Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in breast cancer patients: Does oestrogen receptor status make a difference?

BACKGROUND: The presence of different breast cancer receptor status may impact ovarian stimulation outcomes. AIM: To study the association between oestrogen receptor (ER) status in breast cancer patients and fertility preservation outcomes in a major tertiary referral centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women who underwent fertility preservation following the diagnosis of breast cancer from 2008 to 2018 were included in the study. Patient age, ovarian stimulation parameters and laboratory outcomes were recorded and compared between the ER positive and negative groups. The primary outcome was total number of oocytes frozen. Secondary outcomes included total number of oocytes collected, mature oocytes, and embryos frozen. RESULTS: The women included in the study (n = 214) were analysed in the following groups based on their fertility preservation method: oocyte freezing (n = 131), embryo freezing (n = 70), and both embryo and oocyte freezing (n = 13). There was an increase in the mean (but not mature) number of oocytes frozen (12.4 and 9.2, P-value = 0.03) favouring the ER positive group, even though the women in this group were older (35.0 and 33.4, P-value of 0.03). There is no difference in the starting follicle-stimulating hormone dose, duration of stimulation, mature oocytes collected, and embryos frozen in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with ER positive breast cancer may have more positive ovarian stimulation outcomes.

Experience with transplantation of human cryopreserved ovarian tissue to a sub-peritoneal abdominal site.

STUDY QUESTION: Is a sub-peritoneal abdominal site a suitable site for cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation? SUMMARY ANSWER: Live births have resulted from oocytes aspirated from follicles within cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplanted in a sub-peritoneal abdominal site with similar outcomes observed in terms of number of mature oocytes recovered and embryo development from tissue transplanted to sub-peritoneal abdominal, ovarian, and pelvic sites in our clinic. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Over 130 live births have been reported from cryopreservation of ovarian tissue and subsequent transplantation. In the majority of these, tissue was transplanted onto the remaining ovary. Although grafting to a non-ovarian, non-pelvic, sub-peritoneal abdominal site has resulted in births, it has been suggested that compromised outcomes may be expected from a non-pelvic site. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The aim of the study was to assess the outcome from cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplanted to a site out of the pelvic area; a sub-peritoneal abdominal site. These outcomes were compared to transplantation to the ovary and peritoneal pelvic area in a cohort of 17 fertility preservation women where the individual sites of follicle aspiration were known and subsequent outcomes tracked. Ovarian tissue was slow frozen using the cryoprotectants propanediol and sucrose (n = 16 women) or using dimethyl sulfoxide and sucrose (n = 1 woman). Tissue was kept at 4°C overnight prior to freezing for 1 case. Tissue was thawed appropriately and prepared on 6.0 vicryl sutures for transplantation. Tissue was placed laparoscopically into a sub-peritoneal abdominal site, a pelvic side wall peritoneal pocket and the ovary. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Following resumption of cycling, gonadotrophin stimulation commenced with FSH, LH and antagonist and a trigger was given when one follicle was >13 mm in diameter. Abdominal follicles were aspirated under ultrasound guidance trans-abdominally; ovarian and pelvic follicles were aspirated trans-vaginally. Due to an inability to differentiate pelvic from ovarian follicles at the time of ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval, both were classified as ovarian on the side where both were present. However, on the side, where no ovary was present, outcomes from pelvic follicles were reported. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Average time lapse between ovarian tissue harvest and graft was 6 years. Resumption of cycling occurred on average 4.2 months post first graft, regardless of graft site. Mean follicle diameter on the day of oocyte aspiration was 14 mm for all sites. Aspiration failed to retrieve an oocyte in 30% (36/120) of abdominal follicles which was similar to the other sites; ovarian 24% (21/87), pelvic 32% (31/97). A similar proportion of retrieved oocytes was mature from all sites (67% (50/75) abdominal, 68% (42/62) ovarian, 59% (34/58) pelvic). The proportion of embryos which developed on Day 2 from those fertilized was also similar in all groups (90% (34/38) abdominal, 76% (22/29) ovarian, 96% (22/23) pelvic). To our knowledge, this is the first report of outcomes from cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplanted to a sub-peritoneal abdominal site and the subsequent comparison to outcomes from the ovary and a sub-peritoneal pelvic graft, within the same cohort of patients, where tissue was slow frozen predominantly with the cryoprotectant propanediol and sucrose. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study reports outcomes from a small number of women following ovarian tissue transplantation. Follicle density is an estimate only and the amount of tissue grafted varied between patients. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The demonstration of successful outcomes from cryopreserved ovarian tissue grafted to a sub-peritoneal abdominal site has significant implications for the management of women in which grafting to pelvic sites is contraindicated although it appears to be important to trigger follicle maturation at a lower than normal follicular diameter. The relative ease of oocyte retrieval at the sub-peritoneal abdominal site also has positive implications for the introduction of this approach into clinical practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was used. All authors have no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

A short report on current fertility preservation strategies for boys.

BACKGROUND: Advances in cancer treatment have led to improved long-term survival after childhood cancer, but often at a price of impaired future fertility. Fertility preservation (FP) in male children and early adolescents poses unique challenges as efficacy is unproven. OBJECTIVES: To describe characteristics of testicular tissue cryopreservation (TTCP) specimens taken from paediatric and adolescent patients, stratified by age, and prior chemotherapy, if any, and to demonstrate evidence for germ cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of gonadal biopsies and clinical records of patients consented into the Royal Children's Hospital FP programme between 1987 and 2015. Tissue was sliced into blocks, with one section sent for histopathology prior to cryopreservation. In boys ≥12 years where spermatogenesis could be expected, a portion of tissue was disaggregated completely to look for mature sperm and if found, additional tissue was dissected and the resulting suspension frozen. RESULTS: Testicular tissue cryopreservation specimens in 44 males (0.3-16.8 years) provided an average of 7.8 slices per patient. All the specimens were taken at the same time as another necessary surgical procedure, under one general anaesthesic. There was only one complication of scrotal wound dehiscence. Seven of the forty-four (15.9%) patients had chemotherapy prior to testicular biopsy, while the rest were chemotherapy naïve. Five of these were prepubertal, and two were pubertal patients. Eleven subjects had tissue dissected with mature sperm found in eight. Of these eight patients where sperm were found, all were pubertal with testicular size of more than 10 mL and showing histological evidence of spermatogenesis. No histologic specimen demonstrated any malignant cells. CONCLUSIONS: Testicular tissue cryopreservation can be performed in young patients without delay, preferably prior to cancer treatment. As testicular tissue contains germ cells from which haploid spermatozoa are ultimately derived, future technologies may allow their utilization for fertility in humans. This may be the only hope for biological offspring in some patients undergoing fertility compromising treatment. Retrieval of mature sperm from some pubertal patients, however, offers realistic hope to these patients of future fertility.

A randomised controlled trial of intra-uterine insemination versus in vitro fertilisation in patients with idiopathic or mild male infertility.

BACKGROUND: The cause of infertility is unexplained or poorly explained in 30-40% of couples undergoing standard investigations, and treatment ranges from expectant management to IUI and IVF. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical pregnancy rates and costs of intra-uterine insemination (IUI) and in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in women where the same ovarian stimulation led to the development of two or three mature follicles. METHODS: A randomised controlled clinical trial compared the efficacy of IUI and IVF in a tertiary fertility centre (ISRCTN28780587). Primary outcome measures were fetal heart positive pregnancy rate and cost per live birth. The selection criteria were age: females 18-42 years and males 18-60 years, infertility for one year or more, no IVF or IUI for 12 months prior to the trial, and no coital, tubal or ovulatory disorders, oligospermia, untreated endometriosis or contraindication for multiple pregnancy. All women (n = 102) had the same dose FSH stimulation protocol. Those who developed two or three preovulatory follicles were randomised 3:1 to IUI (n = 33) or IVF (n = 10). IUI or IVF was performed 36 h after hCG administration with single or double embryo transfer on day two. RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy rates (40% vs 12%, P = 0.04) and live birth rate (40% vs 6%, P = 0.01) were higher for IVF than IUI. The cost per live birth was AU$8735 for IVF compared with $42,487 for IUI. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that IVF is more successful and cost-effective than IUI using the same doses of FSH. Further confirmatory studies are required.

