RESUMO
Objective: To investigate whether the minimal cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (mCED), a novel approach for estimating alkylating agent exposure, is associated with the sperm retrieval rates by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in azoospermic postchemotherapy cancer survivors. Design: A retrospective cohort study conducted between 2002 and 2017. Setting: An academic medical center. Patients: A total of 28 azoospermic postchemotherapy cancer survivors who underwent mTESE. Interventions: Chemotherapy exposure and mCED calculation. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the association between the mCED and sperm retrieval rate using mTESE. The mCED value for each patient's regimen received was estimated using the lowest recommended dosing regimen from the range of recommended doses at the time of administration. Results: Spermatozoa were successfully retrieved in 11 (39.3%) of the patients. Age at the time of receiving chemotherapy and mCED were significant factors associated with sperm retrieval. An mCED of <4,000 mg/m2 had a higher sperm retrieval rate (10/14, 71.4%) than an mCED of >4,000 mg/m2 (0/8, 0). The hormone levels were not significantly different when comparing patients with and without successful sperm retrieval. Seminoma, nonseminomatous germ cell tumor, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia had favorable sperm retrieval rates-100% (2/2), 66.7% (2/3), and 66.7% (2/3), respectively-although the numbers of patients in each group were small. Conclusion: Among this cohort of patients with cancer who required chemotherapy regimens, successful sperm retrieval by mTESE was only noted among cancer survivors receiving an mCED of <4,000 mg/m2.
RESUMO
Background: Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) is the gold standard treatment for men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). However, many men do not elect to pursue this surgical intervention. We aimed to identify factors associated with NOA patients undergoing mTESE after initial evaluation by a reproductive urologist (RU) through a retrospective cohort study. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed NOA patient who underwent evaluation by a RU between 2002-2018. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Our primary outcome was electing to undergo mTESE. Results: 44.4% (75/169) of NOA men underwent mTESE. These patients earned significantly higher median neighborhood income ($133,000 vs. $97,000, P<0.001), spent fewer years trying to conceive before seeking care {1.3 [interquartile range (IQR): 1-3] vs. 2.3 (IQR: 1-5), P=0.012}, and were more likely to be married (79.7% vs. 53.9%, P=0.001). On univariate analysis, married men [odds ratio (OR) 3.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67-6.79, P=0.001] and men with higher neighborhood income (OR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.21, P<0.001) were more likely to undergo mTESE, while couples attempting to conceive for a longer period of time prior to initial evaluation were less likely to undergo mTESE (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.92, P=0.003). On multivariable regression analysis, marital status and years attempting to conceive remained significantly associated with NOA patients undergoing mTESE (OR 4.61, 95% CI: 1.16-18.25, P=0.03; OR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52-0.88, P=0.003, respectively). Conclusions: Higher neighborhood income and marital status were positively associated with patients undergoing mTESE, while couples who attempted to conceive for a longer period of time before seeking infertility care were less likely to undergo mTESE.