RESUMO
Microvascular dysfunction (MVD) is considered a form of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), independently associated with poor prognosis after heart transplantation (HTX). It is unknown whether traditional risk factors for CAV are also applicable to MVD. We retrospectively analyzed factors associated with MVD in 94 HTX recipients who completed a PET scan after a normal baseline left heart catheterization excluding epicardial CAV. MVD was defined by abnormal PET blood flow. The mean age was 52 ± 14 and MVD was found in 49 patients (53%). No donor risk factors were significantly associated with recipient MVD. Recipients risk factors for MVD included-diabetes mellitus (51% vs. 27%, p = 0.016) and hypertension (78% vs. 49%, p = 0.004) in patients with and without MVD, respectively. In a multivariate model, recipient hypertension and diabetes were the only significant determinants of MVD development (OR = 2.63, 95% CI [1.69-36.98], p = 0.009 and OR 2.1, 95% CI [1.10-15.38], p = 0.035, respectively). In conclusion, MVD was more associated with metabolic risk determinants rather than traditional CAV risk factors.
Assuntos
Transplante de Coração , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Prognóstico , Seguimentos , Adulto , Aloenxertos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/etiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Vasculares/etiologia , Doenças Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Microcirculação , TransplantadosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors are becoming an important source of organs for heart-transplantation (HT), but there are limited data regarding their use in multiorgan-HT. METHODS: Between January 2020 and June 2023, we identified 87 adult multiorgan-HTs performed using DCD-donors [77 heart-kidney, 6 heart-lung, 4 heart-liver] and 1494 multiorgan-HTs using donation after brain death (DBD) donors (1141 heart-kidney, 165 heart-lung, 188 heart-liver) in UNOS. For heart-kidney transplantations (the most common multiorgan-HT combination from DCD-donors), we also compared donor/recipient characteristics, and early outcomes, including 6-month mortality using Kaplan-Meier (KM) and Cox hazards-ratio (Cox-HR). RESULTS: Use of DCD-donors for multiorgan-HTs in the United States increased from 1% in January to June 2020 to 12% in January-June 2023 (p < 0.001); but there was a wide variation across UNOS regions and center volumes. Compared to recipients of DBD heart-kidney transplantations, recipients of DCD heart-kidney transplantations were less likely to be of UNOS Status 1/2 at transplant (35.06% vs. 69.59%) and had lower inotrope use (22.08% vs. 43.30%), lower IABP use (2.60% vs. 26.29%), but higher durable CF-LVAD use (19.48% vs. 12.97%), all p < 0.01. Compared to DBD-donors, DCD-donors used for heart-kidney transplantations were younger [28(22-34) vs. 32(25-39) years, p = 0.004]. Recipients of heart-kidney transplantations from DCD-donors and DBD-donors had similar 6-month survival using both KM analysis, and unadjusted and adjusted Cox-HR models, including in propensity matched cohorts. Rates of PGF and in-hospital outcomes were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: Use of DCD-donors for multiorgan-HTs has increased rapidly in the United States and early outcomes of DCD heart-kidney transplantations are promising.
Assuntos
Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Transplante de Coração , Doadores de Tecidos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Coração/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doadores de Tecidos/provisão & distribuição , Estados Unidos , Seguimentos , Adulto , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Morte EncefálicaRESUMO
The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock has increased dramatically despite a lack of randomized controlled trials or evidence guiding clinical decision-making. Recommendations from professional societies on temporary mechanical circulatory support escalation and de-escalation are limited. This scientific statement provides pragmatic suggestions on temporary mechanical circulatory support device selection, escalation, and weaning strategies in patients with common cardiogenic shock causes such as acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction. The goal of this scientific statement is to serve as a resource for clinicians making temporary mechanical circulatory support management decisions and to propose standardized approaches for their use until more robust randomized clinical data are available.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , American Heart Association , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/efeitos adversos , Choque Cardiogênico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) serve medically complex patients with multiorgan dysfunction. Whether a CICU that is staffed full time by heart failure (HF) specialists is associated with decreased mortality is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective review of consecutive CICU admissions from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016, was performed. In January 2014, the CICU changed from an open unit staffed by any cardiologist to a closed unit managed by HF specialists. Patients' baseline characteristics were determined, and a multivariate regression analysis was performed to ascertain mortality rates in the CICU. Baseline severity of illness was higher in the closed/HF specialist CICU model (P< 0.001). Death occurred in 101 of 1185 patients admitted to the CICU (8.5%) in the open-unit model and in 139 of 2163 patients (6.4%) admitted to the closed/HF specialist model (absolute risk reduction 2.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-4.0%; Pâ¯=â¯0.01). The transition from an open to a closed/HF specialist model was associated with a lower overall CICU mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.93). Prespecified interaction with a mechanical circulatory support device and unit model showed that treatment with such a device was associated with lower mortality rates in the closed/HF specialist model of a CICU (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.18-0.78; P for interaction <0.01). CONCLUSION: Transition to a closed unit model staffed by a dedicated HF specialist is associated with lower CICU mortality rates.
