Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 46
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Environ Res ; 251(Pt 2): 118697, 2024 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38499224

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The health impacts of the rapid transition to the use of electric vehicles are largely unexplored. We completed a scoping review to assess the state of the evidence on use of battery electric and hybrid electric vehicles and health. METHODS: We conducted a literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, CINAHL, Scopus, and Environmental Science Collection databases for articles published January 1990 to January 2024. We included articles if they presented observed or modeled data on the association between battery electric or hybrid electric cars, trucks, or buses and health-related outcomes. We abstracted data and summarized results. RESULTS: Out of 897 reviewed articles, 52 met our inclusion criteria. The majority of included articles examined transitions to the use of electric vehicles (n = 49, 94%), with fewer studies examining hybrid electric vehicles (n = 11, 21%) or plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (n = 8, 15%). The most common outcomes examined were premature death (n = 41, 79%) and monetized health outcomes such as medical expenditures (n = 33, 63%). We identified only one observational study on the impact of electric vehicles on health; all other studies reported modeled data. Almost every study (n = 51, 98%) reported some evidence of a positive health impact of transitioning to electric or hybrid electric vehicles, although magnitudes of association varied. There was a paucity of information on the environmental justice implications of vehicle transitions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current literature on electric vehicles and health suggest an overall positive health impact of transitioning to electric vehicles. Additional observational studies would help expand our understanding of the real-world health effects of electric vehicles. Future research focused on the environmental justice implications of vehicle fleet transitions could provide additional information about the extent to which the health benefits occur equitably across populations.


Assuntos
Veículos Automotores , Humanos , Automóveis , Fontes de Energia Elétrica , Eletricidade
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(34): 926-932, 2023 Aug 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37616233

RESUMO

During April 30-August 4, 2023, smoke originating from wildfires in Canada affected most of the contiguous United States. CDC used National Syndromic Surveillance Program data to assess numbers and percentages of asthma-associated emergency department (ED) visits on days with wildfire smoke, compared with days without wildfire smoke. Wildfire smoke days were defined as days when concentrations of particulate matter (particles generally ≤2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter) (PM2.5) triggered an Air Quality Index ≥101, corresponding to the air quality categorization, "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups." Changes in asthma-associated ED visits were assessed across U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regions and by age. Overall, asthma-associated ED visits were 17% higher than expected during the 19 days with wildfire smoke that occurred during the study period; larger increases were observed in regions that experienced higher numbers of continuous wildfire smoke days and among persons aged 5-17 and 18-64 years. These results can help guide emergency response planning and public health communication strategies, especially in U.S. regions where wildfire smoke exposure was previously uncommon.


Assuntos
Asma , Incêndios Florestais , Humanos , Fumaça/efeitos adversos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Asma/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
3.
J Asthma ; 60(10): 1918-1925, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37026680

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Asthma self-management education (AS-ME) is an effective strategy to help children with asthma achieve better asthma control and outcome. The objective of this study is to assess the association between the prevalence of receiving AS-ME curriculum components and sociodemographic characteristics among children with current asthma. METHODS: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, child Asthma Call-back Survey 2015-2017 aggregated data were used. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations of each AS-ME component question and sociodemographic characteristic, adjusting for sample weighting. RESULTS: Among 3,213 children with current asthma, 52% of children reported ever being given an asthma action plan by a doctor or other healthcare professional. After adjusting for other variables, boys and Non-Hispanic Black children were more likely to report being given an action plan (APR= 1.15[95% CI 1.00-1.32] and APR= 1.28[95% CI 1.07-1.54] respectively). Non-Hispanic Black (APR = 2.15 [95% CI 1.30-3.55]), non-Hispanic, other race (APR = 1.95 [95% CI1.04-3.66]), and Hispanic children (APR = 1.84 [95% CI 1.18-2.89]) were more likely to report taking a course to learn how to manage asthma than non-Hispanic White children. Hispanic children (40.8%) were more likely to report being advised to change home environment compared to non-Hispanic Whites (31.5%) (APR =1.28 [95% CI 1.01-1.63). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of some elements of asthma-self management education was relatively low and there were differences observed in the prevalence of receiving AS-ME by race/ethnicity, parental education, and income. Targeted implementation of asthma self-management components and interventions may improve asthma control and reduce asthma morbidity.


