Seizure after local anesthesia for nasopharyngeal angiofibroma.

We report a young male patient who experienced seizure after local injection of 3 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 around a recurrent nasal angiofibroma. After receiving 100% oxygen via mask and thiamylal sodium, the patient had no residual neurologic sequelae. Seizure immediately following the injection of local anesthetics in the nasal cavity is probably due to injection into venous or arterial circulation with retrograde flow to the brain circulation. Further imaging study or angiography should be done before head and neck surgeries, especially in such highly vascular neoplasm.

Spinal process landmark as a predicting factor for difficult epidural block: a prospective study in Taiwanese patients.

Although epidural anesthesia is a common practice in neuraxial blockade, difficult access to the epidural space is a frequent problem in operating theaters. We designed this study of epidural blocks to determine if the spinal landmark grading system is valuable in predicting a difficult epidural block. Before the epidural block, we collected the following data: demographics, body habitus (normal, thin, obese, pregnant), spinal anatomy (normal, deformed), spinal level (lumbar, thoracic), and spinal landmark grade (grade 1: spinous processes visible; grade 2: spinous processes not seen but easily palpated; grade 3: spinous processes not seen and not palpated but the interval between them is palpated as a low landmark under the thumb; grade 4: other). We performed all 848 epidural blocks initially using a midline approach and an 18-gauge Touhy needle. We evaluated the technical difficulty of the epidural block using three methods: whether the epidural block was accomplished at the spinal level (first-level success); the total number of attempts at skin puncture (attempts-S); and total number of attempts to change ligament puncture direction (attempts-L) required to complete the epidural block. Of all examined factors, spinal landmark grade correlated best with technical difficulty as measured by all three methods. Deformed spinal anatomy and body habitus both correlated with difficulty, merely from the total numbers of attempts (attempts-S and attempts-L). Thoracic epidurals were more difficult than lumbar epidurals by all three measures of difficulty. We concluded that this spinal landmark grading system is valuable in predicting a difficult epidural block and advocate its use as a predictor by anesthesiologists.

Perioperative airway management in a child with Treacher Collins syndrome.

We report the perioperative airway management in a 12-year-old boy suffering from Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS) and severe mental retardation who was scheduled for elective dental treatment under general anesthesia. TSC is also known as mandibulofacial dysostosis or Franceschetti syndrome, usually with a potentially difficult airway presentation. It is a major challenge for the anesthesiologist to manage an uncooperative child with such a congenital airway anomaly. A difficult airway was encountered during induction of general anesthesia, and both oral intubation by direct laryngoscopy and classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion were unsuccessful. In an expedient critical trial, with the cooperation of two anesthesiologists, one performing nasal fiberoptic intubation and the other maintaining oral mask ventilation, a nasal endotracheal tube was successfully placed at the first attempt, although at the expense of prolonged respiratory depression in the patient. Therefore, fiberoptic nasal intubation simultaneously with mask ventilation for placement of the endotracheal tube is a practical substitute for a difficult airway usually managed by LMA with inadequate ventilation. After extubation, tracheostomy may be indicated if the TCS patient suffers from persistent difficult upper airway in consequence of a traumatic intubation.

Ultrasound examination for the optimal head position for interscalene brachial plexus block.

BACKGROUND: Surface anatomic landmarks have traditionally been used to locate the brachial plexus in the interscalene groove. Head rotation can affect the orientation of neck vessels and may possibly affect the brachial plexus. The optimal degree of head rotation has been specified for better internal jugular vein cannulation but not for interscalene brachial plexus block. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of head rotation on interscalene brachial plexus block. METHODS: We simulated the needle insertion in interscalene approach to brachial plexus with the ultrasound probe to mimic the needle in the manner of actual block in 53 volunteers. Ultrasound-derived measurements were recorded to evaluate the influence of head rotation on the approach including deviation from the imitative needle path to plexus center, depth of brachial plexus and vessel intersection. RESULTS: Medial deviation of the imitative needle path to the center of brachial plexus was found from all angles of head rotation. Increased head rotation angle of 0 degree, 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees and 60 degrees from the midline was associated with increasing medial deviation. The brachial plexus became more superficial if head rotation was over 30 degrees than within the realm of 15 degrees. The likelihood of the stimulated needle path intersecting the internal jugular vein was lower than 5% for head rotation within 30 degrees and would become significantly higher for head rotation over 45 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Whenever we perform interscalene brachial plexus block, the head rotation angle should not exceed 30 degrees. The measured medial deviation of surface landmark should be considered when it is used to approach interscalene brachial plexus.