An update on fertility assistance and assisted reproductive technologies.

BACKGROUND: Conception difficulties are a common reason for presentation to general practitioners (GPs), who play an integral part in advising couples regarding optimisation of trying to conceive, timely and relevant investigations, as well as referral to non-GP specialist care. Lifestyle modification to optimise reproductive and offspring health is a crucial, though sometimes overlooked, component of pre-pregnancy counselling. OBJECTIVE: This article provides an update on fertility assistance and reproductive technologies to help GPs care for patients presenting with fertility concerns as well as those who require donor gametes to conceive or are carrying genetic conditions that may affect the chance of having a healthy baby. DISCUSSION: Recognition of the impact of a woman's (and, to a slightly lesser degree, man's) age remains the highest priority for primary care physicians to allow thorough and timely evaluation/referral. Advising patients about lifestyle modification, such as diet, physical activity and mental health, prior to conception is crucial for overall and reproductive health outcomes. Various treatment options exist to provide personalised and evidence-based care for patients for infertility. Other indications for using assisted reproductive technology include preimplantation genetic testing of embryos to avoid transmission of serious genetic conditions, elective oocyte freezing and fertility preservation.

Barriers to reproductive treatments in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Most couples in Australia want to have children but some might not attain their reproductive goals, experiencing involuntary childlessness or not reaching their desired family size. There is increased focus on helping couples achieve their reproductive goals. Identifying existing barriers, such as those related to social and societal factors, access to treatment and treatment success, is crucial to optimising outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This article discusses existing barriers to reproduction to help general practitioners (GPs) raise the topic of future fertility with patients, care for those presenting with fertility concerns and support those undergoing fertility treatment. DISCUSSION: Recognition of the impact of barriers such as age to achieving reproductive goals remains the highest priority for GPs. This will help them to broach this topic with patients, carry out a timely evaluation or provide referral, as well as discuss opportunities such as elective egg freezing. Other barriers can be mitigated by educating patients, informing them about available resources and supporting those undergoing fertility treatment as part of a multidisciplinary reproductive team.

Ovarian stimulation and oocyte cryopreservation in females and transgender males aged 18 years or less: a systematic review.

Background: Fertility preservation is an important healthcare focus in the paediatric and adolescent population when gonadotoxic treatments are required. Ovarian stimulation (OS) resulting in oocyte cryopreservation is a well-established fertility preservation option in the adult population. It's utility, however, is little known in young patients. The purpose of this review was to synthesise the available literature on OS in patients ≤18 years old, to identify gaps in current research and provide suggestions for future research directions. Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed for all relevant full-text articles published in English in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases. The search strategy used a combination of subject headings and generic terms related to the study topic and population. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Characteristics of the studies, objectives and key findings were extracted and summarised in a narrative synthesis. Results: Database search and manual review identified 922 studies, 899 were eliminated based on defined exclusion criteria. Twenty-three studies were included and comprised 468 participants aged ≤18 years who underwent OS (median 15.2, range 7-18 years old). Only three patients were premenarchal, and four patients were on treatment to suppress puberty. Patients had OS for a broad range of indications including oncology treatment, transgender care and Turner syndrome. A total of 488 cycles of OS were completed, with all but 18 of these cycles (96.3%) successfully resulting in cryopreserved mature oocytes (median 10 oocytes, range 0-35). Fifty-three cycles (9.8%) were cancelled. Complications were rare (<1%). One pregnancy was reported from a female who had OS aged 17 years old. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrates that OS and oocyte cryopreservation is achievable in young females however there are only a few cases in the literature describing OS in premenarcheal children or those who have suppressed puberty. There is little proof that OS can lead to pregnancy in adolescents, and no proof that this can be achieved in premenarchal girls. Therefore it should be regarded as an innovative procedure for adolescents and experimental for premenarcheal girls. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=265705, identifier CRD42021265705.

Assisted reproductive technology - what's new and what's important?

BACKGROUND: Difficulty with conception is a common reason for young couples to present to their primary care physician. Fertility assistance, whether minimal or high level, aims to optimise the chances of having a singleton pregnancy and the birth of a healthy baby. Recent advances in assisted reproductive technology, particularly at a genetic level, have helped us to better understand the causes of infertility, and also to offer techniques that maximise the safety and efficiency of treatment and therefore the chance of a successful outcome. OBJECTIVE: This article provides an update on available fertility assistance and preservation technologies to help guide the general practitioner's approach to patients presenting with fertility concerns. DISCUSSION: Recognition of the significance of a woman's age remains the highest priority for healthcare providers and allows thorough and timely evaluation and development of a management strategy. Despite technological advances, we are still limited by the inability to protect oocytes from ageing and hence are unable to 'make' embryos better.

Applying plastic surgery principles to ovarian tissue transplantation.

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) and transplantation is an innovative procedure increasingly utilized to help preserve fertility after gonadotoxic treatments especially in cancer patients. Approximately 30% of autotransplanted patients are able to achieve live birth, typically with the help of in-vitro fertilization. Numerous techniques and grafting sites have been described to continue to increase this figure. In the field of plastic surgery, tissue grafting has been successful performed for thousands of years and knowledge in this area has been significantly refined. A qualitative review of the literature using PubMed, Cochrane, SCOPUS and Medline databases was performed to look for articles relating to ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) and comparisons made to plastic surgery tissue grafting. Many parallels were found between the principles of grafting in plastic surgery and the principles of OTT, including pre-operative patient optimization, suitable donor site selection, tissue harvest and preparation, graft site choice, immobilization of the graft and post-operative care. Consideration of the benefits and risks of using orthotopic versus heterotopic recipient sites is also highly important with regards to graft take, morbidity and ease of access of oocyte collection. We believe that ongoing discussion between disciplines can have the potential to improve knowledge, surgical techniques and patient outcomes.

Exploring the facilitators and barriers to using an online infertility risk prediction tool (FoRECAsT) for young women with breast cancer: a qualitative study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: As cancer treatments may impact on fertility, a high priority for young patients with breast cancer is access to evidence-based, personalised information for them and their healthcare providers to guide treatment and fertility-related decisions prior to cancer treatment. Current tools to predict fertility outcomes after breast cancer treatments are imprecise and do not offer individualised prediction. To address the gap, we are developing a novel personalised infertility risk prediction tool (FoRECAsT) for premenopausal patients with breast cancer that considers current reproductive status, planned chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy to determine likely post-treatment infertility. The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility of implementing this FoRECAsT tool into clinical practice by exploring the barriers and facilitators of its use among patients and healthcare providers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cross-sectional exploratory study is being conducted using semistructured in-depth telephone interviews with 15-20 participants each from the following groups: (1) premenopausal patients with breast cancer younger than 40, diagnosed within last 5 years, (2) breast surgeons, (3) breast medical oncologists, (4) breast care nurses (5) fertility specialists and (6) fertility preservation nurses. Patients with breast cancer are being recruited from the joint Breast Service of three affiliated institutions of Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre in Melbourne, Australia-Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital and Royal Women's Hospital, and clinicians are being recruited from across Australia. Interviews are being audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and imported into qualitative data analysis software to facilitate data management and analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee, Australia (HREC number: 2017.163). Confidentiality and privacy are maintained at every stage of the study. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scholarly and scientific journals, national and international conference presentations, social media, broadcast media, print media, internet and various community/stakeholder engagement activities.