Multimodality Cardiac Imaging, Cardiac Symptoms, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Who Recovered from Mild COVID-19.

Background Many patients have persistent cardiac symptoms after mild COVID-19. However, studies assessing the relationship between symptoms and cardiac imaging are limited. Purpose To assess the relationship between multi-modality cardiac imaging parameters, symptoms, and clinical outcomes in patients recovered from mild COVID-19 compared to COVID-19 negative controls. Materials and Methods Patients who underwent PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 between August 2020 and January 2022 were invited to participate in this prospective, single-center study. Participants underwent cardiac MRI, echocardiography, and assessment of cardiac symptoms at 3-6 months after SARS-CoV-2 testing. Cardiac symptoms and outcomes were also evaluated at 12-18 months. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact test and logistic regression. Results This study included 122 participants who recovered from COVID-19 ([COVID+] mean age, 42 years ± 13 [SD]; 73 females) and 22 COVID-19 negative controls (mean age, 46 years ± 16 [SD]; 13 females). At 3-6 months, 20% (24/122) and 44% (54/122) of COVID+ participants had at least one abnormality on echocardiography and cardiac MRI, respectively, which did not differ compared to controls (23% [5/22]; P = .77 and 41% [9/22]; P = .82, respectively). However, COVID+ participants more frequently reported cardiac symptoms at 3-6 months compared to controls (48% [58/122] vs. 23% [4/22]; P = .04). An increase in native T1 (10 ms) was associated with increased odds of cardiac symptoms at 3-6 months (OR, 1.09 [95% CI: 1.00, 1.19]; P = .046) and 12-18 months (OR, 1.14 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.28]; P = .028). No major adverse cardiac events occurred during follow-up. Conclusion Patients recovered from mild COVID-19 reported increased cardiac symptoms 3-6 months after diagnosis compared to controls, but the prevalence of abnormalities on echocardiography and cardiac MRI did not differ between groups. Elevated native T1 was associated with cardiac symptoms 3-6 months and 12-18 months after mild COVID-19.

Alterations in Left Atrial and Ventricular Coupling in Mixed Aortic Valve Disease.

AIMS: To characterize left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) function and atrioventricular (AV) coupling in patients with moderate mixed aortic valve disease (MMAVD) against those with isolated moderate or severe aortic valve disease and controls. METHODS & RESULTS: Retrospective LA and LV peak longitudinal strain (LS) analysis were performed on 260 patients (46 MMAVD, 81 moderate aortic stenosis (AS), 50 severe AS, 48 moderate aortic regurgitation (AR), and 35 severe AR) and 66 controls. Peak LV and LA LS and AV coupling, assessed by combined peak LA and LV strain, was compared between the groups. ANOVA and 2-sided t-tests were used and a p-value of <0.01 was considered significant.LV strain was significantly lower in those with MMAVD compared to controls and those with moderate or severe isolated AR but comparable to those with moderate or severe AS (-17.1±1.1% MMAVD vs. -17.7±1.5% moderate AS p=0.02; vs. -17.0%±1.5% severe AS, p=0.74). AV coupling was significantly lower in those with MMAVD compared to controls and those with moderate AS or AR but comparable to those with severe AS or AR (47.1±6.8% MMAVD vs. 45.1±5.6% severe AS, p=0.13; vs. 50.4±9% severe AR, p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Impairments in AV coupling are comparable for patients with MMAVD and those with severe isolated AS or AR. Impairments in LV GLS in MMAVD mirror those found in severe AS. These findings suggest that haemodynamic consequences and adverse remodelling are similar for patients with MMAVD and isolated severe disease.