Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Cancer ; 119(8): 1562-9, 2013 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23483536

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with decreased risk of gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer. However, the impact of NSAIDs on the risk of melanoma has been inconsistent. The authors evaluated the association between NSAID use and cutaneous melanoma risk in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Observational Study (OS). METHODS: At study entry, use of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) and nonaspirin NSAIDs was assessed among 59,806 postmenopausal Caucasian women ages 50 to 79 years. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed after adjusting for participant skin type, sun exposure history, and medical indications for NSAID use among other confounders. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 12 years, 548 incident melanomas were confirmed by medical review. Women who used ASA had a 21% lower risk of melanoma (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.98) relative to nonusers. Increased duration of ASA use (<1 year, 1-4 years, and ≥ 5 years) was associated with an 11% lower risk of melanoma for each categorical increase (Ptrend = .01), and women with ≥ 5 years of use had a 30% lower melanoma risk (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.94). In contrast, use of non-ASA NSAIDs and acetaminophen were not associated with melanoma risk. CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women who used ASA had a significantly lower risk of melanoma, and longer duration of ASA use was associated with greater protection. Although this study was limited by the observational design and self-report of NSAID use, the findings suggest that ASA may have a chemopreventive effect against the development of melanoma and warrant further clinical investigation.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Melanoma/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Melanoma/etnologia , Melanoma/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pós-Menopausa , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etnologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 103(19): 1469-75, 2011 Oct 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21878677

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Case-control studies have reported that exogenous estrogen use is associated with increased risk of skin cancer. The effects of menopausal hormone therapy on incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were evaluated in post hoc analyses of the Women's Health Initiative randomized placebo-controlled hormone therapy trials of combined estrogen plus progestin (E + P) and estrogen only (E-alone). METHODS: Postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years were randomly assigned to conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg/d) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg/d) or placebo in the E + P trial if they had an intact uterus (N = 16,608) or to conjugated equine estrogen alone or placebo in the E-alone trial if they had a hysterectomy (N = 10,739); the mean follow-up was 5.6 and 7.1 years, respectively. Incident nonmelanoma skin cancers (n = 980 [E + P trial]; n = 820 [E-alone trial]) and melanomas (n = 57 [E + P trial]; n =38 [E-alone trial]) were ascertained by self-report. Incident cases of cutaneous malignant melanoma were confirmed by physician review of medical records. Incidences of nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were compared between the two randomization groups within each trial using hazard ratios (HRs), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and Wald statistic P values from Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Rates of incident nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were similar between the active hormone (combined analysis of E + P and E-alone) and placebo groups (nonmelanoma skin cancer: HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.07; melanoma: HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.37). Results were similar for the E + P and E-alone trials when analyzed individually. CONCLUSIONS: Menopausal hormone therapy did not affect overall incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer or melanoma. These findings do not support a role of menopausal estrogen, with or without progestin, in the development of skin cancer in postmenopausal women.


Assuntos
Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Estrogênios Conjugados (USP)/efeitos adversos , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/efeitos adversos , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Menopausa , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/métodos , Estrogênios Conjugados (USP)/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/administração & dosagem , Melanoma/induzido quimicamente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/induzido quimicamente , Saúde da Mulher
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA