Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional nasal cannula during deep sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Adequate oxygenation and airway management during deep sedation can be challenging. We investigated the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (group HF) and conventional nasal cannula (group CO) during sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: Patients undergoing ESD with deep sedation were enrolled. The primary outcome was difference in lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2) between the groups. Incidence of hypoxia (SpO2 < 90%), patients with SpO2 < 95%, hypercapnia, and airway interventions; operator satisfaction; and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients in each group completed the study. The mean of minimum SpO2 values was significantly higher in group HF than in group CO (96.8% ± 4.2% vs. 93.3% ± 5.3%, p = 0.005). The incidence of hypoxia was comparable between the groups (4 [12.5%] vs. 6 [18.8%], p = 0.491); however, patients with SpO2 < 95% were significantly less in group HF (5 [15.6%] vs. 18 [56.3%], p = 0.003). Incidence of hypercapnia was higher in group HF than in group CO (14 [46.7%] vs. 5 [16.7%], p = 0.013). Airway rescue interventions were significantly less common in group HF. Satisfaction of operators and post-procedural complications were comparable between the two groups. In multivariable analysis, group CO and higher body mass index were risk factors for airway managements (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 6.204 [1.784-21.575], p = 0.004; 1.337 [1.043-1.715], p = 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula maintained higher minimum SpO2 value during deep sedation with propofol-remifentanil for ESD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of the Republic of Korea (KCT0006618, https://cris.nih.go.kr ; registered September 29, 2021; principal investigator: Ji Won Choi).

Efficacy of adjuvant dexmedetomidine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block for intractable complex regional pain syndrome: A case report with a 3-year follow-up.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Pain management for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is challenging. When added to local anaesthetics, dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of the block and improves analgesia. The effect of long-term dexmedetomidine use in the brachial plexus block (BPB) for CRPS is unknown. CASE DESCRIPTION: Here, we describe a case of satisfactory pain relief after supraclavicular BPB with dexmedetomidine every 1-3 months over 2 years (10 treatments), in a patient with severe upper extremity CRPS-related pain. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Repeated, long-term, perineural administration of dexmedetomidine with BPB may be suitable for alleviating refractory CRPS pain.

Clinical effect of the proximity of epidural blood patch injection to the leakage site in spontaneous intracranial hypotension.

BACKGROUND: Epidural blood patch (EBP) has been shown to be an effective treatment option for spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). We investigated whether response to the EBP was related to the distance of the injection site from the leakage site in patients with SIH. METHODS: We reviewed patients with SIH who underwent EBP at a single hospital. Patients were assigned to group R (response after EBP) or group N (no response after EBP). We then analyzed the demographics, clinical characteristics, leakage site, leakage length, EBP injection level and distance from leakage site, and injected EBP volume. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included in the analysis. The overall response rate to EBP was 59.7% (37 patients). The leakage length and injection distance from the leakage site did not differ between the two groups. Age, gender, body mass index, leakage site, and EBP volume did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The clinical effect of EBP in SIH was not affected by leakage length or injection distance to leakage site. Further large studies must be conducted to investigate the efficacy of targeted EBP for SIH.

The Optimal Approach for a Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block.

INTRODUCTION: Superior hypogastric plexus block (SHGPB) is technically difficult, and an accurate procedure is required to avoid potential complications. We attempted to determine the reference angles for fluoroscopy-assisted SHGPB and to establish a predictor as a guide to select the optimal approach between the classic posterior approach and transdiscal approach. METHODS: Abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scans from 268 patients diagnosed with pelvic malignancies were examined. The oblique and axial angles needed for the fluoroscope were measured both for posterior and transdiscal approaches by simulating the needle trajectory on CT imaging. We developed an SHGPB index defined by the ratio (%) of the interposterior iliac border distance to the L5 body transverse diameter, which represents the relative transverse diameter of the bony pelvis. We evaluated whether it can help select the optimal approach for the SHGPB between the posterior and transdiscal approaches. RESULTS: Males had a significantly smaller angle than females (right oblique angle for posterior approach, males 14 [range 12 to 17] degrees vs. females 19 [range 16 to 23] degrees; P < 0.001). An SHGPB index of < 150 was an independent predictor for failure of the classic posterior approach (odds ratio 31.3, 95% confidence interval 5.1 to 104.7). CONCLUSIONS: The optimal right oblique angle of fluoroscopy for the posterior approach is 13° to 15° in males and 19° to 20° in females. The transdiscal approach may be favored over the posterior approach when the bony pelvis is narrow relative to the target vertebral body, which can be measured by the SHGPB index being < 150.

