Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 53(8): 2745-8, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26063860

RESUMO

We implemented hospital information system (HIS) alerts to deter unnecessary test orders for ovum and parasite (O&P) exams and Clostridium difficile PCR. The HIS alerts decreased noncompliant O&P orders (orders after >72 h of hospitalization) from 49.8% to 30.9%, an overall decrease of 19%, and reduced noncompliant C. difficile PCR orders (orders <7 days after a previous positive result) from 30.6% to 19.2%, an overall decrease of 31.9%.


Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar/organização & administração , Doenças Parasitárias/diagnóstico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Contagem de Ovos de Parasitas/estatística & dados numéricos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(7): 2282-8, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22518855

RESUMO

Respiratory viruses are increasingly recognized as serious causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. The rapid and sensitive detection of respiratory viruses is essential for the early diagnosis and administration of appropriate antiviral therapy, as well as for the effective implementation of infection control measures. We compared the performance of two commercial assays, xTAG RVP Fast (Luminex Diagnostics, Toronto, Canada) and FilmArray RVP (FA RVP; Idaho Technology, Salt Lake City, UT), in pediatric patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. These assays detect the following viruses: respiratory syncytial virus; influenza A and B viruses; parainfluenza viruses 1, 2, 3, and 4; human metapneumovirus; adenovirus; enterovirus-rhinovirus; coronaviruses NL63, HKU1, 229E, and OC43; and bocavirus. We tested a total of 358 respiratory specimens from 173 pediatric patients previously tested by direct fluorescence assay (DFA) and viral culture. The overall detection rate (number of positive specimens/total specimens) for viruses tested by all methods was 24% for DFA/culture, 45% for xTAG RVP Fast, and 51% for FA RVP. The agreement between the two multiplex assays was 84.5%, and the difference in detection rate was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Overall, the FA RVP assay was more sensitive than the xTAG RVP Fast assay and had a turnaround time of approximately 1 h. The sensitivity, simplicity, and random-access platform make FA RVP an excellent choice for laboratory on-demand service with low to medium volume.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Virologia/métodos , Viroses/virologia , Vírus/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Institutos de Câncer , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Neoplasias/complicações , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Viroses/diagnóstico , Vírus/classificação , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 48(12): 4519-24, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20943860

RESUMO

Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of health care-associated diarrhea. Accurate and rapid diagnosis is essential to improve patient outcome and prevent disease spread. We compared our two-step diagnostic algorithm, an enzyme immunoassay for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) followed by the cytotoxin neutralization test (CYT) with a turnaround time of 24 to 48 h, versus the Cepheid Xpert C. difficile Epi assay, a PCR-based assay with a turnaround time of <1 h. In the first phase of the study, only GDH-positive stool samples were tested by both CYT and Xpert PCR. Discordant results were resolved by toxigenic culture. In the second phase, all stool samples were tested by GDH and Xpert PCR. Only GDH-positive stools were further tested by CYT. Genotypic characterization of 45 Xpert PCR-positive stools was performed by sequencing of the tcdC gene and PCR ribotyping. In phase 1, the agreement between the GDH-CYT and the GDH-Xpert PCR was 72%. The sensitivities and specificities of GDH-CYT and GDH-Xpert PCR were 57% and 97% and 100% and 97%, respectively. In phase 2, the agreement between GDH-CYT and Xpert PCR alone was 95%. As in phase 1, sensitivity of the Xpert PCR was higher than that of the GDH-CYT. The correlation between PCR-ribotyping, sequencing, and Xpert PCR for detection of NAP1 strains was excellent (>90%). The excellent sensitivity and specificity and the rapid turnaround time of the Xpert PCR assay as well as its strain-typing capability make it an attractive option for diagnosis of C. difficile infection.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Clostridioides difficile/classificação , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Institutos de Câncer , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Fezes/microbiologia , Genótipo , Humanos , Proteínas Repressoras/genética , Ribotipagem , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA