End of Affirmative Action-Who Is Impacted Most? Analysis of Race and Sex Among US Internal Medicine Faculty.

BACKGROUND: For over 50 years, the United States (US) used affirmative action as one strategy to increase diversity in higher education including medical programs, citing benefits including training future public and private sector leaders. However, the recent US Supreme Court ending affirmative action in college admissions threatens advancements in the diversity of medical college faculty. OBJECTIVE: Our study evaluated the demographic trends in Internal Medicine (IM) faculty in the US by assessing sex and race/ethnicity diversity to investigate who is likely to be impacted most with the end of affirmative action. DESIGN: Longitudinal retrospective analysis SUBJECTS: IM faculty from the Association of American Medical Colleges faculty roster from 1966 to 2021 who self-reported sex and ethnicity MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary study measurement was the annual proportion of women and racial/ethnic groups among IM faculty based on academic rank and department chairs. RESULTS: Although racial/ethnic diversity increased throughout the era of affirmative action, African American, Hispanic, and American Indian populations remain underrepresented. White physicians occupied > 50% of faculty positions across academic ranks and department chairs. Among the non-White professors, Asian faculty had the most significant increase in proportion from 1966 to 2021 (0.6 to 16.6%). The percentage of women increased in the ranks of professor, associate professor, assistant professor, and instructor by 19.5%, 27.8%, 25.6%, and 26.9%, respectively. However, the proportion of women and racial/ethnic minority faculty decreased as academic rank increased. CONCLUSION: Despite an increase in the representation of women and racial/ethnic minority IM faculty, there continues to be a predominance of White and men physicians in higher academic ranks. With the end of affirmative action, this trend has the danger of being perpetuated, resulting in decreasing diversity among IM faculty, potentially impacting patient access and health outcomes.

Priority of Gender and Racial Disparity in Neurology Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis, 2016-2021.

INTRODUCTION: Medicine and the field of neurology are not immune to gender and racial disparities present more broadly in society. Even within academia there remains a persistent lack of representation of women and racial minorities, but with the recent spotlight on discrimination it is more necessary than ever that prevailing disparities are acknowledged by medical journals and reflected in their publication priorities. This bibliometric study assesses whether social justice trends have influenced the number of articles published that discuss gender and racial disparity in the past 5 years within the top three leading neurological journals. Our assumption is that any trend towards more publications related to gender and racial disparities are reflective of the publication priorities of, and thus the perceived relevance to, the editorial boards of the chosen journals. METHODS: Using key word search of "gender," "race," and "disparity" in the title or context of published papers, the archives of Lancet Neurology, Nature Reviews Neurology, and Alzheimer's & Dementia were reviewed. RESULTS: The results indicated that although there was a slight overall increase in coverage of the aforementioned topics, it was negligible compared to the broad impact of current social justice movements. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest an inadequate publication priority for scholarly work on gender and racial disparity in the chosen journals, over the latest 5 years reviewed.

Trends in Racial and Gender Profiles of United States Academic Emergency Medicine Faculty: Cross-Sectional Survey From 2007 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported existing disparities in academic medicine. The purpose of this study was to assess racial and gender disparity in academic emergency medicine (EM) faculty positions across the United States from 2007 to 2018. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to identify the racial and ethnic and gender distributions across academic ranks in EM. The secondary objective was to describe the racial and gender proportions across different tenure tracks and degrees. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from the Association of American Medical Colleges. Simple descriptive statistics and time series analysis were employed to assess the trends and relationship between race and gender across academic rank, type of degree, and tenure status. RESULTS: When averaged, 75% of all faculty members were White physicians and 67.5% were male. Asian faculty members showed an increased representation in the lower academic ranks and underrepresented minority groups demonstrated a small increase. Asian faculty members demonstrated a significantly increasing trend at the level of instructor (t = 0.02; p = 0.034; 95% CI 0.05-1.03). Female faculty members showed a significantly decreasing trend over the study period (t = -0.01; p < 0.001; 95% CI 0.68-0.75). White academic physicians and male faculty members made up most of all degree types and tenure categories. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in proportional representation, the underrepresentation of female faculty members and those from minority groups persists in emergency medicine. Further studies are needed to identify and address the root causes of these differences.

Equity, diversity, and inclusion in academic American otolaryngology faculty: an elusive dream.