Lumbar Sympathetic Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment for Primary Erythromelalgia: A Case Report.

Erythromelalgia is often refractory and resistant to many forms of treatment. Numerous therapeutic options have been tried, but effective treatment remains elusive. The sympathetic nervous system has been involved in various painful conditions of neuropathic, vascular, and visceral origin. Sympathetic block is helpful in making a diagnosis and managing pain. We report a case of excellent pain relief after lumbar sympathetic pulsed radiofrequency treatment in a patient with primary erythromelalgia of the lower extremities. This case suggests the viability of pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with erythromelalgia.

The influence of epidural catheter on the incidence of intravascular injection during caudal block.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of epidural catheters on the incidence of intravascular injection and to identify possible predictors of intravascular injection in patients undergoing a caudal block using fluoroscopy. METHODS: A total of 154 patients scheduled to receive a caudal block were randomized into group N (those without epidural catheter) or group C (those with epidural catheter). Demographic and clinical data were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of intravascular injection was 15.6% in group N, 6.5% in group C, and 11.0% overall, without statistical differences between the two groups (P = 0.105). Univariate analysis revealed that blood at hub (P = 0.047) and positive aspiration test (P = 0.045) were more frequently observed in group N than in group C. Quality of analgesia was significantly higher in group C than in group N (P = 0.029). Multivariate analysis identified older age (P = 0.024), blood at hub (P = 0.003), and positive aspiration test (P = 0.001) as predictors of intravascular injection. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, while the incidence of intravascular injection during caudal blocks was less frequent with epidural catheter use, it was not statistically significant. However, a caudal block using an epidural catheter provided a lower incidence of blood at hub, fewer positive aspiration tests, and superiority in pain improvement.

Effect of Hyaluronidase Addition to Lidocaine for Trigger Point Injection in Myofascial Pain Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: This randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy of hyaluronidase co-injection with that of local anesthesia alone on the degree of pain and quality of life in patients with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). METHODS: Sixty-one adults, aged 25 to 75 years, with MPS affecting both trapezius muscles were randomly assigned to one of the 2 treatment groups: lidocaine (group L: n = 31) or hyaluronidase (group H: n = 30). All patients received Trigger point injection (TPI). Group L received 3.2 mL 0.5% lidocaine alone. Group H received the same solution of lidocaine mixed with hyaluronidase (600 iu/mL). Patients were followed for 14 days (pre- and post-TPI days 0, 1, 4, 7, and 14) with the verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS), and the primary outcome was VNRS on day 7. Also, we evaluated the neck disability index (NDI) and the short form of brief pain inventory (BPI-SF) on pre- and post-TPI day 14. RESULTS: In both groups, VNRS decreased on days 4, 7, and 14 compared to the pre-TPI. However, in group H, VNRS decreased on day 1 also. There were no significant differences of VNRS between the 2 groups during 14 days. NDI and BPI-SF scores also significantly decreased after TPI in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of VNRS, NDI, or BPI-SF scores. However, TPI consisting of lidocaine mixed with hyaluronidase worked more effectively than lidocaine alone on post-TPI day 1. Further, hyaluronidase showed a tendency to reduce TPI-related soreness.

Evaluation of Factors Affecting Illumination Intensity in Lightwand Endotracheal Intubation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A lightwand is a stylet with a light bulb at its tip that can be used to guide intubation by confirming the illumination through the anterior neck. We aimed to determine the factors affecting the illumination intensity during lightwand endotracheal intubation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 180 patients who underwent lightwand endotracheal intubation. We recorded illumination intensity on a 5-point scale. The patients were categorized into weak (score <3) and bright (score ≥3) groups based on the illumination intensity scale score. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients were analyzed, of whom 125 (71.1%) were enrolled in the bright group, and 51 (29.0%) were enrolled in the weak group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that an increased body mass index (BMI) and mask ventilation grade were associated with light intensity. For mask ventilation, moderate vs. easy (p=0.010) and difficult vs. easy (p=0.008) were associated with the weak group. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that BMI ≥24.6 kg/m2 was correlated with the weak group. CONCLUSION: BMI ≥24.6 kg/m2 or mask ventilation grade above moderate indicates increased odds of weak illumination intensity in lightwand intubation. Pre-intubation examination of these factors helps increase the chances of successful intubation.

