RESUMO
The E4 (also called E1--E4) and E2 proteins of human papillomavirus type 16 are thought to be expressed within the same cells of a lesion, and their open reading frames overlap, suggesting that they may have a functional relationship. We have examined the effect of co-expression of these two proteins and found that each enhances the level of the other. We also identified the N-terminus of E2 as the first example of a viral protein that directly binds the HPV16 E1--E4 protein. This appears to result in the E2 becoming less soluble and promotes its relocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. In addition, the turnover of the E2 protein is decreased in the presence of E1--E4. All this raises the possibility that E1--E4 acts to influence E2 activity by varying the amount of available E2 in the cell.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/química , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/metabolismo , Papillomavirus Humano 16/metabolismo , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/química , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/metabolismo , Proteínas Oncogênicas Virais/química , Proteínas Oncogênicas Virais/metabolismo , Proteínas Virais/química , Proteínas Virais/metabolismo , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Sequência de Bases , Linhagem Celular , Primers do DNA/genética , DNA Viral/genética , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/genética , Escherichia coli/genética , Papillomavirus Humano 16/genética , Humanos , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/genética , Proteínas Oncogênicas Virais/genética , Domínios e Motivos de Interação entre Proteínas , Estabilidade Proteica , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/química , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/metabolismo , Transfecção , Proteínas Virais/genéticaRESUMO
Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) can cause cervical cancer. Expression of the viral E1 E4 protein is lost during malignant progression, but in premalignant lesions, E1 E4 is abundant in cells supporting viral DNA amplification. Expression of 16E1 E4 in cell culture causes G2 cell cycle arrest. Here we show that unlike many other G2 arrest mechanisms, 16E1 E4 does not inhibit the kinase activity of the Cdk1/cyclin B1 complex. Instead, 16E1 E4 uses a novel mechanism in which it sequesters Cdk1/cyclin B1 onto the cytokeratin network. This prevents the accumulation of active Cdk1/cyclin B1 complexes in the nucleus and hence prevents mitosis. A mutant 16E1 E4 (T22A, T23A) which does not bind cyclin B1 or alter its intracellular location fails to induce G2 arrest. The significance of these results is highlighted by the observation that in lesions induced by HPV16, there is evidence for Cdk1/cyclin B1 activity on the keratins of 16E1 E4-expressing cells. We hypothesize that E1 E4-induced G2 arrest may play a role in creating an environment optimal for viral DNA replication and that loss of E1 E4 expression may contribute to malignant progression.
Assuntos
Proteína Quinase CDC2/metabolismo , Ciclina B/metabolismo , Fase G2/fisiologia , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/fisiologia , Papillomaviridae/fisiologia , Proteínas Virais/fisiologia , Animais , Células COS , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Núcleo Celular/química , Ciclina B1 , Citoplasma/química , Replicação do DNA , Humanos , Queratinas/metabolismo , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/genética , Papillomaviridae/patogenicidade , Mutação Puntual , Proteínas Virais/genética , Replicação ViralRESUMO
The ryanodine receptor complex (RyR), a large oligomeric assembly that functions as a Ca(2+)-release channel in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR)/endoplasmic reticulum (ER), comprises four RyR subunits and four FK506-binding proteins (FKBP). The precise mode of interaction and modulation of the cardiac RyR (RyR2) channel by FKBP12/FKBP12.6 remains to be fully defined. We have generated a series of Chinese-hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines stably expressing discrete levels of recombinant human RyR2 (hRyR2) (CHO(hRyR2)). Confocal microscopy of CHO(hRyR2) cells co-expressing either FKBP12 or FKBP12.6 demonstrated that FKBP12.6 was sequestered from the cytoplasm to ER membranes as the cellular levels of hRyR2 increased. There was negligible hRyR2-induced subcellular redistribution of FKBP12. The magnitude of Ca(2+) release in CHO(hRyR2) cells in response to stimulation by 4-chloro- m -cresol was in direct proportion to the expression levels of hRyR2. However, in CHO(hRyR2) cells co-expressing FKBP12.6, Ca(2+) release triggered by the addition of 4-chloro- m -cresol was markedly decreased. In contrast, co-expression of FKBP12 did not affect agonist-induced Ca(2+) release in CHO(hRyR2) cells. Resting cytoplasmic [Ca(2+)] in CHO(hRyR2) remained unaltered after co-expression of FKBP12 or FKBP12.6, but estimation of the ER Ca(2+) load status showed that co-expression of FKBP12.6, but not FKBP12, promoted superfilling of the ER Ca(2+) store which could not be released by RyR2 after agonist activation. The effects of FKBP12.6 on hRyR2-mediated intracellular Ca(2+) handling could be antagonized using rapamycin (5 microM). These results suggest that FKBP12.6 associates with hRyR2 in situ to modulate precisely the functionality of hRyR2 Ca(2+)-release channel.