Limitations in the clinical utility of vaccine challenge responses in the evaluation of primary antibody deficiency including Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders.

Vaccine challenge responses are an integral component in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with primary antibody deficiency, including Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders (CVID). There are no studies of vaccine challenge responses in primary hypogammaglobulinemia patients not accepted for subcutaneous/intravenous immunoglobulin (SCIG/IVIG) replacement compared to those accepted for such treatment. Vaccine challenge responses in patients enrolled in two long-term prospective cohorts, the New Zealand Hypogammaglobulinemia Study (NZHS) and the New Zealand CVID study (NZCS), were compared in this analysis. Almost all patients in the more severely affected SCIG/IVIG treatment group achieved protective antibody levels to tetanus toxoid and H. influenzae type B (HIB). Although there was a highly significant statistical difference in vaccine responses to HIB, tetanus and diphtheria toxoids, there was substantial overlap in both groups. In contrast, there was no significant difference in Pneumococcal Polysaccharide antibody responses to Pneumovax® (PPV23). This analysis illustrates the limitations of evaluating vaccine challenge responses in patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia to establish the diagnosis of CVID and in making decisions to treat with SCIG/IVIG. The conclusion from this study is that patients with symptoms attributable to primary hypogammaglobulinemia with reduced IgG should not be denied SCIG/IVIG if they have normal vaccine responses.

Challenges for gene editing in common variable immunodeficiency disorders: Current and future prospects.

The original CRISPR Cas9 gene editing system and subsequent innovations offers unprecedented opportunities to correct severe genetic defects including those causing Primary Immunodeficiencies (PIDs). Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders (CVID) are the most frequent symptomatic PID in adults and children. Unlike many other PIDs, patients meeting CVID criteria do not have a definable genetic defect and cannot be considered to have an inborn error of immunity (IEI). Patients with a CVID phenotype carrying a causative mutation are deemed to have a CVID-like disorder consequent to an IEI. Patients from consanguineous families often have highly penetrant early-onset autosomal recessive forms of CVID-like disorders. Individuals from non-consanguineous families may have autosomal dominant CVID-like disorders with variable penetrance and expressivity. This essay explores the potential clinical utility as well as the current limitations and risks of gene editing including collateral genotoxicity. In the immediate future the main application of this technology is likely to be the in vitro investigation of epigenetic and polygenic mechanisms, which are likely to underlie many cases of CVID and CVID-like disorders. In the longer-term, the CRISPR Cas9 system and other gene-based therapies could be utilized to treat CVID-like disorders, where the underlying IEI is known.

Diagnosis and subtyping of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: caution required in the use of myositis autoantibodies.

Detection of myositis autoantibodies (MAs) has utility in both the diagnosis and subtyping of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Multiplex assays such as the Euroimmun line immunoassay (LIA) have significant limitations in rare diseases like IIM. A retrospective cohort study was performed on positive MA detected on LIA in 171 patients using the manufacturer's recommended cut-off. Only 16.7% were deemed true positive after clinical correlation. Autoantibody-specific cut-offs were created and applied to the original cohort, along with generically applied higher cut-offs. Positive predictive value (PPV) improved, but there was variable increase in false negatives. False positive MA results are common using LIA, but locally derived cut-offs can improve performance. Clinicians must be aware of the limitations of LIA, which is the commonest method for MA detection in Australasia.

Soluble wild-type ACE2 molecules inhibit newer SARS-CoV-2 variants and are a potential antiviral strategy to mitigate disease severity in COVID-19.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), has caused havoc around the world. While several COVID-19 vaccines and drugs have been authorized for use, these antiviral drugs remain beyond the reach of most low- and middle-income countries. Rapid viral evolution is reducing the efficacy of vaccines and monoclonal antibodies and contributing to the deaths of some fully vaccinated persons. Others with normal immunity may have chosen not to be vaccinated and remain at risk if they contract the infection. Vaccines may not protect some immunodeficient patients from SARS-CoV-2, who are also at increased risk of chronic COVID-19 infection, a dangerous stalemate between the virus and a suboptimal immune response. Intra-host viral evolution could rapidly lead to the selection and dominance of vaccine and monoclonal antibody-resistant clades of SARS-CoV-2. There is thus an urgent need to develop new treatments for COVID-19. The NZACE2-Patari project, comprising modified soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) molecules, seeks to intercept and block SARS-CoV-2 infection of the respiratory mucosa. In vitro data presented here show that soluble wild-type ACE2 molecules retain the ability to effectively block the Spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 variants including the ancestral Wuhan, delta (B.1.617.2) and omicron (B.1.1.529) strains. This therapeutic strategy may prove effective if implemented early during the nasal phase of the infection and may act synergistically with other antiviral drugs such as Paxlovid to further mitigate disease severity.