Assuntos
Unidades de Cuidados Coronarianos , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Cardiac injury has been reported in up to 20%-to-30% of patients with COVID-19, and severe disease can lead to cardiopulmonary failure. The role of mechanical circulatory support in these patients remains undetermined. The authors here aimed to determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) or veno-arterial-venous (VAV) ECMO support. DESIGN AND SETTING: A multicenter, retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: The cohort consisted of adult patients (18 years of age and older) with confirmed COVID-19 requiring VA ECMO or VAV ECMO support in the period from March 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021. Outcomes were recorded until July 31, 2021. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: To show factors related to death during hospitalization, patients were grouped as survivors and nonsurvivors. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate 90-day in-hospital mortality. Overall, 37 patients from 12 centers comprised the study cohort. The median patient age was 44 years old (interquartile range [IQR], 35-52), and 12 (32%) were female patients. The duration of ECMO support ranged from 2-to-132 days. At the end of the follow-up period, 13 patients (35%) were discharged or transferred alive, and 24 patients (65%) died during the hospitalization. The cumulative in-hospital mortality at 90 days was 64% (95% confidence interval: 47-81). During the time from intubation to VA ECMO or VAV ECMO initiation (1 day [IQR 0-7.5] v 6 days [IQR 2.5-14], p = 0.0383), body mass index (32 [IQR 26-36] v 37 [IQR 33-40], p = 0.009), and baseline C-reactive protein (7.15 v 38.9 mg/dL, p = 0.009) were higher in those who expired. CONCLUSION: Only one-third of the patients with COVID-19 requiring VA ECMO or VAV ECMO survived to discharge. Close monitoring of at-risk patients with early initiation of ECMO with circulatory support may further improve outcomes.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/terapia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Contemporary cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) have an increasing prevalence of noncardiovascular comorbidities and multisystem organ dysfunction. However, little guidance exists to support the development of best-practice principles specific to the CICU. This scientific statement evaluates strategies to avoid the potentially preventable complications encountered within contemporary CICUs, focusing on those that are most applicable to the CICU environment. This scientific statement reviews evidence-based practices derived in non-CICU populations, assesses their relevance to CICU practice, and highlights key knowledge gaps warranting further investigation to attenuate patient risk.
Assuntos
American Heart Association , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarianos/normas , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Estado Terminal/terapia , Cardiopatias/terapia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarianos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Cardiopatias/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/mortalidade , Transtornos Mentais/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is an uncommon syndrome characterized by sudden and severe diffuse cardiac inflammation often leading to death resulting from cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmias, or multiorgan system failure. Historically, FM was almost exclusively diagnosed at autopsy. By definition, all patients with FM will need some form of inotropic or mechanical circulatory support to maintain end-organ perfusion until transplantation or recovery. Specific subtypes of FM may respond to immunomodulatory therapy in addition to guideline-directed medical care. Despite the increasing availability of circulatory support, orthotopic heart transplantation, and disease-specific treatments, patients with FM experience significant morbidity and mortality as a result of a delay in diagnosis and initiation of circulatory support and lack of appropriately trained specialists to manage the condition. This scientific statement outlines the resources necessary to manage the spectrum of FM, including extracorporeal life support, percutaneous and durable ventricular assist devices, transplantation capabilities, and specialists in advanced heart failure, cardiothoracic surgery, cardiac pathology, immunology, and infectious disease. Education of frontline providers who are most likely to encounter FM first is essential to increase timely access to appropriately resourced facilities, to prevent multiorgan system failure, and to tailor disease-specific therapy as early as possible in the disease process.
Assuntos
Miocardite , American Heart Association , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiologia , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Feminino , Transplante de Coração , Humanos , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/diagnóstico , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/epidemiologia , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/etiologia , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/terapia , Miocardite/complicações , Miocardite/epidemiologia , Miocardite/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Choque Cardiogênico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogênico/epidemiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of the HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is expanding. Despite being associated with lower rates of adverse events and increased survival, outflow graft obstruction (OGO) has been reported in patients with HM3. The incidence and best management of this serious complication remain unclear. METHODS: We describe six cases of HM3 OGO occurring in five patients in our institutional HM3 cohort. Four cases underwent computed tomography angiography and in two percutaneous angiography was directly performed to confirm the diagnosis. In four cases, percutaneous repair of the OG was performed using common interventional cardiology (IC) techniques. RESULTS: Our institutional incidence of OGO was 7% (event rate of 0.05 per patient year); much higher than the previously reported incidence of 1.6%. All cases occurred in the bend relief covered segment. Only two patients had apparent OG twisting, and in two, OGO occurred despite placement of an anti-twist clip at the time of implant. External compression seems to play a role in most cases. Balloon "graftoplasty" and stent deployment via the femoral artery alleviated the obstruction and normalized LVAD flow in all patients who underwent percutaneous repair. The use of self-expanding stents allowed for downsizing of the procedural access site to 10 Fr. No serious procedure-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: OGO is common in HM3 patients, external compression due to biomaterial accumulated surrounding the OG is a common etiology. Percutaneous repair using standard IC techniques is safe and feasible in cases of compression with or without partial twisting.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Stents , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Significant improvements have been achieved in cardiac arrest resuscitation and postarrest resuscitation care, but mortality remains high. Most of the poor outcomes and deaths of cardiac arrest survivors have been attributed to widespread brain injury. This brain injury, commonly manifested as a comatose state, is a marker of poor outcome and a major basis for unfavorable neurological prognostication. Accurate prognostication is important to avoid pursuing futile treatments when poor outcome is inevitable but also to avoid an inappropriate withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in patients who may otherwise have a chance of achieving meaningful neurological recovery. Inaccurate neurological prognostication leading to withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and deaths may significantly bias clinical studies, leading to failure in detecting the true study outcomes. The American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science Subcommittee organized a writing group composed of adult and pediatric experts from neurology, cardiology, emergency medicine, intensive care medicine, and nursing to review existing neurological prognostication studies, the practice of neurological prognostication, and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. The writing group determined that the overall quality of existing neurological prognostication studies is low. As a consequence, the degree of confidence in the predictors and the subsequent outcomes is also low. Therefore, the writing group suggests that neurological prognostication parameters need to be approached as index tests based on relevant neurological functions that are directly related to the functional outcome and contribute to the quality of life of cardiac arrest survivors. Suggestions to improve the quality of adult and pediatric neurological prognostication studies are provided.
