Estrogen replacement therapy and non-hormonal medication use among patients with uterine cancer.

OBJECTIVE: As the prognosis for endometrial cancer is excellent, management of the effects of estrogen deprivation has an important influence on quality of life. We examined the trends in the use of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and non-hormonal medications among patients with uterine cancer following surgery. METHODS: The MarketScan Database was used to identify patients 18-49 years who underwent hysterectomy plus oophorectomy and those aged 50-75 years who underwent hysterectomy between 2008 and 2020. ERT and non-hormonal treatments of menopause were identified preoperatively and postoperatively. After propensity score balancing, difference-in-differences (DID) analyses were performed to compare the pre-and-postoperative changes in ERT and non-hormonal medication use between groups. The trends in postoperative use of ERT were assessed and tested using Cochran-Armitage trend tests. RESULTS: A total of 19,700 patients with uterine cancer and 185,150 controls were identified. Overall, postoperative ERT use decreased for both age groups and for patients with and without uterine cancer. The DID in ERT use between those with uterine cancer and those with benign pathology after hysterectomy was -37.1% (95% CI, -40.5 to -33.6%) for patients 18-49 years of age and - 10.4% (95% CI, -10.9 to -9.9%) for those 50-75 years. The DID for non-hormonal medication use between those with uterine cancer and those with benign pathology after hysterectomy was 11.2% (95% CI, 7.8 to 14.7%) for younger patients and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.9 to 4.0%) for those 50-75 years. The postoperative new ERT use has been declining over time in patients with uterine cancer in those 18-49 years of age (P = .02) and those 50-75 years of age (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ERT is uncommon and has declined over time in patients with uterine cancer. Conversely, non-hormonal medications are more commonly used among patients with uterine cancer.

Cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for recurrent mismatch repair-proficient endometrial cancer after platinum-based therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The recent Study 309-KEYNOTE-775 showed improved survival for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab compared to chemotherapy in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer. We created a decision model to compare the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) endometrial cancer who had progressed after first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: A Markov model was created to simulate the clinical trajectory of 10,000 patients with recurrent pMMR endometrial cancer. The initial decision point in the model was treatment with ether lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or chemotherapy (doxorubicin or dose-dense paclitaxel). Model probabilities, utility values and costs were derived with assumptions drawn from published literature. A cycle length of 3 months and a time horizon of 2 years was used. The effectiveness was calculated in terms of average quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), expressed in 2020 US dollars/QALYs. One-way, two-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Chemotherapy was the least costly strategy at $66,693 followed by lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab ($193,590). Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab resulted in more patients being alive at 2 years (lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab: 367, chemotherapy: 109). Chemotherapy was cost-effective compared with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (ICER: $164,493/QALYs). Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab became cost-effective when its cost was reduced by $1553 per month (7.8% reduction). CONCLUSION: For patients with recurrent pMMR endometrial cancer Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab is associated with greater survival but is more costly than chemotherapy. The cost of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab would have to be reduced by approximately 7% to be considered cost-effective.

Ambient particulate matter air pollution exposure and ovarian cancer incidence in the USA: An ecological study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between air particulate matter of ≤2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5 ) and ovarian cancer. DESIGN: County-level ecological study. SETTING: Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results from a collection of state-level cancer registries across 744 counties. Data from the Environmental Protection Agency's network for PM2.5 monitoring was used to calculate trailing 5- and 10-year PM2.5 county-level values. County-level data on demographic characteristics were obtained from the American Community Survey. POPULATION: A total of 98 751 patients with histologically confirmed ovarian cancer as a primary malignancy from 2000 to 2016. METHODS: Generalised linear regression models were developed to estimate the association between PM2.5 and PM10 levels, over 5- and 10-year periods of exposure, and ovarian cancer risk, after accounting for county-level covariates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk ratios for associations between ovarian cancer (both overall and specifically epithelial ovarian cancer) and PM2.5 levels. RESULTS: For the 744 counties included, the average PM2.5 level from 1990 through 2018 was 11.75 µg/m3 (SD = 3.7) and the average PM10 level was 22.7 µg/m3 (SD = 5.7). After adjusting for county-level covariates, the overall annualised ovarian cancer incidence was significantly associated with increases in 5-year PM2.5 (RR = 1.11 per 10 units (µg/m3 ) increase, 95% CI 1.06-1.16). Similarly, when the analysis was limited to epithelial cell tumours and adjusted for county-level covariates there was a significant association with trailing 5-year PM2.5 exposure models (RR = 1.12 per 10 units increase, 95% CI 1.08-1.17). Likewise, 10-year PM2.5 exposure was associated with ovarian cancer overall and with epithelial ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Higher county-level ambient PM2.5 levels are associated with 5- and 10-year incidences of ovarian cancer, as measurable in an ecological study.

Heterogeneity of outcomes of endometrial cancer patients included in prospective clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess heterogeneity in five-year overall survival of patients with endometrial cancer using a large retrospective database with cohorts defined by recent prospective clinical trials. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2004 to 2016. The reported inclusion criteria for GOG-249, PORTEC-3, and GOG-258 were used to define the respective cohorts. Five-year overall survival for each cohort was stratified by tumor characteristics and adjuvant therapy regimens. RESULTS: A total of 89,133 patients were identified who would have fulfilled the entry criteria to GOG-249, PORTEC-3, or GOG-258. When stratified by tumor characteristics, irrespective of adjuvant therapy, five-year overall survival ranged from 59.9%-81.7% for patients meeting GOG-249 inclusion criteria, 40.2%-81.8% for patients meeting PORTEC-3 inclusion criteria, and 17.5%-75.0% for those meeting GOG-258 inclusion criteria. Analysis of subgroups by adjuvant therapy regimen revealed significant improvement in five-year overall survival for chemoradiotherapy compared to chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone for endometroid stage III and stage IVA disease and for some stages of serous and clear cell histology. CONCLUSIONS: Recent prospective trials of adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer have included heterogeneous cohorts of patients based on five-year overall survival rates when the populations are stratified by tumor characteristics. The variation in expected five-year overall survival for subsets of patients may result in underpowered studies or misleading results.

Dostarlimab for recurrent mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer: A cost-effectiveness study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with recurrent endometrial cancer treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel whose disease progresses have few effective treatment options. Based on promising clinical trial data, the anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) antibody dostarlimab was recently granted accelerated approval for endometrial cancer by the US Food and Drug Administration. We developed a decision model to examine the cost-effectiveness of dostarlimab for patients with progressive/recurrent deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) endometrial cancer whose disease has progressed with first-line chemotherapy. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness study. POPULATION: Hypothetical cohort of 6000 women with progressive/recurrent dMMR endometrial cancer. METHODS: The initial decision point in the Markov model was treatment with dostarlimab, pembrolizumab or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). Model probabilities, and cost and utility values were derived with assumptions drawn from published literature. Effectiveness was estimated as average quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. One-way, two-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to vary the assumptions across a range of plausible values. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was the least costly strategy, at $55,732, followed by dostarlimab ($151,533) and pembrolizumab ($154,597). Based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY, PLD was cost-effective compared with dostarlimab, with an ICER of $331,913 per QALY gained for dostarlimab, whereas pembrolizumab was ruled out by extended dominance (less effective, more costly), compared with dostarlimab. In one-way sensitivity analyses, dostarlimab was cost-effective when its cost was reduced to $4905 (52% reduction). These results were robust in a variety of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Dostarlimab is associated with greater survival compared with other treatments for women with recurrent dMMR endometrial cancer. Although the agent is substantially more costly, dostarlimab became cost-effective when its cost was reduced to $5489 per cycle.

Pathologic characteristics, patterns of care, and outcomes of Asian-Americans and Pacific islanders with uterine cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the patterns of care and outcomes of Asian-Americans/Pacific Islanders (AAPI) to non-Hispanic White (NHW) women with uterine cancer, and examine differences across Asian country of origin. METHODS: National Cancer Database was used to identify AAPI and NHW women with uterine cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2017. Marginal multivariable log-linear regression models and Cox proportional-hazards models were developed to estimate differences in quality-of-care and all-cause mortality between AAPI and NHW women and across AAPI ethnic groups. RESULTS: We identified 13,454 AAPI and 354,693 NHW women. Compared to NHW women, AAPI patients were younger at diagnosis (median age 57 vs. 62 years), had fewer comorbidities, more often had serous or sarcoma histologic subtypes and stage III/IV cancer. AAPI women had a slightly higher rate of receiving pelvic lymphadenectomy for deeply invasive or high-grade tumors (77.6% vs. 74.3%), and a lower rate of undergoing minimally invasive surgery (70.4% vs. 74.8%) for stage I-IIIC tumors. Among patients undergoing hysterectomy, AAPI women had a lower mortality compared with NHW women for cancer stage I/II/III, and a 28% reduction for type I (grade 1 or 2 endometrioid cancers) disease (aHR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64-0.81). Among AAPI subgroups, Pacific Islanders had the worst survival across different cancer stage and disease type. CONCLUSION: AAPI women are diagnosed with uterine cancer at a younger age and have more aggressive histologic subtypes and advanced stage than their White counterparts. They have a similar level of quality-of-care as NHW women, and an improved survival for early stage and type I disease.