Juvenile probation officers' evaluation of traumatic event exposures and traumatic stress symptoms as responsivity factors in risk assessment and case planning.

Juvenile probation officers (JPOs) are increasingly using risk/needs assessments to evaluate delinquency risk, identify criminogenic needs and specific responsivity factors, and use this information in case planning. Justice-involved youth are exposed to traumatic events and experience traumatic stress symptoms at a high rate; such information warrants attention during the case planning process. The extent to which JPOs identify specific responsivity factors, in general, and trauma history, specifically, when scoring risk/need assessments is understudied. In the current study, 147 JPOs reviewed case vignettes that varied by the adolescents' gender (male vs. female), traumatic event exposure (present vs. absent), and traumatic stress symptoms (present vs. absent), and then scored the YLS/CMI and developed case plans based on that information. JPOs who received a vignette that included trauma information identified a higher number of trauma-specific responsivity factors on the YLS/CMI. Despite an overall high needs match ratio (57.2%), few JPOs prioritized trauma as a target on case plans. The findings underscore the importance of incorporating trauma screening into risk/needs assessment and case planning. (PsycINFO Database Record

Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis in Maori and Pacific Island children in New Zealand.

AIM: To investigate the incidence and severity of anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (anti-NMDA) receptor encephalitis in children from New Zealand. METHOD: A retrospective case series was undertaken of all children (≤18y) diagnosed with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis from January 2008 to October 2015. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were identified with anti-NMDA receptor antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid, three of whom had an associated teratoma. Fifteen children had Maori and/or Pacific Island ancestry. The incidence of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in Maori children was 3.4 per million children per year (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-7.0) and the incidence in Pacific children was 10.0 per million children per year (95% CI 4.3-19.8) compared with 0.2 per million children per year (95% CI 0.0-1.0) in children without Maori or Pacific Island ancestry. Sixty-seven per cent of children had a good outcome (modified Rankin Score ≤2) at 2 years' follow-up. This compares unfavourably with other cohorts despite a shorter median time to first-line immunotherapy (13d; range 4-89) and a higher proportion of children being treated with second-line therapy (50%). INTERPRETATION: Maori and Pacific Island children have a higher incidence of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and possibly a more severe phenotype. These data suggest a genetic predisposition to anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in these populations.

Profound Reversible Hypogammaglobulinemia Caused by Celiac Disease in the Absence of Protein Losing Enteropathy.

When patients with hypogammaglobulinemia are encountered, a vigorous search should be undertaken for secondary treatable causes. Here we describe the first case of a patient with severe asymptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia where the underlying cause was undiagnosed celiac disease. A strict gluten free diet resulted in resolution of her mild long-standing abdominal symptoms and correction of her hypogammaglobulinemia. There was corresponding improvement in her duodenal histology and normalisation of her celiac serology. Protein losing enteropathy was unlikely to have been the mechanism of her profound hypogammaglobulinemia, as her albumin was within the normal range and she had a normal fecal alpha 1 antitrypsin level. Application of the Ameratunga et al. (2013) diagnostic criteria was helpful in confirming this patient did not have Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorder (CVID). Celiac disease must now be considered in the differential diagnosis of severe hypogammaglobulinemia. There should be a low threshold for undertaking celiac serology in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia, even if they have minimal symptoms attributable to gut disease.

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies and myeloperoxidase autoantibodies in clinical expression of Churg-Strauss syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) in the phenotypic expression of Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the relationship between ANCA status and the clinical expression of CSS in a case series derived from the US Food and Drug Administration's adverse events database. METHODS: All cases of CSS reported to the US Food and Drug Administration from 1997 to April 2003 were reviewed. Information about basic demographics, suspect medication use, clinical manifestations, histologic findings, ANCA staining patterns, and the presence of antibodies to myeloperoxidase (anti-MPO) or proteinase 3 (anti-PR3) was recorded when available. RESULTS: There were 93 case reports of CSS with sufficient documentation, including ANCA status. There were 38 (40.9%) of 93 cases with positive ANCA results, of which 15 cases reported a positive ELISA, all of which were positive for anti-MPO. ANCA negativity was associated with an increased proportion of cardiac involvement (risk difference [RD], 38.2%; 95% CI, 25.3% to 51.0%), gastrointestinal involvement (RD, 25.5%; 95% CI, 13.9% to 37.0%), pulmonary infiltrates (odds ratio, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.5-16.2), and the outcome of a life-threatening event or death (RD, 30.9%; 95% CI, 18.7% to 43.1%) when compared with anti-MPO-positive cases. ANCA negativity was associated with a decreased proportion of peripheral neuropathy (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.07-0.9). CONCLUSION: These findings support the hypothesis that the presence or absence of autoantibodies influences the clinical expression and severity of CSS.

SARS-CoV-2 evolution has increased resistance to monoclonal antibodies and first-generation COVID-19 vaccines: Is there a future therapeutic role for soluble ACE2 receptors for COVID-19?

COVID-19 has caused calamitous health, economic and societal consequences. Although several COVID-19 vaccines have received full authorization for use, global deployment has faced political, financial and logistical challenges. The efficacy of first-generation COVID-19 vaccines is waning and breakthrough infections are allowing ongoing transmission and evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, COVID-19 vaccine efficacy relies on a functional immune system. Despite receiving three primary doses and three or more heterologous boosters, some immunocompromised patients may not be adequately protected by COVID-19 vaccines and remain vulnerable to severe disease. The evolution of new SARS-CoV-2 variants has also resulted in the rapid obsolescence of monoclonal antibodies. Convalescent plasma from COVID-19 survivors has produced inconsistent results. New drugs such as Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) are beyond the reach of low- and middle-income countries. With widespread use of Paxlovid, it is likely nirmatrelvir-resistant clades of SARS-CoV-2 will emerge in the future. There is thus an urgent need for new effective anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatments. The in vitro efficacy of soluble ACE2 against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants including omicron (B.1.1.529), was recently described using a competitive ELISA assay as a surrogate marker for virus neutralization. This indicates soluble wild-type ACE2 receptors are likely to be resistant to viral evolution. Nasal and inhaled treatment with soluble ACE2 receptors has abrogated severe disease in animal models of COVID-19. There is an urgent need for clinical trials of this new class of antiviral therapeutics, which could complement vaccines and Paxlovid.

The autoimmune rheumatological presentation of Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders with an overview of genetic testing.

Primary immunodeficiency Disorders (PIDS) are rare, mostly monogenetic conditions which can present to a number of specialties. Although infections predominate in most PIDs, some individuals can manifest autoimmune or inflammatory sequelae as their initial clinical presentation. Identifying patients with PIDs can be challenging, as some can present later in life. This is often seen in patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders (CVID), where symptoms can begin in the sixth or even seventh decades of life. Some patients with PIDs including CVID can initially present to rheumatologists with autoimmune musculoskeletal manifestations. It is imperative for these patients to be identified promptly as immunosuppression could lead to life-threatening opportunistic infections in these immunocompromised individuals. These risks could be mitigated by prior treatment with subcutaneous or intravenous (SCIG/IVIG) immunoglobulin replacement or prophylactic antibiotics. Importantly, many of these disorders have an underlying genetic defect. Individualized treatments may be available for the specific mutation, which may obviate or mitigate the need for hazardous broad-spectrum immunosuppression. Identification of the genetic defect has profound implications not only for the patient but also for affected family members, who may be at risk of symptomatic disease following an environmental trigger such as a viral infection. Finally, there may be clinical clues to the underlying PID, such as recurrent infections, the early presentation of severe or multiple autoimmune disorders, as well as a relevant family history. Early referral to a clinical immunologist will facilitate appropriate diagnostic evaluation and institution of treatment such as SCIG/IVIG immunoglobulin replacement. This review comprises three sections; an overview of PIDs, focusing on CVID, secondly genetic testing of PIDs and finally the clinical presentation of these disorders to rheumatologists.

Selective IgA Deficiency May Be an Underrecognized Risk Factor for Severe COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2, the agent responsible for COVID-19, has wreaked havoc around the globe. Hundreds of millions of individuals have been infected and well over six million have died from COVID-19. Many COVID-19 survivors have ongoing physical and psychiatric morbidity, which will remain for the rest of their lives. Early in the pandemic, it became apparent that older individuals and those with comorbidities including obesity, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and renal and pulmonary disease were at increased risk of adverse outcomes. It is also clear that some immunodeficient patients, such as those with innate or T cell-immune defects, are at greater risk from COVID-19. Selective IgA deficiency (sIgAD) is generally regarded as a mild disorder in which most patients are asymptomatic because of redundancy in protective immune mechanisms. Recent data indicate that patients with sIgAD may be at high risk of severe COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 gains entry primarily through the upper respiratory tract mucosa, where IgA has a critical protective role. This may underlie the vulnerability of sIgAD patients to adverse outcomes from COVID-19. This perspective highlights the need for ongoing research into mucosal immunity to improve COVID-19 treatments for patients with sIgAD.

Encephalitis in adults in the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand, 2009 to 2018.

We conducted a retrospective study to determine the incidence and frequency of different subtypes of encephalitis in patients aged 15 and older in the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand between 2009 and 2018. Residents in Auckland and Northland presenting with encephalitis between 2009 and 2018 were identified from three overlapping databases: positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, CSF neuronal antibody requests, and CSF neuronal antibody tests sent overseas. A diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis required fulfilment of diagnostic criteria published by Graus and colleagues (2016). One hundred and thirty-six (69, 50.7% female) patients met study inclusion criteria. The median age was 59 (range 15-92). The annual incidence was 1.10 cases per 100,000 person-years. Of these 136 patients, 56 (41.2%) had an infectious aetiology, with varicella zoster (26, 46.4%) and herpes simplex (23, 41.1%) being the most common agents. Autoimmune encephalitis was diagnosed in 32 patients (23.5%). LGI-1 antibody was the most commonly identified neuronal autoantibody (10 patients, 13.2%). Forty-eight patients (35.3%) had encephalitis of unknown cause. In-hospital mortality for infectious encephalitis was 12.5%, autoimmune encephalitis 6.3%, and encephalitis of unknown cause 10.4%. Compared to a previous analysis of encephalitis in adults in Auckland, the incidence of encephalitis and autoimmune encephalitis had increased. The proportion of patients with an unknown cause for encephalitis had decreased.

The Rapidly Expanding Genetic Spectrum of Common Variable Immunodeficiency-Like Disorders.

The understanding of common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID) is in evolution. CVID was previously a diagnosis of exclusion. New diagnostic criteria have allowed the disorder to be identified with greater precision. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), it has become apparent that an increasing number of patients with a CVID phenotype have a causative genetic variant. If a pathogenic variant is identified, these patients are removed from the overarching diagnosis of CVID and are deemed to have a CVID-like disorder. In populations where consanguinity is more prevalent, the majority of patients with severe primary hypogammaglobulinemia will have an underlying inborn error of immunity, usually an early-onset autosomal recessive disorder. In nonconsanguineous societies, pathogenic variants are identified in approximately 20% to 30% of patients. These are often autosomal dominant mutations with variable penetrance and expressivity. To add to the complexity of CVID and CVID-like disorders, some genetic variants such as those in TNFSF13B (transmembrane activator calcium modulator cyclophilin ligand interactor) predispose to, or enhance, disease severity. These variants are not causative but can have epistatic (synergistic) interactions with more deleterious mutations to worsen disease severity. This review is a description of the current understanding of genes associated with CVID and CVID-like disorders. This information will assist clinicians in interpreting NGS reports when investigating the genetic basis of disease in patients with a CVID phenotype.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel subcutaneous immunoglobulin, Evogam®, in primary immunodeficiency.

This phase III, open-label, multi-centre study investigated the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and quality of life impact of Evogam(®), a new chromatographically fractionated 16% subcutaneous immunoglobulin, utilising a 1:1 dose transition ratio from previous immunoglobulin therapy. Thirty-five previously treated patients with primary immunodeficiency received weekly Evogam over 36 weeks. Primary endpoints were rate of serious bacterial infections (SBIs) and steady-state serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) trough concentrations. No SBIs were reported during the study. Evogam produced significantly higher mean trough IgG concentrations with 1:1 dose conversion compared to previous immunoglobulin treatment (8.94 versus 8.27 g/L, p = 0.0063). Evogam was efficacious in the prevention of infections and maintenance of trough levels using a 1:1 dose conversion. It was well tolerated with no withdrawals due to adverse events and was preferred to IVIg by the majority of patients.

Severe COVID-19 is a T cell immune dysregulatory disorder triggered by SARS-CoV-2.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has had a calamitous impact on the global community. Apart from at least 6 M deaths, hundreds of millions have been infected and a much greater number have been plunged into poverty. Vaccines have been effective but financial and logistical challenges have hampered their rapid global deployment. Vaccine disparities have allowed the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants including delta and omicron, perpetuating the pandemic. AREAS COVERED: The immunological response to SARS-CoV-2 is now better understood. Many of the clinical manifestations of severe disease are a consequence of immune dysregulation triggered by the virus. This may explain the lack of efficacy of antiviral treatments, such as convalescent plasma infusions, given later in the disease. EXPERT OPINION: T cells play a crucial role in both the outcome of COVID-19 as well as the protective response to vaccines. Vaccines do not prevent infection but reduce the risk of a chaotic and destructive cellular immune response to the virus. Severe COVID-19 should be considered a virus-induced secondary immune dysregulatory disorder of cellular immunity, with broad host susceptibility. This perspective of COVID-19 will lead to better diagnostic tests, vaccines, and therapeutic strategies in the future.

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron: Light at the End of the Long Pandemic Tunnel or Another False Dawn for Immunodeficient Patients?

COVID-19 has had a disastrous impact on the world. Apart from at least 6 million deaths, countless COVID-19 survivors are suffering long-term physical and psychiatric morbidity. Hundreds of millions have been plunged into poverty caused by economic misery, particularly in developing nations. Early in the pandemic, it became apparent certain groups of individuals such as the elderly and those with comorbidities were more likely to suffer severe disease. In addition, patients with some forms of immunodeficiency, including those with T-cell and innate immune defects, were at risk of poor outcomes. Patients with immunodeficiencies are also disadvantaged as they may not respond optimally to COVID-19 vaccines and often have pre-existing lung damage. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.529) and its subvariants (BA.1, BA.2, etc) have emerged recently and are dominating COVID-19 infections globally. Omicron is associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization and appears to have a lower case fatality rate compared with previous SARS-CoV-2 variants. Omicron has offered hope the pandemic may finally be coming to an end, particularly for vaccinated, healthy individuals. The situation is less clear for individuals with vulnerabilities, particularly immunodeficient patients. This perspective offers insight into potential implications of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant for patients with immunodeficiencies.

Critical role of diagnostic SARS-CoV-2 T cell assays for immunodeficient patients.

After almost 3 years of intense study, the immunological basis of COVID-19 is better understood. Patients who suffer severe disease have a chaotic, destructive immune response. Many patients with severe COVID-19 produce high titres of non-neutralising antibodies, which are unable to sterilise the infection. In contrast, there is increasing evidence that a rapid, balanced cellular immune response is required to eliminate the virus and mitigate disease severity. In the longer term, memory T cell responses, following infection or vaccination, play a critical role in protection against SARS-CoV-2.Given the pivotal role of cellular immunity in the response to COVID-19, diagnostic T cell assays for SARS-CoV-2 may be of particular value for immunodeficient patients. A diagnostic SARS-CoV-2 T cell assay would be of utility for immunocompromised patients who are unable to produce antibodies or have passively acquired antibodies from subcutaneous or intravenous immunoglobulin (SCIG/IVIG) replacement. In many antibody-deficient patients, cellular responses are preserved. SARS-CoV-2 T cell assays may identify breakthrough infections if reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) or rapid antigen tests (RATs) are not undertaken during the window of viral shedding. In addition to utility in patients with immunodeficiency, memory T cell responses could also identify chronically symptomatic patients with long COVID-19 who were infected early in the pandemic. These individuals may have been infected before the availability of reliable RT-qPCR and RAT tests and their antibodies may have waned. T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 have greater durability than antibodies and can also distinguish patients with infection from vaccinated individuals.

The (apparent) antibody paradox in COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The immunological response to COVID-19 is only partly understood. It is increasingly clear that the virus triggers an inappropriate host inflammatory reaction in patients experiencing severe disease. AREAS COVERED: The role of antibodies in COVID-19 remains to be fully defined. There is evidence for both protection and harm in different clinical syndromes triggered by SARS-CoV-2. Many patients dying from COVID-19 had both high titers of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and elevated viral loads. The uncertain protective role of humoral immunity is mirrored by the lack of benefit of therapeutic convalescent plasma infusions in COVID-19. In contrast, there is increasing evidence that a vigorous T-cell response is protective. Delayed or low avidity T cell reactions were seen in patients suffering severe COVID-19. EXPERT OPINION: These observations suggest T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 are the dominant long-term protective mechanism following either infection or vaccination. The magnitude and quality of the antibody response is likely to reflect underlying T cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Much of what has been learned about COVID-19 will need to be revised following the recent rapid emergence and dominance of the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2.

Diagnosis and management of coeliac disease in children.

Coeliac disease (CD) remains under diagnosed with only 10-20% of patients identified. Genes encoding HLA DQ2 or DQ8 are found in the vast majority of those with CD and testing for their presence can be useful to rule out the possibility CD. CD is more common in certain ethnic groups including those of North Indian origin. The classical presentation tends to occur in younger children, while atypical presentations occur at an older age. The number of children being diagnosed with CD is increasing; this may be due to greater recognition of the more atypical presentations, improved serologic tests, and the screening of asymptomatic groups at increased risk, but may also be due to an overall increased prevalence. Although serologic testing has become more reliable, there still remain significant problems around testing, particularly in those <18 months of age. All children should undergo a duodenal biopsy on a gluten containing diet in order to diagnose CD before recommending a gluten-free diet (GFD). A GFD should be offered to all children diagnosed with CD even when perceived as asymptomatic, as there is significant morbidity associated with CD later in life.

Comparison of Diagnostic Criteria for Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders (CVID) in the New Zealand CVID Cohort Study.

Common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID) are the most frequent symptomatic primary immune deficiencies in adults and children. In addition to recurrent and severe infections, patients with CVID are susceptible to autoimmune and inflammatory complications. The aetiologies of these uncommon conditions are, by definition, unknown. When the causes of complex disorders are uncertain, diagnostic criteria may offer valuable guidance to the management of patients. Over the last two decades, there have been four sets of diagnostic criteria for CVID in use. The original 1999 European Society for Immunodeficiencies and Pan-American Society for Immunodeficiency (ESID/PAGID) criteria are less commonly used than the three newer criteria: Ameratunga et al (Clin Exp Immunol 174:203-211, 2013), ESID (J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2019) and ICON (J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 4:38-59, 2016) criteria. The primary aim of the present study was to compare the utility of diagnostic criteria in a well-characterised cohort of CVID patients. The New Zealand CVID cohort study (NZCS) commenced in 2006 and currently comprises one hundred and thirteen patients, which represents approximately 70% of all known CVID patients in NZ. Many patients have been on subcutaneous or intravenous (SCIG/IVIG) immunoglobulin treatment for decades. Patients were given a clinical diagnosis of CVID as most were diagnosed before the advent of newer diagnostic criteria. Application of the three commonly used CVID diagnostic criteria to the NZCS showed relative sensitivities as follows: Ameratunga et al (Clin Exp Immunol 174:203-211, 2013), possible and probable CVID, 88.7%; ESID (J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2019), 48.3%; and ICON (J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 4:38-59, 2016), 47.1%. These differences were mostly due to the low rates of diagnostic vaccination challenges in patients prior to commencing SCIG/IVIG treatment and mirror similar findings in CVID cohorts from Denmark and Finland. Application of the Ameratunga et al (Clin Exp Immunol 174:203-211, 2013) CVID diagnostic criteria to patients on SCIG/IVIG may obviate the need to stop treatment for vaccine studies, to confirm the diagnosis.