Assuntos
Coma/diagnóstico , Parada Cardíaca/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Sobreviventes , Comitês Consultivos , Biomarcadores/análise , Lesões Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Lesões Encefálicas/etiologia , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Coma/etiologia , Eletroencefalografia , Potenciais Evocados , Parada Cardíaca/complicações , Humanos , Prognóstico , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
Human immunodeficiency virus-positive (HIV+) patients are not routinely offered heart transplantation (HT) due to lack of adequate outcomes data. Between January 2004 and March 2017, we identified 41 adult (≥18 years) HT recipients with known HIV+ serostatus at the time of transplant in UNOS and evaluated post-HT outcomes. Overall, Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of survival at 1 and 5 years were 85.9% and 77.3%, respectively, with no significant difference in bridge-to-transplant ventricular-assist device (BTT-VAD, n = 22) and no-BTT-VAD (n = 19). KM estimates of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and malignancy at 5 years were 32% and 19%, respectively. Using propensity scores, 41 HIV+ HT recipients were matched to 41 HIV- HT recipients for idiopathic dilated-cardiomyopathy; and there was no significant difference in post-HT survival up to 5 years. Furthermore, only 24 centers in the United States had performed HIV+ HT during the study period, indicating that >80% of HT centers in the United States had not performed any HIV+ HT. In a cohort representative of the current status of HIV+ HTs in the United States, we found that the posttransplant survival was excellent and rates of CAV and malignancy were comparable to the overall HT population. These results should encourage greater number of centers to offer HT to suitable HIV+ candidates and help reduce unequal access to HT for HIV+ patients.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/mortalidade , Rejeição de Enxerto/mortalidade , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Transplante de Coração/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Doenças Vasculares/mortalidade , Adulto , Aloenxertos , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , HIV/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por HIV/virologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Coração Auxiliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Doenças Vasculares/epidemiologiaRESUMO
AIM: Preoperatively elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is a contraindication to heart transplantation (HT). Transpulmonary pressure gradient (TPG) is one of the main variables used in PVR determination (ie, PVRâ¯=â¯TPG/cardiac output). Unlike PVR, which is subject to the shortcoming of cardiac output estimation, TPG is directly measured. We aimed to evaluate the relationship of TPG obtained before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation on post-HT survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 490 patients were implanted with Heartmate II LVADs in the multicenter Heartmate II Bridge-to-Transplantation clinical trial, and 416/490 had pre-LVAD TPG data available. Outcomes during LVAD support and after HT stratified by both PVR and TPG were studied. The median pre-LVAD TPG was 10 mm Hg. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar for patients with and without TPG >10 mm Hg. Outcomes during LVAD support (ie, recovery to LVAD explantation, HT, or ongoing device support) for patients below and above the median TPG were similar. However, post-HT 1-year survival rate was significantly higher for patients with TPG ≤10 mm Hg compared with those with TPG >10 mm Hg (91% vs 80%; Pâ¯=â¯.016). Analysis based on the median PVR of 2.68 Wood units did not stratify post-HTx 1-year survival rates between the groups (89% vs 83%; Pâ¯=â¯.25). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated TPG, rather than high PVR, before LVAD implantation was associated with increased mortality following HT. Pre-LVAD TPG may be useful to identify a cohort that requires close follow-up with serial hemodynamic monitoring before HT.
Assuntos
Transplante de Coração , Coração Auxiliar , Hipertensão Pulmonar , Resistência Vascular , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Transplante de Coração/métodos , Transplante de Coração/mortalidade , Humanos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Período Pré-Operatório , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Artéria Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The clinical significance of positive anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) antibody tests in recipients of left ventricular assist devices remains unclear. In light of emerging evidence suggesting the possibility of persistent low-level HCV infection in patients with positive anti-HCV antibody test but negative HCV ribonucleic acid, it is very important to distinguish the truly false positive HCV antibodies, in recipients of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices, from those suggestive of a prior clinically resolved infection or one where a low-level viremia may have persisted. We conducted a retrospective analysis of left ventricular assist device recipients at our institution. While the total incidence of positive HCV antibody with concomitantly negative HCV ribonucleic acid test (19.2%) was in keeping with the incidences reported in prior cross-sectional studies, we longitudinally followed our patients and observed a 100% seroreversion. Seroreversion, which has not been reported in other studies, occurred either during continued left ventricular assist device support (10 out of 26) or after heart transplant (7 out of 26). Hundred percent seroreversion strongly suggested that the anti-HCV antibodies were truly false positive.
