Sociodemographic disadvantage in the burden of stress and academic performance in medical school: implications for diversity in medicine.

BACKGROUND: Nontraditional students bring to medicine inherent characteristics and perspectives that enrich the learning environment and contribute to expanding diversity in medicine. However, research has shown that these students, by virtue of their sociodemographic backgrounds, face unique challenges in medical education, which ultimately place them at a disadvantage compared to their peers. The purpose of this study is to explore relationships between sociodemographic characteristics, stress, and academic performance, in the context of outcomes that may be undermining efforts to diversify the physician workforce. METHODS: Using a retrospective observational cohort methodology, we examined institutional and USMLE exam performance data in conjunction with Perceived Stress Scale-4 survey results from six cohorts of students at Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV (n = 358). Using independent samples t-test, mean stress and academic performance were compared between four sociodemographic groups: first-generation college students, underrepresented in medicine (URM), socioeconomically disadvantaged, and age 30 + at matriculation. Results were considered significant where P ≤ .05. RESULTS: First-generation college students had significantly higher stress at the end of third year clerkships (mean 7.8 vs. 6.8, P* = .03). URM students had significantly lower scores on preclinical exams (mean 81.37 vs. 83.07, P* = .02). The students who were age 30 + at matriculation had significantly lower exam scores on all academic performance measures. CONCLUSION: Our results echo historic trends in academic performance for racial and ethnic minority students, and we present recent evidence of academic performance disparities based on age at matriculation. Residency program directors continue to use test scores as a primary metric to screen applicants and thus, poor academic performance has profound consequences on career trajectory. Finally, significantly higher stress in the first-generation students may be evidence of underlying psychological distress. Expanding the sociodemographic diversity among physicians, and by extension, medical students, has long been recognized as fundamental to addressing inequities in healthcare. However, results from our study suggest that aspects of medical education are unfavorable and disadvantageous for first-generation, URM, and older medical students. A deeper understanding of the interplay between sociodemographic characteristics and success in medical school is paramount as we pursue diversity in medicine.

College competitiveness and medical school exam performance.

BACKGROUND: In medical school, students are tested through periodic USMLE Step 1 and 2 examinations before obtaining a medical license. Traditional predictors of medical school performance include MCAT scores, undergraduate grades, and undergraduate institutional selectivity. Prior studies indicate that admissions committees might unfairly discriminate against applicants who graduated from less competitive universities. However, there is limited literature to determine whether those who attended competitive colleges perform better on USMLE Step 1 and 2 examinations. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to determine if students who attended competitive undergraduate colleges outperform those who did not on medical school benchmarks. METHODS: We defined a Competitive College as having greater than 10% of its student body scoring 1400 or higher (on a 1600 scale) on the SAT. If this criteria was not met, colleges would be categorized as Non-Competitive. Descriptive statistics and unpaired t-tests were calculated to analyze average test scores on the MCAT, Phase 1 NBME, USMLE Step 1, Phase 2 NBME, and USMLE Step 2. RESULTS: Our findings suggest there are no statistically significant differences between students who do or do not attend competitive undergraduate colleges on these medical school benchmark examinations following the MCAT. CONCLUSION: Admissions committees should use this data to aid in their student selection as our research indicates that institutional selectivity accurately predicts MCAT scores, but not performance on standardized medical school examinations once admitted.

Development and Validation of Simulation-Based Procedural Checklists for Evaluation of Neonatal Nurse Practitioner Performance.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal nurse practitioner (NNP) procedural competence is essential. Procedural simulation provides opportunity to practice high-risk, low-frequency procedures and helps improve skill retention. A formal procedural simulation experience was created in an attempt to provide sufficient experience for NNPs. While preparing for the simulation experience, the group recognized the lack of validated competency metrics for most neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) procedures. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to create and validate procedural checklists measuring competence of NNPs participating in simulated performance of 9 high-risk NICU procedures. METHODS: IRB approval was obtained and NNPs agreed to data collection. A self and peer assessment tool was developed and distributed to NNPs, nurses, and neonatologists to gather a baseline perception of procedural competency. Procedural checklists were then developed to measure/assess individual skills against a standard. Benchmark videos were created to demonstrate the standard approach to procedural performance. Each procedural skill performed by the NNP participant was scored by 3 individual evaluators: once in real time and twice by video recording analysis. FINDINGS/RESULTS: A Cronbach α was used to measure the reliability and validity of the procedural checklists. Comparison was made between live grading and video-based grading scores using analysis of variance. Difference between grading modalities was less than 3% and nonsignificant for 8 of 9 procedures. No significant difference was found between individual graders for any of the skills being evaluated and suggested high interrater reliability of the checklists. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Objective, standardized procedural checklists are valid tools to evaluate NNP procedural skills in simulation. Procedural simulation experiences help strengthen skills, improve performance, and possibly improve patient outcomes.