Assuntos
Asma , Autogestão , Masculino , Criança , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/terapia , Etnicidade , Hispânico ou Latino , Escolaridade
4.
J Asthma ; 60(8): 1601-1607, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36608267

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: A better understanding of the impacts of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on emergency department (ED) visits for asthma is needed to improve asthma control. METHODS: Using data from the National Syndromic Surveillance Program (NSSP), we assessed changes in average weekly asthma ED visits in the United States in 3 surveillance periods: 1) March 15, 2020-January 2, 2021; 2) January 3, 2021-January 1, 2022; and 3) January 2-March 5, 2022, relative to pre-pandemic comparison periods between December 30, 2018 and December 28, 2019. For each surveillance period, we assessed changes in asthma ED visits by age group and sex. RESULTS: For the surveillance period beginning March 15, 2020, average weekly asthma ED visits declined 31% relative to what was observed during the comparison period - that is, from 45,276 visits/week in 2019 to 31,374 visits/week in 2020. Declines of over 19% and 26% were observed for 2021 and 2022, respectively, relative to the comparison periods. In all surveillance periods, the largest declines occurred among children, especially those ages 0-4 (74%) and 5-11 (66%) years. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted asthma ED visits in the United States. The impact was greater among children than adults, as ED visits among children were notably lower during all three pandemic surveillance periods than during the corresponding pre-pandemic periods. Additional information about the roles of behaviors of patients with asthma and changes in asthma care might improve our understanding of the reasons underlying these observed changes.


Assuntos
Asma , COVID-19 , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Asma/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
5.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 20: E44, 2023 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37262329

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Controlling Childhood Asthma and Reducing Emergencies initiative aims to prevent 500,000 emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations within 5 years among children with asthma through implementation of evidence-based interventions and policies. Methods are needed for calculating the anticipated effects of planned asthma programs and the estimated effects of existing asthma programs. We describe and illustrate a method of using results from randomized control trials (RCTs) to estimate changes in rates of adverse asthma events (AAEs) that result from expanding access to asthma interventions. METHODS: We use counterfactual arguments to justify a formula for the expected number of AAEs prevented by a given intervention. This formula employs a current rate of AAEs, a measure of the increase in access to the intervention, and the rate ratio estimated in an RCT. RESULTS: We justified a formula for estimating the effect of expanding access to asthma interventions. For example, if 20% of patients with asthma in a community with 20,540 annual asthma-related ED visits were offered asthma self-management education, ED visits would decrease by an estimated 1,643; and annual hospitalizations would decrease from 2,639 to 617. CONCLUSION: Our method draws on the best available evidence from RCTs to estimate effects on rates of AAEs in the community of interest that result from expanding access to asthma interventions.


Assuntos
Asma , Humanos , Criança , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Asma/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitalização
6.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(7): 1533-1536, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35731203

RESUMO

Among 664,956 hospitalized COVID-19 patients during March 2020-July 2021 in the United States, select mental health conditions (i.e., anxiety, depression, bipolar, schizophrenia) were associated with increased risk for same-hospital readmission and longer length of stay. Anxiety was also associated with increased risk for intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, and death.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Saúde Mental , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
J Asthma ; 59(3): 427-433, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33272056

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe asthma control and household environmental exposures among adults and children with asthma in Puerto Rico. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the 2014-2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call-back Survey on 931 adults and 177 children with current asthma in Puerto Rico. These data were analyzed to assess the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma in Puerto Rico and potential associations with household environmental exposure to cockroaches, smoke, and mold. Asthma control was classified using daytime and nighttime symptoms, activity limitation, and short-acting beta agonist use. Prevalence and prevalence ratios were calculated, adjusting for sample weighting. RESULTS: An estimated 53% of adults with asthma and 29% of children with asthma in Puerto Rico have uncontrolled asthma. Among adults with asthma, in the past 30 days, 29% had seen or smelled mold and 50% had seen cockroaches; in the past week, 12% reported having someone smoke in their home. Adults with uncontrolled asthma were 1.4 times more likely to have observed mold in their homes than were those with controlled asthma when adjusting for age, sex, education, and income (prevalence ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.4 [1.1, 1.8]). Children with uncontrolled asthma were also more likely to have mold observed in their home than were children with controlled asthma (adjusted PR [95% CI]: 3.0 [1.3, 7.1]). CONCLUSIONS: Uncontrolled asthma is common among adults and children with asthma in Puerto Rico. These results suggest potential differences in household mold exposure by asthma control status.