Effect of remimazolam versus propofol anesthesia on postoperative delirium in neurovascular surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine newly approved for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Remimazolam emerges as an ideal drug for the neurosurgical population due to its rapid emergence, enabling early neurological assessment, and its ability to maintain perfusion pressure, which is crucial for preventing cerebral ischemia. However, the use of benzodiazepine has been associated with an increased risk of postoperative delirium (POD). There is currently limited evidence about the relationship between remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and POD. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority trial, we plan to include 696 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I to III, undergoing elective neurovascular surgery under general anesthesia. After informed consent, the patients will be randomized to receive either remimazolam or propofol-based TIVA with a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the incidence of POD within 5 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include subtypes, number of positive assessments and severity of POD, emergence agitation, intraoperative awareness and undesirable patient movement, intraoperative hypotension, and postoperative cognitive function. The data will be analyzed in modified intention to treat. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate the effect of remimazolam on the development of POD compared to propofol anesthesia. The results of this trial will provide evidence regarding the choice of optimal anesthetics to minimize the risk of POD in neurosurgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was prospectively registered at the Clinical trials ( https://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT06115031, principal investigator: Jiseon Jeong; date of first registration: November 2, 2023, before the recruitment of the first participant.

An alternative distal approach for the lumbar medial branch radiofrequency denervation: a prospective randomized comparative study.

BACKGROUND: An alternative technique involving a "distal approach" can be used for lumbar medial branch radiofrequency denervation (LMBRFD). We described and assessed this technique by comparing it with a conventional tunnel vision approach in a prospective randomized trial. METHODS: Eighty-two patients underwent LMBRFD by a distal (n = 41) or a tunnel vision approach (n = 41). The primary end point was a comparison of the mean difference in the change of 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) scores of low back pain from entry to the scores at 1 month (NRS at baseline--NRS at 1 month) and at 6 months (NRS at baseline--NRS at 6 months) between the distal approach group and the tunnel vision approach group. The secondary end points were a change of NRS and the Oswestry disability index over time. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients in each group had complete time courses. There were no statistically significant differences in the change of NRS scores between the groups at 1 month (corrected P = 0.19; 97.5% 2-sided confidence interval [CI], -1.37 to 0.37) and 6 months (corrected P = 0.53; 97.5% CI, -1.36 to 0.77). Patients in both groups showed a statistically significant reduction in NRS and Oswestry disability index scores from baseline to that of the scores at 1 and 6 months (all P < 0.0001, Bonferroni corrected). The procedure-related pain score was significantly lower in the distal approach group (P = 0.001; 99% CI, -2.00 to -0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent LMBRFD by the tunnel vision or distal approaches showed significant pain relief at the 6-month follow-up. Less periprocedural pain was reported in the distal approach group. We consider that the distal approach provides an improved option for LMBRFD.