The Impact of a Rural Training Track on Medical Students Specialty Choice.

BACKGROUND: Compare the expectations and outcomes of students involved in rural medical training versus those of urban trainees. METHODS: Survey items relating to primary care interest were added to program evaluation surveys already being sent at the beginning and end of the primary clinical year. Students from the graduating class of 2016 and the class of 2017 responded to the surveys (N=115). Responses from students trained in rural sites were compared with students trained in medium or large communities. For the purposes of the survey, primary care was not specifically defined and was open to participants' interpretation. Primary care is commonly thought of as the medical care from the doctor who sees a patient first and provides treatment or decides the other specialist care that the patient may need. Primary care specialties can include family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology. RESULTS: Most students enter their primary clinical year undecided about specialty choice and preferred practice location. At the end of the primary clinical year, most students have decided on a specialty and most report wanting to practice in communities similar to where they trained during that year. Before the primary clinical year student attitudes toward primary care are not significantly different based on selected training site. However at the end of the primary clinical year, students who had been trained in small communities were significantly more likely to choose primary care compared with students trained in medium to large communities. CONCLUSIONS: For students who begin the primary clinical year undecided regarding specialty choice, and practice location, the community size of the training site plays a large role in the decisions they will make. A majority of students trained in small communities chose to go into primary care and practice in small communities.

Correlations between community size and student perceptions of value.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine if medical students' feeling of being valued was correlated to community size. The study, conducted in several communities in South Dakota, examined students' feeling of value relating to attending physicians, healthcare teams and patients. METHODS: Student value items were added to student satisfaction surveys sent out to students at the end of their primary clinical year and data collected from two graduating classes of students (n=114). Student responses were grouped by clinical campus and mean responses by community size were calculated. Additionally, student encounter logs were reviewed for study participants to gauge participation levels during clinical encounters. RESULTS: The degree to which students felt valued by their physician attending, the healthcare team and the patients decreased consistently as community size increased. Differences were statistically significant between students in the smallest and largest communities. Additionally, students in the community of 15 000 felt significantly more valued than students in the community of 170 000. Furthermore, there also appears to be a relationship between the percentage of participation in patient care by students and community size. Students in the smaller, rural communities participated at a higher percentage rather than observing. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a relationship between community size and the extent to which students feel value. The degree to which students felt valued decreased consistently as community size increased. Differences were statistically significant between students in the smallest communities and the two largest communities. Students in the smaller, rural communities participated at a higher percentage. Additional studies are needed to address whether students participate more as a result of feeling valued, or whether participation leads to an enhanced perception of value by students.

Wellness Activities, Stress, and Academic Performance in Medical Students.

INTRODUCTION: Medical student wellness has a range of effects from academic performance to tragic mortality. Many factors correlate with academic performance, including study environments, faculty support, research participation, and student attitude. Its relationship with student stress and wellness demonstrates mixed results. This study hopes to help clarify these results and will also assess the interplay of these factors in relation to the pre-clerkship and clerkship phases of medical school. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study was conducted using a de-identified database from 2017 to 2023, provided per an Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol. The subjects were the students of the classes of 2021-2027 at the Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV. The database included performance data including semester, clinical subject, and USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 exam scores. Other data included variables relating to self-perceived stress and time spent in wellness activities before medical school and at the end of the pre-clerkship and clerkship phases of medical school. The effects of these variables were calculated with bivariate correlations and independent samples T-tests using cut-off points calculated from the class means of those variables. A total of 361 medical students were included in the study. RESULTS: Students with high wellness time had lower stress levels in both the pre-clerkship and clerkship phases of medical school (5.83 vs. 7.3 p < 0.001* and 5.74 vs. 8.49 p < 0.001*, respectively). Students with low stress levels in the pre-clerkship phase scored 5.81 points higher on the Step 1 exam (p = 0.013*). Clerkship phase stress levels were significantly negatively correlated with all clinical subject exams except for pediatrics. Stress levels in the pre-clerkship and clerkship phases had similar relationships with the second and third semester and Step 2 exams, respectively, although not statistically significant. Wellness activity time did not have a significant relationship with academic performance. CONCLUSION: Stress levels had significant negative relationships with many medical school exams. Although wellness activity time did not have a direct relationship with academic performance, its relationship with stress levels can allude to an indirect effect on academic performance. This, along with fending off burnout and stress, are reasons why medical student wellness should be a priority for medical schools, faculty, and their students.

