Tumescent local anaesthesia for early dermatosurgery in infants.

BACKGROUND: Early paediatric dermatosurgery reveals excellent cosmetic results due to high skin elasticity and pronounced capacity to recover from trauma. Furthermore, the size of skin lesions increases during life proportionally to skin growth and therefore early removal is of major importance. Selected local anaesthetics like prilocaine can cause methaemoglobinemia. However, in contrast to general anaesthesia, many other local anaesthetics do not bare any major risks for infants. OBJECTIVE: In this retrospective study, we analysed infants aged less than 7 months receiving tumescent local anaesthesia (TLA) followed by dermatosurgery at our department between 2005 and 2015. The analysis is mainly based on our records. Additional information for a subset of patients was gained by a postoperative survey. METHODS: Ninety-two infants (39 male, 53 female) with a median age of 4.2 months (range: 1.5 months; 6.7 months) were included in this study. Additional postoperative information was available for 33 of the 92 studied patients (35%). RESULTS: Infants were mainly operated for removal of a melanocytic naevus (n = 54), followed by haemangioma (n = 23), naevus sebaceous (n = 6) and other lesions (n = 9). The lesions were located on the scalp or neck (n = 31), on the extremities (n = 31), on the trunk (n = 21), in the face (n = 6) or on the buttocks (n = 3). The median size of excision was 509 mm2 (range: 16 mm2 ; 3600 mm2 ). Primary defect closure was performed by intracutaneous (n = 68) or extracutaneous (n = 24) suture techniques. No side-effects of local anaesthesia were observed in any patient. Postoperative complications include pain (1/33; 3%), wound-healing disorder (1/33; 3%) and visible severe scarring (2/33; 6%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TLA and dermatosurgery in infants is a suitable outpatient treatment option for small lesions without any major risks or side-effects and the benefit of prolonged postoperative analgesia.

Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in patients with intensively pretreated or refractory germ cell cancer: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: Long-term survival is rarely achieved in patients with cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer (GCT). Both single-agent gemcitabine and oxaliplatin have shown activity in patients who experience relapse or are refractory to cisplatin treatment. This study investigates the activity of a gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin regimen in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8; oxaliplatin was administered at a dose of 130 mg/m(2) on day 1. Response was evaluated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with a median age of 37 years (range, 21 to 54 years) were enrolled onto the study. Primary tumor localization was gonadal, retroperitoneal, or mediastinal in 30, one, and four patients, respectively. Patients had been pretreated with a median of six platinum-containing cycles (range, four to 13 cycles) and 89% of patients previously had experienced treatment failure after high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation. Sixty-three percent of patients were considered absolutely cisplatin-refractory or cisplatin-refractory. A median of two cycles (range, 1 to 6 cycles) per patient were applied. Toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression, with Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 occurring in 54% of patients. Only 9% of patients developed neutropenic fever. Three patients attained a complete remission (CR), two patients attained a marker-negative partial remission, and 11 patients attained a marker-positive partial remission, resulting in an overall response rate of 46% (95% CI, 30% to 64%). All three patients with CR and one patient with a marker-negative partial remission remained disease free at 16+, 12+, 4+, and 2+ months of follow-up. Seven (44%) of these 16 responses, including one CR, occurred in cisplatin-refractory patients. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin demonstrates antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory GCT, and may offer a chance of long-term survival for selected patients.

Activity of oxaliplatin in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin, a diaminocyclohaxane platinum derivative with incomplete cross-resistance to cisplatin in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with nonseminomatous cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer or relapsed disease after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) plus autologous stem-cell support were treated with single-agent oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 repeated every 4 weeks (group 1; n = 16) or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) given on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle (group 2; n = 16). Patients were pretreated with a median of seven (range, three to 13) cisplatin-containing treatment cycles; 78% had received carboplatin/etoposide-based HDCT before oxaliplatin therapy. Twenty-seven patients (84%) were considered refractory (n = 20; 63%) or absolutely refractory (n = 7; 22%) to cisplatin therapy. RESULTS: Overall, four patients achieved a partial remission (13%; 95% confidence interval, 1% to 24%). Two additional patients achieved disease stabilization. All responses were observed in cisplatin-refractory patients, including three who had not responded to previous HDCT. Patients received a median two cycles of oxaliplatin with a median cumulative dose of 350 mg/m(2). Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, with five patients developing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic side effects consisted mainly of nausea/vomiting. One patient developed grade 3 neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Considering the particularly unfavorable prognostic characteristics of this patient population compared with patients from previous trials for new drugs in germ cell cancer, eg, paclitaxel and gemcitabine, a 13% overall response rate and a 19% response rate in the group treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) seems to be of interest. Oxaliplatin may be a palliative treatment option for this patient population, and evaluation in combination regimens is warranted.

Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel plus 24-h continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and 3-weekly cisplatin for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with weekly 24-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid, weekly paclitaxel and 3-weekly cisplatin in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. Between November 1999 and November 2001, 29 chemotherapy-naive patients (13 male and 16 female) with a median age of 56 years (range 22-72) were consecutively enrolled at three centers. 5-FU 2 g/m2 was given weekly over 24 h i.v. preceded by folinic acid 500 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 was administered as a 1-h infusion weekly and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 as 1-h infusion on days 8 and 29. Six weeks of therapy (days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36) followed by 1 week of rest was considered one cycle. A median of 3 cycles (range 1-5) was administered to 29 patients with a total of 73 cycles applied. All patients were assessable for toxicity and survival, 28 patients were assessable for response (one patient received less than one complete cycle and could not be evaluated for response). Four patients (14%) obtained a complete response and 10 patients (34%) a partial response (overall response rate 48%, 95% CI 29-68%). Seven patients (24%) had stable disease. Seven patients (24%) had progressive disease during or within 4 weeks after treatment. The median progression-free and overall survival times were 8 months (range 1-23) and 11 months (range 1-23), respectively. Overall toxicity was acceptable. Hematological toxicity was favorable with only one patient (3%) experiencing WHO grade 3/4 leukocytopenia and one patient (3%) WHO grade 3/4 anemia. Non-hematologic WHO grade 3/4 toxicities included alopecia in 19 (66%), nausea/vomiting in six (21%), diarrhea in six (21%), neurotoxicity grade 3 in three (10%) and infection in three (10%) patients. A total of 42 applications (10%) (range 0-5) had to be postponed and dose reductions of at least one drug was necessary in 37% of applications. In three patients (10%) treatment was stopped because of toxicity. All patients were treated on an outpatient basis. Thus, the combination of weekly paclitaxel, cisplatin and continuously infused 5-FU/folinic acid appears to be a highly active regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Compared with our previous experience with the same combination of drugs but using paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks, the protocol with weekly application of paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 shows a reduced incidence of hematologic toxicity, particularly leukopenia. Other organ toxicities apart from a slightly higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy were comparable between the two treatment protocols. Efficacy with a response rate of 50% was well preserved by this weekly regimen.

Irinotecan in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer: a phase II study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

Despite generally high cure rates in patients with metastatic germ cell cancer, patients with progressive disease on first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy or with relapsed disease following high-dose salvage therapy exhibit a very poor prognosis. Irinotecan has shown antitumour activity in human testicular tumour xenografts in nude mice. We have performed a phase II study examining the single agent activity of irinotecan in patients with metastatic relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer. Refractory disease was defined as progression or relapse within 4 weeks after cisplatin-based chemotherapy or relapse after salvage high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support. Irinotecan was administered at a dose of 300 (-350) mg m(-2) every 3 weeks. Response was evaluated every 4 weeks. Fifteen patients have been enrolled. Median age was 35 (19-53) years. Primary tumour localisation was gonadal/mediastinal in 12/3 patients. Patients had been pretreated with a median of six (4-12) cisplatin-containing cycles and 13 out of 15 patients had previously failed high-dose chemotherapy with blood stem cell support. Median number of irinotecan applications was two (1-3). Fourteen patients are assessable for response and all for toxicity. In one patient, no adequate response evaluation was performed. Toxicity was generally acceptable and consisted mainly of haematological side effects with common toxicity criteria 3 degrees anaemia (two patients), common toxicity criteria 3 degrees leukocytopenia (one patient) and common toxicity criteria 3 degrees thrombocytopenia (three patients). Common toxicity criteria 3/4 degrees non-haematological toxicity occurred in five patients (33%): 1 x diarrhoea, 2 x alopecia, 1 x fever and in one patient worsening of pre-existing peripheral polyneuropathy from 1 degrees to 4 degrees. No response was observed to irinotecan therapy. Currently, 13 patients have died of the disease and two patients are alive with the disease. The patients included in our study exhibit similar prognostic characteristics as patients treated in previous trials evaluating new drugs in this setting. Irinotecan at a dose of 300-350 mg m(-2) every 3 weeks appears to have no antitumour activity in patients with cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer and, thus, further investigation in this disease is not justified.