Epinephrine decreases the dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine necessary for tourniquet pain blockade during spinal anesthesia for total knee replacement arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: We quantified the dose-sparing effect of epinephrine by comparing the median effective dose (ED(50)) of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine co-administered with epinephrine with the ED(50) of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine alone. METHODS: Three groups were randomly generated from 162 patients undergoing total knee replacement arthroplasty under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia: Group B (bupivacaine), Group BE1 (bupivacaine plus epinephrine 100 µg), and Group BE2 (bupivacaine plus epinephrine 200 µg). Each group was further divided by bupivacaine doses of 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or 11 mg. The anesthesia was defined as successful if a bilateral T12 sensory block occurred within 15 min, and no intraoperative epidural supplement was required. The ED(50) and ED(95) for successful anesthesia and successful tourniquet pain blockade were determined separately by probit regression analysis. RESULTS: The ED(50) and ED(95) of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for successful anesthesia were not different among the groups: the ED(50) values were 7.1 mg [95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 6.0-8.0 mg] in Group B, 6.2 mg (95 % CI 4.8-7.2 mg) in Group BE1, and 6.3 mg (95 % CI 4.9-7.2 mg) in Group BE2. However, the ED(50) and ED(95) values for tourniquet pain control were significantly smaller in Groups BE1 and BE2 than in Group B: the ED(50) values were 7.2 mg (95 % CI 6.3-7.9 mg), 5.5 mg (95 % CI 4.1-6.3 mg), and 5.3 mg (95 % CI 3.7-6.2 mg) in Groups B, BE1, and BE2, respectively. The incidence of tourniquet pain was significantly lower in Groups BE1 and BE2 than in Group B. The time to patients' requests for supplemental analgesia was significantly longer in Groups BE1 and BE2 than in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal epinephrine did not decrease the dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine required for successful anesthesia. However, it reduced the dose required for tourniquet pain blockade.

Latent infection after spinal cord stimulation device implantation for complex regional pain syndrome: A case report.

RATIONALE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is one of the invasive treatments of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). The positive effect has been observed for several years after implantation. However, infection is a common cause of SCS failure and device removal. PATIENT CONCERNS: Here we describe a case of latent infection at the implantable generator pocket site 9 years after SCS implantation in a patient with CRPS. DIAGNOSES: A 52-year-old patient was diagnosed with type 1 CRPS. The right foot pain was intractable with standard treatments. SCS implantation was performed and SCS worked well without complication. Nine years later, the patient revisited due to pain, tenderness, and redness at the abdominal wall for 2 weeks. The right foot pain was maintained with NRS 4 for 8 years, and the stimulation stopped 1 year back. SCS infection was diagnosed. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent SCS removal surgery. OUTCOMES: All SCS devices were removed successfully. The patient was discharged without any complications. CONCLUSIONS: While uncommon, infection after SCS implantation can occur even 9 years later. Immediate diagnosis, proper antibiotics, and surgical removal could be needed to prevent further spread of infection and better prognosis.

Non-Surgical Treatments of Trigeminal Neuralgia from the Perspective of a Pain Physician: A Narrative Review.

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a unilateral disorder characterized by electric shock-like pain, abrupt onset and termination, and limited to one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. Various therapeutic modalities for TN have been introduced. We searched for literature indexed in PubMed, Medline, and the National Library of Medicine and reviewed all relevant articles on non-surgical treatments for TN. Published studies were reviewed with no restrictions on date; reviews, clinical trials, animal studies, retrospective studies, and cases were included. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are the recommended first-line pharmacotherapies. Interventional treatments should be considered when pharmacotherapy is insufficient or withdrawn because of adverse effects.

Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional nasal cannula during sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective study.

Background: The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a relatively recent method that provides high-flow, heated, humidified gas delivery. Objectives: We compared HFNC (group HF) and conventional nasal cannula (NC) (group CO) during deep sedation with propofol and remifentanil for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Design: Single-center, retrospective observational cohort study. Methods: In this study, a total of 159 cases were analyzed (group CO, 71 and group HF, 88). We collected the data from electronic medical records from September 2020 to June 2021. The lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2), incidence of hypoxia (SpO2 < 90%), rescue interventions, and adverse events between the two groups were investigated. Results: There were significant differences between the two groups in lowest SpO2 and incidence of hypoxia [group CO versus group HF; 90.3 ± 9.7% versus 95.7 ± 9.0%, 25 (35.2%) versus 10 (11.4%); p < 0.001, p < 0.001; respectively]. Among the rescue interventions, the number of jaw thrust, patient stimulation, O2 flow increase, and nasal airway insertion were significantly higher in the CO group than in the HF group. However, postprocedural chest X-ray showed higher rates of abnormal findings (atelectasis, aspiration, and pneumoperitoneum) in group HF than in group CO [group CO: 8 (11.3%) versus group HF: 26 (29.5%), p = 0.005]. In multivariable analysis, besides group CO, difficult type of lesion was the risk factor for hypoxia. Conclusions: Compared to the conventional NC, HFNC provided adequate oxygenation and a stable procedure without significant adverse events during sedation for ESD. However, caution is needed to avoid complications associated with deep sedation and difficult type of lesions.