We analyze gender and racial disparities in academic otolaryngology from 2007 to 2018 in the United States (US). A cross-sectional retrospective analysis was done using data from the American Association of Medical Colleges. The distribution of gender and race, academic ranks, tenure tracks, and degrees was reported. The total number of otolaryngologists increased from 1,490 to 2,239, where 53 percent were females. All races experienced an increase; however, Whites and Asians had a greater increase compared to Black and Hispanics. Regarding percentages at different ranks, White were the majority (>50 percent) in every category. As for tenure, the general trend was a decrease in the total number of tenured physicians from 327 in 2007 to 318 in 2018, where Black, Hispanic, and Asian tenured physicians increased, while White tenured physicians decreased. White male otolaryngologists were the majority for every subgroup (>60 percent), whereas Black faculty made up less than 1 percent of tenured category. Female representation gradually increased for all levels of tenure. As for all degrees, Whites were the majority for all levels of education (>60 percent). There were some improvements in the representations for the females in all and Asians on the tenure track. However, progress for the URM remains an elusive dream.

Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Academic American Surgery Faculty: An Elusive Dream.

BACKGROUND: In the context of shifting population demographics in the United States, a diverse workforce in health care can lead to improved patient outcomes and enhance access to culturally competent care for minorities. The objective of this study was to analyze and quantify the relationship of gender, race, and academic rank, tenure status, and degree in American academic surgical faculty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 12-y retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the data from the Association of American Medical Colleges was performed. The distribution of race and gender across academic ranks, tenure, and degree types were recorded from 2007-2018. Simple descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis was used to analyze the time trends and association between gender and race across academic rank, tenure status, and degree types. RESULTS: When averaged over the 12 y of this study, there were significantly more whites (69.8%) and males (74.5%) among the academic surgery faculty compared with other races and females, respectively (P value <0.05). Asians and females experienced the greatest increase in proportional representation across all academic ranks with an absolute increase of 7% and 5% in full professor, 5% and 6% in associate professor, and 7% and 3% in chairperson (P value <0.05), respectively. No significant association was observed between gender and race with tenure status or degree type. CONCLUSIONS: Female and Asians are increasing in proportional representation; however, racial and gender disparities remain prevalent at higher academic ranks and positions of leadership, especially among black and Hispanic academic surgeons.

Racial and gender disparities in neurology.

INTRODUCTION: The USA is a diverse society with representation from different ethnic and racial backgrounds, resulting in under-represented minorities (URMs) in various specialties of medicine. Our objective was to find the statistical ratio of URMs in the academic faculty of neurology. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the American Association of Medical College database. The database covered neurology faculty members from 2006 to 2017. RESULTS: This study shows a significant change in racial representation in faculty ranks over the last 12 years. At chairperson rank, white people decreased from 86.4% to 79.8% whereas Asian, Hispanic and multiple races (non-Hispanic) simultaneously increased from 6.4% to 9.3%, 0.9% to 3.1% and 1.8% to 4.7%, respectively. At the professor rank, white people decreased from 87.4% to 81.6%, while Asians and Hispanics increased from 7.1% to 10.5% and from 0.7% to 2.1%, respectively. At the rank of associate professor, white people decreased from 81.1% to 68.3% whereas Asians, Hispanics and unknown races increased from 10.3% to 19.0%, 1.6% to 3.1% and from 2.1% to 3.5%, respectively. For the rank of assistant professor, white people decreased from 64.7% to 56.9% and Asians increased from 20.5% to 25.9%. Gender differences (men vs women) for the ranks of chairperson, professor, associate professor, assistant professor and instructors were 90.3% and 9.7%, 83.1% and 16.9%, 67.1% and 32.9%, 56.8% and 43.2%, and 48.1% and 51.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Over a period of 12 years the racial proportion in academic neurology has changed, but it is not proportionate to their respective increase in the population of the USA. Moreover, the portion of female faculty increased, but they are still under-represented in leadership roles. This racial and gender disparity can be addressed by well-planned interventions.

Impact of robot-assisted spine surgery on health care quality and neurosurgical economics: A systemic review.

Whenever any new technology is introduced into the healthcare system, it should satisfy all three pillars of the iron triangle of health care, which are quality, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. There has been quite advancement in the field of spine surgery in the last two decades with introduction of new technological modalities such as CAN and surgical robotic devices. MAZOR SpineAssist/Renaissance was the first robotic system to be approved for the use in spine surgeries in the USA in 2004. In this review, the authors sought to determine if the current literature supports this technology to be cost-effective, accessible, and improve the quality of care for individuals and populations by increasing the likelihood of desired health outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery seems to provide perfection in surgical ergonomics and surgical dexterity, consequently improving patient outcomes. A lot of data is present on the accuracy, effectiveness, and safety of the robotic-guided technology which reflects remarkable improvements in quality of care, making its utility convincingly undisputable. The technology has been claimed to be cost-effective but there seems to be lack of data in the literature on this topic to validate this claim. Apart from just the outcome parameters, there is an immense need of studies on real-time cost-efficacy, patient perspective, surgeon and resident learning curve, and their experience with this new technology. Furthermore, new studies looking into increased utilities of this technology, such as brain and spine tumor resection, deep brain stimulation procedures, and osteotomies in deformity surgery, might authenticate the cost of the equipment.

US Psychiatry Faculty: Academic Rank, Gender and Racial Profile.

OBJECTIVE: The gender and racial underrepresentation persist in academic psychiatry faculty appointments. Our study investigated the gender and racial distribution and its temporal trends in academic psychiatry faculty positions across the USA over a 12-year period. METHODS: Using the annual reports of the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), a retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. Simple descriptive statistics analyzed the time trends and the distribution of gender and race across academic ranks, tenure, and degree types. RESULTS: Over the 12-year study period, the White race was the most represented at each rank. In the lower academic ranks, there was an increased representation of Asians, while the minority race/ethnicities experienced minimal increment. Similarly, males were overrepresented at higher academic ranks, with females increasing in proportion at lower academic ranks. CONCLUSIONS: Females and minorities remain underrepresented in academic psychiatry faculty positions, especially among senior academic and leadership positions. Differences in tenure tracks and degree types may contribute to the overrepresentation of White and male academic physicians.

Neurosurgical Post-Operative Wound Infections: A retrospective study on surgical site infections for quality improvement.

Despite efforts to maintain a meticulous aseptic environment, wound infection is one of the most common complications following surgery and may be related to dehiscence, haemorrhage, infection, and/or poor surgical technique. With the appearance of new wound closure techniques and suture materials, we felt compelled to perform a retrospective study on our institution's neurosurgical population to determine how our institution compared to others in terms of incidence of surgical site infection (SSI). A retrospective analysis was performed at our single institution for all patients that had cranial or spine surgery by a neurosurgeon for the past 15 years. The data were extracted via Crimson Continuum of Care software program and analysed using χ2 and relative risk. The data retrieval software program collected a total of 1184 cranial and spinal surgeries. Of these 1184 cases, 12 resulted in post-operative wound infections. Using these collected values, we compared the results with published values in the literature. Prior studies have shown that up to 33% of surgical cases have post-operative infections. Using this reported value in comparison with our data, χ2 testing equals 547.893 with 1 df, P = .0001 (confidence interval = 0.05), which demonstrated statistical significance when compared with surgical literature. The results from this retrospective analysis demonstrated that the rate of neurosurgical post-operative SSI falls within the range consistent with the literature, which has shown rates of infection from <1% up to 15% depending on the type of surgery, surgical technique, and patient characteristics. SSIs can be an unfortunate and costly post-operative complication. Risks factors in the past have been studied, but introspection by each institution is an important metric to ensure accountability and provide optimal patient care in comparison with established data and guidelines. No deviation from current techniques is deemed necessary at our institution based on the results.

