Is there a difference in outcomes between the first and second surgical procedures in patients who have bilateral shoulder operations?

BACKGROUND: Some patients who have shoulder surgery on 1 shoulder go on to have surgery on their contralateral shoulder. It is unclear whether the clinical improvements following the second surgical procedure are as significant as the improvements after the first surgical procedure. METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery on both shoulders performed by a single surgeon between March 2013 and June 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were obtained preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years for both shoulders. Scores were then compared based on hand dominance and which shoulder was treated first. Complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 105 patients (210 surgical procedures) were included. Of the patients, 66 underwent bilateral open shoulder surgery and 39 underwent bilateral arthroscopic shoulder surgery. There was a significant reduction in VAS scores from preoperative to postoperative levels following surgery (5.9 before surgery vs. 1.7 after surgery). We found no difference in VAS scores at any time point when comparing whether the dominant or nondominant shoulder was operated on first. Significantly higher VAS scores were observed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months following the first shoulder operation compared with the second; by 6 months and beyond, there was no longer a difference. CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo bilateral shoulder surgery have more pain in the first 3 months following their first shoulder operation compared with their second. However, there is no difference in pain scores at 6 months and beyond between shoulders.

Outpatient vs. inpatient reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes and complications.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an effective treatment option for many shoulder conditions. Historically, this surgical procedure was performed on an inpatient basis. There has been a recent trend to perform RTSA on an outpatient basis in proper candidates. METHODS: All patients who underwent outpatient RTSA performed by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2017 were included. Demographic information and clinical outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, visual analog scale, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores), as well as data on complications, readmission, and revision surgery, were recorded. This group of patients was then compared with a cohort of patients who underwent RTSA in the inpatient setting during the same period. RESULTS: Overall, 241 patients (average age, 68.9 years; 52.3% female patients) underwent outpatient RTSA and were included. Patients who underwent outpatient RTSA showed significant improvements in all clinical outcome scores at both 1 and 2 year postoperatively (all P < .0001). The control group of patients who underwent RTSA as inpatients consisted of 373 patients (average age, 72 years; 66% female patients). Significantly more controls had diabetes (P = .007), and controls had a higher body mass index (P = .022). No significant differences existed in improvements in clinical outcome scores between the inpatient and outpatient groups. Complication rates were significantly lower for outpatient cases than for inpatient controls (7.0% vs. 12.7%, P = .023). CONCLUSION: RTSA performed in an outpatient setting is a safe and reliable procedure that provides significant improvements in clinical outcome scores with fewer complications compared with inpatient RTSA.

Can a functional difference be detected in reverse arthroplasty with 135° versus 155° prosthesis for the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare humeral inclinations of 135° and 155° in patients undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Our hypothesis was that forward flexion would be higher in the 155° group but be associated with a higher rate of scapular notching. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 100 primary RSAs performed with a humeral inclination of either 135° or 155°. The prostheses were otherwise identical and a neutral glenosphere was used in all cases. Functional outcome, forward flexion, external rotation, and scapular notching were assessed at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no difference in range of motion or functional outcome scores between the 2 groups. In the 155° group, forward flexion improved from 76° to 135° (P < .001) and external rotation remained unchanged (29° vs. 30°; P = .835). In the 135° group, postoperative forward flexion improved from 78° to 132° (P < .001) and external rotation was unchanged (28° vs. 29°; P = .814). Scapular notching was observed in 58% of cases with a 155° inclination compared with 21% with a 135° inclination (P = .009). CONCLUSION: With a neutral glenosphere there was no difference in postoperative forward flexion or external rotation after an RSA with a humeral inclination of 135° compared with 155°. Scapular notching was reduced with the use of 135° design compared with a 155° design but persists at a rate of 21% at 2-year follow-up in the absence of a lateralized glenosphere.

Proximal stress shielding is decreased with a short stem compared with a traditional-length stem in total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the outcome and radiographic humeral adaptations after placement of a traditional-length (TL) or short-stem (SS) humeral component during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The hypothesis was there would be no difference in outcome or radiographic adaptations. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective review was performed of primary TSAs performed with a TL or SS press-fit humeral component. The stems were identical in geometry and coating, with the only variable being stem length. Functional outcome and radiographs were reviewed at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively in 58 TL stems and 56 SSs. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in all range of motion and functional outcome from baseline (P < .001) but no difference between the groups (P > .05). TL stems were placed in anatomic alignment 98% of the time compared with 86% of the SS cases (P = .015), but alignment did not influence outcome. Cortical thinning was more common in the medial metaphysis with the TL stem (74%) than with the SS (50%; P = .008). Partial calcar osteolysis was seen in 31% of TL stems and in 23% of SSs (P = .348). There was no difference in loosening or shift between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in functional outcome at short-term follow-up between a TL stem and a SS in TSA. The pattern of radiographic adaptations may differ based on stem length. Further study is needed to evaluate the mid- to long-term differences, particularly with regard to calcar osteolysis.

Radiographic changes differ between two different short press-fit humeral stem designs in total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic changes of the humerus in the short term after total shoulder arthroplasty with two different short-stem humeral components. The hypothesis was that there would be no difference in radiographic changes or functional outcome based on component type. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of primary total shoulder arthroplasties performed with a short press-fit humeral component. Group A included a collarless humeral stem with an oval geometry and curved stem (Ascend or Ascend Flex; Wright Medical, Memphis, TN, USA). Group B included a humeral stem with a metaphyseal collar, rectangular geometry, and straight stem (Apex; Arthrex, Inc., Naples, FL, USA). Radiographic changes and functional outcome were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 42 patients in group A and 35 patients in group B available for analysis. There was no difference in functional outcome between the groups. In group A, the mean total radiographic change score of the humerus was 3.9, with changes classified as low in 38% and high in 62%. In group B, the mean total radiographic change score of the humerus was 2.5, with changes classified as low in 77% and high in 23% (P < .001). Medial calcar osteolysis was present in 71% of group A compared with 28.5% of group B (P < .001). CONCLUSION: At short-term follow-up, there is no difference in functional outcome or revision between 2 different humeral stem designs. However, bone adaptive changes and the rate of medial calcar osteolysis are significantly different.

Healing and functional outcome of a subscapularis peel repair with a stem-based repair after total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcome and healing of a subscapularis peel with a stem-based repair after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The hypothesis was that the repair would lead to subscapularis healing in the majority of cases. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed on a consecutive series of TSAs. Range of motion and functional outcome were assessed according to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale scores at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Belly-press and lift-off tests were also performed. An ultrasound evaluation assessed subscapularis healing at final follow-up. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 15 months, 60 patients (mean age, 64 years) were examined. Mean forward flexion improved from 115° to 137°. External rotation at the side improved from 27° to 52°, and internal rotation improved from L4 to L2 (P < .05). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 34.3 to 79.8 (P < .001). Likewise, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and Simple Shoulder Test scores showed significant improvement from 33.1 to 85.3 and 4.3 to 10.2, respectively (P < .001). The visual analog scale score for pain decreased from 5.8 to 0.7 (P < .001). On ultrasound examination, the subscapularis was healed intact in 55 cases (91.7%), attenuated in 3 cases (5%), and torn in 2 cases (3.3%). CONCLUSION: A stem-based repair of a subscapularis peel after TSA leads to functional improvement in the majority of cases with >90% postoperative healing of the subscapularis.

Neer Award 2015: A randomized, prospective evaluation on the effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss after total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic agent that has been shown to significantly reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements after total knee and hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of TXA on postoperative blood loss after shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A total of 111 patients (62 women; average age, 67 years) who underwent shoulder arthroplasty were prospectively randomized in double-blinded fashion to receive either 100 mL of normal saline or 100 mL of normal saline with 2 g TXA by topical application into the wound at the completion of the case. All patients received a postoperative drain. Drain output representing postoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements, and change in hemoglobin level were recorded. All postoperative complications were noted. RESULTS: The average blood loss recorded after surgery was 170 mL in the placebo group and 108 mL in the TXA group (P = .017). The average change in hemoglobin level was 2.6 g/dL in the placebo group and 1.7 g/dL in the TXA group (P < .001). There were no transfusion requirements or postoperative complications noted in either group. DISCUSSION: In this cohort of patients, those treated with TXA experienced a significantly lower amount of postoperative blood loss and a significantly smaller change in hemoglobin level compared with those treated with placebo. Further work is required to determine the effectiveness and clinical significance of TXA in reducing transfusion requirements in shoulder arthroplasty and, more specifically, shoulder arthroplasty performed for complicated patients or for trauma and fracture patients.

Biologic resurfacing of the glenoid with humeral head resurfacing for glenohumeral arthritis in the young patient.

BACKGROUND: Resurfacing of the glenoid with an interposition soft tissue graft in conjunction with humeral head arthroplasty has been proposed as an option to improve glenohumeral arthritis in young patients while avoiding the potential complications associated with total shoulder arthroplasty. There currently exist minimal outcomes data for this procedure, and the results have not been consistent. The purpose of this study was to report on the outcomes in our cohort of patients aged younger than 55 years. METHODS: A multicenter review of 16 patients who had undergone humeral head arthroplasty with soft tissue interposition grafting of the glenoid was performed. All patients had a minimum follow-up time of 24 months, unless revision surgery was required because of failure of the procedure. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 60 months, the patients showed improvement in the visual analog scale score for pain from 8.1 to 5.8 (P < .05), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 23.2 to 57.7 (P < .05). Forward elevation improved from 128° to 134° (P = .33), and external rotation improved from 28° to 32° (P = .5). Internal rotation showed no improvement. Conversion to a total shoulder arthroplasty was performed in 7 patients (44%) at a mean of 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal management for the young patient with arthritis has not yet been established. Because of the limited improvement in patient outcomes and the relatively high revision rate, biologic resurfacing of the glenoid with humeral head resurfacing is no longer our primary treatment option for young patients and should be used with caution.

The effects of primary implant bearing design on the complexity of revision unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Comparisons of fixed- (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) implants have failed to demonstrate a superiority of one design over the other. Despite showing equally successful outcomes, the wear patterns and small particulate debris associated with MB implants have been linked to an increased prevalence of osteolysis. This study compared the complexity of revision surgery for both bearing types. Operative time, use of augmentation and/or bone grafts, and the level of constraint required during revision were used to assess complexity. It was found that MB knees more frequently required tibial augmentation in our sample population (P=0.020), but overall surgical complexity was equivalent for revisions of both implant designs. These data suggest that additional research pertaining to the potential differences between implants be investigated.

Role of primary bearing type in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Although it has been shown that mobile- and fixed-bearing (FB) prostheses yield equivalent functional outcomes, wear patterns and debris types associated with mobile-bearing (MB) knees have been correlated to an increased prevalence of osteolysis. The complexity of revision surgery was compared between both designs. Several markers, including operative time, use of augmentation, bone grafts, and level of constraint, were analyzed. Data support that for failed total knee arthroplasty, there is a significant difference in mean time to revision between the MB (54.7 months) and FB types (80.6 months) (p ≤ 0.0001). MB knees more frequently required hinged implants during revision, potentially increasing the complexity of the procedure. This study raises concern for use of the MB implants, especially in younger patients who are more likely to require a future revision.

Resection arthroplasty for failed shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: As shoulder arthroplasty becomes more common, the number of failed arthroplasties requiring revision is expected to increase. When revision arthroplasty is not feasible, resection arthroplasty has been used in an attempt to restore function and relieve pain. Although outcomes data for resection arthroplasty exist, studies comparing the outcomes after the removal of different primary shoulder arthroplasties have been limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter review of 26 patients who underwent resection arthroplasty for failure of a primary arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 41.8 months (range, 12-130 months). Resection arthroplasty was performed for 6 failed total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs), 7 failed hemiarthroplasties, and 13 failed reverse TSAs. RESULTS: Patients who underwent resection arthroplasty demonstrated significant improvement in visual analog scale pain score (6 ± 4 preoperatively to 3 ± 2 postoperatively). Mean active forward flexion and mean active external rotation decreased, but this difference was not significant. Subgroup analysis revealed that postoperative mean active forward flexion was significantly greater in patients undergoing resection arthroplasty after failed TSA than after reverse TSA (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Resection arthroplasty is effective in relieving pain, but patients have poor postoperative function. Patients with resection arthroplasty for failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty have worse function than those with failed hemiarthroplasty or TSA. Surgeons should be aware of this when assessing postoperative function. There is no difference in functional outcome between hemiarthroplasty and TSA.

