The use of dose quantities in radiological protection: ICRP publication 147 Ann ICRP 50(1) 2021.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection has recently published a report (ICRP Publication 147;Ann. ICRP50, 2021) on the use of dose quantities in radiological protection, under the same authorship as this Memorandum. Here, we present a brief summary of the main elements of the report. ICRP Publication 147 consolidates and clarifies the explanations provided in the 2007 ICRP Recommendations (Publication 103) but reaches conclusions that go beyond those presented in Publication 103. Further guidance is provided on the scientific basis for the control of radiation risks using dose quantities in occupational, public and medical applications. It is emphasised that best estimates of risk to individuals will use organ/tissue absorbed doses, appropriate relative biological effectiveness factors and dose-risk models for specific health effects. However, bearing in mind uncertainties including those associated with risk projection to low doses or low dose rates, it is concluded that in the context of radiological protection, effective dose may be considered as an approximate indicator of possible risk of stochastic health effects following low-level exposure to ionising radiation. In this respect, it should also be recognised that lifetime cancer risks vary with age at exposure, sex and population group. The ICRP report also concludes that equivalent dose is not needed as a protection quantity. Dose limits for the avoidance of tissue reactions for the skin, hands and feet, and lens of the eye will be more appropriately set in terms of absorbed dose rather than equivalent dose.

Use of effective dose.

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 103 provided a detailed explanation of the purpose and use of effective dose and equivalent dose to individual organs and tissues. Effective dose has proven to be a valuable and robust quantity for use in the implementation of protection principles. However, questions have arisen regarding practical applications, and a Task Group has been set up to consider issues of concern. This paper focusses on two key proposals developed by the Task Group that are under consideration by ICRP: (1) confusion will be avoided if equivalent dose is no longer used as a protection quantity, but regarded as an intermediate step in the calculation of effective dose. It would be more appropriate for limits for the avoidance of deterministic effects to the hands and feet, lens of the eye, and skin, to be set in terms of the quantity, absorbed dose (Gy) rather than equivalent dose (Sv). (2) Effective dose is in widespread use in medical practice as a measure of risk, thereby going beyond its intended purpose. While doses incurred at low levels of exposure may be measured or assessed with reasonable reliability, health effects have not been demonstrated reliably at such levels but are inferred. However, bearing in mind the uncertainties associated with risk projection to low doses or low dose rates, it may be considered reasonable to use effective dose as a rough indicator of possible risk, with the additional consideration of variation in risk with age, sex and population group.

Models for the transfer of radionuclides in cattle for use in radiological assessments.

In performing assessments of the radiological impact of releases of radioactive materials to the environment, mathematical models are required to enable the transfer through various parts of the environment and hence the dose to man to be predicted. The nature of the models and their degree of complexity depend largely upon the particular applications in which they are to be used. Two types of model of differing degrees of complexity for predicting the transfer of strontium, caesium and iodine in cattle have been developed at NRPB . They form part of a general model for the transfer of radionuclides through terrestrial foodchains . The first is a relatively simple model based on the use of equilibrium transfer factors, while the second is an improved but more complex model which incorporates the extra features necessary to provide a reasonable representation of the time dependence of transfer to milk and to meat. Comparisons of the results using the two types of model in some situations of radiological interest have been performed. From these comparisons conclusions have been drawn about the adequacy and pertinence of the use of each model type in different situations.

Parameters for modelling the interception and retention of deposits from atmosphere by grain and leafy vegetables.

The Normalised Specific Activity (NSA), a quantity which relates the concentration of a contaminant per unit mass of vegetation to its daily rate of ground deposition, has been used as the basis for determining interception factors and retention half-lives for radioactive contaminants deposited on grain and leafy vegetables. The values are for use in assessing contamination levels on crops at harvest during conditions of continuous deposition. The approach implicitly takes account of other processes which influence foliar contamination, namely, translocation and dilution due to plant growth. The respective NSA values for grain and prepared leafy vegetables determined from several separate experimental studies are fairly constant and are of about the same level for fall-out strontium and caesium. There is evidence from previous studies on herbage to suggest that similar NSA values might be expected for other contaminants on grain and leafy vegetables. Plutonium is an exception in that NSA values for grain and prepared leafy vegetables are lower than those for the fission products by factors of between 5 and 10 depending upon the source of the contaminant. Consideration has been given to determining the most appropriate value of the fraction of activity transferred from grain to flour during refining. This is an element dependent parameter and the values estimated for strontium, caesium and plutonium are respectively 0.15, 0.5 and 0.1. The study has indicated the need for data in several areas in order to improve the capability to model interception and retention on field crops in continuous and acute release conditions.

Review of trends in the UK population dose.

The Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency (HPA-RPD), formerly the National Radiological Protection Board, has periodically reported the doses to members of the public and workers in the UK from all sources of radiation. This paper is a review of the doses reported in these publications from the 1970s to 2000 or later. The paper aims to present how the estimated doses received by the UK population have changed over this time period, and where possible from earlier years as well, from all sources of radiation. It was not possible to directly compare the doses reported in the earlier reports. There have been changes in the type of doses estimated, the dosimetry (in particular the definition of effective dose) and improvements made in the measurement of natural background doses. In these cases the earlier reported doses have been recalculated using modern dosimetry so that the doses can be compared. The occupational doses reported in this paper are for those workers involved in the civil nuclear power production industry, industrial radiography or from the medical use of radiation sources. For workers it was found that the individual and collective dose has decreased significantly over this time through the introduction of legislation, the improvement in technology and better working practices. Members of the public are exposed to radiation following the atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, discharges from UK civil nuclear sites and from diagnostic radiology as well as from natural sources. Exposure to anthropogenic sources has decreased over the period considered in this paper. However, the dose to the UK population as a whole, presented as a per caput dose to a population of 55 million, has not changed significantly as it is dominated by the constant level of exposure to natural sources of radiation.

Consultative exercise on dose assessments.

A summary is given of a meeting held at Sussex University, UK, in October 2000, which allowed the exchange of ideas on methods of assessment of dose to the public arising from potential authorised radioactive discharges from nuclear sites in the UK. Representatives of groups with an interest in dose assessments were invited, and hence the meeting was called the Consultative Exercise on Dose Assessments (CEDA). Although initiated and funded by the Food Standards Agency, its organisation, and the writing of the report, were overseen by an independent Chairman and Steering Group. The report contains recommendations for improvement in co-ordination between different agencies involved in assessments, on method development and on the presentation of data on assessments. These have been prepared by the Steering Group, and will be taken forward by the Food Standards Agency and other agencies in the UK. The recommendations are included in this memorandum.