Hypotension after reperfusion in liver transplantation: histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate versus University of Wisconsin solution.

BACKGROUND: The greatest hemodynamic instability during orthotopic liver transplantation occurs at graft reperfusion. Many factors have been implicated. PURPOSE: To compare hemodynamic changes after reperfusion in grafted livers preserved with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution versus grafted livers preserved with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. METHODS: In this prospective study, we randomly divided 89 patients who underwent deceased donor liver transplantation into 2 groups: the UW group and the HTK group. The HTK group was further divided into 2 subgroups: flushed and not flushed before reperfusion. The patients were monitored with hemodynamic and metabolic parameters at 3 times: after the skin incision, 5 minutes before reperfusion, and 5 minutes after reperfusion. RESULTS: Hemodynamic parameters in the UW group had not changed significantly at 5 minutes before reperfusion or 5 minutes after reperfusion (P = .45), and the incidence of hypotension after reperfusion in the UW group was 20%. In both HTK groups, the mean arterial pressure 5 minutes after reperfusion was significantly lower than at 5 minutes before reperfusion (P = .002); the incidence of hypotension after reperfusion in the nonflushed HTK group was 83.3% and in the flushed HTK group, 65.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of hypotension after reperfusion is greater if HTK solution rather than UW solution is used. Flushing of grafted livers preserved with HTK solution might eliminate some vasoactive substances found in HTK solution.

The effect of clamping of inferior vena cava and portal vein on urine output during liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypotension, massive transfusion, liver disease, coexistent renal dysfunction, and decreased glomerular filtration rate during the anhepatic phase are major hazards for kidney function. We undertook this study to determine the change in urine output during clamping. METHOD: Twenty-four patients without preexistent renal disease, who were undergoing liver transplantation using the piggyback method, were enrolled in this study. Patients with a serum creatinine level >1.2 mg/dL were excluded. Urine output was monitored over 30 minutes before inferior vena cava and portal vein clamping, during clamping, and for 30 minutes after declamping. None of the patients had a clamping time >70 minutes. Our goal was to maintain mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate just by fluid administration diuretics were avoided. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 39.12 +/- 13.52 years (range, 15-67 years) with a male to female ratio of 1:4. Urine output 30 minutes before clamping was 3.64 +/- 3.58 (range, 1.25-15.18) mL/kg/h, decreased to 1.28 +/- 2.58 (range, 0-11.39) mL/kg/h during clamping (P=.00), and increased to 3.56 +/- 3.64 (range, 0.51-15.18) mL/kg/h 30 minutes after declamping (P=.00). CONCLUSION: Urine output was significantly reduced in all patients after clamping of the IVC and portal veins. This observation may be explained by increased venous pressure leading to decreased renal perfusion pressure. It has been stated that one of the advantages of veno-veno bypass (VVB) is increased renal perfusion pressure. However, if the clamping time in the piggyback method is <70 minutes and patients have normal preoperative renal function, the decreased renal perfusion pressure will not cause postoperative kidney dysfunction.

Post-reperfusion Syndrome and Outcome Variables after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) is an important complication during liver transplantation. OBJECTIVE: We studied the occurrence and severity of PRS in patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) to investigate how PRS was correlated to clinical variables and outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively recorded intra- and peri-operative data for 184 adult patients who received cadaveric OLT during a 3-year period from 2005 to 2008. Patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of PRS: Group 1 (mild or no PRS) comprised 152 patients; and group 2 (significant PRS) consisted of 32 patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic and pre-operative data between groups. Group 2 had more total blood loss than group 1 (p=0.036), especially after reperfusion (p=0.023). Group 2 required more packed red cell transfusions (p=0.005), more fresh frozen plasma (p=0.003) and more platelets (p=0.043) than group 1. Fibrinolysis was more frequent in group 2 (p=0.004). Hospital stay in group 2 was significantly longer than in group 1 (p=0.034), but the frequencies of other outcomes including infection, retransplantation, dialysis, rejection and extended donor criteria did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding, blood transfusion and fibrinolysis occurred more often in the group of severe PRS after reperfusion. Although postoperative complications like rejection, infection and the dialysis rate were not significantly different in the two groups, hospital stay was more prolonged in the group with severe PRS.