Long-term outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) has been proposed as an alternative to laparoscopic (TLH) and abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), particularly for women with medical comorbidities. We examined the use and long-term outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for women with early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify women with stage I-II endometrial cancer treated with primary hysterectomy from 2000 to 2015. Multivariable regression models were developed to examine clinical, demographic, and pathologic factors associated with performance of TVH. The association between route of hysterectomy and cancer-specific and overall survival was examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 19,212 patients including 837 (4.6%) who underwent TVH were identified. Performance of TVH declined from 4.5% in 2000 to 2.2% in 2015 (P < 0.0001). Compared to patients 65-69 years of age, patients 75-79 years old (aRR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.19-1.79) and those >80 years old (aRR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.30-1.97) were more likely to undergo TVH. Women with high grade tumors were less likely to undergo TVH. Five-year overall and cancer specific survivals were similar for TAH, TLH, and TVH. In multivariable models, there was no association between TVH and either cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65-1.22) compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Use of TVH for stage I and II endometrial cancer has decreased in the U.S. Chronologic age is the greatest predictor of performance of TVH. Performance of TVH does not negatively impact survival for women with early-stage endometrial cancer.

Adoption of minimally invasive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with metastatic uterine cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced stage uterine cancer is increasing. We analyzed the use and outcomes of open versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for women with stage IV uterine cancer who received NACT and underwent IDS. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with stage IV uterine cancer diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 and treated with NACT. Among women who underwent IDS, overall survival (OS) was compared between those who underwent laparotomy vs a minimally invasive approach. To account for imbalances in confounders, a propensity score analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1618 women were identified. Minimally invasive IDS was performed in 31.1% and increased from 16.2% in 2010 to 40.4% in 2017 (P < 0.001). More recent year of diagnosis and performance of surgery at a comprehensive cancer center were associated with increased use of MIS (P < 0.05). Women with serous and clear cell tumors, and carcinosarcomas (compared to endometrioid tumors), as well as Medicaid coverage (compared to commercial insurance) were less likely to undergo an MIS approach (P < 0.05). The median OS was 28 months (95% CI 23.7-30.7) and 24.3 months (95% CI 22.3-26.1) for MIS and laparotomy, respectively. After propensity score balancing, there was no association between the use of MIS and survival (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.71-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Among women with stage IV uterine cancer treated with NACT performance of minimally invasive debulking surgery is increasing. Compared to laparotomy, MIS does not appear to negatively impact survival.

Uptake and outcomes of sentinel lymph node mapping in women undergoing minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the patterns and outcomes of sentinel lymph node (SLN) assessment in women with endometrial cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: United States inpatient and outpatient hospital services. POPULATION: Women with endometrial cancer who underwent a laparoscopic or robotic-assisted hysterectomy. METHODS: The Perspective Database from 2012 to 2018 was used. Performance of lymph node dissection was classified as SLN mapping, lymph node dissection or no nodal evaluation. Adjusted regression models were developed to examine the association between SLN mapping and morbidity and cost. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Utilisation rates, morbidity and cost of both lymph node dissection and SLN mapping. RESULTS: Among 45 381 patients, SLN mapping was performed for 7768 patients (17.1%), lymph node dissection was performed for 23 214 patients (51.2%) and no lymphatic evaluation was performed for 14 399 patients (31.7%). SLN mapping increased from 1.8% in 2012 to 35.3% in 2018, whereas the rate of lymph node dissection decreased from 63.5% to 39.1% (p < 0.001). Among women who underwent nodal evaluation, residence in the west, White race and use of robotic-assisted hysterectomy were associated with SLN mapping (p < 0.05 for all). The complication rate was 5.9% for SLN mapping, compared with 7.3% in those that underwent lymph node dissection (aRR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.95). The median hospital costs for women who underwent SLN mapping ($10 479) and lymph node dissection ($10 747) were higher than for those who did not undergo nodal assessment ($9149) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of SLN mapping is increasing for endometrial cancer. Compared with lymph node dissection, SLN mapping is associated with lower morbidity. SLN mapping significantly increases the costs compared with hysterectomy alone. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: SLN mapping is increasing rapidly for endometrial cancer and is associated with decreased perioperative morbidity.

Patterns of cervical cancer screening among Medicaid beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer screening guidelines have evolved over time with the incorporation of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing along with cytology. Current screening guidelines recommend cytological screening every 3 years or HPV testing with or without cytology every 5 years in women age 30-65 years. We examined the use of cervical cancer screening among average-risk Medicaid beneficiaries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. POPULATION: Women age 30-64 years at average risk for cervical cancer who underwent cervical cancer screening with cytology, co-testing or primary HPV testing from 2013 to 2016. METHODS: The IBM Watson Health Multi-State Medicaid MarketScan Database was used. Subsequent screening rates within 3 years of the index test were examined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The rate of repeat cervical cancer screening was analysed using a cumulative incidence function. RESULTS: A total of 265 083 patients were identified. Overall, 43.1% (n = 114 312) had index co-testing, 55.2% (n = 146 309) had cytology and 1.7% (n = 4462) had primary HPV testing. The cumulative incidence of early, repeat cervical cancer screening was 3.9% at 12 months, 22.7% at 24 months and 33.3% at 36 months. During the period from 12 to 24 months after follow up, 20.9% of women underwent repeat screening while 19.4% underwent repeat screening 24-36 months after the index test. Among women who did not undergo repeat cervical cancer screening, a yearly gynaecological examination was performed in only 16 627 (10.7%) during year 2 and in 11 116 (8.8%) during year 3. CONCLUSION: Among average-risk Medicaid beneficiaries, cervical cancer screening is frequently overused. Women who do not undergo cervical cancer screening are unlikely to undergo routine gynaecological examination. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Among average-risk Medicaid beneficiaries, cervical cancer screening is frequently overused.

Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With COVID-19 Who Undergo Urgent and Emergent Surgical Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality of patients with COVID-19 who undergo urgent and emergent surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although COVID-19 infection is usually associated with mild disease, it can lead to severe respiratory complications. Little is known about the perioperative outcomes of patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We examined patients who underwent urgent and emergent surgery at 2 hospitals in New York City from March 17 to April 15, 2020. Elective surgical procedures were cancelled throughout and routine, laboratory based COVID-19 screening was instituted on April 1. Mortality, complications, and admission to the intensive care unit were compared between patients with COVID-19 detected perioperatively and controls. RESULTS: Among 468 subjects, 36 (7.7%) had confirmed COVID-19. Among those with COVID-19, 55.6% were detected preoperatively and 44.4% postoperatively. Before the routine preoperative COVID-19 laboratory screening, 7.7% of cases were diagnosed preoperatively compared to 65.2% after institution of screening (P = 0.0008). The perioperative mortality rate was 16.7% in those with COVID-19 compared to 1.4% in COVID-19 negative subjects [aRR = 9.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.68-15.21]. Serious complications were identified in 58.3% of COVID-19 subjects versus 6.0% of controls (aRR = 7.02; 95%CI, 4.96-9.92). Cardiac arrest, sepsis/shock, respiratory failure, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and acute kidney injury were more common in those with COVID-19. The intensive care unit admission rate was 36.1% in those with COVID-19 compared to 16.4% of controls (aRR = 1.34; 95%CI, 0.86-2.09). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk for serious perioperative morbidity and mortality. A substantial number of patients with COVID-19 are not identified until after surgery.

Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review was performed to examine the outcomes of simple hysterectomy for women with low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until November 4, 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Original research reporting recurrence or survival outcomes among women with early-stage cervical cancer (defined as stage IA2 to IB1 disease) who were treated with simple hysterectomy. METHODS: Data regarding study characteristics, tumor characteristics, other treatment modalities, adjuvant therapy, recurrence, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Studies that reported both simple hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy outcomes were compared in a subgroup analysis. Summary statistics were reported and eligible studies were further analyzed to determine an estimated hazard ratio comparing simple hysterectomy with radical hysterectomy. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included, of which 3 were randomized control trials, 14 retrospective studies, 2 prospective studies, and 2 population-level data sets. The cohort included 2662 women who underwent simple hysterectomy, of which 36.1% had stage IA2 disease and 61.0% stage IB1 disease. Most cases (96.8%) involved tumors of ≤2 cm in size, and 15.4% of cases were lymphovascular space invasion positive. Approximately 71.8% of women who underwent simple hysterectomy had a lymph node assessment, and 30.7% of women underwent adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation. The most common complications described were lymphedema (24%), lymphocysts (22%), and urinary incontinence (18.5%). The total death rate for studies that reported deaths was 5.5%. By stage, there was a 2.7% mortality rate among IA2 disease and a 7.3% mortality rate among IB1 disease. Of note, 18 studies reported outcomes for both simple and radical hysterectomy, with a 4.5% death rate in the radical hysterectomy group and a 5.8% death rate in the simple hysterectomy group. Estimated and reported hazard ratio demonstrated no significant association for mortality between radical and nonradical surgeries for IA2 disease but potentially increased risk of mortality among IB1 disease. All studies had a moderate to high risk of bias, including the 3 randomized control trials. Level of evidence was limited to III to IV. CONCLUSION: The use of less radical surgery for women with stage IA2 and small volume IB1 cervical cancers appears favorable. However, there is concern that simple hysterectomy in women with stage IB1 tumors may adversely impact survival. Overall, the quality of studies available is modest, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn from the available literature.

Cost of care for the initial management of cervical cancer in women with commercial insurance.

BACKGROUND: Women with newly diagnosed cervical cancer are often treated with extensive, multimodal therapies that may include a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Little is known about the cost of treatment or how these costs are passed on to the patients. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to examine the cost of care during the first year after a diagnosis of cervical cancer, to estimate the sources of the costs, and to explore the out-of-pocket costs. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a study of women with commercial insurance who received a new diagnosis of cervical cancer, and whose cases were recorded in the MarketScan database from 2008 to 2016. Patients were categorized based on the primary treatment received being either surgery (hysterectomy with or without adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy) or radiation. The inflation-adjusted medical expenditures for a 12-month period beginning on the date of the first treatment were estimated. The payments were divided into the expenditures of inpatient care, outpatient care (including chemotherapy), and outpatient pharmacy costs. The out-of-pocket costs incurred by the patients in the form of copayments, coinsurance, and deductibles were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 4495 patients, including 3014 (67%) who underwent surgery and 1481 (33%) who primarily underwent radiotherapy, were identified. The median total expenditure per patient during the first year after the diagnosis was $56,250 (interquartile range, $25,767-$107,532). The median total expenditure for patients with surgery as the primary treatment was $37,222 (interquartile range, $20,957-$75,555). The median total expenditure for patients treated primarily with radiotherapy was $101,266 (interquartile range, $63,155-$160,760). For patients treated primarily with surgery, inpatient services accounted for $15,145 (interquartile range, $0-$26,898), outpatient services accounted for $18,430 (interquartile range, $5354-$48,047), and outpatient pharmacy costs accounted for $628 (interquartile range, $141-$1847). The median cost for those women who did not require adjuvant therapy was $26,164 compared with $89,760 for women treated with adjuvant radiation. The median out-of-pocket costs for the cohort was $2253 (interquartile range, $1137-$3990) or 3.9% of the total costs. CONCLUSION: The cost of care for women with newly diagnosed cervical cancer is substantial. Overall, patients are responsible for approximately 3.9% of the costs in the form of out-of-pocket expenditures.

The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Care of Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize evidence from studies investigating survival outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery (traditional or robotic laparoscopy) compared with those for patients with ovarian cancer undergoing laparotomy. DATA SOURCES: We searched Ovid MEDLINE and Embase (from inception to December 2019). METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Observational cohort studies and randomized controlled trials that compared risk of recurrence or death between women undergoing minimally invasive and open procedures for staging (10), interval cytoreduction (4), secondary cytoreduction (2), and evaluation of resectability (1) were included. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Data on the number of participants, number of deaths and recurrences, and results of analyses of overall or progression-free survival were abstracted for all studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the results of studies comparing minimally invasive staging and open staging. The surgical approach (minimally invasive versus open) was not significantly associated with hazard of death or recurrence (pooled hazard ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.38) or all-cause mortality (pooled hazard ratio 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-1.89). One randomized trial demonstrated that diagnostic laparoscopy could triage patients to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and avoid suboptimal primary surgery, without affecting recurrence-free or overall survival. Most studies included in this review were observational and at high risk for bias, and few studies accounted for potential confounding. CONCLUSION: Although existing studies do not demonstrate deleterious survival effects associated with minimally invasive surgery for ovarian cancer, these data must be viewed with caution given the significant methodologic shortcomings in the existing literature.

Coronavirus Spectrum Infections (COVID-19, MERS, SARS) in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly around the world to become a global pandemic. There is limited data on the impact of COVID-19 among patients with cancer. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to determine outcomes of adult patients with cancer affected by coronavirus infections, specifically SARS, MERS, and COVID-19. Studies were independently screened by two reviewers and assessed for quality and bias. Outcomes measured included study characteristics, cancer type, phase of care at the time of diagnosis, and clinical presentation. Morbidity and mortality outcomes were analyzed to assess the severity of infection as compared to the general population. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies with 110 patients were included. Of these, 66.4% had COVID-19 infections, 32.7% MERS and only one patient with SARS. The majority of COVID-19 studies were based on studies in China. There was a 56.6% rate of a severe event, including ICU admission or requiring mechanical ventilation, with an overall 44.5% fatality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer with coronavirus infections may be more susceptible to higher morbidity and mortality.

Toxicity after adjuvant therapy for stage III uterine cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal adjuvant therapy for stage III endometrial cancer is unknown. Studies have suggested that combination therapy with chemotherapy and radiation is associated with improved survival. We examined early and late-term toxicities associated with chemotherapy (CT), external beam radiotherapy (RT), or combination chemoradiotherapy for stage III uterine cancer. METHODS: The SEER-Medicare database was used to identify women age ≥ 65 years with stage III uterine cancer who received adjuvant CT, RT, or chemoradiotherapy from 2000 to 2015. The associations between therapy and early and late-term toxicities identified with billing claims, hospitalizations and emergency department visits were examined using multivariable regression models. RESULTS: A total of 2185 patients were identified including 574 (26.3%) who received CT, 636 (29.1%) who received RT, and 975 (44.6%) who received chemoradiotherapy. The proportion of patients receiving chemoradiotherapy or CT increased over time. During the first 6 and 12 months of adjuvant therapy, RT was associated with a lower risk of early-term toxicity compared to chemoradiotherapy (aRR = 0.59, 95%CI 0.49-0.70 and aRR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.67-0.86, respectively) while CT shared a similar risk of early toxicities as chemoradiotherapy. CT and RT shared a similar risk of late-term toxicities compared to chemoradiotherapy. CT and RT alone were associated with a higher hazard for overall mortality than chemoradiotherapy (aHR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.47 and aHR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.08-1.44, respectively). CONCLUSION: Chemoradiotherapy is associated with lower mortality compared to single modality therapy and has a similar risk of early and late term toxicities compared to CT, though higher risk of early toxicities compared to RT.

Using machine learning to create prognostic systems for endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We used a novel machine learning algorithm to develop a precision prognostication system for endometrial cancer. METHODS: The Ensemble Algorithm for Clustering Cancer Data (EACCD) unsupervised machine learning algorithm was applied to women with endometrioid endometrial cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2015. The prognostic system was created based on TNM stage, grade, and age. The concordance (C-index) was used to cut dendrograms and create prognostic groups. Kaplan-Meier cancer-specific survival was employed to visualize the survival function of EACCD-based prognostic groups and AJCC groups. RESULTS: A total of 46,773 women were identified. Using the machine learning algorithm with TNM stage, grade, and three age groups, eleven prognostic groups were generated with a C-index of 0.8380. The five-year survival rates for the eleven groups ranged from 37.9-99.8%. To simplify the classification system further, using visual inspection of the data we created a modified EACCD grouping, and combined the top six survival groups into three new prognostic groups. The new five-year survival rates for these eight modified prognostic groups included: 99.1% for group 1, 96.5% for group 2, 92.2% for group 3, 84.8% for group 4, 72.7% for group 5, 61.1% for group 6, 52.6% for group 7, and 37.9% for group 8. The C-index for the modified eight prognostic groups was 0.8313. CONCLUSION: This novel machine learning algorithm demonstrates improved prognostic prediction for patients with endometrial cancer. Using machine learning for endometrial cancer allows for the integration of multiple factors to develop a precision prognostication system.

The effect of guideline-concordant care in mitigating insurance status disparities in cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the receipt of evidence-based care could mitigate survival disparities among Medicaid recipients and uninsured women with cervical cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was utilized to identify women with cervical cancer treated from 2004 to 2016. Eight quality metrics were determined. Survival outcomes were examined stratified by insurance status and stage. To measure the impact of guideline-concordant care on the mitigation of disparities, we compared survival outcomes of the overall cohort to one that was perfectly adherent to all quality metrics. RESULTS: A total of 103,400 patients were identified; 47.0% of patients had private insurance, 21.5% Medicaid and 9.2% uninsured. Medicaid and uninsured patients were significantly less likely than privately insured patients to receive timely completion of radiation and timely initiation of treatment; uninsured patients were also significantly less likely to receive treatment for locally advanced disease. Medicaid and uninsured patients were also less likely to receive lymph node assessment and primary chemoradiation. Medicaid and uninsured patients had an increased risk of mortality compared to privately insured patients (aHR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.31-1.41 and aHR 1.29, 95% CI 1.23-1.36 respectively). While the receipt of these quality metrics was associated with improved survival, Medicaid and uninsured women who received guideline-concordant care were still at an increased risk of death compared to women with private insurance (aHR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.35-1.49 and aHR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.32 respectively). CONCLUSION: Medicaid and uninsured patients were less likely to receive evidence-based care and were at increased risk of mortality at all stages compared to privately insured patients. The receipt of quality care does not eliminate insurance status-based disparities among women with cervical cancer.

Travel distance, hospital volume and their association with ovarian cancer short- and long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patterns of patient travel among women with ovarian cancer and to explore the association between travel distance and short and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Women with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2016 who underwent primary surgery were identified in the National Cancer Database. Mixed-effect log-linear models and proportional hazards models were developed to evaluate the association between travel distance and short and long-term outcomes after propensity score weighting. A further analysis was performed to compare patients who traveled a short distance to a low volume center (Local) to patients who traveled farther to a high volume hospital (Travel). RESULTS: We identified 56,834 patients treated in 1201 hospitals. Hispanic women were 58% and black women 64% less likely than white women to travel to a center in the greatest distance quartile for care. Similarly, Medicaid recipients (vs. commercially insured) were less likely to travel to a quartile four hospital (compared to Q1 of distance traveled). Of all patients, 90-day mortality was significantly lower in patients who traveled farther (Q4 vs. Q1; P < 0.0001). Compared to women in the Local group, patients in the Travel group had a decreased 30-day readmission rate. There was no difference in 30-day, 90-day, or 5-year mortality when comparing the Local to the Travel group. CONCLUSIONS: Travel distance for ovarian cancer surgery has increased over time. While there may be some short-term benefits in traveling to a regional center for care, there was little difference in long term outcomes based on travel distance.

A modern assessment of the surgical pathologic spread and nodal dissemination of endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk of nodal metastases in a contemporary cohort of women based on pathologic risk factors including histology, depth of invasion, tumor grade, and lymphovascular space invasion. METHODS: Women with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2004 to 2016 who were registered in the National Cancer Database were analyzed. Patients were stratified by T stage: T1A (<50% myometrial invasion), T1B (>50% myometrial invasion) and T2 (cervical involvement). Lymph node metastases were assessed in relation to tumor T stage and grade, and further stratified by lymphovascular space invasion. RESULTS: We identified 161,960 patients. The rate of nodal metastases within the endometrioid histology cohort was 2.2% for T1A cancers, 12.8% for T1B cancers and 19.9% for T2 cancers. For stage TIA cancers, the percent of patients with positive nodes increased from 1.1% for grade 1 cancers, to 2.9% for grade 2 cancers to 4.8% for grade 3 cancers. The corresponding rates of nodal metastases for stage T1B cancers were 8.6%, 13.7%, and 16.9%, respectively. For T1A cancers without lymphovascular space invasion, nodal metastases ranged from 0.6% in those with grade 1 cancers to 3.0% for grade 3 cancers. The corresponding risk of nodal disease ranged from 11.8% to 13.9% for T1A cancers with lymphovascular space invasion. CONCLUSIONS: There was a sequential increase in the risk of lymph node metastases based on depth of uterine invasion, tumor grade, and the presence of lymphovascular space invasion. The overall rate of nodal metastasis is lower than reported in the original GOG 33.