RESUMO
In recent years, intrathecal baclofen (ITB) has attained an important role in the treatment of severe spasticity and dystonia in children. There are principal differences between the use of ITB in children and its use in neurology and oncology in adults. Here, we present a consensus report on best practice for the treatment of severe spastic and dystonic movement disorders with ITB. Using a problem-orientated approach to integrate theories and methods, the consensus was developed by an interdisciplinary group of experienced ITB users and experts in the field of movement disorders involving 14 German centers. On the basis of the data pooled from more than 400 patients, the authors have summarized their experience and supporting evidence in tabular form to provide a concise, but still a comprehensive information base that represents our current understanding regarding ITB treatment options in children and adolescents.
Assuntos
Baclofeno/uso terapêutico , Distúrbios Distônicos/tratamento farmacológico , Relaxantes Musculares Centrais/uso terapêutico , Espasticidade Muscular/tratamento farmacológico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adolescente , Criança , Consenso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Espinhais , MasculinoRESUMO
PURPOSE: BECTS (benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes) is associated with characteristic EEG findings. This study examines the influence of anti-convulsive treatment on the EEG. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial including 43 children with BECTS, EEGs were performed prior to treatment with either Sulthiame or Levetiracetam as well as three times under treatment. Using the spike-wave-index, the degree of EEG pathology was quantified. The EEG before and after initiation of treatment was analyzed. Both treatment arms were compared and the EEG of the children that were to develop recurrent seizures was compared with those that were successfully treated. RESULTS: Regardless of the treatment agent, the spike-wave-index was reduced significantly under treatment. There were no differences between the two treatment groups. In an additional analysis, the EEG characteristics of the children with recurrent seizures differed statistically significant from those that did not have any further seizures. CONCLUSION: Both Sulthiame and Levetiracetam influence the EEG of children with BECTS. Persistent EEG pathologies are associated with treatment failures.