Exploring Post-COVID-19 Functional Outcomes in Residents in Long-Term Care Homes in British Columbia, Canada.

Research on functional outcomes in long-term care (LTC) home residents after COVID-19 infection is limited. In the current study, we examined outcomes in 1,310 LTC residents with a positive COVID-19 test in the period from March 2020 to April 2022 ("COVID" group). We also reviewed outcomes in residents in the same LTC homes without a history of COVID-19 during the same period ("No-COVID" group, n = 2,301). In a retrospective longitudinal design, we explored activities of daily living (ADLs), cognitive function, and clinical care needs over time. Change was assessed from the last assessment before contracting COVID-19 to three assessments subsequent to COVID-19, over on average seven months after infection. We found deterioration over time in ADLs and cognitive performance in both groups. The change in ADLs and clinical care needs was slightly greater in the COVID than the No-COVID group from baseline to the first follow-up assessment; in subsequent assessments, the change was similar in both groups. Overall, we observed similar functional outcomes among surviving residents in the two groups, with initially greater deterioration in ADLs and clinical care needs in residents with a history of COVID-19 followed by a trajectory resembling the one in the No-COVID residents.

The magnitude of the problem of malnutrition in Europe.

A review of the publications on hospital malnutrition in Europe over the last 5 years shows that the incidence and prevalence of malnutrition are still very high: 21 and 37%, respectively. The process of structured nutrition support is still far from being generally implemented, as based on the few studies available. As a result, malnutrition diagnosed on admission to hospital is still associated with adverse clinical outcome (increased length of stay and higher rates of complications).

Validation of reaction time as a measure of cognitive function and quality of life in healthy subjects and patients.

OBJECTIVE: Malnutrition is a common problem in hospitalized patients and is related to decreased cognitive function and impaired quality of life (QoL). We investigated the validity of reaction time as a simple bedside tool for measuring cognitive function in healthy subjects and patients, and additionally the relationships with QoL and malnutrition in patients. METHODS: Healthy subjects (N = 130) were assessed for simple and complex reaction time and cognitive function (Addenbrooke cognitive examination, ACE). Patients (N = 70) were assessed for simple and complex reaction time, cognitive function (ACE), and QoL (short-form health survey) (N = 40). RESULTS: Reaction time was related to cognitive function in both healthy subjects and patients. Reaction time was inversely related to the physical component summary of QoL in patients (r = -0.42, P < 0.001). Five of eight QoL scales and the mental component summary of QoL were significantly lower in malnourished patients. Reaction time and ACE were impaired in patients compared to healthy subjects, but not further impaired in malnourished patients. CONCLUSION: Simple reaction time test is related to cognitive function in healthy subjects and patients and to QoL in patients. Complex reaction time test is related to more components of cognitive function. Thus, simple and complex reaction time tests could serve as bedside measurements reflecting, respectively, QoL or cognitive function.