Endoscopic approaches to gastroparesis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review covers the cause, evaluation and treatment options for gastroparesis. Symptoms of delayed gastric emptying are increasingly seen by gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal surgeons. Endoscopy - both laparoscopic and flexible - is increasingly important in treatment algorithms for this problem. RECENT FINDINGS: Gastroparesis is increasingly being seen in clinical practice. A progressive algorithm needs to be followed in these challenging cases: starting with medical treatment and diet modification, progressing through endoscopic treatments including new ones such as per-oral pyloromyotomy, and finally laparoscopic treatments including gastrectomy. SUMMARY: Endoscopic interventions are effective treatments for certain gastroparesis patients. New procedures offer a minimally invasive alternative to more radical options and should probably be more widely adopted.

A broad assessment of clinical outcomes after laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

OBJECTIVES: There is considerable discussion regarding "success" rates for laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS). We hypothesized that, in part, this was a reflection of the outcome variables used. We, therefore, defined 8 specific variables (within 3 categories) and assessed outcomes for each in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: Four hundred patients (208 women; median age 52 years old) who underwent LARS at the University of Washington from 1993 to 2008 were given a comprehensive questionnaire to assess various aspects of their outcomes from LARS. In addition, we analyzed all functional studies and all endoscopies performed in these patients in our institution, whether the patients had symptoms or not, and compared the findings to all available preoperative values. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 92 (6-175) months. CONCLUSIONS: The success or failure of LARS cannot be defined in a single domain. A comprehensive analysis of outcomes requires categorization that includes symptom response, side-effects, patient's perception and objective measurement of acid exposure, mucosal integrity, and the need for additional medical or surgical treatment. Only then can patients and physicians better understand the role of LARS and make informed decisions.

Assessment of a simple, novel endoluminal method for gastrotomy closure in NOTES.

BACKGROUND: A reliable method for gastrotomy closure in NOTES will be essential for NOTES to become viable clinically. However, methods using existing and widely available endoscopic accessories have been ineffective. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new simple method for gastric closure (retracted clip-assisted loop closure) that uses existing endoscopic accessories with minor modifications. METHODS: The retracted clip-assisted loop closure technique involves deploying 3-4 Resolution(®) clips (modified by attaching a 90-cm length of suture to the end of each clip) along the margin of the gastrotomy with one jaw on the serosal surface and the other jaw on the mucosal surface. The suture strings are threaded through an endoloop. Traction is then applied to the strings causing the gastric wall to tent. The endoloop is secured below the tip of the clips, completing a full-thickness gastrotomy closure. The main outcome measures were feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the new retracted clip-assisted loop closure technique for NOTES gastrotomy closure. RESULTS: An air-tight seal was achieved in 100% (n = 9) of stomachs. The mean leak pressure was 116.3 (±19.4) mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: The retracted clip-assisted loop closure technique can be used to perform NOTES gastrotomy closure by using existing endoscopic accessories with minor modifications.

Complications of laparoscopic fundoplication in the elderly.

Our objective was to assess the complications of laparoscopic fundoplication in 77 patients older than 70 years of age. The indications for surgery were (1) complications of reflux esophagitis (n = 17), (2) large hiatal hernia (n = 10), (3) asthma and bronchitis (n = 7), (4) the need for other surgery (n = 13), and (5) a patient's desire to discontinue medical treatment that was controlling reflux esophagitis (n = 30). Operative time varied from 34 to 250 minutes (mean [standard deviation], 116 +/- 20). Hospital stay varied from 12 hours to 19 days (mean, 1.2). No patient needed conversion to open operation. Intraoperative complications were observed in 4 patients (5.2%): left pneumothorax in 2, major operative bleeding in 1, and minor spleen lesion in 1. The most common postoperative complications were gas-bloating syndrome and dysphagia. Gastric ulcer was diagnosed in two. Other postoperative complications included acute delirium, acute urinary retention, and acute ischemia of the lower extremity. One patient died of congestive heart failure. It is concluded that laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective procedure for treating geriatric patients with reflux esophagitis and may be performed with low morbidity and mortality rates.

High-resolution manometry in evaluation of factors responsible for fundoplication failure.

BACKGROUND: From 10% to 25% of patients undergoing antireflux procedures eventually redevelop symptoms as a result of anatomic failure of the hiatal repair or fundoplication. High-resolution manometry (HRM) allows for reliable evaluation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in detail, including subtle evidence of a hiatus hernia. The aim of this study was to characterize the dynamics and function of the LES postoperatively using HRM to determine which elements may contribute to recurrent symptoms after antireflux surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-three patients with recurrent symptoms and/or abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring after Nissen fundoplication (Unsuccessful group) and 11 asymptomatic post-Nissen patients tested as routine follow-up (Successful group) underwent HRM. Tracings were analyzed for percentage of peristalsis, LES pressure, length of the high-pressure zone (HPZ), LES residual pressure, and the presence of a dual HPZ (indicating a recurrent hiatus hernia). Results were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Mean LES pressure tended to be greater in the Successful group compared with the Unsuccessful group (p = 0.068). There were no differences in length of the HPZ, residual pressures, and peristalsis. A dual HPZ was identified in 13 Unsuccessful group patients (56%), and 1 (9%) of the Successful group patients (p < 0.05). Abnormal DeMeester scores were observed in 79% of patients with a dual HPZ, compared with 35% of patients without a dual HPZ (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a dual HPZ on HRM in patients after fundoplication appears to be a strong predictor of recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease. In patients with recurrent symptoms after antireflux surgery, HRM also provides valuable information about peristalsis and LES characteristics that help guide appropriate management.