Effect of chewing gum on anxiety in women undergoing elective cesarean section: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety is a common problem in pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section. We aimed to determine the anxiolytic effects of chewing gum in pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Sixty-six women were randomly assigned to either the control group (n=33) or gum group (n=33) in a 1:1 ratio. In the gum group, the participants chewed xylitol gum for at least 10 min/h, regardless of fasting. Gum chewing was started at 5 pm a day before surgery and continued till the participant entered the operation room. In the control group, participants were requested to follow fasting guidelines without further instruction. The primary outcome was preoperative anxiety measured using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) immediately before surgery. RESULTS: The APAIS score immediately before surgery showed no significant difference between the control and the gum group (19.2±5.8 vs. 19.1±4.1, P>0.99). There were no statistically significant differences in the eight items related to anxiety: unfitness, concentration difficulty, hunger, thirst, dry mouth, fatigue, headache, and nausea. However, the pain score during the procedure of combined spinal epidural anesthesia was significantly lower in the chewing gum group [4 (IQR, 3-5.5)] than in the control group [5 (IQR, 3-7), P=0.045]. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative gum chewing did not reduce anxiety levels measured immediately before entering the operating room in the participants undergoing elective cesarean section. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of Korea: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp and identifier: KCT0006602; date of registration: September 27, 2021; principal investigator's name: RyungA Kang.

Comparison of pulmonary morbidity using sevoflurane or propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in an Ivor Lewis operation.

OBJECTIVE: An inhalation anesthetic-induced attenuation effect on the inflammatory reaction during one-lung ventilation (OLV) has been reported. Pulmonary inflammation is a substantive prognostic factor for Ivor Lewis operations. Blood inflammatory parameters and postoperative pulmonary complications between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis operations were compared. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study. SETTING: A medical university. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight patients undergoing Ivor Lewis operation allocated randomly into 2 groups. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received sevoflurane or total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil (n = 24 per group). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood interleukin-6 (IL-6), malondialdehyde (MDA), oxygenation, abnormalities on a chest radiograph (CXR), extubation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospitalization, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 anesthetic techniques. The level of IL-6 at the end of surgery was lower for sevoflurane (69.5 [35.9-121.0] pg/mL) than propofol-remifentanil (128.2 [92.8-163.8] pg/mL, p = 0.03), but this difference was not maintained 24 hours after surgery. Frequencies of abnormalities measured by a CXR, PaO(2)/F(I)O(2)<300, and PaCO(2) <50 mmHg until discharge, the postoperative highest C-reactive protein level, white blood cells, and MDA did not differ between the 2 anesthetics. No differences in the extubation time, ICU stay, discharge day, or the incidence of hospital complications between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia techniques were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane anesthesia attenuated an increase in blood IL-6 at the end of surgery but did not provide any advantages over propofol remifentanil in terms of postoperative pulmonary complications in Ivor Lewis operations.

Early and Long-Term Outcomes after Propofol-and Sevoflurane-Based Anesthesia in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Propofol is considered to protect against immunosuppression and has lower inflammatory responses in the perioperative period than volatile agents. We evaluated whether the anesthetic agent is associated with cancer outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2616 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery under general anesthesia between 2016 and 2018 (follow-up closure: July 2021) at a single institution. Patients received propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia or sevoflurane-based inhalational anesthesia. After propensity score matching, the postoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was compared as primary outcome, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: After 1:2 propensity matching, 717 patients were given propofol anesthesia and 1410 patients were given sevoflurane anesthesia. In the matched cohort, preoperative NLR was not significantly different between propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia (mean (95% CI)2.3 (1.8 to 2.8) and 2.2 (1.9 to 3.2); p = 0.72). NLR was significantly lower in propofol anesthesia at postoperative day two and five (mean difference (95% CI) 0.71 (0.43 to 0.98); p = 0.000 and 0.52 (0.30 to 0.74); p = 0.000). Urinary retention showed a higher incidence after propofol anesthesia (4.9% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.008). Other postoperative complications and overall/recurrence-free survival were not different in the two groups. DISCUSSION: Although propofol anesthesia showed lower postoperative NLR than sevoflurane anesthesia, there was no association with clinical outcomes.