Assuntos
Coração Auxiliar , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite C/sangue , Hepatite C/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Orthotopic heart transplant is the gold standard therapeutic intervention for patients with end-stage heart failure. Conventionally, heart transplant has relied on donation after brain death for organ recovery. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is the donation of the heart after confirming that circulatory function has irreversibly ceased. DCD-orthotopic heart transplant differs from donation after brain death-orthotopic heart transplant in ways that carry implications for widespread adoption, including differences in organ recovery, storage and ethical considerations surrounding normothermic regional perfusion with DCD. Despite these differences, DCD has shown promising early outcomes, augmenting the donor pool and allowing more individuals to benefit from orthotopic heart transplant. This review aims to present the current state and future trajectory of DCD-heart transplant, examine key differences between DCD and donation after brain death, including clinical experiences and innovations in methodologies, and address the ongoing ethical challenges surrounding the new frontier in heart transplant with DCD donors.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Transplante de Coração , Doadores de Tecidos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/ética , Morte Encefálica , Preservação de Órgãos/métodosRESUMO
Despite a record setting number of heart transplants performed annually, the national donor shortage continues to plague transplant teams across the United States. Here we describe the barriers to adaptation of numerous "non-traditional" orthotopic heart transplant donor characteristics including donors with hepatitis C virus, those meeting criteria for donation after cardiac death, donors with coronavirus disease 19 infection, donors with the human immunodeficiency virus, and grafts with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Our center's objective was to increase our transplant volume by expanding our donor pool from "traditional" donors to these "non-traditional" donors. We detail how medical advances such as certain laboratory studies, pharmacologic interventions, and organ care systems have allowed our center to expand the donor pool thereby increasing transplantation volume without adverse effects on outcomes.
RESUMO
Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after cardiac transplantation is a devastating complication with increasing frequency lately in the setting of donation after circulatory death (DCD). Severe PGD is commonly treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) using central or peripheral cannulation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of PGD after cardiac transplantation requiring ECMO support at our center from 2015 to 2020, focused on our now preferential approach using peripheral cannulation without a priori venting. During the study period, 255 patients underwent heart transplantation at our center and 26 (10.2%) of them required ECMO for PGD. Of 24 patients cannulated peripherally 19 (79%) were alive at 30 days and 17 (71%) 1 year after transplant; two additional patients underwent central ECMO cannulation due to unfavorable size of femoral vessels and concern for limb ischemia. Successful decannulation with full graft function recovery occurred in 22 of 24 (92%) patients cannulated peripherally. Six of them had an indwelling intra-aortic balloon pump placed before the transplantation. None of the other 18 patients received a ventricular vent. In conclusion, the use of an a priori peripheral and ventless ECMO approach in patients with PGD after heart transplant is an effective strategy associated with high rates of graft recovery and survival.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Transplante de Coração , Disfunção Primária do Enxerto , Humanos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Disfunção Primária do Enxerto/etiologia , Disfunção Primária do Enxerto/terapia , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/efeitos adversosRESUMO
The use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has decreased in recent years due to negative outcome studies in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction, despite its favorable adverse-event profile. Acute hemodynamic response studies have identified potential super-responders with immediate improvements in cardiac index (CI) in heart failure patients. This single-center retrospective study aimed to predict CI and mean arterial pressure (MAP) changes throughout the entire duration of IABP support. The study analyzed 336 patients who received IABP between 2016 and 2022. Linear mixed-effect regression models were used to predict CI and MAP improvement during IABP support. The results showed that CI and MAP increases during the first days of support, and changes during IABP support varied with time and were associated with baseline parameters. Longitudinal CI change was associated with body surface area, baseline CI, baseline pulmonary artery pulsatility index, baseline need for pressors, and diabetes. Longitudinal MAP change was associated with baseline MAP, baseline heart rate, need for pressors, or inotropes. The study recommends considering these parameters when deciding if IABP is the most appropriate form of support for a specific patient. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the findings.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Infarto do Miocárdio , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Cardiogênico/cirurgia , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Hemodinâmica/fisiologiaRESUMO
Fungal infective endocarditis, although rare, carries a high mortality risk. We present a case of successful multidisciplinary management of Exophiala dermatitidis infective endocarditis in an immunocompetent male with a bio-prosthetic mitral valve. This case highlights the clinical presentation and provides valuable treatment insights into this rare fungal entity. Prompt consideration of fungal pathogens in predisposed patients, expedited detection through non-culture-based tests, and a combined surgical and prolonged antifungal approach are pivotal.
Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Exophiala , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Micoses , Humanos , Masculino , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Endocardite Bacteriana/cirurgia , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Endocardite/tratamento farmacológico , Endocardite/microbiologia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) occurs frequently in a growing population of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) but outcomes with invasive management approaches are unknown. We sought to determine in-hospital outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in comparison with medical management only. The National Inpatient Sample was used to capture hospitalizations in the United States from 2006 to 2019. Admissions for NSTEMI in patients with chronic HF and ESRD were identified by International Classification of Diseases codes. The cohort was divided into those that received PCI or medical management only. In-hospital outcomes were compared by multivariable logistic regression and propensity matching. In 27,433 hospitalizations, 8,004 patients (29%) underwent PCI, and 19,429 (71%) were managed with medications only. PCI was associated with lower adjusted odds of death during hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.66, p <0.01). This association remained consistent after propensity matching (adjusted odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.64, p <0.01) and was apparent across all subtypes of HF. Patients with PCI had greater duration (5, 3, to 9 vs, 5, 3 to 8 days, p <0.01) and cost of hospitalization ($107,942, 70,230 to $173,182 vs, $44,156, 24,409 to $80,810, p <0.01). In conclusion, patients with HF and ESRD admitted for NSTEMI experienced lower in-hospital mortality with PCI in comparison with medical therapy only. Invasive percutaneous revascularization may be reasonable for appropriately selected patients with HF and ESRD but randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its safety and efficacy in this high-risk population.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Falência Renal Crônica , Infarto do Miocárdio , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Doença Crônica , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on heart transplantation (HT) using COVID-19 donors. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated COVID-19 donor use, donor and recipient characteristics, and early post-HT outcomes. METHODS: Between May 2020 and June 2022, study investigators identified 27,862 donors in the United Network for Organ Sharing, with 60,699 COVID-19 nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) performed before procurement and with available organ disposition. Donors were considered "COVID-19 donors" if they were NAT positive at any time during terminal hospitalization. These donors were subclassified as "active COVID-19" (aCOV) donors if they were NAT positive within 2 days of organ procurement, or "recently resolved COVID-19" (rrCOV) donors if they were NAT positive initially but became NAT negative before procurement. Donors with NAT-positive status >2 days before procurement were considered aCOV unless there was evidence of a subsequent NAT-negative result ≥48 hours after the last NAT-positive result. HT outcomes were compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,445 "COVID-19 donors" (COVID-19 NAT positive) were identified; 1,017 of these were aCOV, and 428 were rrCOV. Overall, 309 HTs used COVID-19 donors, and 239 adult HTs from COVID-19 donors (150 aCOV, 89 rrCOV) met study criteria. Compared with non-COV, COVID-19 donors used for adult HT were younger and mostly male (â¼80%). Compared with HTs from non-COV donors, recipients of HTs from aCOV donors had increased mortality at 6 months (Cox HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.02-2.96; P = 0.043) and 1 year (Cox HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.22-3.22; P = 0.006). Recipients of HTs from rrCOV and non-COV donors had similar 6-month and 1-year mortality. Results were similar in propensity-matched cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In this early analysis, although HTs from aCOV donors had increased mortality at 6 months and 1 year, HTs from rrCOV donors had survival similar to that seen in recipients of HTs from non-COV donors. Continued evaluation and a more nuanced approach to this donor pool are needed.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Coração , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Doadores de TecidosRESUMO
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy improves survival and quality of life by mechanically unloading the left ventricle and maintaining hemodynamics in patients with end-stage heart failure. LVADs can also be lifesaving by maintaining hemodynamics during ventricular arrhythmia. Continuous-flow LVADs have become the preferred LVAD technology. As presented here, a continuous-flow LVAD successfully provided hemodynamic support to a patient in sustained ventricular fibrillation for over 12 hours when the internal defibrillator was unable to terminate the arrhythmia. This case demonstrates that continuous-flow LVADs can be lifesaving in the setting of otherwise certain hemodynamic collapse from sustained ventricular fibrillation.