Assuntos
Asma , Adulto , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/etiologia , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Fungos , Humanos , Porto Rico/epidemiologia , Fumaça
8.
J Asthma ; 59(12): 2509-2519, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34902258

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the risk of severe clinical outcomes during hospitalizations of adults with asthma and/or COPD plus COVID-19 and compares those risks with those during hospitalizations of adults with asthma and/or COPD without COVID-19. METHODS: We used data from 877 U.S. hospitals from the Premier Healthcare Database during March 2020-March 2021. Hospitalizations (n = 311,215) among patients aged ≥18 years with an ICD-10-CM diagnosis involving asthma or COPD were classified into three groups: adults with asthma (but not COPD), adults with COPD (but not asthma), and adults with both asthma and COPD. We used multivariable Poisson regression to assess associations of severe clinical outcomes [intensive care unit (ICU) admission, use of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and death] and COVID-19 status. RESULTS: The percentage of hospitalizations among patients with asthma and COVID-19 resulting in ICU admission, IMV, and death were 46.9%, 14.0%, and 8.0%, respectively. These risks were higher than those among patients with asthma without COVID-19 (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.17 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-1.21], 1.61 [95% CI, 1.50-1.73], and 5.56 [95% CI, 4.89-6.32]), respectively. Risks of ICU admission, IMV, and death were also high among patients with COPD and COVID-19 and exceeded the corresponding risks among patients with COPD without COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Hospitalizations among patients with asthma and/or COPD with COVID-19 had a more severe clinical course than hospitalizations for asthma and/or COPD exacerbations without COVID-19.Supplemental data for this article is available online at at www.tandfonline.com/ijas .


Assuntos
Asma , COVID-19 , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Humanos , Adulto , Adolescente , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/terapia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Hospitalização , Razão de Chances
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(36): 1249-1254, 2021 09 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34499628

RESUMO

Although COVID-19 generally results in milder disease in children and adolescents than in adults, severe illness from COVID-19 can occur in children and adolescents and might require hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) support (1-3). It is not known whether the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant,* which has been the predominant variant of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) in the United States since late June 2021,† causes different clinical outcomes in children and adolescents compared with variants that circulated earlier. To assess trends among children and adolescents, CDC analyzed new COVID-19 cases, emergency department (ED) visits with a COVID-19 diagnosis code, and hospital admissions of patients with confirmed COVID-19 among persons aged 0-17 years during August 1, 2020-August 27, 2021. Since July 2021, after Delta had become the predominant circulating variant, the rate of new COVID-19 cases and COVID-19-related ED visits increased for persons aged 0-4, 5-11, and 12-17 years, and hospital admissions of patients with confirmed COVID-19 increased for persons aged 0-17 years. Among persons aged 0-17 years during the most recent 2-week period (August 14-27, 2021), COVID-19-related ED visits and hospital admissions in the states with the lowest vaccination coverage were 3.4 and 3.7 times that in the states with the highest vaccination coverage, respectively. At selected hospitals, the proportion of COVID-19 patients aged 0-17 years who were admitted to an ICU ranged from 10% to 25% during August 2020-June 2021 and was 20% and 18% during July and August 2021, respectively. Broad, community-wide vaccination of all eligible persons is a critical component of mitigation strategies to protect pediatric populations from SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 illness.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Adolescente , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
J Asthma ; 58(8): 1111-1117, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32312135

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between daycare attendance and asthma control among children aged 0 to 4 years with asthma. METHODS: We analyzed 2012-2014 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call-back Survey on 388 children with asthma aged 0 to 4 years with information on daycare attendance in the past 12 months. We calculated weighted prevalence ratios to assess the association between daycare attendance and asthma control (categorized based on day-time and nighttime asthma symptoms, activity limitation, and short-acting beta agonist use). Adjusted models controlled for parent or guardian education, household income, race, sex, cost barriers to asthma care, long-term control medication use, and the number of other children in the child's household. RESULTS: In this sample of children with asthma, representative of 520,400 children in 26 U.S. states, 34% attended daycare in the past 12 months. Only 32% of children who attended daycare in the past 12 months reported having an asthma action plan on file at the daycare they most recently attended. Presence of the asthma triggers of pets, mold, and smoking in a child's daycare were reported to be uncommon. Prevalence of uncontrolled asthma was 44% in children who attended daycare in the past 12 months and 68% in children who did not. The adjusted prevalence ratio between daycare attendance and uncontrolled asthma was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.73, 1.25). CONCLUSIONS: When adjusting for covariates, we observed no evidence of an association between daycare attendance in early life and uncontrolled asthma.


Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Creches , Asma/epidemiologia , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
J Asthma ; 57(8): 886-897, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31187658

RESUMO

Objective: Asthma carries a high burden of disease for residents of Puerto Rico. We conducted this study to better understand asthma-related healthcare use and to examine potential asthma triggers.Methods: We characterized asthma-related healthcare use in 2013 by demographics, region, and date using outpatient, hospital, and emergency department (ED) insurance claims with a primary diagnostic ICD-9-CM code of 493.XX. We examined environmental asthma triggers, including outdoor allergens (i.e., mold and pollen), particulate pollution, and influenza-like illness. Analyses included descriptive statistics and Poisson time-series regression.Results: During 2013, there were 550,655 medical asthma claims reported to the Puerto Rico Healthcare Utilization database, representing 148 asthma claims/1,000 persons; 71% of asthma claims were outpatient visits, 19% were hospitalizations, and 10% were ED visits. Females (63%), children aged ≤9 years (77% among children), and adults aged ≥45 years (80% among adults) had the majority of asthma claims. Among health regions, Caguas had the highest asthma claim-rate at 142/1,000 persons (overall health region claim-rate = 108). Environmental exposures varied across the year and demonstrated seasonal patterns. Metro health region regression models showed positive associations between increases in mold and particulate matter <10 microns in diameter (PM10) and outpatient asthma claims.Conclusions: This study provides information about patterns of asthma-related healthcare use across Puerto Rico. Increases in mold and PM10 were associated with increases in asthma claims. Targeting educational interventions on exposure awareness and reduction techniques, especially to persons with higher asthma-related healthcare use, can support asthma control activities in public health and clinical settings.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Asma/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Alérgenos/análise , Asma/imunologia , Asma/terapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Monitoramento Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Geografia , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos , Material Particulado/análise , Porto Rico/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto Jovem
12.
J Prim Prev ; 41(3): 279-295, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32410066

RESUMO

In 2017, Puerto Rico sustained extensive damage from Hurricane Maria, increasing the risk of fires and carbon monoxide (CO) poisonings. Using a population-based, in-person survey of households with children less than 6 years old in Puerto Rico, we collected data in 2010 concerning the presence of smoke alarms and CO alarms in these households. We generated national estimates by extrapolating the number of households in each stratum using data from the 2010 Census. We determined which household characteristics predicted the presence of these alarms. Of 355 households analyzed, 31% had functional smoke alarms, or an estimated 109,773 households territory wide. The presence of smoke alarms was associated with living in multifamily housing and no child in the household receiving government medical insurance. Public housing or publicly subsidized housing, as compared to owner-occupied housing and unsubsidized rental housing, was associated with having a functional smoke alarm in households with children aged less than 6 years. Based on only six houses having CO alarms, we estimated only 7685 (2%) households had CO alarms. The low prevalence of functional smoke or CO alarms 7 years before Hurricane Maria is unfortunate and should be remedied by ensuring that such alarms are widely installed in current rebuilding activities.


Assuntos
Monóxido de Carbono/análise , Características da Família , Incêndios , Fumaça/análise , Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/prevenção & controle , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Tempestades Ciclônicas , Feminino , Incêndios/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Equipamentos de Proteção , Habitação Popular , Porto Rico , Medição de Risco
13.
Am J Emerg Med ; 37(3): 421-426, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29929888