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for pain management after gastrectomy: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial.

Background: Open gastrectomy causes severe postoperative pain. Therefore, we investigated the opioid-sparing effect of the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) after open gastrectomy. Methods: Adult patients undergoing open gastrectomy were randomly assigned to either the ESPB group (ESPB + fentanyl based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia [IV-PCA]) or a control group (fentanyl based IV-PCA only). The primary outcome was total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were pain intensities using a numeric rating scale at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hour postoperatively, and the amount of fentanyl equivalent consumption during the PACU stay and at 3, 6, and 12 hour postoperatively, and the time to the first request for rescue analgesia. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour postoperatively between the two groups (P = 0.471). Pain intensities were not significantly different between the groups except during the PACU stay and 3 hour postoperatively (P < 0.001, for both). Time to the first rescue analgesia in the ward was longer in the ESPB group than the control group (P = 0.045). Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided ESPB did not decrease total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour after open gastrectomy. It only reduced postoperative pain intensity until 3 hour postoperatively compared with the control group. Ultrasound-guided single-shot ESPB cannot provide an efficient opioid-sparing effect after open gastrectomy.

Risk factors associated with repeated epidural blood patches using autologous blood.

Background: An epidural blood patch (EBP) is a procedure to treat intracranial hypotension that does not respond to conservative treatment. EBPs are commonly repeated when the symptoms persist. In this study, we used a large single-center retrospective cohort and evaluated the factors associated with repeated EBPs. Methods: From January 2010 to December 2020, a total of 596 patients were treated with EBPs for intracranial hypotension. We evaluated the factors associated with repeated EBPs in the entire population, in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), and in those with available myelographies. Results: In a total of 596 patients, 125 (21.1%) patients required repeated EBPs, and 96/278 (34.5%) in SIH and 29/314 (9.2%) in iatrogenic population. In patients with SIH, international normalized ratio (INR) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage on myelographies consistently exhibited significant associations (odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.87; P = 0.043 and OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.28-3.69; P = 0.004). In patients with iatrogenic injury, INR and CSF leakage on myelogram did not show difference in repeated EBPs. Conclusions: Repeated EBPs may be more frequently required in patients with SIH. Prolonged INR and CSF leakage were associated with repeated EBPs in patient with SIH. Further studies are needed to determine factors associated with repeated EBP requirements.

The analgesic effect of lumbar sympathetic ganglion block in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.

Background: Persistent or recurrent lumbosacral pain is a common symptom after spinal surgery. Several interventions have been introduced for failed back surgery syndrome; however, their clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness are insufficient. Sympathetic ganglion block has been selected for pain associated with the sympathetic nervous system. In this study, we compared pain and quality of life in patients with failed back surgery syndrome who responded and did not respond to lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. Methods: We included 84 patients diagnosed with failed back surgery syndrome who had lumbosacral pain and underwent lumbar sympathetic ganglion block between January 2020 and April 2021. The patients' data were retrospectively analyzed; clinical outcomes were assessed before (T0), 1 week after (T1), and 4 weeks after (T4) lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. Based on the pain difference from T0 to T1, we categorized patients into two groups: patients with ≥ 50% pain reduction (responder group) and patients with < 50% pain reduction (non-responder group). Demographic, clinical, surgical, and fluoroscopic data were evaluated and compared. The primary outcome was pain scores and the EuroQol-5D score from T0 to T4. Results: Among the 84 patients analyzed, 41 (48.8%) experienced ≥ 50% pain reduction at 1 week after lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block significantly improved pain at T1 and T4 compared to T0 in both groups. Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block improved the EuroQol-5D score at T1 compared to T0 in the responder group. The responder group had a significant decrease in pain at T1 from T0 and T4 from T0 and a significant decrease in the EuroQol-5D score at T1 from T0 compared with the non-responder group. Coldness of the leg over time did not differ between the groups. No serious adverse events occurred in either of the groups. Conclusion: Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block may improve pain at 1 and 4 weeks in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Patients with ≥ 50% pain reduction at 1 week showed simultaneous improvement in quality of life and pain reduction at 4 weeks. Clinical trial registration: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index/index.do, identifier KCT0007236.