Risks and benefits of stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult neurocritical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Neurocritical care patients are at high risk for stress-related upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the risks and benefits of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in this patient group. METHODS: A systematic search of major electronic literature databases was conducted. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which researchers compared the effects of SUP (with proton pump inhibitors or histamine 2 receptor antagonists) with placebo or no prophylaxis in neurocritical care patients. The primary outcome was UGI bleeding, and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and nosocomial pneumonia. Study heterogeneity was sought and quantified. The results were reported as risk ratios/relative risks (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 8 RCTs comprising an aggregate of 829 neurocritical care patients. Among these trials, one study conducted in a non-intensive care unit setting that did not meet our inclusion criteria was ultimately included based on further evaluation. All studies were judged as having a high or unclear risk of bias. SUP was more effective than placebo or no prophylaxis at reducing UGI bleeding (random effects: RR 0.31; 95 % CI 0.20-0.47; P < 0.00001; I (2) = 45 %) and all-cause mortality (fixed effects: RR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.50-0.98; P = 0.04; I (2) = 0 %). There was no difference between SUP and placebo or no prophylaxis regarding nosocomial pneumonia (random effects: RR 1.14; 95 % CI 0.67-1.94; P = 0.62; I (2) = 42 %). The slight asymmetry of the funnel plots raised the concern of small trial bias, and apparent heterogeneity existed in participants, interventions, control treatments, and outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: In neurocritical care patients, SUP seems to be more effective than placebo or no prophylaxis in preventing UGI bleeding and reducing all-cause mortality while not increasing the risk of nosocomial pneumonia. The robustness of this conclusion is limited by a lack of trials with a low risk of bias, sparse data, heterogeneity among trials, and a concern regarding small trial bias. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) identifier: CRD42015015802 . Date of registration: 6 Jan 2015.

Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Failure and Cerebrospinal Fluid Protein: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS) are used to manage hydrocephalus but suffer from high failure rates. Our objectives were to (1) conduct a meta-analysis to objectively weigh this conflicting evidence, and (2) conduct a systematic review compiling and synthesizing what is known about the association between CSF proteins and shunt failure. A literature search was performed in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to June 2023. The articles were screened based on the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted using R statistical software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria); heterogeneity, subgroup, sensitivity, risk of bias, and publication bias analyses were performed. Thirty-one studies were selected for the systematic review, of which eight were selected for the meta-analysis. Perioperative CSF protein level was compared between 351 shunt failures and 1,094 shunt survivals; the mean difference of 24.37 mg/dL favoring shunt failure was significant (95% confidence interval=2.44-46.29 mg/dL). Our systematic review yielded a hypothesized pathogenesis: proteins attached to imperfections in the shunt surface lead to secondary attachment of cells, particularly astrocytes, and tertiary attachment of ependymal cells and the choroid plexus. Owing to the limitations of this meta-analysis, including lack of robustness due to missing data, heterogeneity, and certainty of the evidence, future research is needed to better understand the relationship between perioperative CSF protein levels and shunt failure.

Advancing Diversity in Microbiology: A 55-Year Retrospective Analysis.

Background For over 50 years, affirmative action helped advance equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in educational institutions in the United States (U.S.). However, the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to end affirmative action in college admissions threatens the progress toward EDI. Objective This study aimed to assess the progress in promoting gender and racial diversity within the discipline of microbiology over a 55-year period. We sought to analyze the representation of women and minority groups in faculty ranks, tenure positions, and leadership to identify disparities and trends and determine who will likely be impacted most with the end of affirmative action. Materials and methods This longitudinal retrospective study utilized publicly available and non-identifiable Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) data on full-time microbiology faculty from 1967 to 2021. Faculty members were categorized based on academic ranks and tenure status, while gender and racial data were also considered. Results The analysis revealed a consistent dominance of white faculty, with over 60% representation across all academic ranks throughout the study period. The Asian and female faculty representation decreased in senior academic ranks. We observed a positive trend in the annual increase of women in faculty positions, academic ranks, chairs, and tenure positions. Furthermore, Asian faculty demonstrated the most robust surge in representation. However, disparities persisted for black, Hispanic, and Native American faculty members, reflecting broader challenges in their representation. Discussion Although efforts to enhance diversity within microbiology have yielded positive results, underrepresented minority groups still face obstacles in attaining leadership positions and senior academic ranks. The diminishing proportion of women at higher academic ranks raises concerns about potential attrition or lack of promotion opportunities. The end of affirmative action poses a risk of perpetuating this trend, leading to a decline in diversity among microbiology faculty.

Acute-onset cerebellar symptoms in Lhermitte-Duclos disease: case report.

Adult-onset Lhermitte-Duclos disease (LD), or dysplastic cerebellar gangliocytoma, is a hamartoma considered pathognomonic for Cowden disease. Classically, LD has a progressive and insidious onset of symptoms. In this case report, we present a patient having rapid neurological deterioration from acute-onset LD. There are only three reported cases of acute LD presentation. A 22-year-old female presented to the emergency department with diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, and gait instability which developed within 6 h. A non-contrast CT scan revealed diffuse attenuation in the left cerebellum and mild ventricular dilatation. LP revealed no organisms. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed salient "tiger stripe" appearance of the left cerebellar cortex and effacement of the fourth ventricle. The patient subsequently underwent suboccipital craniotomy and gross total resection of the lesion. The tumor histology showed distortion of normal cerebellar architecture with dysplastic ganglion cells, loss of Purkinje cells, atrophy of the white matter, and expansion of cerebellar folia. Findings were consistent with adult-onset Lhermitte-Duclos disease.

