (iii) attaining a score >72 in the Post Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the control group, a web-only group, or a health coaching + web group. The primary endpoint was based on a composite of PA, weight, and PTGI score at 12 months. RESULTS: Patients in the health coaching + web group (difference = 6.6%, P = .010) and the web-only group (difference = 5.9%, P = .031) had greater overall improvements across the three-outcome composite than the control group. The health coaching + web group had greater overall improvement in PTGI (difference = 12.6%; P < .001) than the control group, but not in PA and weight. CONCLUSION: The web-based program, with or without health coaching, may improve health behaviours including PA, weight, and distress management among cancer survivors within 2 months of completing primary cancer treatment. The web-based program with health coaching was mainly effective for reducing psychological distress.

Effects of trastuzumab on locoregional recurrence in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: In the present study, the ability of adjuvant trastuzumab to reduce locoregional recurrence in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 520 patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer who received surgery followed by adjuvant RT and cytotoxic chemotherapy from 2003 to 2011. Adjuvant trastuzumab was administered to 286 patients. Propensity score matching was conducted to compare trastuzumab-treated and non-treated cohorts. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 7.1 years (range 1.1-14.1 years). Propensity score matching yielded 171 matched pairs of patients with no significantly different clinical factors. An improved 7-year locoregional control (LRC) rate was observed in the trastuzumab-treated cohort compared with the non-treated cohort (95.6% vs. 89.9%, p = 0.014). Based on multivariate analysis, hormone receptor negativity (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.348, p = 0.007), positive lymph node ratio > 0.25 (HR = 2.549, p = 0.040), and lack of adjuvant trastuzumab (HR = 3.401, p = 0.017) were identified as significant risk factors for poor LRC. Adjuvant trastuzumab significantly reduced the locoregional recurrence rate in patients with one or two risk factors (7-year LRC = 95.0% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.007); however, the benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab was non-significant in patients with no risk factors (7-year LRC = 95.8% vs. 97.9%, p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant trastuzumab improved LRC in patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer receiving adjuvant RT and cytotoxic chemotherapy, especially in hormone receptor-negative, HER2-enriched subtype, and high positive lymph node ratio breast cancer.

Malignant and borderline phyllodes tumors of the breast: a multicenter study of 362 patients (KROG 16-08).

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for local recurrence (LR) and investigate roles of adjuvant local therapy for malignant and borderline phyllodes tumors of the breast. METHODS: From 1981 to 2014, 362 patients with malignant (n = 235) and borderline (n = 127) phyllodes tumors were treated by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or total mastectomy (TM) at 10 centers. Thirty-one patients received adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), and those who received adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5 years. LR developed in 60 (16.6%) patients. Regional recurrence occurred in 2 (0.6%) patients and distant metastasis (DM) developed in 19 (5.2%) patients. Patients receiving BCS (p = 0.025) and those not undergoing adjuvant RT (p = 0.041) showed higher LR rates. For malignant subtypes, local control (LC) rates at 5 years for BCS alone, BCS with adjuvant RT, TM alone, and TM with adjuvant RT were 80.7, 93.3, 92.4, and 100%, respectively (p = 0.033). Multivariate analyses revealed BCS alone, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, and positive margins as independent risk factors for LR. Margin-positive BCS alone showed poorest LC regardless of tumor size (62.5%, p = 0.007). For margin-negative BCS alone, 5-year LC rates for tumors ≥ 5 cm versus those < 5 cm were 71.8% versus 89.5% (p = 0.012). For borderline subtypes, only positive margins (p = 0.044) independently increased the risk of LR. DM developed exclusively in malignant subtypes and a prior LR event increased the risk of DM by sixfold (HR 6.2, 95% CI 1.6-16.1, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Malignant and borderline phyllodes tumors with positive margins after surgery have high LR rates. After treatment by margin-negative BCS alone, patients with large malignant phyllodes tumors ≥ 5 cm also have heightened risk of LR. Thus, such patients should be considered for additional local therapy.

Chest wall recurrence in pT1-2N0-1 breast cancer patients after mastectomy without radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: In correlation with the nodal status in the era of modern radiotherapy, the chest wall recurrence (CWR) rate was investigated in pT1-2N0-1 breast cancer patients after a mastectomy without post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). METHODS: The data from the patients participating in two South Korean multi-institutional studies (KROG 14-22; N = 1842 and KROG 14-23; N = 1382) were analyzed. In total, 3224 pT1-2N0-1 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy without PMRT were analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 72.2 months (range 0.8-125.2 months). The overall CWRs during the follow-up period were 1.68% in N0 patients and 2.82% in N1 patients. There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year and 10-year CWR-free survival (CWRFS) between the N0 and N1 patients. Of the 70 patients with CWR, 33 (1% of all the patients) had isolated CWR, and the 10-year overall survival rate in this group was 96.9%. After the propensity score matching of the N0 and N1 groups, there was still no difference in CWRFS by nodal status. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CWR in pT1-2N0-1 breast cancer patients is very low, especially with isolated recurrence. Also, the obtained data showed that the nodal status had no impact on CWRFS.

Air-electron stream interactions during magnetic resonance IGRT : Skin irradiation outside the treatment field during accelerated partial breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: To investigate and to prevent irradiation outside the treatment field caused by an electron stream in the air generated by the magnetic field during magnetic resonance image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 20 patients who received APBI with a magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) system were prospectively studied. The prescription dose was 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions of 3.85 Gy and delivered with a tri-cobalt system (the ViewRay system). For each patient, primary plans were delivered for the first five fractions and modified plans with different gantry angles from those of the primary plan (in-treatment plans) were delivered for the remaining five fractions to reduce the skin dose. A 1 cm thick bolus was placed in front of the patient's jaw, ipsilateral shoulder, and arm to shield them from the electron stream. Radiochromic EBT3 films were attached to the front (towards the breast) and back (towards the head) of the bolus during treatment. Correlations between the measured values and the tumor locations, treatment times, and tumor sizes were investigated. RESULTS: For a single fraction delivery, the average areas of the measured isodoses of 14% (0.54 Gy), 12% (0.46 Gy), and 10% (0.39 Gy) at the front of the boluses were as large as 3, 10.4, and 21.4 cm2, respectively, whereas no significant dose could be measured at the back of the boluses. Statistically significant but weak correlations were observed between the measured values and the treatment times. CONCLUSION: During radiotherapy for breast cancer with an MR-IGRT system, the patient must be shielded from electron streams in the air generated by the interaction of the magnetic field with the beams of the three-cobalt treatment unit to avoid unwanted irradiation of the skin outside the treatment field.

Recurrence outcomes after omission of postoperative radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a multicenter, retrospective study in Korea (KROG 16-02).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the loco-regional recurrence (LRR) rate after breast-conserving surgery without postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, 311 DCIS patients from 9 institutions were analyzed retrospectively. The median age was 47 (range, 20-82). The median tumor size was 7 mm (range, 0.01-76). Margin width was <1 cm in 85 patients (27.3%), and nuclear grade was high in 37 patients (11.9%). Two hundred and three patients (65.3%) received tamoxifen. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 74 months (range, 5-189), there were 11 local recurrences (invasive carcinoma in 6 and DCIS in 5) and 1 regional recurrence. The 7-year LRR rate was 3.8%. On univariate analysis, age and margin width were significant risk factors influencing LRR (p = 0.017 and 0.014, respectively). When age and margin width were combined among 211 patients whose margin width were available, the 7-year LRR rates were as follows (p < 0.001): (1) 0% in patients with age >50 years and any margin width status (n = 64), (2) 1.2% in age ≤50 years and margin width ≥1 cm (n = 93), (3) 13.1% in age ≤50 years and margin width <1 cm (n = 54). CONCLUSIONS: The LRR rate was very low in selected DCIS patients treated with breast-conserving surgery without postoperative RT. However, adjuvant RT should be considered for those with age ≤50 years and margin width <1 cm.

Radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Comparison of treatment outcomes.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively compared the treatment outcomes of localized prostate cancer between radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 738 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent either RP (n = 549) or EBRT (n = 189) with curative intent at our institution between March 2001 and December 2011. Biochemical failure was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of ≥ 0.2 ng/ml in the RP group and the nadir of + ≥ 2 ng/ml in the EBRT group. RESULTS: The median (range) follow-up duration was 48.8 months (0.7-133.2 months) and 48.7 months (1.0-134.8 months) and the median age was 66 years (45-89 years) and 71 years (51-84 years; p < 0.001) in the RP and EBRT groups, respectively. Overall, 21, 42, and 36 % of patients in the RP group, and 15, 27, and 58 % of patients in the EBRT group were classified as low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively (p < 0.001). Androgen-deprivation therapy was more common in the EBRT group (59 vs. 27 %, respectively; p < 0.001). The 8-year biochemical failure-free survival rates were 44 and 72 % (p < 0.001) and the disease-specific survival rates were 98 % and 97 % (p = 0.543) in the RP and EBRT groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the EBRT group included more high-risk patients than did the RP group, the outcomes of EBRT were not inferior to those of RP. Our data suggest that EBRT is a viable alternative to RP for treating localized prostate cancer.

Treatment factors affecting breast cancer-related lymphedema after systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients.

We evaluated whether the sequence or regimen of systemic chemotherapy could be a risk factor for breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE). We retrospectively analyzed 848 patients with stage II/III breast cancer who underwent curative surgery with adequate systemic therapy from 2004 to 2009. Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) was performed in 552 patients (65.1 %) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in 296 (34.9 %). We evaluated the incidence of LE based on clinicopathological factors and treatments. At a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 358 patients (42.2 %) had experienced LE and 243 (28.7 %) had retained (persistent LE) [120/552 (21.7 %) with ACT vs. 123/296 (41.6 %) with NAC; P < 0.001]. The incidence of LE in patients with taxane was greater than in those without taxane [233/704 (33.1 %) vs. 10/144 (6.9 %); P < 0.001]. Multivariate analysis showed that NAC [hazard ratio (HR), 1.63 in LE event; P < 0.001; HR, 1.39 in persistent LE; P = 0.02] and RT including supraclavicular area (SCRT) (HR 1.55; P = 0.02; HR 1.93; P = 0.006), number of dissected axillary lymph nodes (N-ALNs) >10 (HR, 1.37; P = 0.01; HR, 1.71; P = 0.001), advanced stage (HR, 1.31; P = 0.03; HR, 1.60; P = 0.002), and taxane (HR, 1.69; P = 0.03; HR, 2.07; P = 0.04) were independent risk factors for the LE occurrence. In addition to advanced stage, N-ALNs and SCRT, NAC, and taxane were shown to increase the risk of LE, which could help clinicians identify patients at risk for LE.

Influence of boost radiotherapy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ breast cancer: a multicenter, retrospective study in Korea (KROG 11-04).

To estimate the effect of boost radiotherapy on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) breast cancer. We included patients from nine institutions who met the following criteria: having Tis, age 18 years or older, having breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy within 12 weeks after surgery. From 1995 through 2006, 728 patients were analyzed retrospectively by the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. All patients received whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT) after BCS. 232 patients (31.9 %) also received boost radiation therapy (RT) (median 10 Gy). After median follow-up of 82 months, 5-year LRFS was 98.4 % and 10-year LRFS was 95.8 % for all patients. There was no statistically significant difference of LRFS between the boost and no-boost groups. Nineteen (2.6 %) patients had ipsilateral breast recurrences, including 12 of invasive recurrence and 7 DCIS. The presence of the HER2 receptor was associated with more invasive recurrences. Nine (1.2 %) patients developed contralateral breast cancer, including six invasive breast cancer and three DCIS. In the multivariate analysis, only the margin status was a significant prognostic factor for LRFS. Boost RT was not associated with further improvement of local control in DCIS after BCS and WBRT. HER2 receptor-positive patients may need further treatment with the anti-HER2 agents.

Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy guided by the multimodal method of indocyanine green fluorescence, radioisotope, and blue dye versus the radioisotope method in breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the identification rate and surgery time of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by a multimodal method (MMM) using a mixture of indocyanine green (ICG), radioisotope (RI), and blue dye (BD) compared with the RI alone. METHODS: In this phase II randomized study, 86 patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer were enrolled and received SLNB with either MMM or RI. We compared the identification rate, number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), and detection time of SLNB and evaluated the safety. RESULTS: The mean age of the MMM group and RI group was 48.2 and 51.0 years (p = 0.12), respectively. There were no differences in histopathologic factors, including tumor size, node positivity, and hormone receptor positivity between groups. SLNs were identified in all patients of both groups (100 % in the MMM group and 100 % in the RI group). The average number of SLNs in the MMM group was more than that in the RI group (3.4 ± 1.37 vs. 2.3 ± 1.04, respectively; p < 0.001). The time to detect the first sentinel lymph node was similar in each group (6.5 ± 5.16 vs. 8.0 ± 4.35 min; p = 0.13). In the MMM group, percutaneous lymphatic drainage was visualized by fluorescent imaging in 90.7 % (39 of 43 patients). During and after the operation, there were no complications, including allergic reactions, skin staining, or necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first randomized trial that compared MMM using ICG, RI, and BD and the conventional RI method for SLNB. MMM is a feasible and safe method for SLNB.

Evaluation of cosmetic outcomes in breast reconstruction patients undergoing radiotherapy using an anomaly generative adversarial network model.

Considering the rising prevalence of breast reconstruction followed by radiotherapy (RT), evaluating the cosmetic impact of RT is crucial. Currently, there are limited tools for objectively assessing cosmetic outcomes in patients who have undergone reconstruction. Therefore, we validated the cosmetic outcome using a previously developed anomaly Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based model and evaluated its utility. Between January 2016 and December 2020, we collected computed tomography (CT) images from 82 breast cancer patients who underwent immediate reconstruction surgery followed by radiotherapy. Among these patients, 38 received immediate implant insertion, while 44 underwent autologous breast reconstruction. Anomaly scores (AS) were estimated using an anomaly GAN model at pre-RT, 1st follow-up, 1-year (Post-1Y) and 2-year (Post-2Y) after RT. Subsequently, the scores were analyzed in a time-series manner, considering reconstruction types (implant versus autologous), RT techniques, and the incidence of major complications. The median age of the patients was 46 years (range 29-62). The AS between Post-1Y and Post-2Y demonstrated a positive relationship (coefficient 0.515, P < 0.001). The AS was significantly associated with objective cosmetic indices, namely Breast Contour Difference (P = 0.009) and Breast Area Difference (P = 0.004), at both Post-1Y and Post-2Y. Subgroup analysis stratified by type of breast reconstruction revealed significantly higher AS values in patients who underwent prosthetic implant insertion compared to those with autologous reconstruction at all follow-up time points (1st follow-up, P = 0.001; Post-1Y, P < 0.001; and Post-2Y, P < 0.001). A threshold AS of ≥ 1.9 was associated with a 10% predicted risk of developing major complications. The feasibility of an AS generated by a GAN model for predicting both cosmetic outcomes and the likelihood of complications following RT has been successfully validated. Further investigation involving a larger patient cohort is warranted.

Estimating the risk and benefit of radiation therapy in (y)pN1 stage breast cancer patients: A Bayesian network model incorporating expert knowledge (KROG 22-13).

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the risk and benefit of (y)pN1 breast cancer patients in a Bayesian network model. METHOD: We developed a Bayesian network (BN) model comprising three parts: pretreatment, intervention, and risk/benefit. The pretreatment part consisted of clinical information from a tertiary medical center. The intervention part regarded the field of radiotherapy. The risk/benefit component encompasses radiotherapy (RT)-related side effects and effectiveness, including factors such as recurrence, cardiac toxicity, lymphedema, and radiation pneumonitis. These factors were evaluated in terms of disability weights and probabilities from a nationwide expert survey. The overall disease burden (ODB) was calculated as the sum of the probability multiplied by the disability weight. A higher value of ODB indicates a greater disease burden for the patient. RESULTS: Among the 58 participants, a BN model utilizing discretization and clustering techniques revealed five distinct clusters. Overall, factors associated with breast reconstruction and RT exhibited high discrepancies (24-34 %), while RT-related side effects demonstrated low discrepancies (3-11 %) among the experts. When incorporating recurrence and RT-related side effects, the mean ODB of (y)pN1 patients was 0.258 (range, 0.244-0.337), with a higher tendency observed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or mastectomy cases. The ODB for TNBC patients undergoing mastectomy without postmastectomy radiotherapy was 0.327, whereas for non-TNBC patients undergoing breast conserving surgery with RT, the disease burden was 0.251. There was an increasing trend in ODB as the field of RT increased. CONCLUSION: We developed a Bayesian network model based on an expert survey, which helps to understand treatment patterns and enables precise estimations of RT-related risk and benefit in (y)pN1 patients.