Effect of COVID-19 Curriculum Changes on Medical Student Exam Performance: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused medical schools to convert to an online format, necessitating a swift change in medical education delivery. New teaching methods were adapted, with some schools having greater success than others. Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine (KSOM) employed a small-group interactive learning style that consists of eight or fewer medical students and one faculty mentor engaging in group problem-based learning (PBL) twice weekly. This style had clear signs of struggle with a significant decrease in exam performance. Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine (RVUCOM) employed a large-group didactic lecture style that consisted of one faculty mentor lecturing hundreds of medical students in a pre-recorded setting five times weekly. This style had greater success with its curriculum adaptation leading to minimal effect on their exam performance. This study aims to investigate whether the type of medical school curriculum (small-group interactive vs. large-group didactic) impacts student exam performance during online learning transitions forced by the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODOLOGY: KSOM and RVUCOM students were grouped into above-expectations and below-expectations categories based on each institution's standardized exam performance metrics. Independently sampled t-tests were performed to compare groups. KSOM was classified as a small-group interactive curriculum through its heavy reliance on student-led PBL, whereas RVUCOM was classified as a large-group didactic curriculum through its extensive proctor-led slideshow lectures. RESULTS: KSOM's transition to online PBL resulted in fewer students scoring above the national average on the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) exams compared to previous cohorts (55% vs. 77%, respectively; N = 47 and 78; P < 0.01). RVUCOM's transition to online large-group lectures yielded no significant differences between students who performed above expectations and students who performed below expectations between their cohorts (63% vs. 65%, respectively; N = 305 and 300; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: KSOM's COVID-19 cohort performed significantly worse than RVUCOM's COVID-19 cohort during their medical school organ-system exams. We believe that the small-group learning at KSOM is less resilient for online curricula compared to the large-group didactics seen at RVUCOM. Understanding which didactic methods can transition to online learning more effectively than others is vital in guiding effective curriculum adjustments as online delivery becomes more prominent.

Extenuating circumstances. Student selection of case presentations for a required rural family medicine clerkship.

PURPOSE: The Fourth Year Rural Family Medicine Clerkship has been a required four-week clinical rotation at the Sanford School of Medicine of the University of South Dakota (SSOM) for more than 30 years. Among the clerkship requirements has been a graded, formal case presentation. The purpose of this study was to examine the case presentations selected by the medical students for this required component of the clerkship and to determine if this correlated with their overall clinical experiences. METHODS: Clinical diagnoses of patients selected by all students for their formal case presentations were recorded and compared with the overall clinical experiences as documented using the Student Patient Experience Log database. The frequency of multiple diagnosis cases was also determined. RESULTS: Although the large majority of clinical experiences occur in ambulatory settings during this clerkship, findings suggest students have a preference for presenting on patients who were hospitalized. This does not, however, indicate that students wish to necessarily present more complicated cases. In fact, the percentage of patients selected who had multiple diagnoses was much lower compared with their overall clinical experiences. CONCLUSIONS: The variety of clinical cases selected for presentation is different than the variety of overall clinical experiences. This suggests that some selection criteria are being used by students.

Teaching Skills Training for Pre-clinical Medical Students Through Weekly Problem-Based Learning Teaching Topic Presentations and Directed Feedback.

Problem: Medical students commonly encounter scenarios in which they are charged with teaching medical content, but studies find a paucity of teaching skills training especially in the pre-clerkship phase of undergraduate medical programs. Intervention: Videos lessons were created to instruct on five teaching skills identified as useful for presenting short lessons on medical topics: effective learning objectives, appropriate lesson complexity, audience engagement, relevance to practice, and resource selection. A rubric was generated to assess the performance level of each teaching skill. Context: First-year medical students viewed the video lessons and were instructed to implement these teaching skills for the creation and delivery of weekly learning issue (LI) presentations within a problem-based learning (PBL) course. PBL facilitators assessed students by using the rubric to assign a score of 0-2 corresponding to the level of skill performance. Impact: Scores in every dimension of our LI assessment rubric showed significant improvement above week 1 at the end of the initial 4 weeks of practice and assessment. Follow-up assessment showed durable performance and significant improvement for 3 out of 5 at weeks 8 and 12. Lessons Learned: Our novel framework was effective in fostering the adoption and implementation of five teaching skills among first-year medical students over a 4-week period, with most skills remaining durable over 12 weeks. Furthermore, end-of-course surveys showed that students found feedback received using the framework helpful in improving their LIs, and faculty reported that student LI presentation quality improved overall. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01912-x.