Fermented biochar has a markedly different effect on fate of pesticides in soil than compost, straw, and a mixed biochar-product.

Current knowledge about how biochars affect the fate of pesticides in soil is based on studies that used pure biochars. After finding that an additional biological post-pyrolysis treatment, such as co-composting or lactic fermentation, is required for biochars for superior performance in temperate arable soils, a knowledge gap formed of how such further processed biochar products would affect the fate of pesticides in soil. This study compared the effects of a novel fermented biochar alone or mixed with biogas residues on the fate of two pesticides, 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) and metalaxyl-M, in a temperate arable soil to the traditional organic amendments wheat straw and compost. The fate of 14C-labeled MCPA was markedly affected in different ways. Fermented biochar effectively reduced the water-extractability and mineralization due to adsorption that was comparable to adsorption strengths reported for pure biochars. However, this effect was weak for the biochar mixed with biogas residues. Straw reduced water-extractable amounts due to increased biodegradation and formation of likely biogenic non-extractable residues of MCPA. In contrast, compost decelerated mineralization and increased the water solubility of the MCPA residues due to released dissolved organic matter. The amendments' effects were minor regarding 14C-metalaxyl-M, except for the fermented biochar which again reduced water-extractability and delayed degradation due to adsorption. Thus, the effects of the organic amendments differed for the two pesticide compounds with only the fermented biochar's effect being similar for both. However, this effect was no longer present in the mixed product containing 20% biochar. Our findings clearly show that biologically treated biochar-containing products can affect the fate of pesticides in soil very differently, also when compared to traditional organic amendments. Such impacts and their desirable and undesirable ecotoxicological implications need to be considered before the large-scale application of biochars to temperate arable soils.

Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides.

The emission of nutrients and pesticides from agricultural soils endangers natural habitats. Here, we review to which extent carbon-rich organic amendments help to retain nutrients and pesticides in agricultural soils and to reduce the contamination of surrounding areas and groundwater. We compare straw, compost, and biochar to see whether biochar outperforms the other two more traditional and cheaper materials. We present a list of criteria to evaluate the suitability of organic materials to be used as soil amendments and discuss differences in elemental compositions of straw, compost, and biochar to understand, how soil microorganisms utilize those materials. We review their effects on physical and chemical soil characteristics, soil microbial communities, as well as effects on the transformation and retention of nutrients and pesticides in detail. It becomes clear that for all three amendments their effects can vary greatly depending on numerous aspects, such as the type of soil, application rate, and production procedure of the organic material. Biochar is most effective in increasing the sorption capacity of soils but does not outperform straw and compost with regards to the other aspects investigated. Nevertheless, the possibility to design biochar properties makes it a very promising material. Finally, we provide critical comments about how to make studies about organic amendments more comparable (comprehensive provision of material properties), how to improve concepts of future work (meta-analysis, long-term field studies, use of deep-insight microbial DNA sequencing), and what needs to be further investigated (the link between structural and functional microbial parameters, the impact of biochar on pesticide efficiency).

Formation, classification and identification of non-extractable residues of 14C-labelled ionic compounds in soil.

The influence of an ionic functional group on the fate of chemicals in the environment, especially the formation of non-extractable residues (NER), has not been systematically investigated. Using 4-n-dodecylphenol[phenylring-14C(U)], 4-n-dodecylbenzenesulfonicacid[phenylring-14C(U)] sodiumsalt (14C-DS-) and 4-n-dodecylbenzyltrimethylammoniumchloride[phenylring-14C(U)] (14C-DA+) all with a high structural similarity, the formation, classification and identification of NER of negatively (14C-DS-), positively (14C-DA+) and uncharged (14C-DP) chemicals were investigated in a sterilized and non-sterilized soil. After 84 days of incubation in non-sterile soil, 40.6%, 21.7% and 33.5% of the applied radioactivity (AR) of 14C-DP, 14C-DS- and 14C-DA+, respectively, were converted to NER. In contrast, in sterile soil NER formation was markedly lower. The NER were further investigated with respect to sequestered, covalently bound and biogenic residues (i.e. NER types I, II, and III). Silylation of 14C-DP, 14C-DS- and 14C-DA+ derived NER released 3.0-23.2% AR, indicating that these were sequestered, whereas the residual NER (12.9-33.1% AR) was covalently bound to the soil. Analysis of extracts derived by silylation showed that 14C-DP, but neither 14C-DS- nor 14C-DA+, were released by silylation, suggesting that DP might be part of the sequestered NER. Acid hydrolysis of the NER containing soil and subsequent analysis of soil extracts for 14C-aminoacids indicated that 2.5-23.8% AR were biogenic residues. Most DP and DS- derived NER were biogenically or covalently bound, whereas DA+ predominantly forms sequestered NER in soil. From these results we propose that chemicals forming high amounts of NER should be investigated regarding types I-III NER because sequestered parent compounds should be considered in persistence assessments.