One-year recombinant growth hormone therapy does not improve hemoglobin state and morphology of erythrocytes in growth hormone deficient children.

An increase in growth rates of children suffering from growth hormone deficiency (GHD) subjected to recombinant growth hormone treatment (rGHT) was shown to be accompanied by acceleration of metabolic processes that may stimulate oxygen consumption in various organs and tissues. Therefore, oxygen-transporting properties of RBC should undergo considerable changes during the rGHT. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of rGHT on erythrocyte shape and hemoglobin state in GHD children. The level of oxyhemoglobin (Oxy-Hb) in RBC was analyzed by Raman spectroscopy. The RBC count, mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and other parameters were calculated. The blood of eleven treatment-naive prepubertal children with GHD (aged 3-9, median 5.7 years) was examined and compared with control group (aged 5-7; median 6.0 years) at three time points: 0, 3 and 12 months of rGHT. Before rGHT, the MI in GHD children was higher (median 0.48 vs 0.14 p=0.0018) and the RBC count was lower (median 4.20 vs 4.96 1012 cells/L p=0.0022) than in control group. After the treatment, cell count in GHD patients did not differ significantly from the control group, but Oxy-Hb level became higher (median 0.64 vs 0.41 p=0.0075). During rGHT, MCV decreased (median 80.3 vs 83.2µm3 p=0.0231). Morphological and functional characteristics of erythrocytes in GHD children were shown to differ significantly from the healthy control group. A twelve-month rGHT partially improved some of the studied parameters but Oxy-Hb level and echinocyte count remained high.

Drosophila mini-white model system: new insights into positive position effects and the role of transcriptional terminators and gypsy insulator in transgene shielding.

The white gene, which is responsible for eye pigmentation, is widely used to study position effects in Drosophila. As a result of insertion of P-element vectors containing mini-white without enhancers into random chromosomal sites, flies with different eye color phenotypes appear, which is usually explained by the influence of positive/negative regulatory elements located around the insertion site. We found that, in more than 70% of cases when mini-white expression was subject to positive position effects, deletion of the white promoter had no effect on eye pigmentation; in these cases, the transposon was inserted into the transcribed regions of genes. Therefore, transcription through the mini-white gene could be responsible for high levels of its expression in most of chromosomal sites. Consistently with this conclusion, transcriptional terminators proved to be efficient in protecting mini-white expression from positive position effects. On the other hand, the best characterized Drosophila gypsy insulator was poorly effective in terminating transcription and, as a consequence, only partially protected mini-white expression from these effects. Thus, to ensure maximum protection of a transgene from position effects, a perfect boundary/insulator element should combine three activities: to block enhancers, to provide a barrier between active and repressed chromatin, and to terminate transcription.

Drosophila gypsy insulator and yellow enhancers regulate activity of yellow promoter through the same regulatory element.

There is ample evidence that the enhancers of a promoterless yellow locus in one homologous chromosome can activate the yellow promoter in the other chromosome where the enhancers are inactive or deleted, which is indicative of a high specificity of the enhancer-promoter interaction in yellow. In this paper, we have found that the yellow sequence from -100 to -69 is essential for stimulation of the heterologous eve (TATA-containing) and white (TATA-less) promoters by the yellow enhancers from a distance. However, the presence of this sequence is not required when the yellow enhancers are directly fused to the heterologous promoters or are activated by the yeast GAL4 activator. Unexpectedly, the same promoter proximal region defines previously described promoter-specific, long-distance repression of the yellow promoter by the gypsy insulator on the mod(mdg4) ( u1 ) background. These finding suggest that proteins bound to the -100 to -69 sequence are essential for communication between the yellow promoter and upstream regulatory elements.

An endogenous Su(Hw) insulator separates the yellow gene from the Achaete-scute gene complex in Drosophila.

The best characterized chromatin insulator in Drosophila is the Suppressor of Hairy wing binding region contained within the gypsy retrotransposon. Although cellular functions have been suggested, no role has been found yet for the multitude of endogenous Suppressor of Hairy wing binding sites. Here we show that two Suppressor of Hairy wing binding sites in the intergenic region between the yellow gene and the Achaete-scute gene complex form a functional insulator. Genetic analysis shows that at least two proteins, Suppressor of Hairy wing and Modifier of MDG4, required for the activity of this insulator, are involved in the transcriptional regulation of Achaete-scute.