The use of two common palliative outcome measures in clinical care and research: a systematic review of POS and STAS.

The Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) and the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS) are outcome measures assessing quality of care in palliative care patients. This review aims to appraise their use in clinical care and research. Five electronic databases were searched (February 2010) for original papers describing the validation or use of POS and/or STAS. Of the 83 papers included, 43 studies were on POS, 39 on STAS and one study using both. Eight STAS studies validated the original version, four an adaptation; 20 studies applied the STAS in another culture and 19 in other languages. POS papers reported included: 14 adapted POS versions, 12 translations of the POS and 15 studies of use in different cultures. Both measures have been used in cancer, HIV/AIDS and in mixed groups. POS has also been applied in neurological, kidney, pulmonary and heart disease. Both tools were used in different areas such as the evaluation of care or interventions, description of symptom prevalence and implementation of outcome measures in clinical practice. Overall, they seem to be well accepted tools for outcome measurement in palliative care, both in clinical care and research.

[Palliative medicine and advanced incurable illness]. / Palliativmedizin und fortgeschrittene, nicht heilbare Erkrankungen.

Advanced incurable and life-threatening diseases of internal organs such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, and terminal kidney failure are associated with considerable burden for the patients caused by pronounced symptoms (e.g., dyspnea, anxiety, depression) and unmet psychosocial needs. Nevertheless, in Germany addressing palliative medicine in the context of these disorders and co-treatment of these patients by cross-sector partnership with specialized palliative care physicians are not very developed. Against the background of an international perspective and current guidelines, general aspects of palliative care needs (symptom control, communication, advance care planning, etc.) are discussed together with the resultant implications for potential cooperation between internal medicine and palliative care as well as special aspects of the individual diseases (e.g., prognosis or implications of certain treatment options such as "automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator", AICD). Timely involvement of the specific expertise of palliative care medicine can ensure that the workload of the primary providers (and their teams) is reduced and better cross-sector management (hospital and home) of the severely ill patients and their families is achieved.