The Concurrent Use of Phenytoin and Levetiracetam for Seizure Prophylaxis in ICU Patients: The "Arrowhead Rationale".

The administration of multiple antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is standard practice for neurological intensive care unit (ICU) patients who cannot obtain seizure control with monotherapy. Phenytoin and levetiracetam continue to be highly utilized AEDs for ICU patients due to their efficacy and relatively low cost. However, there is no randomized control trial to date that assesses the efficacy outcomes of the concurrent use of these two medications for ICU patients in convulsive or silent status epilepticus that combats the toxicity with increasing dosages of a single drug by itself. Here, we have analyzed several studies published over the past two decades to better understand whether the concomitant use of these two medications is more efficacious in treating unremitting seizures in ICU patients. Several factors influence which AED is a better fit for ICU patients due to the complexity of their clinical state. Risk for drug interactions, increased incidence of renal and hepatic impairment, and higher need for patient monitoring are daily barriers that determine AED use. After analysis of past research, while the efficacy of concurrent use of levetiracetam and phenytoin is still not fully clear, we offer the "Arrowhead Rationale" for such dual therapy in a subset of patients at our tertiary care trauma and stroke center in Southern California.

Determinants and Disparities of Neurosurgery Patients Refusing Inpatient Palliative Care After Provider Recommendation.

Background Disparities have been found in the utilization of palliative care (PC). However, a limitation of existing research is that it co-mingles factors affecting whether a patient is offered PC with factors affecting whether a patient accepts/refuses PC. Our objective is to identify the determinants and disparities of neurosurgery patients accepting/refusing inpatient PC after a provider recommends an inpatient PC consult. Methodology In this single-center retrospective cohort study, the last 750 consecutive neurosurgery patient medical records were screened. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the patient was seen by the neurosurgery service during their hospitalization and (2) the patient had a documented inpatient PC consult ordered or the patient had at least one progress note documenting PC in the plan of care. Excluded were patients not seen by the neurosurgery service during the hospitalization in which the PC consult order or plan was documented. Analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression with backward stepwise variable selection. Candidate variables included age, gender, race, ethnicity, language, marital status, insurance type, surrogate decision-maker (SDM) relationship to patient, advanced directive, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), ambulation, activities of daily living (ADL) dependence, primary diagnosis category, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at the time of admission, GCS at the time of PC consult, GCS at the time of discharge, duration of hospitalization, and hospitalization mortality. Results Of the last 750 neurosurgery patients, this study included 144 patients (33.3% female; mean age 57.53±19.89 years). Among these patients, 109 patients (75.7%) accepted PC and 35 patients (24.3%) refused PC. Univariate analysis showed that patients refusing PC tended to be older (p=0.003) and have a shorter duration of hospitalization (p=0.023). Chi-squared analysis found associations between PC acceptance/refusal and preferred language (p=0.026), religion (p<0.001), and SDM relationship to patient (p=0.004). Multivariate logistic regression found that predictors of PC refusal were older age (OR=0.965, p=0.049), non-English (OR=0.219, p=0.004), adult child SDM (OR=0.246, p=0.023), and other relative/friend SDM (OR=0.208, p=0.011). Religious patients were more likely to accept PC (OR=7.132, p<0.001). Race and ethnicity factors were not found to be significant predictors of PC refusal: Black (p=0.649), other race (p=0.189), and Hispanic (p=0.525). Conclusion Nearly one-quarter of neurosurgery patients offered PC refused this care. Predictors of PC refusal were older age, non-English, adult child SDM, and other relative/friend SDM. Religious patients were more likely to accept PC. Race and ethnicity were not found to be significant predictors of accepting/refusing PC, which may suggest these previously identified disparities stem from minority patients being offered less PC. Additional research is needed to replicate these findings among different patient populations. Because PC is compatible with life-prolonging therapies and aims to provide additional emotional and spiritual support to the patient and family, the finding that nearly one-quarter of patients refused PC may demonstrate a pervasive misconception and need for patient education.

Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-Cited Articles.

Propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS) is a rare, yet life-threatening sequelae to prolonged administration of the anesthetic propofol in mechanically intubated patients. The condition is characterized by progressive multi-system organ failure and eventual mortality; of note, the predominant characteristics of PRIS involve but are not limited to cardiovascular impairment and collapse, metabolic and lactic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalemia, and acute renal failure. While potent or extended doses of propofol have been found to be the primary precipitating factor of this condition, others such as age, critical illness, steroid therapy, and hyperlipidemia have been discovered to play a role as well. This bibliometric analysis was done to reflect the current relevance and understanding of PRIS in recent literature. The SCOPUS database was utilized to conduct a search for articles with keywords "propofol infusion syndrome" and "propofol syndrome" from February 24, 2001, until April 16, 2023, with parameters for article title, citation number, citation per year, author, institution, publishing journal, and country of origin. PRIS was first defined in 1990, just a year after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration for use as a sedative-hypnotic. Since then, interest in PRIS slowly rose up to 13 publications per year in 2013. Seven papers on the topic were published in Critical Care Medicine, six in Neurocritical Care, and four in Anesthesia. The most common institutions were Mayo Clinic, Northeastern University, and Tufts Medical Center. To our knowledge, this is the first bibliometric analysis to evaluate the most influential publications about PRIS. A majority of the research is case-based, possibly owing to the rarity of the condition. Our research suggests that confounding factors outside the precipitating dosage of propofol may be implicated in the onset and progression of PRIS. This study could therefore bring renewed interest to the topic and lead to additional research focused on fully understanding the pathophysiology of PRIS in order to promote the development of novel diagnostics and treatment.

Catheter-Associated Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Ventriculitis and Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia With Subsequent Acinetobacter Ventriculitis: A Case Report.

Ventriculitis is associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts, and rare microorganisms associated with infection include vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) faecium and Acinetobacter baumannii. Both organisms are known to cause nosocomial infections, and the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains presents a treatment challenge. There is a lack of consensus on antimicrobial agent selection for ventriculitis involving VRE faecium or MDR A. baumannii, which are life-threatening conditions. We present a case of a 59-year-old male presenting with CSF catheter-associated VRE faecium ventriculitis and MDR A. baumannii pneumonia who subsequently developed a nosocomial MDR A. baumannii ventriculitis. Both instances of ventriculitis were successfully treated with combination antibiotic therapy. VRE faecium ventriculitis was successfully treated with linezolid and intrathecal daptomycin. While daptomycin is not approved for Enterococcal infections, the synergistic effect of daptomycin in combination with linezolid proved effective. Although the MDR A. baumannii pneumonia was not cured with cefiderocol monotherapy, the MDR A. baumannii ventriculitis was successfully treated with combination therapy including cefiderocol, ampicillin/sulbactam, and intrathecal colistin. This highlights life-saving combination antibiotic therapies for ventriculitis caused by multiple rare and drug-resistant microorganisms.

Gender Differences in Surgical Case Volume Among Neurosurgery Residents.

OBJECTIVES: Gender differences in surgical training opportunities, measured by case volume, have been demonstrated in the fields of otolaryngology and ophthalmology. We hypothesize that this gender disparity is not present among neurosurgery residents. This study compares median female and male case volumes stratified by postgraduate year (PGY) level for U.S. neurosurgery residents. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included case log data from two southern California neurosurgery residency training programs, Riverside University Health System (RUHS) and Desert Regional Medical Center (DRMC), from 2015 to 2021. For each PGY level, gender differences in case volumes were summarized using median, SD, and two-sided t-tests. RESULTS: Among 47 (19.1% female) neurosurgery residents, there were no significant gender differences in case volumes across any PGY levels. Female residents had greater median surgical cases during PGY-1 (median (SD), female 107.0 (13.1) vs male 102.0 (24.3); p=0.841) and PGY-7 (female 282.5 (17.7) vs male 246 (60.9); P=0.424), while male residents had greater median case volumes for all other PGY levels. CONCLUSIONS: Although previous studies have found significant gender differences in case volumes among surgical residents in otolaryngology and ophthalmology, case log data from two neurosurgery residency programs in southern California, RUHS and DRMC, does not reflect this gender disparity at any PGY level.