RESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Large-scale quality and performance measurement across unaffiliated hospitals is an important strategy to drive practice change. The Michigan Emergency Department Improvement Collaborative (MEDIC), established in 2015, has baseline performance data to identify practice variation across 15 diverse emergency departments (EDs) on key emergency care quality indicators. METHODS: MEDIC is a unique physician-led partnership supported by a major third-party payer. Member sites contribute electronic health record data and trained abstractors add supplementary data for eligible cases. Quality measures include computed tomography (CT) appropriateness for minor head injury, using the Canadian CT Head Rule for adults and Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Network rules for children; chest radiograph use for children with asthma, bronchiolitis, and croup; and diagnostic yield of CTs for suspected pulmonary embolism. Baseline performance was established with statistical process control charts. RESULTS: From June 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017, the MEDIC registry contained 1,124,227 ED visits, 23.2% for children (<18 years). Overall baseline performance included the following: 40.9% of adult patients with minor head injury (N=11,857) had appropriate CTs (site range 24.3% to 58.6%), 10.3% of pediatric minor head injury cases (N=11,183) exhibited CT overuse (range 5.8% to 16.8%), 38.1% of pediatric patients with a respiratory condition (N=18,190) received a chest radiograph (range 9.0% to 62.1%), and 8.7% of pulmonary embolism CT results (N=16,205) were positive (range 7.5% to 14.3%). CONCLUSION: Performance varied greatly, with demonstrated opportunity for improvement. MEDIC provides a robust platform for emergency physician engagement across ED practice settings to improve care and is a model for other states.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/diagnóstico por imagem , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Radiografia Torácica/normas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Medicina de Emergência/normas , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia Torácica/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Doenças Respiratórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes, costs, and clinician and parent satisfaction after implementation of a protocol to discharge patients from the emergency department (ED) after successful reduction of uncomplicated ileocolic intussusception. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In March 2017, an intussusception management protocol was implemented for children presenting with ultrasound findings of ileocolic intussusception. Those meeting inclusion criteria were observed after successful radiological reduction in the ED and discharged after 6 h with resolution of symptoms. Retrospective chart review was completed for cases before and after protocol implementation for clinical outcomes and costs. Clinicians and parents were surveyed to assess overall satisfaction. RESULTS: Charts were reviewed before (42 encounters, 37 patients) and after (30 encounters, 23 patients) protocol implementation. After implementation, admission rates decreased from 95% (40/42) to 23% (7/30; P < 0.001) and antibiotic use was eliminated (91% to 0%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in recurrence rates (17% versus 23%, P = 0.44). Median total length of stay decreased from 18.87 to 9.52 h (P < 0.001), whereas median ED length of stay increased from 4.37 to 9.87 h (P < 0.001). In addition, there was an overall hospital cost saving of over $2000 ($9595 ± 3424 to $7465 ± 3723; P = 0.009) per encounter. Clinicians and parents were overall satisfied with the protocol and parents showed no changes in patient satisfaction with protocol implementation. CONCLUSIONS: An intussusception protocol can facilitate early discharge from the ED and improve patient care without increased risk of recurrence. Additional benefits include decreased hospital- and patient-related costs, elimination of antibiotic use, and parent as well as clinician satisfaction.
Assuntos
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Doenças do Íleo/terapia , Intussuscepção/terapia , Satisfação Pessoal , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Enema , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Doenças do Íleo/economia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Intussuscepção/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Alta do Paciente/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prevenção Secundária/economia , Prevenção Secundária/organização & administração , Prevenção Secundária/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine retrospectively the clinical effectiveness of an unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol for evaluation of equivocal appendicitis in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Pediatric patients (≤18 years old) underwent unenhanced MR imaging and contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the appendix between December 2013 and November 2014 and December 2012 and November 2013, respectively, within 24 hours after an abdominal ultrasonographic examination with results equivocal for appendicitis. Pertinent MR imaging and CT reports were reviewed for visibility of the appendix, presence of appendicitis and appendiceal perforation, and establishment of an alternative diagnosis. Surgical reports, pathologic reports, and 30-day follow-up medical records were used as reference standards. Diagnostic performance with MR imaging and CT was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for diagnosis of appendicitis and appendiceal perforation. The Fisher exact test was used to compare proportions; the Student t test was used to compare means. RESULTS: Diagnostic performance with MR imaging was comparable to that with CT for equivocal pediatric appendicitis. For MR imaging (n = 103), sensitivity was 94.4% (95% CI: 72.7%, 99.9%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI: 95.8%, 100%); for CT [n = 58], sensitivity was 100% (95% CI: 71.5%, 100%), specificity was 97.9% (95% CI: 88.7%, 100%). Diagnostic performance with MR imaging and CT also was comparable for detection of appendiceal perforation, with MR imaging (n = 103) sensitivity of 90.0% (95% CI: 55.5%, 99.8%) and specificity of 85.7% (95% CI: 42.1%, 99.6%) and CT (n = 58) sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI: 19.4%, 99.4%) and specificity of 85.7% (95% CI: 42.1%, 99.6%). The proportion of examinations with identifiable alternative diagnoses was similar at MR imaging to that at CT (19 of 103 [18.4%] vs eight of 58 [13.8%], respectively; P = .52). The proportion of appendixes seen at MR imaging and at CT also was similar (77 of 103 [74.8%] vs 50 of 58 [86.2%], respectively; P = .11). CONCLUSION: Unenhanced MR imaging is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of equivocal appendicitis in nonsedated pediatric patients.
Assuntos
Apendicite/diagnóstico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pediatric somatic symptom and related disorders (SSRDs) are common with high health care costs and use because of lack of standardized, evidence-based practice. Our hospital implemented a clinical pathway (CP) for SSRD evaluation and management. Our study objective was to evaluate health care cost and use associated with the organization's SSRD CP in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient settings hypothesizing lower cost and use in the CP group relative to controls. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of costs and use before and after implementation of the SSRD CP. Data were collected from the hospital's electronic health record and the Pediatric Health Information System database. Participants included pediatric patients on the CP ("P" group) and control groups with an SSRD diagnosis and mental health consultation either the year before the CP ("C" group) or during the CP study period ("T" group). Primary outcomes included costs, length of stay, diagnostic testing, imaging, subspecialty consultation, and readmission rates. RESULTS: The ED P group had more lower-cost imaging, whereas the inpatient T group greater higher-cost imaging than other groups. The inpatient P group had significantly shorter length of stay, fewer subspecialty consults, and lower costs. There were no significant group differences in readmission rates. The CP reduced median total costs per patient encounter by $51 433 for the inpatient group and $6075 for the ED group. CONCLUSIONS: The CP group showed significant reductions in health care cost and use after implementation of a CP for SSRD care. In future work, researchers should explore patient and practitioner experience with the SSRD CP and long-term outcomes.
Assuntos
Sintomas Inexplicáveis , Criança , Procedimentos Clínicos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic category of somatic symptom and related disorders (SSRDs), although common, is often poorly recognized and suboptimally managed in inpatient pediatric care. Little literature exists to address SSRDs in the inpatient pediatric setting. The purpose of the study was to characterize current SSRD practice, identify problem areas in workflow, and develop a standardized approach to inpatient evaluation and management at a tertiary care academic children's hospital. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group identified patients with SSRD admitted between May 2012 and October 2014. A retrospective chart review on a convenience sample was performed to identify population characteristics and current practice. Lean methodology was used to define current state practice and future state intervention. These methods were used to guide identification of problem areas, which informed protocol, a clinical practice guideline, and resource development. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients aged 8 to 17 years met inclusion criteria for chart review. Most patients presented with either neurologic or pain-related complaints. The mean length of stay was 5.44 days (SD = 6.3), with few patients receiving a mental health consultation within 24 hours of hospitalization. Patients averaged 5.8 medical and/or psychiatric diagnoses on discharge (SD = 5.2), and two-thirds did not have an SSRD diagnosis. Half of patients had comorbid psychiatric diagnoses, whereas one-quarter were discharged with no mental health follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we describe the process and content development of a single-site institutional protocol, clinical practice guideline, and resources for the evaluation and management of pediatric SSRDs. This study may serve as a model for similar standardization of SSRD care in other inpatient pediatric medical settings.
Assuntos
Sintomas Inexplicáveis , Transtornos Mentais , Dor/diagnóstico , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adolescente , Criança , Protocolos Clínicos , Hospitalização , Hospitais , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
Despite 90% of primary care providers at altitude reporting experience with home oxygen therapy for hypoxemic, otherwise well infants, its use at sea level is not well described. Our objective was to understand experience with home oxygen at sea level and determine potential barriers and benefits of its use. We surveyed all pediatricians and family medicine providers within a 30-mile radius of our pediatric hospital from May 2016 to December 2016. Forty-three percent of providers responded. Few (8%) had any experience with home oxygen therapy for bronchiolitis. When all responders were asked about potential benefits and barriers, they reported less disruption of family routines and reduced cost as the largest potential benefits, and lack of parental comfort the largest barrier. Despite their concerns, 53% of providers felt that home oxygen use would not substantially affect their practice. Our results identify a need for education before using this alternative to admission in our center.
Assuntos
Altitude , Bronquiolite/terapia , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Oxigenoterapia/métodos , Médicos de Atenção Primária/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Michigan , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We describe children's postconcussive symptoms (PCSs), neurocognitive function, and recovery during 4 to 5 weeks after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) and compare performance and recovery with those of injured control group participants without MTBIs. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal, observational study was performed with a convenience sample from a tertiary care, pediatric emergency department. Participants were children 10 to 17 years of age who were treated in the emergency department and discharged. The MTBI group included patients with blunt head trauma, Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13 to 15, loss of consciousness for < or = 30 minutes, posttraumatic amnesia of < or = 24 hours, altered mental status, or focal neurologic deficits, and no intracranial abnormalities. The control group included patients with injuries excluding the head. The Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire and domain-specific neurocognitive tests were completed at baseline and at 1 and 4 to 5 weeks after injury. RESULTS: Twenty-eight MTBI group participants and 45 control group participants were compared. There were no significant differences in demographic features. Control group participants reported some PCSs; however, MTBI group participants reported significantly more PCSs at all times. Among MTBI group participants, PCSs persisted for 5 weeks after injury, decreasing significantly between 1 and 4 to 5 weeks. Patterns of recovery on the Trail-Making Test Part B differed significantly between groups; performance on other neurocognitive measures did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: In children 10 to 17 years of age, self-reported PCSs were not exclusive to patients with MTBIs. However, PCSs and recovery patterns for the Trail-Making Test Part B differed significantly between the groups.