RESUMO

Unintentional non-fire-related (UNFR) carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is a leading cause of poisoning in the US and a preventable cause of death. We generated national estimates of accidental CO poisoning and characterized the populations most at risk. UNFR CO poisoning cases were assessed using hospitalization and emergency department (ED) data from the Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Emergency Department Sample databases. We used hospitalization data from 2003 to 2013 and ED data from 2007 to 2013. We calculated trends using a linear regression of UNFR CO poisonings over the study period and age-adjusted rates using direct standardization and U.S. Census Bureau estimates. During 2003-2013, approximately 14,365 persons (4.1 cases/million annually) with confirmed or probable UNFR CO poisoning were admitted to hospitals and the annual rate of poisonings showed a weak downward trend (p = 0.12). During 2007-2013, approximately 101,847 persons (48.3 visits/million annually) visited the ED and the annual rate of poisonings showed a significant downward trend (p ≤ 0.01). Most UNFR CO hospital cases involved patients who were older (aged 45-64 years), white, male, or living in the South or Midwest. Overall, the rate of hospitalizations did not change over the study period. Unintentional CO poisoning is preventable and these cases represent the most recent national estimates. ED visits declined over the study period, but the hospitalization rates did not change. This emphasizes the need for prevention efforts, such as education in the ED setting, increased use of CO alarms, and proper use and maintenance of fuel-powered household appliances.


Assuntos
Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/mortalidade , Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/prevenção & controle , Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Feminino , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
15.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(3): 414-419, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28888530

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unintentional non-fire-related (UNFR) carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning has been among the leading causes of poisoning in the United States. Current estimation of its economic burden is important for an optimal allocation of resources for UNFR CO poisoning prevention. OBJECTIVE: This study was to estimate the morbidity costs of UNFR CO poisoning. We also compared the costs and benefits of installing CO detectors in residences. METHODS: We used 2010-2014 charges and cost data from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), and Truven© Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental data. We directly measured the morbidity cost as the summation of costs for different healthcare services. Benefit of installing CO detector was estimated by summing up the avoidable morbidity cost and mortality cost (value of life). Cost of CO detectors was calculated using the average market price of CO detectors. We also calculated the benefit-to-cost ratio by dividing the benefit by its cost. All expenditures were converted into 2013 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: For UNFR CO poisoning, total annual medical cost ranged from $33.6 to $37.7 million. Annual non-health-sector costs varied from $3.7 to almost $4.4 million. The benefit-to-cost ratio can be as high as 7.2 to 1. CONCLUSION: UNFR CO poisoning causes substantial economic burden in the U.S. The benefit of using CO detectors in homes to prevent UNFR CO poisoning can considerably exceed the cost of installation. Public health programs could use these findings to promote broad installation of CO detectors in homes.


Assuntos
Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/epidemiologia , Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/mortalidade , Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
16.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(10): 1837-1844, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29534918

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Carbon monoxide (CO) is an insidious gas responsible for approximately 21,000 emergency department visits, 2300 hospitalizations, and 500 deaths in the United States annually. We analyzed 10 combined years of data from two Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry acute hazardous substance release surveillance programs to evaluate CO incident-related injuries. METHODS: Seventeen states participated in these programs during 2005-2014. RESULTS: In those 10years, the states identified 1795 CO incidents. Our analysis focused on 897 CO incidents having injured persons. Of the 3414 CO injured people, 61.0% were classified as general public, 27.7% were employees, 7.6% were students, and 2.2% were first responders. More than 78% of CO injured people required hospital or pre-hospital treatment and 4.3% died. The location for most injured people (39.9%) were homes or apartments, followed by educational facilities (10.0%). Educational services had a high number of people injured per incident (16.3%). The three most common sources of CO were heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; generators; and motor vehicles. Equipment failure was the primary contributing factor for most CO incidents. CONCLUSIONS: States have used the data to evaluate trends in CO poisoning and develop targeted public health outreach. Surveillance data are useful for setting new policies or supporting existing policy such as making CO poisoning a reportable condition at the state level and requiring CO alarms in all schools and housing. Public health needs to remain vigilant to the sources and causes of CO to help reduce this injury and death.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/epidemiologia , Vazamento de Resíduos Químicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Substâncias Perigosas/efeitos adversos , Habitação/normas , Ferimentos e Lesões/induzido quimicamente , Monitoramento Ambiental , Falha de Equipamento , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Habitação/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Vigilância da População , Sistema de Registros , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia
17.
Environ Sci Technol ; 50(8): 4564-71, 2016 Apr 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26953674