Clinical experience of pain treatment for postherpetic neuralgia in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a neuropathic pain syndrome that occurs following acute herpes zoster infection. The main clinical problem is intractable pain which interferes with activity of daily life and reduces the quality of life in the elderly patients. This retrospective study was to evaluate the outcome of pain treatment for the elderly patients with PHN at the Pain Clinic of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital. METHODS: Fifty-eight elderly outpatients with PHN were studied from January 2004 to June 2006. The pain intensity before and after treatment were assessed by patients themselves with numeric pain scale (NPS). The pain treatment included (1) medication with anticonvulsants, opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); (2) nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine or 1% lidocaine twice a week at the beginning of the treatment. The therapeutic outcome was expressed by pain relief. The reduction of pain and residual pain intensity were evaluated subjectively by the patients themselves with patients' global impression and NPS, respectively, after treatment for one and three months (or last visit). The adverse events throughout the treatment course were analyzed. RESULTS: (1) The mean age of the patients was 75.1 yr. The number of female PHN sufferers was higher than that of male in all aged groups and the highest incidence was found in the age group of 70-79 (65.5%). The most commonly involved dermatomes were in the thoracic region (82.7%). (2) All patients suffered from severe pain (NPS 8-10) before treatment. (3) The pain management was a combination of medication and nerve block at the beginning of the treatment. Among the medications, gabapentin was prescribed to all the patients and almost all of them (98.3%) required opioids simultaneously and some of them needed additional NSAIDs at the beginning of the treatment. (4) The most common adverse event was somnolence (24.1%). (5) Among the sympathetic blocks, the intercostal nerve block was performed commonly (84.5%). (6) The therapeutic outcome was expressed by pain relief. As to the reduction of pain, 46 cases (79.3%) and 57 cases (98.3%) felt moderate and much improvement after treatment for one and three months (or last visit), respectively. As to residual pain intensity, although none of them got complete pain relief, however, there were 12 cases (20.7%) and 45 cases (77.6%) felt the pain intensity was mild (NPS 1-3) after treatment for one and three months respectively. (7) There was a statistically significant decrease in the pain intensity between before treatment and after treatment for one month and three months. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results showed that the concurrent combination therapy with proper medications and appropriate nerve blocks could offer satisfactory pain relief in the majority of elderly patients with PHN.

Ultrasonographic examination to search out the optimal upper arm position for coracoid approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block--a volunteer study.

BACKGROUND: Infraclavicular brachial plexus block has been widely used for surgical procedures below the mid humerus owing to its excellent anesthetic quality and ease of practice. However, what is the optimal upper arm position for carrying out the procedure still lacks consensus of opinion. The primary goal of this study was to determine the optimal upper arm position for coracoid infraclavicular block by ultrasonographic examination. METHODS: High-frequency (5-10 MHz) ultrasonographic examination on the vertical line 2 cm medial to the coracoid process was performed in 40 volunteers. We assessed the influence of four different upper arm positions on the topographic anatomy of the infraclavicular region. Ultrasonography-derived distances and morphometric measurements were applied to evaluate the optimal puncture site. The deviation of coracoid puncture site from the ultrasonographically modified ideal puncture site in distance was also recorded. RESULTS: When the upper arm was abducted 900, the brachial plexus was much closer to the skin (1.67 cm) and farther from the pleura (1.15 cm) as compared with other positions. In this position, the revealation of anterosuperior plexus relative to artery, identification of all three cords and pleura were 53.8%, 64.1% and 87.2%, respectively. We also found that as the upper arm was drawing from abduction to adduction the ideal puncture site tended to shift more inferiorly. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the most optimal position for carrying out coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block is to abduct the upper arm 90 degrees with external rotation of the shoulder. Though ultrasonographic guidance is suggested for infraclaricular brachial plexus block, an optimal position for puncture site determined by anatomical landmark is also acceptable.

The feasibility of surface landmark for coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block by ultrasonographic assessment.

BACKGROUND: The coracoid infraclavicular block first introduced by Whiffler provides a safer and easily approach than classic infraclavicular block. In this technique, the anatomy-based puncture site is 2 cm medial and 2 cm caudal from the coracoid process. This prospective study was purposed to evaluate the feasibility of surface landmark-based coracoid block by ultrasonography. METHODS: High-frequency ultrasonographic examination was performed in 80 volunteers along the vertical line 2 cm medial to the coracoid process. The C point (C) is defined as landmark-based puncture site. The U point (U) is defined as the ultrasonographically modified optimal puncture site. After identifying the neurovascular bundle, the extent of precision based on landmark was examined and ultrasonographic measurements were also done. Demographic data was applied to correlate with the deviation between C and U. RESULTS: The landmark-based puncture site for coracoid infraclavicular block was found to have a fair precision rate of 74.4%, although not high enough to provide a reliable puncture in daily practice. There was a significant trend toward a more superior puncture site of 2.95 mm (95% CI, 1.2-4.7). In female subjects, U was 5.12 mm (95% CI, 2.91-7.33) superior to C which was statistically significantly (P < 0.001). In male subjects, U was not significantly superior to C. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographic guidance is suggested whenever anatomical precision is inadequate or meeting with great individual bodily variance which renders landmark-based technique difficult. However, if this facility is not available, the gender discrepancy in measurement should be seriously considered when coracoid process is used as the landmark.