A comparison of two tools to screen potentially inappropriate medication in internal medicine patients.

WHAT IS KNOWN: Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) is an important issue for inpatient management; it has been associated with safety problems, such as increases in adverse drugs events, and with longer hospital stays and higher healthcare costs. OBJECTIVE: To compare two PIM-screening tools-STOPP/START and PIM-Check-applied to internal medicine patients. A second objective was to compare the use of PIMs in readmitted and non-readmitted patients. METHOD: A retrospective observational study, in the general internal medicine ward of a Swiss non-university hospital. We analysed a random sample of 50 patients, hospitalized in 2013, whose readmission within 30 days of discharge had been potentially preventable, and compared them to a sample of 50 sex- and age-matched patients who were not readmitted. PIMs were screened using the STOPP/START tool, developed for geriatric patients, and the PIM-Check tool, developed for internal medicine patients. The time needed to perform each patient's analysis was measured. A clinical pharmacist counted and evaluated each PIM detected, based on its clinical relevance to the individual patient's case. The rates of screened and validated PIMs involving readmitted and non-readmitted patients were compared. RESULTS: Across the whole population, PIM-Check and STOPP/START detected 1348 and 537 PIMs, respectively, representing 13.5 and 5.4 PIMs/patient. Screening time was substantially shorter with PIM-Check than with STOPP/START (4 vs 10 minutes, respectively). The clinical pharmacist judged that 45% and 42% of the PIMs detected using PIM-Check and STOPP/START, respectively, were clinically relevant to individual patients' cases. No significant differences in the rates of detected and clinically relevant PIM were found between readmitted and non-readmitted patients. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Internal medicine patients are frequently prescribed PIMs. PIM-Check's PIM detection rate was three times higher than STOPP/START's, and its screening time was shorter thanks to its electronic interface. Nearly half of the PIMs detected were judged to be non-clinically relevant, however, potentially overalerting the prescriber. These tools can, nevertheless, be considered useful in daily practice. Furthermore, the relevance of any PIM detected by these tools should always be carefully evaluated within the clinical context surrounding the individual patient.

Wound Discharge After Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis in Lower Limb Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The benefits vs risk of pharmacological prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease in orthopedic patients remain controversial. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis regimes are commonly used in this patient group. Few studies specifically examine wound complications attributable to this therapy. In this prospective trial, we investigated the effect of various regimens on postoperative wounds. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter study involving patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty was undertaken. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on thromboprophylaxis: no anticoagulation, aspirin, or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (enoxaparin). Surgical wounds were evaluated for each regime using the Southampton Wound Assessment Score. RESULTS: Over a 12-month period, 327 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 68.1 years (±11.2 years). There were 105 patients in the no anticoagulation group (32.1%), 97 patients in the aspirin group (29.7%), and 125 patients in the LMWH group (38.2%). Wound scores were evaluated for evidence and amount of discharge. The use of LMWH conferred a 4.92 times greater risk and aspirin a 3.64 times greater risk of wound discharge than no pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (P < .0001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus between groups either as an inpatient or postdischarge. CONCLUSION: There is a significant increase in the risk of wound discharge when aspirin or LMWH is used in arthroplasty patients. As potential complications of wound problems are significant, a more balanced view of risk vs benefit needs to be taken when prescribing thromboprophylaxis for this patient group.

A Pilot Study to Detect Agitation in People Living with Dementia Using Multi-Modal Sensors.

People living with dementia (PLwD) often exhibit behavioral and psychological symptoms, such as episodes of agitation and aggression. Agitated behavior in PLwD causes distress and increases the risk of injury to both patients and caregivers. In this paper, we present the use of a multi-modal wearable device that captures motion and physiological indicators to detect agitation in PLwD. We identify features extracted from sensor signals that are the most relevant for agitation detection. We hypothesize that combining multi-modal sensor data will be more effective to identify agitation in PLwD in comparison to a single sensor. The results of this unique pilot study are based on 17 participants' data collected during 600 days from PLwD admitted to a Specialized Dementia Unit. Our findings show the importance of using multi-modal sensor data and highlight the most significant features for agitation detection.

[Exercise tests in pneumopathy patients]. / Pruebas de esfuerzo en pacientes neumopatas.

In this prospective work eleven pneumopathes patients were studied, ten of them with HAP, which were subjected to effort prove in endless band, in order to know the electrocardiographic alterations presented during the exercise. The VO2 máx was determined simultaneously in four patients. In the four, the value of this parameter was found under the normal value, which showed us a poor increase of the cardiac expense for the demands in the exercise. If the effort proves had not been practiced, this fact could not have been known. Related to the electrocardiographic alterations, cellular diastolic depolarization signs (cellular damage), product of the cellular damage, were found. The mechanics of this cellular damage, as well as the one of the poor increase of cardiac expense, are mentionned in the discussion.