RESUMO

Household air pollution (HAP) contributes to 3.5-4 million annual deaths globally. Recent interventions using improved cookstoves (ICS) to reduce HAP have incorporated temperature sensors as stove use monitors (SUMs) to assess stove use. We deployed SUMs in an effectiveness study of 6 ICSs in 45 Kenyan rural homes. Stove were installed sequentially for 2 weeks and kitchen air monitoring was conducted for 48 h during each 2-week period. We placed SUMs on the ICSs and traditional cookstoves (TCS), and the continuous temperature data were analyzed using an algorithm to examine the number of cooking events, days of exclusive use of ICS, and how stove use patterns affect HAP. Stacking, defined as using both a TCS and an ICS in the same day, occurred on 40% of the study days, and exclusive use of the ICS occurred on 25% of study days. When researchers were not present, ICS use declined, which can have implications for long-term stove adoption in these communities. Continued use of TCSs was also associated with higher HAP levels. SUMs are a valuable tool for characterizing stove use and provide additional information to interpret HAP levels measured during ICS intervention studies.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/prevenção & controle , Culinária , Características da Família , Utensílios Domésticos , Monóxido de Carbono/análise , Culinária/instrumentação , Culinária/normas , Estudos Cross-Over , Temperatura Alta , Utensílios Domésticos/instrumentação , Utensílios Domésticos/normas , Humanos , Quênia , Tamanho da Partícula , Material Particulado/análise , População Rural
18.
Am J Emerg Med ; 33(9): 1140-5, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26032660

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unintentional, non-fire related (UNFR) carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning deaths are preventable. Surveillance of the populations most at-risk for unintentional, non-fire related (UNFR) carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is crucial for targeting prevention efforts. OBJECTIVE: This study provides estimates on UNFR CO poisoning mortality in the United States and characterizes the at-risk populations. METHODS: We used 1999 to 2012 data to calculate death rates. We used underlying and multiple conditions variables from death records to identify UNFR CO poisoning cases. RESULTS: For this study, we identified 6136 CO poisoning fatalities during 1999 to 2012 resulting in an average of 438 deaths annually. The annual average age-adjusted death rate was 1.48 deaths per million. Fifty four percent of the deaths occurred in a home. Age-adjusted death rates were highest for males (2.21 deaths per million) and non-Hispanic blacks (1.74 deaths per million). The age-specific death rate was highest for those aged ≥85 years (6.00 deaths per million). The annual rate of UNFR CO poisoning deaths did not change substantially during the study period, but we observed a decrease in the rate of suicide and unintentional fire related cases. CONCLUSION: CO poisoning was the second most common non-medicinal poisonings death. Developing and enhancing current public health interventions could reduce ongoing exposures to CO from common sources, such as those in the residential setting.


Assuntos
Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
19.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol ; 33(4): 663-669, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36878971

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prescribed agricultural burning is a common land management practice, but little is known about the health effects from the resulting smoke exposure. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between smoke from prescribed burning and cardiorespiratory outcomes in the U.S. state of Kansas. METHODS: We analyzed a zip code-level, daily time series of primary cardiorespiratory emergency department (ED) visits for February-May (months when prescribed burning is common in Kansas) in the years 2009-2011 (n = 109,220). Given limited monitoring data, we formulated a measure of smoke exposure using non-traditional datasets, including fire radiative power and locational attributes from remote sensing data sources. We then assigned a population-weighted potential smoke impact factor (PSIF) to each zip code, based on fire intensity, smoke transport, and fire proximity. We used Poisson generalized linear models to estimate the association between PSIF on the same day and in the past 3 days and asthma, respiratory including asthma, and cardiovascular ED visits. RESULTS: During the study period, prescribed burning took place on approximately 8 million acres in Kansas. Same-day PSIF was associated with a 7% increase in the rate of asthma ED visits when adjusting for month, year, zip code, meteorology, day of week, holidays, and correlation within zip codes (rate ratio [RR]: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.13). Same-day PSIF was not associated with a combined outcome of respiratory ED visits (RR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.97, 1.02]), or cardiovascular ED visits (RR [95% CI]: 1.01 [0.98, 1.04]). There was no consistent association between PSIF during the past 3 days and any of the outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest an association between smoke exposure and asthma ED visits on the same day. Elucidating these associations will help guide public health programs that address population-level exposure to smoke from prescribed burning.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Poluição do Ar , Asma , Humanos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Kansas/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Fatores de Tempo , Material Particulado/análise , Poluição do Ar/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA