Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Allergy (Cairo) ; 2016: 9040319, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26997960

RESUMO

Physicians underrecognize and undertreat anaphylaxis. Effective interventions are needed to improve physician knowledge and competency regarding evidence-based anaphylaxis diagnosis and management (ADAM). We designed and evaluated an educational program to improve ADAM in pediatrics, internal medicine, and emergency medicine residents from two academic medical centers. Anonymous questionnaires queried participants' demographics, prior ADAM clinical experience, competency, and comfort. A pretest assessing baseline knowledge preceded a 45-minute allergist-led evidence-based presentation, including practice with epinephrine autoinjectors, immediately followed by a posttest. A follow-up test assessed long-term knowledge retention twelve weeks later. 159 residents participated in the pretest, 152 participated in the posttest, and 86 participated in the follow-up test. There were no significant differences by specialty or site. With a possible score of 10, the mean pretest score (7.31 ± 1.50) was lower than the posttest score (8.79 ± 1.29) and follow-up score (8.17 ± 1.72) (P < 0.001 for both). Although participants' perceived confidence in diagnosing or managing anaphylaxis improved from baseline to follow-up (P < 0.001 for both), participants' self-reported clinical experience with ADAM or autoinjector use was unchanged. Allergist-led face-to-face educational intervention improves residents' short-term knowledge and perceived confidence in ADAM. Limited clinical experience or reinforcement contributes to the observed decreased knowledge.

2.
Cardiol Rev ; 16(6): 280-7, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18923231

RESUMO

Chronic heart failure (CHF) remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, despite the use of optimal standard-of-care medical therapies. Although the role of the immune system in the pathogenesis and progression of CHF has been well-appreciated, attempts to modify specific systemic immune mediators have been unsuccessful. Building on the modest successes of more broad-spectrum immune therapies, Celacade therapy was developed, a device that induces apoptosis in an ex vivo blood sample. Upon reinjection into the body, the treated blood sample has been shown to have an anti-inflammatory effect. Celacade has been successful in several animal models of disease where inflammation plays an important pathogenic role. Two phase III clinical trials of Celacade have been undertaken. A trial on the use of Celacade in peripheral arterial disease with intermittent claudication was terminated early due to a lack of clinical effect, and a larger trial of Celacade treatment in CHF (ACCLAIM) was completed in 2006. ACCLAIM did not reach the primary end point for the overall study population; however, the study results demonstrated a reduced risk of death or first cardiovascular hospitalization by 39% in patients with New York Heart Association class II CHF and a 26% reduction in patients with class II, III, and IV disease who had no prior history of myocardial infarction. Celacade has been approved for treatment of CHF in these groups of patients in the European Union, and an FDA-mandated confirmatory study of Celacade for possible approval in the United States is in progress.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/farmacologia , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Doença Crônica , Insuficiência Cardíaca/imunologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/patologia , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/farmacologia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA