Evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and mammographic density as predictors of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Response rates vary among breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST). Thus, there is a need for reliable treatment predictors. Evidence suggests tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) predict NAST response. Still, TILs are seldom used clinically as a treatment determinant. Mammographic density (MD) is another potential marker for NAST benefit and its relationship with TILs is unknown. Our aims were to investigate TILs and MD as predictors of NAST response and to study the unexplored relationship between TILs and MD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 315 invasive breast carcinomas treated with NAST between 2013 and 2020. Clinicopathological data were retrieved from medical records. The endpoint was defined as pathological complete response (pCR) in the breast. TILs were evaluated in pre-treatment core biopsies and categorized as high (≥10%) or low (<10%). MD was scored (a-d) according to the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) fifth edition. Binary logistic regression and Spearman's test of correlation were performed using SPSS. RESULTS: Out of 315 carcinomas, 136 achieved pCR. 94 carcinomas had high TILs and 215 had low TILs. Six carcinomas had no available TIL data. The number of carcinomas in each BI-RADS category were 37, 122, 112, and 44 for a, b, c, and d, respectively. High TILs were independently associated with pCR (OR: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.59-5.46) compared to low TILs. In the univariable analysis, MD (BI-RADS d vs. a) showed a tendency of higher likelihood for pCR (OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 0.99-5.98). However, the association was non-significant, which is consistent with the result of the multivariable analysis (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 0.78-8.04). We found no correlation between TILs and MD (0.02; p = .80). CONCLUSION: TILs significantly predicted NAST response. We could not define MD as a significant predictor of NAST response. These findings should be further replicated.

Prognostic and predictive impact of stroma cells defined by PDGFRb expression in early breast cancer: results from the randomized SweBCG91RT trial.

PURPOSE: Predictive biomarkers are needed to aid the individualization of radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer. Cancer-associated fibroblasts have been implicated in tumor radioresistance and can be identified by platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta (PDGFRb). This study aims to analyze how PDGFRb expression affects RT benefit in a large randomized RT trial. METHODS: PDGFRb was assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays from 989 tumors of the SweBCG91RT trial, which enrolled lymph node-negative, stage I/IIA breast cancer patients randomized to RT after breast-conserving surgery. Outcomes were analyzed at 10 years for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and any recurrence and 15 years for breast cancer specific death (BCSD). RESULTS: PDGFRb expression correlated with estrogen receptor negativity and younger age. An increased risk for any recurrence was noted in univariable analysis for the medium (HR 1.58, CI 95% 1.11-2.23, p = 0.011) or PDGFRb high group (1.49, 1.06-2.10, p = 0.021) compared to the low group. No differences in IBTR or BCSD risk were detected. RT benefit regarding IBTR risk was significant in the PDGFRb low (0.29, 0.12-0.67, p = 0.004) and medium (0.31, 0.16-0.59, p < 0.001) groups but not the PDGFRb high group (0.64, 0.36-1.11, p = 0.110) in multivariable analysis. Likewise, risk reduction for any recurrence was less pronounced in the PDGFRb high group. No significant interaction between RT and PDGFRb-score could be detected. CONCLUSION: A higher PDGFRb-score conferred an increased risk of any recurrence, which partly can be explained by its association with estrogen receptor negativity and young age. Reduced RT benefit was noted among patients with high PDGFRb, however without significant interaction.

Positive sentinel node in luminal A-like breast cancer patients - implications for adjuvant chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND: In luminal A-like breast cancer, the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy still is largely based on lymph nodestatus. Sentinel node (SN) positive patients who are no longer recommended an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) risk undertreatment, especially if they have ≥4 lymph node metastases (LNMs). AIM: To quantify the group of SN positive luminal A-like patients with ≥4 LNMs and to investigate if the ratio between positive SNs and examined SNs (SN ratio) can provide information of the axillary tumor burden. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nearly 370 patients between 2014-2016 in Western Sweden with a clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with both SNB and subsequent ALND were included. SNB findings were compared to ALND findings and the ability of the SN ratio to describe the axillary tumor burden was evaluated using multivariable analysis. RESULTS: In total,17.6% of patients with luminal A-like tumors had ≥4 LNMs. The SN ratio was statistically significant for predicting ≥4 LNMs among luminal A-like patients (p = .013, OR 1.89 (95% CI 1.14-3.12) per 0.1 increment in SN ratio). CONCLUSIONS: One sixth of patients with SN positive luminal A-like tumors risk undertreatment. The SN ratio may aid in identifying many of these patients.

Combining histological grade, TILs, and the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway to identify immunogenic tumors and de-escalate radiotherapy in early breast cancer: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of immunological biomarkers for radiotherapy (RT) individualization in breast cancer requires consideration of tumor-intrinsic factors. This study aimed to investigate whether the integration of histological grade, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) can identify tumors with aggressive characteristics that can be downgraded regarding the need for RT. METHODS: The SweBCG91RT trial included 1178 patients with stage I-IIA breast cancer, randomized to breast-conserving surgery with or without adjuvant RT, and followed for a median time of 15.2 years. Immunohistochemical analyses of TILs, PD-1, and PD-L1 were performed. An activated immune response was defined as stromal TILs ≥10% and PD-1 and/or PD-L1 expression in ≥1% of lymphocytes. Tumors were categorized as high-risk or low-risk using assessments of histological grade and proliferation as measured by gene expression. The risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and benefit of RT were then analyzed with 10 years follow-up based on the integration of immune activation and tumor-intrinsic risk group. RESULTS: Among high-risk tumors, an activated immune infiltrate was associated with a reduced risk of IBTR (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.73, p=0.006). The incidence of IBTR in this group was 12.1% (5.6-25.0) without RT and 4.4% (1.1-16.3) with RT. In contrast, the incidence of IBTR in the high-risk group without an activated immune infiltrate was 29.6% (21.4-40.2) without RT and 12.8% (6.6-23.9) with RT. Among low-risk tumors, no evidence of a favorable prognostic effect of an activated immune infiltrate was seen (HR 2.0, 95% CI 0.87 to 4.6, p=0.100). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating histological grade and immunological biomarkers can identify tumors with aggressive characteristics but a low risk of IBTR despite a lack of RT boost and systemic therapy. Among high-risk tumors, the risk reduction of IBTR conferred by an activated immune infiltrate is comparable to treatment with RT. These findings may apply to cohorts dominated by estrogen receptor-positive tumors.

Integrating Tumor-Intrinsic and Immunologic Factors to Identify Immunogenic Breast Cancers from a Low-Risk Cohort: Results from the Randomized SweBCG91RT Trial.

PURPOSE: The local immune infiltrate's influence on tumor progression may be closely linked to tumor-intrinsic factors. The study aimed to investigate whether integrating immunologic and tumor-intrinsic factors can identify patients from a low-risk cohort who may be candidates for radiotherapy (RT) de-escalation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The SweBCG91RT trial included 1,178 patients with stage I to IIA breast cancer, randomized to breast-conserving surgery with or without adjuvant RT, and followed for a median of 15.2 years. We trained two models designed to capture immunologic activity and immunomodulatory tumor-intrinsic qualities, respectively. We then analyzed if combining these two variables could further stratify tumors, allowing for identifying a subgroup where RT de-escalation is feasible, despite clinical indicators of a high risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). RESULTS: The prognostic effect of the immunologic model could be predicted by the tumor-intrinsic model (Pinteraction = 0.01). By integrating measurements of the immunologic- and tumor-intrinsic models, patients who benefited from an active immune infiltrate could be identified. These patients benefited from standard RT (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.85; P = 0.025) and had a 5.4% 10-year incidence of IBTR after irradiation despite high-risk genomic indicators and a low frequency of systemic therapy. In contrast, high-risk tumors without an immune infiltrate had a high 10-year incidence of IBTR despite RT treatment (19.5%; 95% CI, 12.2-30.3). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating tumor-intrinsic and immunologic factors may identify immunogenic tumors in early-stage breast cancer populations dominated by ER-positive tumors. Patients who benefit from an activated immune infiltrate may be candidates for RT de-escalation.

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes add prognostic information for patients with low-risk DCIS: findings from the SweDCIS randomised radiotherapy trial.

BACKGROUND: The immune microenvironment is an important modulator of tumour progression and treatment response. In invasive breast cancer, assessment of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) provides prognostic and predictive information. However, the clinical impact of TILs for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not yet been demonstrated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the SweDCIS randomised radiotherapy trial including primary DCIS cases following breast-conserving surgery. TILs were assessed on haematoxylin-eosin sections (n = 711) according to the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines. TILs-scores were analysed as continuous and dichotomised (≤5% versus >5%) variable regarding ipsilateral breast events (IBEs) as the predefined primary endpoint. RESULTS: Most women (61.9%) showed a TILs prevalence of ≤5%. High TILs-scores were associated with larger lesion size, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positivity, higher nuclear grade, and KI67-score. DCIS cases with high TILs prevalence had a significant increased cumulative IBE incidence at five years post-surgery (TILslow-versus TILshigh 9% versus 18%; p < 0.001). Among patients with HER2-negative DCIS, high TILs remained an independent poor prognosis marker for IBE risk in multivariable analysis with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.41 [95%CI 1.17-4.95, p = 0.017]. Including TILs-status provided a refined stratification of patients with general low-risk DCIS (grade <3, size <25 mm, free margin). No interaction between TILs and radiotherapy benefits was detected. CONCLUSION: High TILs are associated with higher IBE risk over 5-years post-surgery, particularly for HER2-negative DCIS. Our data indicate that TILs should be integrated into the clinical workup to define patients with low-risk DCIS who can omit adjuvant therapy or patients with potential benefits from immunotherapy.

Immune Infiltrate in the Primary Tumor Predicts Effect of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer; Results from the Randomized SweBCG91RT Trial.

PURPOSE: Tumor-infiltrating immune cells play a key role in tumor progression. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether the immune infiltrate predicts benefit from postoperative radiotherapy in a large randomized breast cancer radiotherapy trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In the SweBCG91RT trial, patients with stage I and II breast cancer were randomized to breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and postoperative radiotherapy or to BCS only and followed for a median time of 15.2 years. The primary tumor immune infiltrate was quantified through two independent methods: IHC and gene expression profiling. For IHC analyses, the absolute stromal area occupied by CD8+ T cells and FOXP3+ T cells, respectively, was used to define the immune infiltrate. For gene expression analyses, immune cells found to be prognostic in independent datasets were pooled into two groups consisting of antitumoral and protumoral immune cells, respectively. RESULTS: An antitumoral immune response in the primary tumor was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer recurrence and predicted less benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. The interaction between radiotherapy and immune phenotype was significant for any recurrence in both the IHC and gene expression analyses (P = 0.039 and P = 0.035) and was also significant for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in the gene expression analyses (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with an antitumoral immune infiltrate in the primary tumor have a reduced risk of any recurrence and may derive less benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. These results may impact decisions regarding postoperative radiotherapy in early breast cancer.

Effect of Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery Depending on the Presence of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes: A Long-Term Follow-Up of the SweBCG91RT Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: The effects of radiotherapy (RT) on the basis of the presence of stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to analyze the association of TILs with the effect of postoperative RT on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in a large randomized trial. METHODS: In the SweBCT91RT (Swedish Breast Cancer Group 91 Radiotherapy) trial, 1,178 patients with breast cancer stage I and II were randomly assigned to breast-conserving surgery plus postoperative RT or breast-conserving surgery only and followed for a median of 15.2 years. Tumor blocks were retrieved from 1,003 patients. Stromal TILs were assessed on whole-section hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides using a dichotomized cutoff of 10%. Subtypes were scored using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray. In total, 936 patients were evaluated. RESULTS: Altogether, 670 (71%) of patients had TILs less than 10%. In a multivariable regression analysis with IBTR as dependent variable and RT, TILs, subtype, age, and grade as independent variables, RT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.61; P < .001), high TILs (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.96, P = .033) grade (3 v 1; HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.34; P = .029), and age (≥ 50 v < 50 years; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.80; P = .002) were predictive of IBTR. RT was significantly beneficial in the low TILs group (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.58; P < .001) but not in the high TILs group (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.19; P = .138). The test for interaction between RT and TILs was not statistically significant (P = .317). CONCLUSION: This study shows that high values of TILs in the primary tumor independently seem to reduce the risk for an IBTR. Our findings further suggest that patients with breast cancer with low TILs may derive a larger benefit from RT regarding the risk of IBTR.