Remote Patient Monitoring of Postoperative Rehabilitation.

Postoperative rehabilitation is a critical part of the treatment algorithm for patients with shoulder issues. When patients could not go to in-person therapy, many therapists pivoted to a remote option, and several application-based rehabilitation programs emerged. This article will discuss the shift to remote patient rehabilitation and will highlight the benefits and potential pitfalls of remote rehabilitation. It will also discuss ways to monitor patients remotely as they are performing their postoperative rehabilitation exercises. Finally, it will discuss how these remote platforms can be used, and what the user experience is like for the patient and the surgeon.

Antibiotic-loaded bone cement reduces deep infection rates for primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective, cohort study of 501 shoulders.

BACKGROUND: Deep infection after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is a devastating event and has an increased incidence compared with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Recent reports in the hip and knee arthroplasty literature suggest that antibiotic-loaded bone cement may lower infection rates for primary arthroplasties. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the effect of antibiotic-loaded bone cement vs plain bone cement on the prevention of deep infection after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four surgeons from their respective facilities participated in the retrospective cohort data collection. From 1999 to 2008, 501 consecutive primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasties were performed. Patients with revision of failed previous arthroplasties were excluded, and patients with any other previous shoulder procedure were included. Two groups were examined in this retrospective cohort: In group 1 (265 shoulders), the cement used for humeral fixation did not have antibiotics; in group 2 (236 shoulders), antibiotic-impregnated bone cement containing tobramycin, gentamycin, or vancomycin/tobramycin was used for fixation. RESULTS: At an average postoperative follow-up of 37 months, no deep infection had developed in the 236 shoulders in group 2, whereas a deep infection had developed in 8 of the 265 shoulders (3.0%) in group 1. This difference between the groups was significant (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic-impregnated bone cement was effective in the prevention of postoperative deep infection after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty during short-term follow-up.

Pectoralis major tendon transfer for the treatment of scapular winging due to long thoracic nerve palsy.

BACKGROUND: Painful scapular winging due to chronic long thoracic nerve (LTN) palsy is a relatively rare disorder that can be difficult to treat. Pectoralis major tendon (PMT) transfer has been shown to be effective in relieving pain, improving cosmesis, and restoring function. However, the available body of literature consists of few, small-cohort studies, and more outcomes data are needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outcomes of 26 consecutive patients with electromyelogram-confirmed LTN palsy who underwent direct (n = 4) or indirect transfer (n = 22) of the PMT for dynamic stabilization of the scapula were reviewed. All patients were followed up clinically for an average of 21.8 months (range, 3-62 months) with evaluations of active forward flexion, active external rotation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and observation of scapular winging. RESULTS: Preoperative to postoperative results included increases in the mean active forward flexion from 112° to 149° (P < .001) an in mean active external rotation from 53.8° to 62.8° (P = .045), an improvement in the mean ASES score from 28 to 67.0 (P < .001), and an improvement in the mean VAS pain score from 7.7 to 3.0 (P < .001). Recurrent scapular winging occurred in 5 patients. There was no difference in outcome by length of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: PMT transfer is an effective treatment for painful scapular winging resulting from LTN palsy. This is the largest reported series of consecutive patients treated with PMT transfer for the correction of scapular winging.

Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient? Early observations.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of comminuted proximal humerus fractures in older patients is challenging. Variable values of functional outcomes scores, ROMs, patient satisfaction, and bony healing have been reported with conventional techniques, including open reduction and internal fixation, percutaneous pinning, and hemiarthroplasty. Another alternative is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, although it is unclear whether this provides better ROM or function. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We (1) evaluated ROM, pain level, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores of patients who had a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for displaced three- and four-part proximal humerus fracture and (2) identified clinical and radiographic complications from the procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients in three institutions who had undergone a primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for displaced three- or four-part proximal humerus fractures. Mean age was 77 years (range, 65-94 years). Minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 23 months; range, 12-36 months). RESULTS: Mean postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 78 (range, 36-98), mean active forward flexion was 139° (range, 90°-180°), and mean active external rotation was 27° (range, 0°-45°). Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons pain score was 0.7 (range, 0-5) and mean visual analog scale pain score was 1.1 (range, 0-5). Complications were identified in three of 30 patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: At short term, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty relieved pain and improved function. The complication rate compared favorably with those reported for other treatment alternatives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes after Latarjet using suture-button fixation.

BACKGROUND: Latarjet has become a common treatment option for patients with shoulder instability in the setting of bone loss. The coracoid is commonly secured with screws. METHODS: All patients who underwent Latarjet with suture-button fixation with minimum 1-year follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Preoperative demographic and clinical outcome data including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were recorded and compared with postoperative scores. Radiographs were reviewed for signs of nonunion. Complications were recorded. RESULTS: Overall 21 patients (76% male, average age: 30.4 ± 11.3 years) underwent Latarjet with suture-button fixation. Significant improvements at 1 year were seen in ASES (P < 0.001), SANE (P < 0.001), and VAS (P = 0.011) scores compared with preoperative scores. Of the 21 patients who had reached 1-year follow-up, 17 (81%) reached 2-year follow-up. For the 17 patients who reached 2-year follow-up, there were significant improvements in ASES (P = 0.001), SANE (P = 0.001), and VAS (P = 0.005) scores from preoperative values. When isolating the 17 patients with 2-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between their 1-year and 2-year ASES (P = 0.73), SANE (P = 0.17), and VAS (P = 0.37) scores. Overall, 3 patients (14%) sustained a complication (one redislocation, one with coracoid migration and a fibrous union, and one superior labral tear requiring biceps tenodesis and superior labral repair). CONCLUSION: Suture-button fixation of the coracoid during the Latarjet provides encouraging clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 and 2 years.

Outpatient versus inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes and complications.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective treatment option for glenohumeral arthritis. Historically, this surgical procedure was performed on an inpatient basis. There has been a recent trend in performing TSA on an outpatient basis in the proper candidates. METHODS: All patients who underwent outpatient TSA performed by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2017 were included. Demographic information and clinical outcome scores, as well as data on complications, readmissions, and revision surgical procedures, were recorded. This group of patients was then compared with a matched cohort of patients who underwent inpatient TSA over the same period. RESULTS: Overall, 94 patients (average age, 60.4 years; 67.0% male patients) underwent outpatient TSA and were included. Patients who underwent outpatient TSA showed significant improvement in all clinical outcome scores at both 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The control group consisted of 77 patients who underwent inpatient TSA (average age, 62.6 years; 53.2% male patients). No significant differences in complications or improvements in clinical outcome scores were found between the inpatient and outpatient groups. CONCLUSION: TSA performed in an outpatient setting is a safe and reliable procedure that provides significant improvement in clinical outcome scores and no difference in complication rates compared with inpatient TSA.

Subscapularis Repair During Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Stem-Based Double-Row Repair: Sonographic and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of the subscapularis in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a controversial topic, with conflicting evidence regarding outcomes after repair. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to report clinical and sonographic outcomes of a through-implant double-row suture technique for subscapularis repair in RTSA and to compare clinical outcomes and range of motion (ROM) between patients with an intact subscapularis tendon repair versus those whose tendon repair was not intact. The authors hypothesized that the novel repair technique would find more than 80% of tendons intact on ultrasound, with significant improvement in clinical outcome scores and ROM. The authors also hypothesized that patients with an intact subscapularis tendon repair would have better clinical outcomes compared with those with a nonintact tendon repair. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: The study included all patients who underwent RTSA by 1 of 2 surgeons between August 2016 and March 2017 with the through-implant double-row suture technique for subscapularis repair. Subscapularis tendon integrity was assessed postoperatively via ultrasound at minimum 1-year follow-up. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at the final follow-up visit in addition to ROM measures. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients (31 males, 17 females; mean age, 68.9 ± 7.4 years; mean follow-up, 13.8 ± 2.1 months) were included. On ultrasound, the subscapularis was intact in 83.3% of patients. Regarding preoperative versus postoperative outcome scores, the ASES score (mean ± SD) significantly improved from 38.3 ± 14.7 to 81.9 ± 13.6, the SANE score significantly improved from 29.8 ± 24.2 to 75.5 ± 21.0, and the VAS pain score significantly improved from 5.9 ± 2.1 to 1.2 ± 1.6 (P < .001 for all). Forward flexion and external rotation significantly improved. No significant difference existed in clinical outcome scores or ROM between patients with intact versus torn subscapularis tendons based on ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Subscapularis repair using a stem-based double-row repair technique during RTSA demonstrated an overall healing rate of 83.3%, as evidenced by ultrasound examination at short-term follow-up. Integrity of subscapularis repair did not affect clinical outcome or ROM.

Tuberosity Repair in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fracture Using a Stem-based Double-row Repair: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal tuberosity repair method in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture is unknown. METHODS: Eight matched pairs of cadaver shoulders were randomly assigned to a stem-based tuberosity repair technique or a nonstem-based repair (Boileau technique) and mechanically tested with a 10 kN load cell. Cyclic loading was performed between 10 and 100 N for 500 cycles at 1 Hz, followed by static pull to failure at 33 mm/s. Ultimate load was determined from the maximum load reached during the pull to failure. A paired Student t-test was used to compare the means of the ultimate load and average cyclic displacement of the two sample groups. RESULTS: The ultimate load to failure for the stem-based tuberosity repair technique was significantly higher than the nonstem-based technique (668 ± 164 N versus 483 ± 67 N; P = 0.032). The average cyclic displacement for the stem-based tuberosity repair technique was significantly less than the nonstem-based technique 0 (0.83 ± 0.67 mm versus 3.36 ± 2.36 mm; P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: The stem-based tuberosity repair technique afforded higher ultimate load to failure with less average cyclic displacement than the nonstem-based technique. Consideration to the stem-based technique should be given when performing a tuberosity repair in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Adhesive Capsulitis: Demographics and Predictive Factors for Success Following Steroid Injections and Surgical Intervention.

PURPOSE: Examine demographic factors of all patients treated for adhesive capsulitis by a single surgeon, report the treatments and outcomes of these patients, and determine the effectiveness of various treatments, including corticosteroid injections and operative intervention in relation to risk factors for adhesive capsulitis. METHODS: All patients treated for adhesive capsulitis by a single surgeon between 2008 to 2014 with minimum 2 years' follow-up were identified via charts and operative reports and were eligible for inclusion. Demographic information including sex and medical comorbidities was documented. Preintervention and postintervention shoulder range of motion was recorded. Specific treatment information (number of corticosteroid injections, etc) was collected. Treatment outcomes were then compared as an aggregate and among varying comorbidities. RESULTS: Overall, 1377 patients were treated for adhesive capsulitis (946 women vs 431 men [P = .001]). For patients with adhesive capsulitis: a higher percentage of men than women had diabetes (24.8% vs 17.3% [P = .001]); nondiabetic patients had better forward flexion at initial presentation than patients with diabetes (114° vs 108° [P = .015]); more patients with diabetes required capsular release than nondiabetic patients (13% vs 7.3% [P = .003]); more nondiabetic patients resolved adhesive capsulitis without corticosteroid or surgical intervention than patients with diabetes (83.6% vs 61.7% [P = .001]); more nondiabetic patients resolved adhesive capsulitis after single corticosteroid injection than did patients with diabetes (95.9% vs 86.7% [P = .001]). Multiple intraarticular corticosteroid injections provided no added benefit over a single injection in resolving adhesive capsulitis in patients with diabetes and nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSION: In shoulder adhesive capsulitis, women and patients with diabetes are more commonly affected, patients with diabetes respond less favorably to physical therapy in isolation and physical therapy plus corticosteroid injections than nondiabetic patients. No benefit from multiple intraarticular corticosteroid injections was seen compared with a single intraarticular corticosteroid injection in patients with diabetes and nondiabetic patients. Patients with diabetes and nondiabetic patients have functional improvement after capsular release and manipulation if conservative treatment for adhesive capsulitis fails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case control.